Miscopy

Tag: Covid 19

  • How to Treat Complex Chronic Conditions

    How to Treat Complex Chronic Conditions

    In the YouTube video “Healing Chronic Conditions with Brain Retraining: Insights from Dr. Brian Plante,” Dr. Plante, a licensed naturopathic doctor specializing in Integrative Health Care from the National University of Natural Medicine, discusses his work in treating complex chronic conditions, including Lyme disease, environmental toxicities, autoimmune conditions, and neurological and psychiatric disorders. He emphasizes a holistic approach to mental and physical health and the importance of understanding and compassion in empowering patients.

    Dr. Plante also highlights the role of the brain in complex chronic conditions and the benefits of brain retraining and neurological exercises in developing tolerance, capacity, and resilience. He shares his background and interest in complex infections and mental health care, combining his expertise to provide comprehensive care for patients with chronic complex illnesses, such as Lyme disease, mold toxicity, and neurological disorders.

    The discussion revolves around the interplay between brain function and pathogenic infections, the importance of addressing brain issues, and the concept of expanding one’s capacity to feel safe to manage stressors.

    Dr. Plante emphasizes a holistic approach to mental and physical health and the importance of understanding and compassion in empowering patients to navigate their health journeys.

    Dr. Plante shares his background and what led him to the field of integrative and functional medicine. He explains that he was drawn to the idea of being a “Healer” and facilitating healing, which led him to discover naturopathic medicine. Naturopathic doctors are trained as primary care physicians with an emphasis on chronic illnesses, including thyroid and adrenal issues, digestive disorders, hormone imbalances, allergies, and asthma.

    Dr. Plante also mentions his interest in complex infections and mold toxicity, which he was exposed to during his residency in California. He emphasizes the need to use both conventional medical training and naturopathic skills to support patients with these conditions, as they often involve multiple organ systems. Dr. Plante’s passion for mental health care led him to work with patients with complex chronic illnesses, combining his expertise in various areas to provide comprehensive care.

    He also discusses Long Haul Covid (lol), chronic viral infections, mold toxicity, heavy metal toxicity, disautonomia (including POTS and adrenal issues), and more nuanced conditions like Massal Activation Syndrome and multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome. He explains that these conditions share some similarities and fall under the umbrella of chronic complex illness.

    When someone comes to the clinic with multiple symptoms, the first step is to identify the area of dysfunction that requires the most support. Common features of imbalance include sympathetic versus parasympathetic nervous system issues, nutrient absorption problems, detoxification issues, and immune disregulation. By focusing on these categories, healthcare professionals can provide comprehensive support without overwhelming the patient.

    Dr. Plante also mentions the use of SPECT scanning to understand chronic conditions better, specifically looking for global reduction in blood flow and inflammatory patterns. However, SPECT scanning doesn’t provide specific information about the cause of these patterns without further investigation.

    When discussing conditions related to the brain and the limbic system, Dr. Plante explains that issues with the temporal lobes, which regulate mood, emotion, and memory, are common in neurodegenerative cases and can lead to a reduction in temporal lobe blood flow. He also mentions the importance of targeting the regulatory system, particularly in cases of PTSD, Massive Activation Syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome.

    The doctor emphasizes that the brain is an organ that is both hardwired into the body and wirelessly connected to it, and disturbances in the rest of the body can influence brain function and cause neurocognitive symptoms and regional brain structural changes. Mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, disruption to the blood-brain barrier, and toxicity from pathogens can lead to nerve cell dysfunction and rewiring of brain circuits in maladaptive patterns, resulting in sickness behaviors, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and a vicious cycle that makes it difficult to recover.

    Tthe discussion then revolves around the interplay between brain function and pathogenic infections, specifically Lyme disease. Dr. Plante explains how bacterial infections can lead to changes in the brain and symptoms that seem unrelated, and how brain retraining can influence the internal environment to make it less hospitable to pathogens. He also talks about the role of the hypothalamus in regulating homeostasis and how its dysfunction can lead to various downstream effects on physiology.

    Critical factors for long-term recovery include addressing physical systems, identifying and addressing underlying infections, environmental toxicants, nutritional deficiencies, sleep apnea, and emotional and psychological trauma. Treatment typically involves rebalancing or modulating the immune response, giving the body the nutrients it needs, and detoxifying the body.

    Dr. Plante suggests referring trauma victims to specialists for EMDR, brain spotting, somatic experiencing, or neurofeedback to help rewire the brain. He also highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach, combining brain retraining with functional medicine practices. The doctor explains that for some patients with chronic complex illnesses, the menu of tolerable treatments is limited, and brain retraining can broaden therapeutic options. He also mentions that certain conditions, such as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome and Electromagnetic Field Hyper-Sensitivity Syndrome, have a significant limbic component, making brain retraining an essential part of their treatment plan.

    He explains that some patients may not experience any improvement or even detox reactions due to an ongoing state of fight or flight and difficulty regulating their emotional state. Dr. Plante emphasizes that this regulation is not about control but rather the ability to adapt to life’s ups and downs. He introduces the concept of the window of tolerance, which refers to the range of stress response activation and appropriate rest.

    The goal of brain retraining is to restore the brain’s ability to self-regulate, allowing it to adapt to various circumstances without being overwhelmed. This concept is essential for individuals with chronic conditions to manage their symptoms effectively.

    When discussing the concept of expanding our capacity to feel safe as a means to handle stressors in life, Dr. Plante uses the metaphor of surfing to describe the experience of trauma, explaining that the first encounter with a stressor can be overwhelming and potentially damaging, like surfing during a tsunami. In contrast, trauma therapy or brain retraining is likened to learning to surf on a calm day with a coach, gradually building tolerance and resilience.

