Miscopy

Tag: Australia

  • Andrew Bridgen MP Speech on Excess Deaths in the UK After Covid Vaccines

    Andrew Bridgen MP Speech on Excess Deaths in the UK After Covid Vaccines

    In his speech in the British Parliament, Andrew Bridgen MP discussed the rising trend of excess deaths in immediate follow-up of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the United Kingdom, specifically referring to the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities recording of 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above and over 18,000 excess deaths recorded among people aged 15-19 in the 12 months starting in July 2022.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discussed Serious Adverse Events that have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The video explores the experimental COVID-19 vaccines’ possible impact on cardiac emergencies and Australian mortality, as well as the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, the lack of data on Spike protein production, and the contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccines. Andrew Bridgen MP advocated for evidence-based medicine and a return to basic science and ethics.

    The Speech

    At the beginning of his speech, Andrew Bridgen MP points out that excess deaths have been on the rise, affecting a significant number of people, generally those in their prime. The deaths have not been proportionate to the elderly population. The speaker also comments on history’s potential judgment of the house’s handling of the issue.

    The Office of Health Improvement and Disparities has recorded 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above in the 12 months starting in July 2020, which includes the Autumn 2020 wave of COVID-19 and a portion of the first COVID-19 winter.

    However, over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group have been recorded in the 12 months starting in July 2022, which is 9% above expected levels, more than twice as many as in the previous year. There was a clear stepwise increase in mortality after the vaccine rollout, which has continued steadily ever since, despite data suggesting that fewer hospitalizations and deaths were associated with the vaccine than previous COVID-19 illnesses. Officials seem unwilling to acknowledge this disturbing data and have chosen to turn a blind eye to it.

    Andrew Bridgen MP then discusses the issue of harm caused by the COVID-19 vaccines to vaccinated individuals, specifically the Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), which have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The vaccines, Andrew Bridgen MP claims, have caused harm to 1 in 800 people to supposedly save one in 20,000, which is, according to him, “madness“.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the flawed assumptions and biases that have been used to arrive at these conclusions, and the importance of considering socioeconomic and ethnic differences in the vaccination process. He also explores the phenomenon of the excess mortality seen in more heavily vaccinated regions, and the correlation between vaccination and several health issues such as cardiac arrest and cardiovascular disease. After saying this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for transparency and accountability in the vaccination process and the need for further research to identify the causal link between vaccination and harm.

    The impact of vaccination on cardiac emergencies in South Australia for 15-44 year olds is then brought up. After the vaccine rollout in this age group, there was a 67% increase in cardiac emergencies compared to usual, with 2,172 cases in November 2021, up from 1,300 emergency cardiac presentations a month before.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the increase in Australian mortality overall, which is due to cardiac deaths, and how these excess deaths cannot be explained by an aging population, disease of old age, low Statin prescriptions, or undertreated hypertension. He suggests that the experimental COVID-19 vaccines may be the cause of these excess deaths and raises concerns about the data presentation by the ON. He also discusses the lack of transparency from the UK Health Security Agency regarding anonymized data and how this data could potentially reveal damaging information about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines.

    When discussing the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, Andrew Bridgen MP highlights the lack of data on the amount of Spike protein produced on vaccination and the broken system for properly recording deaths.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also mentions the issue of doctors waiting for permission from the regulator before certifying deaths and the circularity of the situation. He discusses the problem of contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccine and the potential harm caused by this. With this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for a review of the excess deaths and argues that the experimental vaccines are not safe and not effective.

    In response to his speech, a female attendee attempts to counter his arguments regarding the increase in excess deaths as being due to a combination of factors, including the ongoing challenges of COVID-19 and the high flu prevalence of the previous year. The leading causes of excess deaths in England were respiratory illnesses, dementia, and heart disease, according to her. Vaccination was mentioned as an important aspect, but conflicting data was presented on its causality. She encouraged the use of the yellow card system for patients who experienced side effects from vaccines. The factor of vaccine safety was also discussed, including the MH’s action in response to rare cases of concurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia following vaccinations, leading to the vaccine not being offered to certain age groups and the commission on human medicines conducting an independent review to address concerns.

    YouTube Video

  • Australian Parliament Speech by the Honorable John Ruddick Which Got Deleted by YouTube

    Australian Parliament Speech by the Honorable John Ruddick Which Got Deleted by YouTube

    YouTube has made the decision to ban an Australian parliament speech, marking the first time in history that it has done so. The speech, given by the Honorable John Ruddick, criticizes the authoritarian measures taken by the state and federal liberal governments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ruddick questions the need for lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations and highlights the delayed response from the Liberal Party in speaking out against the government’s actions. He also discusses various topics including the founding of the Red Cross, concerns about the arms buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, and the potential dangers of big government.

