Tag: Conspiracy

  • The Obesity Industrial Complex

    The Obesity Industrial Complex

    In this video, James Li of 51-49 exposes the role of the obesity industrial complex and its connection to big pharma and food companies, as well as medical professionals and mainstream media, in propagating the idea that obesity can be cured by weight loss drugs.

    James Li highlights the fact that the companies are driven by profit, use flawed science to back their products, and lobby congress to pass laws that benefit them, putting public health at risk. The speaker also discusses the flawed healthcare system in the US and suggests that education and dismantling the perverse incentive structure could lead to a healthier populace. The video urges viewers to ask questions and make informed decisions.

    00:00:00

    In this section, James Li questions the claim made by Dr. Stanford that obesity is a genetic disease independent of lifestyle factors such as dietary changes and processed foods. Scientific consensus suggests that genetics only account for 25 to 70-80% of weight predisposition in individuals.

    James Li alleges that big food and pharma companies are working together with medical professionals and mainstream media to sell products and propagate propaganda that obesity is a disease that can be cured with weight loss drugs, such as Wilgovi and Ozempic, that have questionable health impacts. These drugs are helpful to some but have questionable benefits to weight loss and may only benefit the companies for their profits.

    James Li suggests that the companies lobby congress to pass the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act, requiring Medicare to cover weight management drugs, with taxpayer money. The alleged greed of these companies poses a risk to public health, and their products and narratives should be scrutinized by everyone.

    00:05:00

    In this section, James Li discusses the issues with the current healthcare system in the United States and its economic and social incentives that contribute to the growth of the obesity industrial complex. The problem is that 95% of healthcare dollars are spent on interventions after people get sick, making healthcare the largest and fastest-growing industry in the US. Additionally, there is no economic or social incentive in the current system that encourages a healthy populace.

    James Li proposes two solutions: advocating for more honest education about food and dismantling the current perverse incentive structure in place. This includes moves such as the FDA recommending added sugar for kids to zero and tax money going to subsidizing healthy food. The video ends with the call to inform and ask questions about the Confluence of all these things to make informed decisions for ourselves.

    YouTube Video

  • Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    What did the BBC do back in 2008? They aired a documentary called “The Conspiracy Files 9/11: Third Tower” where they tried to whitewash the mystery of why World Trade Center 7 collapsed.

    Even though BBC pretended to be unbiased, it was clear that they would never air anything suggesting that the official story is wrong, because why bother with facts when we can blindly believe what the government tells us?

    And of course, they conveniently left out parts of Larry Silverstein’s interview where he said “pull it“, because that would contradict their oh-so-trusted story about debris and fires causing the collapse. But hey, who needs evidence when we have good old-fashioned blind faith, am I right?

    And let’s not forget about all the fun demolition terms like “blast shoot blow and pull” that were thrown around, because if there’s one thing we love, it’s making light of a tragedy.

    All in all, this documentary was a true masterpiece in propaganda and will go down in history as a shining example of how not to do journalism. Bravo, BBC. Bravo.

    For Real

    The documentary “The Conspiracy Files 911 Third Tower” aired on BBC in July 2008, attempting to explain the collapse of World Trade Center 7 which wasn’t hit by a plane during the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Though the program makers attempt to present unbiased evidence, they ultimately push the official story that fire and structural damage caused the collapse.

    The documentary makers purposefully omit a key line from an interview with building owner Larry Silverstein, where he refers to “pulling” the building, but the BBC removes his connection between the word “pull” and the collapse of the building.

    The term “pull” is used in the demolition industry to refer to bringing down buildings. The documentary also mentions other instances where the term “pull” is used with the meaning of demolishing buildings, and it points out that no firefighters were in the building when it collapsed.

    The BBC’s omission of certain evidence suggests that they are biased towards the official story.

    Bullet Points

    • In 2008, the BBC aired a documentary about the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on 9/11.
    • The documentary claims that the collapse of WTC7 is the final mystery of 9/11.
    • The BBC presents evidence for fire and structural damage as the cause of the collapse, but also manipulates evidence to support the official story.
    • The owner of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, is accused of being involved in the demolition of the building, but claims to have meant “pulling” firefighters out of harm’s way.
    • There were no firefighters in WTC7 when it collapsed, and the building fell neatly into its own footprint.

    Let’s Sing Along

    Verse 1:
    In 2008, the BBC aired
    A doc on 9/11 that left some scared
    They aimed to solve the final mystery
    Of why building seven took history

    Chorus:
    But even though they claimed to be unbiased
    Some manipulations were carefully devised
    To promote the official story, it seems
    And hide evidence that didn’t fit their schemes

    Verse 2:
    Larry Silverstein, the building’s owner
    Was accused of being part of a huge donor
    To the conspiracy to destroy the towers
    But the BBC cut out a key line in his powers

    Chorus:
    They removed his connection between “pull” and the fall
    Of the building, as if one affected all
    But the truth is out there, for those who seek
    Just don’t get fooled again, don’t be meek

    Outro:
    Blast, shoot, blow, and pull
    Are words used in the demolition tool
    To bring down buildings, bridges, and more
    But who’s really behind the war?

    YouTube Video