    The key to managing stress, according to Dr. Plante, is acknowledging that it can be adaptive when dosed properly and that the solution is not to avoid all stressors but to gradually reintroduce them within a tolerable range. He emphasizes the importance of feeling safe in one’s environment and body, which can be expanded through certain trauma therapy approaches. The ultimate goal is to broaden the window of tolerance, enabling us to maintain a sense of safety and self-regulation in the face of life’s challenges.

    Dr. Plante emphasizes the significance of returning to a parasympathetic state after a sympathetic response, as getting stuck in a stressed state can be detrimental.

    The conversation then shifts to the topic of physical exercise and its impact on the nervous system. Dr. Plante shares his observations that gentle, restorative exercises, such as Qi Gong and yoga, can be beneficial for individuals recovering from chronic conditions, particularly those suffering from post-exertional malaise. He explains that these exercises help build energy reserves and improve overall health.

    The discussion also touches upon the idea that as individuals heal their nervous systems, their capacity to handle hard things, including physical exercise, increases. With this, Dr. Brian Plante discusses how small practices, such as positive self-talk and facing physically uncomfortable situations, can have a significant impact on one’s ability to handle stress and shift out of the sympathetic nervous system response.

    He uses the analogy of a ping-pong match between emotional and physiological capacity and emphasizes the importance of not getting overwhelmed or burning out. The speaker also mentions the role of the prefrontal cortex in regulating the limbic structures and the sympathetic nervous system, and encourages listeners to celebrate small wins and keep going despite the long recovery process. Dr. Plante emphasizes that recovery from chronic conditions takes time, but is possible with the right support and tools.

    YouTube Video

  • Michael Shellenberger Discusses the Dangers of Censorship and the Rewriting of History

    Michael Shellenberger Discusses the Dangers of Censorship and the Rewriting of History

    In this video, Michael Shellenberger discusses the dangers of censorship and the rewriting of history, highlighting his own experiences as a journalist and author. He addresses topics such as police killings, disinformation campaigns, and censorship during the pandemic. He also delves into the concept of the “woke matrix,” propaganda, and the rise of cancel culture.

    The speaker explores the implications of denying the existence of God and the moral hierarchy based on race. He raises questions about mask-wearing and the behavior of individuals in positions of power. The importance of free speech, equal justice, and meritocracy is emphasized, along with the need to address psychopathic and narcissistic tendencies in leaders.

    The speaker encourages critical analysis of information and the pursuit of truth, while advocating for access to clean energy and debunking misinformation on climate change. They stress the importance of patriotism, love for humanity, and positive change through journalism and new institutions. The talk concludes with a discussion on environmental stewardship and the role of climate change narratives in censorship and control.

    Escape the Woke Matrix

    In the beginning of the video Michael Shellenberger discusses the importance of understanding history and the dangers of censorship. He highlights how censorship rewrites history to benefit the powerful and harm the people. He also talks about his own work as a journalist and author, including uncovering the FBI and intelligence community’s efforts to discredit factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings. Shellenberger addresses the issue of domestic censorship and disinformation campaigns supported by the U.S. government. He then introduces his lecture titled “Escape the Woke Matrix” and questions the prevailing narratives surrounding climate change and social issues.

    Michael Shellenberger then discusses the decline in police killings of African-Americans over the years, citing data from Roland Friar at Harvard University. He explains that police killings of African-Americans decreased from 217 per year in the 1970s to 157 per year in the 2010s. Furthermore, he highlights that police killings of all races have dramatically declined, from 59 per year between 1970-1975 to 12 per year. Shellenberger also mentions that researchers do not have enough data to determine if trans people are being killed disproportionately or if trans homicides are rising. He criticizes news outlets for irresponsibly suggesting otherwise. Shellenberger then goes on to discuss various instances of disinformation campaigns, such as the FBI investigation based on a made-up memo about Trump and the lab leak theory of COVID-19. He emphasizes the need for accurate information and highlights the role of senior government officials in perpetuating disinformation campaigns.

    When discussing various examples of censorship and suppression of information related to the pandemic, v mentions how the Washington Post and Fauci were involved in spreading disinformation, and how a fake science article was published to support conspiracy theories. Shellenberger also talks about the Great Barrington declaration, which proposed a focused protection approach to the pandemic, and how it was met with criticism and attempts to discredit it. He criticizes individuals like Renee DiResta, who ran a censorship operation using taxpayer dollars, and mentions social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook censoring posts related to election questioning and vaccine side effects. Shellenberger highlights the government’s involvement in demanding censorship, and expresses concern over the violation of the First Amendment.

    The speaker also discusses how accurate information was being censored by platforms like Twitter and Facebook because they were concerned that people might make the wrong decisions based on that information. The FBI had reportedly approached these platforms, prompting them to be prepared to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story before it had even been published. The speaker argues that this censorship goes against the principles of journalism and the First Amendment, which protect the public interest and whistleblowers. The speaker also highlights the efforts by the Aspen Institute, funded by the US federal government, to discourage journalists from covering certain stories and focusing instead on the individuals who leaked the information. The speaker contends that these tactics are being used to suppress information and protect “fragile” individuals, under the guise of protecting them from harm.