    Additionally, he questions the validity of the global warming narrative and proposes the idea of a government-free society. The speech concludes with Ruddick expressing his belief in maximizing human potential and inviting his parliamentary colleagues to join the libertarian movement.

    YouTube banned the video after it was published on the Australian government channel, citing “Content Violation“.

    In the beginning of his speech, the Honorable John Ruddick reflects on his relationship with the New South Wales Liberal Party and discusses his decision to join the Liberal Democrats. He criticizes the authoritarian measures taken by state and federal liberal governments during the COVID-19 pandemic, referring to them as an overreaction to a “bad flu.” He questions the need for lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, citing Sweden’s approach of trust in its citizens. He also highlights the delayed response of the Liberal Party members in speaking out against the government’s actions. Additionally, he mentions an article from the New York Times that claims no one had caught COVID-19 in an outdoor environment.

    At 00:05:00, the speaker expresses their disappointment with several aspects of the Australian government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They criticize the implementation of lockdowns and the push for multiple vaccine injections, noting that there has been an increase in excess deaths since the vaccine rollout. The speaker also highlights the banning of Ivermectin, a drug that has shown potential in treating COVID-19, and suggests a conflict of interest in the influence of pharmaceutical companies over the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Additionally, they criticize the liberal party for the increase in government debt and their surrender to pressure for a net-zero carbon economy. Despite these disappointments, the speaker expresses hope for budget repair under the new government.

    At 00:10:00 of the video, the speaker discusses the principles of libertarianism and highlights Switzerland as a successful example. They emphasize the belief in limited government, the inherent morality of capitalism, and the negative consequences of big government. They praise Switzerland for its low government intrusion, decentralized power, and high per capita income. The speaker also mentions Switzerland’s healthcare system, low crime rate with high firearm ownership, and its tradition of staying out of wars. The video excerpt showcases the speaker’s admiration for the Swiss model and its alignment with libertarian ideals.

    At 00:15:00 John Ruddick discusses various topics including the founding of the Red Cross by a Christian businessman, concerns about the arms buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, the potential for a catastrophic war, the importance of free speech, the dangers of big government, and the impact of mass delusions. He also shares the story of William Buckley, an escaped convict who was adopted by an Aboriginal tribe and witnessed a mass delusion among the tribes. The member emphasizes the need for de-escalation and the separation of church and state to prevent the magnification of delusions by state power.

    At 00:20:00 the politician questions the validity of the global warming narrative and the motives behind it. He suggests that the predictions of rising temperatures and shrinking ice caps have not materialized, and natural disasters are just part of natural cycles. He also criticizes the shift from global warming to climate change and the hostility towards nuclear energy. The politician questions the qualifications of prominent figures like Al Gore and Greta Thunberg in the field and raises concerns about the commercial and political interests at play. He argues that the environmental movement has been hijacked by a money-making scheme and highlights the need to focus on animal welfare and the protection of endangered species and native forests.

    At 00:25:00 the parliament member discusses the idea of a government-free society and the potential benefits it could bring. He argues that a society based on voluntary interaction could be more humane, safe, vibrant, diverse, and successful. He suggests gradually phasing out government over decades with democratic consent and highlights the issues of legalized coercion and the excessive size of government today. He proposes several initial steps towards a zero percent government, including abolishing middle-class welfare, adopting a Swiss-style healthcare system, and replacing the Department of Education with a school voucher system. He also suggests privatizing the police and court system, while acknowledging the need for finding effective ways to care for the poor. The speech concludes by emphasizing the superiority of innovative and efficient solutions, such as Uber, over heavily regulated taxes, and highlights other government services that anarcho-capitalists believe can deliver an upgrade in quality service.

    At 00:30:00 the speaker expresses his belief in maximizing human potential and reaching for other worlds. They argue for a government-free, voluntary-based society as a means to tap into humanity’s highest potential. The speaker also highlights the historical impact of libertarianism, such as its articulation of the benefits of free enterprise and its opposition to socialism and Keynesianism. They mention the libertarian stance on gay marriage, opposition to Middle Eastern Wars, and support for minorities being bullied by the state and popular culture. The speaker concludes by inviting their parliamentary colleagues to join the libertarian movement and complete a membership form.

    Odysee Video