    The speaker further discusses various aspects of the “woke matrix,” including attempts to read encrypted text messages, the creation of tip lines for reporting “wrong think,” and the involvement of figures like Jacinda Ardern in global censorship initiatives. They also explore the censorship industrial complex, which involves organized pressure campaigns and cancellation efforts in various domains. The speaker argues that propaganda plays a role in controlling the information environment and influencing public perception, citing the example of the Hunter Biden laptop story. They suggest that the rise of cancel culture and wokism as predicates for censorship, stems from a lack of traditional moral structures and the need for individuals to find meaning and significance in their lives.

    The speaker then discusses the dangers of denying the existence of God, arguing that when people stop believing in God, they end up believing in anything, including things like climate change as a new external authority. He describes how guilt has shifted from religious sins to guilt about using fossil fuels and modern technology. The speaker also addresses the rise of a new moral order based on race, where people are ranked on a moral hierarchy. He criticizes the idea that laws should be enforced differently based on victimhood and argues that it is leading to a new set of witches. The speaker further discusses the influence of social media and the rise of cluster B personality disorders, with individuals adopting victimhood as an identity. He warns about the dangers of entitlement, aggression, and impaired empathy that can arise from perpetuating victimhood as an identity. The speaker concludes by mentioning the infiltration of narcissists and psychopaths in victimhood movements.

    The speaker raises questions about the reasoning behind the demand for mask-wearing, particularly in schools, questioning why well-intentioned people would support this. They also touch on the idea that individuals in positions of political power who exhibit psychopathic behavior can create an epidemic of psychopathology, and that people who are not inherently psychopathic can, under certain circumstances, behave like psychopaths. The speaker warns against creating a culture of cluster B personality disorders and highlights the potential for aggression and violence within grievance-based movements. They emphasize the importance of free speech but also acknowledge the need for equal justice under the law, meritocracy, affordable energy, and freedom of speech as essential components of a liberal democracy. Lastly, they discuss the need to address and remove individuals with psychopathic and narcissistic tendencies from positions of power and authority.

    The speaker emphasizes the importance of not becoming like the monsters we confront and the challenge of loving our enemies. He also discusses the need to debunk false narratives and misinformation, particularly when it comes to the perception of increasing hatred. By examining the data, he suggests that there is actually less hatred among racial, religious, and sexual minorities today compared to any other time in recorded history. He encourages individuals to critically analyze information, debunk false claims, and seek truth in order to maintain a sense of bravery and overcome victimization. The speaker also criticizes the New York Times and Financial Times for their biased reporting and emphasizes the importance of seeking status and recognition for the right reasons, such as courage, acuity, and compassion.

    Michael Shellenberger then discusses the misrepresentation of data on hurricanes and the importance of providing access to clean energy for people in the third world. He points out that satellite technology has greatly improved hurricane detection and refutes the claim that there has been an increase in hurricanes over the last century. He argues that denying access to natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas for sub-Saharan Africans and South Asians is morally wrong, as it prevents them from escaping poverty and significantly impacts their quality of life. Shellenberger emphasizes that cheap energy is crucial for women’s liberation and highlights the potential for global poverty eradication and wildlife conservation. He concludes by urging everyone to fight for this future and expresses his gratitude to the audience.

    When discussing the importance of patriotism and love for humanity, Michael Shellenberger acknowledges that there are negative aspects of the country but emphasizes the uniqueness and tolerance of America. Shellenberger believes that building a positive future involves addressing issues such as climate change and solving environmental problems, advocating for the use of gas and nuclear energy to lift people out of poverty. He criticizes censorship, fake hate crises, and the need to be policed by authorities. When asked about the connection between the decline of Christianity and the rise of wokism, Shellenberger agrees that people may turn to new ideologies to find meaning in their lives. He highlights the need for consistent reinvention and the potential for journalism, public intellectual life, and new institutions like the University of Austin to bring about positive change. Shellenberger encourages people to confront darkness, let go of unhealthy relationships and toxic institutions, and find freedom in expressing their beliefs.

    Michael Shellenberger then highlights two important ways to be better environmental stewards. Firstly, he emphasizes the importance of not throwing plastic waste into the recycling bin, as plastic recycling is largely ineffective and often ends up polluting rivers and oceans. Secondly, he advocates for nuclear power as a solution to climate change, debunking common misconceptions and emphasizing the need for a change in attitudes towards nuclear energy. Shellenberger also discusses how certain personality types, such as narcissists and psychopaths, have taken over institutions and organizations, using their charisma and spellbinding tactics. He argues that the decline of patriotism has led to the rise of a new, base morality enforced through bullying. Lastly, he mentions that red flags arise when news promoting increasing hatred contradicts the overall trend of declining violence and societal hatred.

    Michael Shellenberger also discusses how the narrative of climate change is often used as a tool for censorship and control. He highlights the consequences of climate action, such as depriving developing regions like sub-Saharan Africa of the natural gas they produce, which is vital for fertilizer and food production. Shellenberger suggests that the motivations behind these actions may be driven by a desire for power and control rather than genuine concern for the environment. He also mentions the importance of debunking false narratives and engaging in discussions with woke individuals, emphasizing the need to understand various factors like psychopathy and narcissism on a spectrum rather than being dismissive. Additionally, he shares his satisfaction in debunking the notion of an increase in hate and racism through evidence-based arguments, stating that it has had a positive impact in challenging these claims. Finally, he briefly acknowledges the issue of corporate power and money but does not elaborate further on it in his talk.

    In the end, Michael Shellenberger discusses the connection between the news media, corporations, and financial institutions in the context of the attention economy. He explains that the news media’s main interest is to capture your attention so they can sell it to advertisers. While moving towards subscriber-based media may be a partial remedy, it is important to be aware that the business model may not change anytime soon. Shellenberger also points out that there is a demand for debunking, as people find it exciting to see conventional wisdom challenged. He believes that the attention economy doesn’t have to be a bad thing, just like capitalism doesn’t necessarily have negative implications. However, he does acknowledge the issue of pathogenicism and the takeover of institutions by individuals with extreme ideas. Overall, Shellenberger emphasizes the complexity of these interconnected systems and the need for a balanced approach that includes the positive role of government.

    Odysee Video

    YouTube Video

  • Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche Expresses Concerns About Harmful Effects of Covid-19 Vaccines

    Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche Expresses Concerns About Harmful Effects of Covid-19 Vaccines

    In the YouTube video titled “Geert’s Concern about the New Covid Variant (JN.1),” Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a virologist with a background in molecular biology and immunology, expresses his concerns about the harmful effects of Covid-19 vaccines and the business model of the pharmaceutical industry. He warns of the potential dangers of focusing solely on vaccine solutions, particularly in light of the emergence of new Covid variants.

    Dr. Vanden Bossche argues that these vaccines do not fit the definition of a vaccine, as they cannot be controlled in terms of dose or duration. He also discusses the concept of “immune refocusing,” which can hinder the immune system’s ability to adapt when encountering a new variant, and the phenomenon of “immo quiet” or “immo silent” epitopes, which can recognize previously masked antigenic sites within the Spike protein but do not effectively neutralize the virus, instead enhancing its infectiousness.

    Dr. Vanden Bossche warns of the emergence of more infectious variants like JN.1 and GN1 due to suboptimal immune pressure and immune focusing towards cellular responses.

    Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche also expresses deep concerns about the evolution of the Covid virus and the diminishing effectiveness of vaccines. He explains that virulence-inhibiting antibodies are decreasing, putting pressure on the virus and making vaccines ineffective. Furthermore, the lack of proper training of the innate immune system due to vaccine breakthrough infections is leading to a corrupted adaptive immune system.

    Vanden Bossche anticipates a new, more virulent variant could emerge soon, impacting vaccinated individuals more severely than unvaccinated ones. Despite missing the timeline of the new variant’s emergence, he emphasizes the importance of conveying truthful information and taking action to address the real issue – the evolving crisis caused by the virus. Geert encourages viewers to consider his message and acknowledges the possibility of being wrong.

    Detailed Description

    Geert Vanden Bossche is a veterinary medicine and virology expert with a background in molecular biology and immunology. He expresses his concern about the current state of the Covid-19 pandemic, stating that he is more worried now than he was even at the beginning. He goes on to describe his academic and professional background, including his work in the vaccine industry and with global health organizations like the Gates Foundation and Gavi. Throughout the interview, Gert shares his expertise and insights on the Covid-19 pandemic and its current challenges.

    Geert also expresses his concerns about the new Covid variant (JN.1) and reflects on his past criticisms of mass vaccination efforts, which he believed would have detrimental consequences. He recalls raising warnings about the polio and Ebola vaccinations and being met with opposition from health organizations and the industry, but ultimately being proven right. Despite feeling isolated and criticized for his critical voice, Geert remains steadfast in his belief that truth and science are powerful allies. Despite the challenges, he acknowledges the importance of vaccines and the difficult decision that comes with challenging an industry that has provided significant benefits to the world.

    Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche argues that the vaccines do not protect against infection, but only against the disease. In a global health context, preventing infection is mandatory to fight a pandemic, and failing to do so results in the virus spreading, generating new variants that can evade the protection provided by the vaccines. This results in a self-perpetuating cycle of variant generation, turning a natural pandemic into an immune escape pandemic. Despite the obvious issues, some people still argue that the vaccines protect against severe disease and covid-19 related illness. Dr. Vanden Bossche is flabbergasted that this argument is still used, as it does not consider the global health context and the potential for immune escape variants

    Geert then discusses his concerns surrounding the continued vaccination efforts despite the emergence of new Covid variants. He argues that the current focus on vaccination does not address the long-term consequences, including the potential overburdening of healthcare systems. Geert asserts that heavily vaccinated populations are experiencing a spiral of transmission, and viable options for controlling the virus appear to have been exhausted. From a virological, immunological, and clinical perspective, the virus continues to evolve, with no herd immunity or endemicity in sight. Geert expresses worry that this cycle of breakthrough infections and immun escape could eventually lead to something very serious

    Geert further expresses concerns about the current vaccines for COVID-19, specifically the mRNA vaccines. He argues that these vaccines do not fit the definition of a vaccine as they cannot be controlled in terms of dose, location, or duration. Geert explains that these vaccines allow the proteins to be produced in the body of the vaccinated person and spread throughout the body, which is unprecedented in vaccinology. From a definition perspective, he does not consider these vaccines to be vaccines, despite their ability to generate immune responses against the antigen produced in the human cell. Geert also mentions that these vaccines can induce immune refocusing, which sets up a chain of immune escape. The speaker points to a scientific paper published in October 2021 that shows the response of the neutralization response with regards to the B.1 vent variant booster, which is part of his argument against the effectiveness and safety of the current COVID-19 vaccines

    Virologist Geert also discusses the concept of “immune refocusing” in relation to the new Covid variant (JN.1). He explains that, even without a booster, the strongest antibody response to the original variant is still present, creating a focus on the original variant in the immune system. This can hinder the immune system’s ability to adapt when encountering a new variant. While immune refocusing is a known term in vaccinology, the speaker notes that they have not seen this phenomenon occur naturally before. The immune system’s response to vaccine breakthrough infections can boost previously induced antibodies, allowing them to still have some neutralizing effect, but this effect is short-lived. These antibodies, which initially have lower affinity and target less immunogenic epitopes, can drive the propagation of more infectious variants due to their suboptimal immune pressure

    When discussing the potential disadvantages of mRNA vaccines in regards to the production of low affinity antibodies against dominant epitopes, Geers explains that this phenomenon leads to immune pressure and the selective propagation of more infectious variants. According to Geert, the prolonged expression of the Spike protein on the surface of transfected cells during mRNA vaccine production induces imperfect low affinity antibodies, which automatically prioritize subdominant epitopes. He states that after the second dose of mRNA vaccines, cross-neutralizing antibodies against several different variants can be observed. However, Geert expresses concern that this immune response will not improve and instead suggest that administering vaccines or booster doses will accelerate immune refocusing events and immunp escape. He emphasizes that the neutralization observed with these antibodies is not real, but rather pseudo-neutralization due to their low affinity

    Geert Vanden Bossche continues by expressing his concerns about the effectiveness of existing antibodies against the new covid variant. He explains that these antibodies, which are called low Affinity antibodies, interact with the virus through multiple arms, creating a multimeric distribution on the surface of the virus. These antibodies can only react with the virus when it is presented as a multimeric structure and cannot react with the monovalent spike. This results in pseudo-neutralizing activity, meaning that these antibodies can only mitigate the infection, not inhibit it completely. Due to the prolonged suboptimal functional activity, immun escape is tremendously driven, leading to the succession of more infectious variants sharing most of their mutations. Geert criticizes the scientists for misleading information presented without testing the antibodies using monovalent spike in an Eliza assay, which would reveal their true neutralizing capacity. He summarizes that while antibodies may lose their neutralizing capacity, they can still attach to single particles and have an infection-enhancing effect, making the situation complex

    Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche goes into more detail on the concept of “imuno quiet” or “imuno silent” epitopes, which are non-neutralizing antibodies that can recognize previously masked conserved antigenic sites within the Spike protein. These antibodies have a high affinity for these sites but do not effectively neutralize the virus, instead enhancing its infectiousness by promoting the stabilization of viral aggregates. Over time, with each new immune response following a vaccine breakthrough infection, the immune system may focus on less immunodominant domains of the virus, generating antibodies with even lower affinity, promoting the formation of even larger aggregates that are more readily taken up by antigen-presenting cells

    Geert explains that antigen-presenting cells love to pick up larger particles and induce CTL responses, which is why the evolution of JN.1 is so worrisome. While Public Health authorities claim that JN.1 is not more virulent than other variants, Geert contends that this overlooks the message that JN.1 is conveying through its mutations. Upon analyzing these mutations, one can understand the immune pressure that caused them and predict what is to come. Geert finds it suspicious that vaccines are still effectively neutralizing these newly emerging variants despite the changes in the spike protein. He shares images from research papers to demonstrate the frightening continuous evolution of the virus, with mutations on top of previous ones. Geert criticizes scientists and health experts for only presenting data after a boost and claiming the presence of neutralizing antibodies, but these may be low Affinity antibodies that interact with the virus in a way that generates dampened infectiousness, immune escape, and suboptimal immune pressure.

    Geert Vanden Bossche also expresses concern over the new Covid variant, GN1. He explains that monovalent antibodies can only interact with the multimeric presentation of the spike on a viral particle or on viral aggregates, limiting their neutralizing effect. He further states that highly vaccinated populations have developed antibodies that stabilize aggregates, which are now primarily taken up by antigen presenting cells and driving mitigation of infection. By killing infected cells, cytotoxic T-cells play a role in mitigating the infection, but this process also drives the emergence of more infectious variants like GN1. Observations include GN1 spreading like wildfire, a surge in hospitalization, severe disease, and death, and the emergence of mutations in non-spike viral proteins that enhance infection. Geert concludes that GN1 is the result of immune pressure on the virus.

    Geert Vanden Bossche explains that these newly synthesized antibodies can promote the stabilization of larger viral aggregates, which are taken up by antigen-presenting cells and stimulate CTL (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes) responses. CTLs are not specific to the Spike protein, but bind strongly to the universal epitope. Geert theorizes that this shift in the immune response from humoral responses to cellular responses may lead to the emergence of more infectious variants, as the mutations are directed against the universal epitope. He also criticizes the claim that T-cells are important in mitigating the infection, stating that there is no evidence of memory T-cells being involved, and they can only interact once the cell is already infected. Geert concludes that the new variant, although not itself more virulent, indicates a shift in the immune focusing towards cellular responses, which could be leading to suboptimal immune pressure on viral infectiousness.

    The virologist then discusses the shift from antibody-mediated immune response to cell-mediated response in dealing with new covid variants. He explains that as the concentration of neutralizing antibodies increases, they can mask newly discovered epitopes, allowing the immune system to recognize more conserved epitopes. This is referred to as immune refocusing. However, the speaker also notes that a dramatic stimulation of CTL responses, due to large aggregates, can overwhelm antigen-presenting cells and cause them to prioritize CTL stimulation over T-helper peptide stimulation. This can lead to a decline in antibodies and weaker rebooting of the immune response. The lower concentration of antibodies and diminishing affinity will then move the graph further to the right, indicating even more CTL stimulation and less stimulation of T-helper cells. Unfortunately, the speaker concludes that due to the antigen-presenting cells prioritizing CTL stimulation over T-helper peptide stimulation, none of the updated vaccines will effectively work

    Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche expresses his alarm over the diminishing concentration of infection enhancing antibodies in individuals who have received booster shots, which he believes are responsible for inhibiting the virulence of the virus. He explains that these infection enhancing antibodies also block the transfer of the virus from dendritic cells to susceptible cells in the body, inhibiting virulence. The shift towards CTL-mediated mitigation of infection, according to Dr. Vanden Bossche, will result in a diminished concentration of these infection enhancing or virulence inhibiting antibodies, putting suboptimal immune pressure on viral virulence. He uses the examples of Omicron and the Harbinger variant to illustrate this concept, suggesting that a new variant could emerge very soon with heightened virulence due to the intense immune pressure on a small domain within the protective antigen. Dr. Vanden Bossche also explains that unvaccinated individuals, who have shifted towards their innate immune system, will not be affected by the new variant as their innate immunity can become stronger with training. However, he emphasizes that the issue is that vaccinated individuals, due to vaccine breakthrough infections and high antibody titers, have been unable to train their innate immune system, resulting in a corrupted adaptive immune system that is becoming increasingly useless as their last line of defense against virulence.

    Geert Vanden Bossche explains that the virulence inhibiting antibodies are decreasing, putting pressure on the virus and making the vaccine ineffective. Additionally, he notes that the innate immune system wasn’t fully trained due to vaccine breakthrough infections being sidelined. Dr. Vanden Bossche predicts that when a new variant emerges, some unvaccinated individuals may experience completely asymptomatic or mild infections due to their immune systems being trained by more infectious variants. However, he also warns that the continuous exposure to the virus in a highly vaccinated community can pose a risk to everyone. He uses the analogy of physical training to explain the impact of infectious variants on the immune system and emphasizes that the nonvariant-specific innate immune system can deal with different types of variants as long as it is trained to handle a higher level of infectiousness.

    Geert says the focus of the Covid crisis has shifted to a fight between those promoting vaccination and boosters, and those raising concerns about their safety, but that both parties are distracting from the real issue, which is the evolution of the virus. Geert warns that the virus is “running away with the bone” due to its rapid spread and immune pressure on virulence-inhibiting antibodies, and that memory T cells, which can mitigate infection, have not been shown to be induced by vaccines or natural infections. Geert anticipates a significant rise in mortality from Covid-19 and encourages viewers to be aware of this potential outcome.

    Geert also discusses his concerns about the rapid progression of a new covid variant and the immense damage it is anticipated to cause. Although he admits to missing the timeline of its emergence, he emphasizes the significance of conveying truthful information. He explains that the immune refocusing mechanism, which allows the immune system to recover and prolong viral spread, no longer applies to this new variant as it progresses rapidly. He predicts that there will be a transition from asymptomatic infections among unvaccinated individuals to severe cases and deaths in vaccinated populations within a continuum. Geert urges that the damage will be enormous and emphasizes the reality of the evolving situation, which he believes is beyond our control

    Geert argues that the neutralizing effect of antibodies against the new variant is much lower and Virus spreads as it is under infection mitigating pressure. The speaker asserts that there will be no more infectious variants, a new variant will emerge in highly vaccinated countries, the rate of mortality and morbidity will increase exponentially in vaccinated populations, and African populations will not be affected. He recommends that people who are thoroughly vaccinated take antivirus and predicts that there will be mandates for taking antivirals in the future. The speaker expresses his conviction that history will show that those who did not try to suppress the viral spread at this point will not be on the right side of history

    Geert remarkedly expresses his deep concern about the current crisis caused by the new Covid variant. He believes that we are facing a monumental crisis and emphasizes the importance of taking action. Geert shares that he cannot accept the disaster as a human being but only accepts it as a scientist. He has done extensive research on the topic and asserted that all the elements of biophysics, immunology, virology, and vaccinology fit together in a way that doesn’t violate any laws or rules regarding these disciplines. Geert strongly believes that this is the truth and is preparing for the chaos that is coming. However, he criticizes health authorities for only looking at the surface of the situation and not examining what is happening beneath the surface, where the real danger lies. Geert’s passionate and convincing message highlights his commitment to humanity and his willingness to stand up and speak out against the crisis

    At the end of the video, Geert acknowledges the possibility of being wrong but emphasizes that if his concerns about the new Covid variant prove to be true, the implications would be difficult for everyone.

    YouTube Video

  • Andrew Bridgen MP Speech on Excess Deaths in the UK After Covid Vaccines

    Andrew Bridgen MP Speech on Excess Deaths in the UK After Covid Vaccines

    In his speech in the British Parliament, Andrew Bridgen MP discussed the rising trend of excess deaths in immediate follow-up of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the United Kingdom, specifically referring to the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities recording of 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above and over 18,000 excess deaths recorded among people aged 15-19 in the 12 months starting in July 2022.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discussed Serious Adverse Events that have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The video explores the experimental COVID-19 vaccines’ possible impact on cardiac emergencies and Australian mortality, as well as the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, the lack of data on Spike protein production, and the contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccines. Andrew Bridgen MP advocated for evidence-based medicine and a return to basic science and ethics.

    The Speech

    At the beginning of his speech, Andrew Bridgen MP points out that excess deaths have been on the rise, affecting a significant number of people, generally those in their prime. The deaths have not been proportionate to the elderly population. The speaker also comments on history’s potential judgment of the house’s handling of the issue.

    The Office of Health Improvement and Disparities has recorded 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above in the 12 months starting in July 2020, which includes the Autumn 2020 wave of COVID-19 and a portion of the first COVID-19 winter.

    However, over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group have been recorded in the 12 months starting in July 2022, which is 9% above expected levels, more than twice as many as in the previous year. There was a clear stepwise increase in mortality after the vaccine rollout, which has continued steadily ever since, despite data suggesting that fewer hospitalizations and deaths were associated with the vaccine than previous COVID-19 illnesses. Officials seem unwilling to acknowledge this disturbing data and have chosen to turn a blind eye to it.

    Andrew Bridgen MP then discusses the issue of harm caused by the COVID-19 vaccines to vaccinated individuals, specifically the Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), which have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The vaccines, Andrew Bridgen MP claims, have caused harm to 1 in 800 people to supposedly save one in 20,000, which is, according to him, “madness“.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the flawed assumptions and biases that have been used to arrive at these conclusions, and the importance of considering socioeconomic and ethnic differences in the vaccination process. He also explores the phenomenon of the excess mortality seen in more heavily vaccinated regions, and the correlation between vaccination and several health issues such as cardiac arrest and cardiovascular disease. After saying this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for transparency and accountability in the vaccination process and the need for further research to identify the causal link between vaccination and harm.

    The impact of vaccination on cardiac emergencies in South Australia for 15-44 year olds is then brought up. After the vaccine rollout in this age group, there was a 67% increase in cardiac emergencies compared to usual, with 2,172 cases in November 2021, up from 1,300 emergency cardiac presentations a month before.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the increase in Australian mortality overall, which is due to cardiac deaths, and how these excess deaths cannot be explained by an aging population, disease of old age, low Statin prescriptions, or undertreated hypertension. He suggests that the experimental COVID-19 vaccines may be the cause of these excess deaths and raises concerns about the data presentation by the ON. He also discusses the lack of transparency from the UK Health Security Agency regarding anonymized data and how this data could potentially reveal damaging information about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines.

    When discussing the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, Andrew Bridgen MP highlights the lack of data on the amount of Spike protein produced on vaccination and the broken system for properly recording deaths.

    Andrew Bridgen MP also mentions the issue of doctors waiting for permission from the regulator before certifying deaths and the circularity of the situation. He discusses the problem of contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccine and the potential harm caused by this. With this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for a review of the excess deaths and argues that the experimental vaccines are not safe and not effective.

    In response to his speech, a female attendee attempts to counter his arguments regarding the increase in excess deaths as being due to a combination of factors, including the ongoing challenges of COVID-19 and the high flu prevalence of the previous year. The leading causes of excess deaths in England were respiratory illnesses, dementia, and heart disease, according to her. Vaccination was mentioned as an important aspect, but conflicting data was presented on its causality. She encouraged the use of the yellow card system for patients who experienced side effects from vaccines. The factor of vaccine safety was also discussed, including the MH’s action in response to rare cases of concurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia following vaccinations, leading to the vaccine not being offered to certain age groups and the commission on human medicines conducting an independent review to address concerns.

    YouTube Video

  • Australian Parliament Speech by the Honorable John Ruddick Which Got Deleted by YouTube

    Australian Parliament Speech by the Honorable John Ruddick Which Got Deleted by YouTube

    YouTube has made the decision to ban an Australian parliament speech, marking the first time in history that it has done so. The speech, given by the Honorable John Ruddick, criticizes the authoritarian measures taken by the state and federal liberal governments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ruddick questions the need for lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations and highlights the delayed response from the Liberal Party in speaking out against the government’s actions. He also discusses various topics including the founding of the Red Cross, concerns about the arms buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, and the potential dangers of big government.

    Additionally, he questions the validity of the global warming narrative and proposes the idea of a government-free society. The speech concludes with Ruddick expressing his belief in maximizing human potential and inviting his parliamentary colleagues to join the libertarian movement.

    YouTube banned the video after it was published on the Australian government channel, citing “Content Violation“.

    In the beginning of his speech, the Honorable John Ruddick reflects on his relationship with the New South Wales Liberal Party and discusses his decision to join the Liberal Democrats. He criticizes the authoritarian measures taken by state and federal liberal governments during the COVID-19 pandemic, referring to them as an overreaction to a “bad flu.” He questions the need for lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, citing Sweden’s approach of trust in its citizens. He also highlights the delayed response of the Liberal Party members in speaking out against the government’s actions. Additionally, he mentions an article from the New York Times that claims no one had caught COVID-19 in an outdoor environment.

    At 00:05:00, the speaker expresses their disappointment with several aspects of the Australian government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They criticize the implementation of lockdowns and the push for multiple vaccine injections, noting that there has been an increase in excess deaths since the vaccine rollout. The speaker also highlights the banning of Ivermectin, a drug that has shown potential in treating COVID-19, and suggests a conflict of interest in the influence of pharmaceutical companies over the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Additionally, they criticize the liberal party for the increase in government debt and their surrender to pressure for a net-zero carbon economy. Despite these disappointments, the speaker expresses hope for budget repair under the new government.

    At 00:10:00 of the video, the speaker discusses the principles of libertarianism and highlights Switzerland as a successful example. They emphasize the belief in limited government, the inherent morality of capitalism, and the negative consequences of big government. They praise Switzerland for its low government intrusion, decentralized power, and high per capita income. The speaker also mentions Switzerland’s healthcare system, low crime rate with high firearm ownership, and its tradition of staying out of wars. The video excerpt showcases the speaker’s admiration for the Swiss model and its alignment with libertarian ideals.

    At 00:15:00 John Ruddick discusses various topics including the founding of the Red Cross by a Christian businessman, concerns about the arms buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, the potential for a catastrophic war, the importance of free speech, the dangers of big government, and the impact of mass delusions. He also shares the story of William Buckley, an escaped convict who was adopted by an Aboriginal tribe and witnessed a mass delusion among the tribes. The member emphasizes the need for de-escalation and the separation of church and state to prevent the magnification of delusions by state power.

    At 00:20:00 the politician questions the validity of the global warming narrative and the motives behind it. He suggests that the predictions of rising temperatures and shrinking ice caps have not materialized, and natural disasters are just part of natural cycles. He also criticizes the shift from global warming to climate change and the hostility towards nuclear energy. The politician questions the qualifications of prominent figures like Al Gore and Greta Thunberg in the field and raises concerns about the commercial and political interests at play. He argues that the environmental movement has been hijacked by a money-making scheme and highlights the need to focus on animal welfare and the protection of endangered species and native forests.

    At 00:25:00 the parliament member discusses the idea of a government-free society and the potential benefits it could bring. He argues that a society based on voluntary interaction could be more humane, safe, vibrant, diverse, and successful. He suggests gradually phasing out government over decades with democratic consent and highlights the issues of legalized coercion and the excessive size of government today. He proposes several initial steps towards a zero percent government, including abolishing middle-class welfare, adopting a Swiss-style healthcare system, and replacing the Department of Education with a school voucher system. He also suggests privatizing the police and court system, while acknowledging the need for finding effective ways to care for the poor. The speech concludes by emphasizing the superiority of innovative and efficient solutions, such as Uber, over heavily regulated taxes, and highlights other government services that anarcho-capitalists believe can deliver an upgrade in quality service.

    At 00:30:00 the speaker expresses his belief in maximizing human potential and reaching for other worlds. They argue for a government-free, voluntary-based society as a means to tap into humanity’s highest potential. The speaker also highlights the historical impact of libertarianism, such as its articulation of the benefits of free enterprise and its opposition to socialism and Keynesianism. They mention the libertarian stance on gay marriage, opposition to Middle Eastern Wars, and support for minorities being bullied by the state and popular culture. The speaker concludes by inviting their parliamentary colleagues to join the libertarian movement and complete a membership form.

    Odysee Video

  • The International Covid Summit III Held at the European Parliament in Brussels

    The International Covid Summit III Held at the European Parliament in Brussels

    The International Covid Summit III held at the European Parliament in Brussels saw speakers presenting their findings on various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Topics included the history of coronavirus research, the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties, and the potential premeditation of the pandemic.

    Speakers also discussed the lies spread about the pandemic, including the myth of asymptomatic transmission and the effectiveness of lockdowns, while emphasizing the negative impacts of lockdowns on issues like poverty, starvation, and joblessness.

    In addition, there were talks regarding the nasal spray vaccine, the autophagy lysosomal degradation pathway as a protective system against viruses, and how COVID-19 affects multiple organs beyond the lungs.

    In the second hour of the conferance, the speakers discuss various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the cytokine storm and thromboembolisms, the use of omics technology, the morphology of the virus, its phylogenesis, the genetic composition of the virus, and the complexity of its immunology.

    They also discuss the situation in Europe, including overcrowded hospitals and a scandal surrounding the release of images depicting the scale of the crisis. The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as masks and lockdowns, is also debated, with some questioning their efficacy and others emphasizing the importance of historical context in decision-making.

    The third hour of the conference covers a range of topics around the COVID-19 pandemic. One speaker explains the results of various studies on the efficacy of masks, highlighting that the Danish study showed no statistical significance in the difference of infection rates between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers.

    Another speaker discusses the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 and notes that randomized studies are not ethical in an epidemic when a treatment is known to work. A key topic is the controversy around Ivermectin, which the speakers argue is an effective treatment for COVID-19 but is being suppressed due to conflicts of interest, politicization, and suppression of science by the pharmaceutical industry. The speakers also discuss the potential role of psychology in manipulating public behavior and decision-making during the pandemic.

    In the remainder of the conference the presenters discuss problems with PCR testing, the changing definitions and goals of vaccinations, manipulation and hiding of vaccine data, the efficacy of vaccinations decreasing over time, and fatal flaws in CDC efficacy analyses.

    Speakers highlight the importance of adhering to scientific definitions to avoid confusion and promote informed consent. They express their concern about how vaccines failing to stop infection and transmission can potentially drive the emergence of new variants and the need to acknowledge the value of naturally acquired immunity.

    Additionally, they call for worldwide moratoriums on the use of mRNA vaccine technology for all species and comprehensive reviews of funding structures for public regulatory agencies to determine potential conflicts of interest.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, two members of the European Parliament, Christian Karish and Ivan Sinchich, welcome the attendees of the International Covid Summit III. They express their gratitude to those who have been fighting for their rights and liberties during these trying times. They also emphasize the importance of this event as a platform for sharing ideas and discussing the scientific, social, medical, and legal findings of the past three years of the covid crisis. Furthermore, they acknowledge the role of the MEPs in fighting for democracy and human rights in Europe while also celebrating the efforts made by U.S. Congress members and many others around the world. Lastly, they express their commitment to continue fighting for the people and their rights.

    00:05:00

    In this section, a speaker commends the attendees for following the science during the COVID-19 pandemic while also upholding human rights, rule of law, and freedom. They criticize certain bureaucrats and politicians who are not yet accepting accountability for their wrong decisions and discreditation attempts towards those who spoke the scientific truth during the pandemic. Attendees are here to exchange findings and send a strong message to European lawmakers, government agencies, and the public about early treatments, vaccine efficacy, and the legalities surrounding the pandemic.

    00:10:00

    In this section, two speakers, Stephen Malthouse and Patrick Ky, open the International Covid Summit III in the European Parliament in Brussels. Malthouse, a family doctor from Canada, thanks the hosts and speakers for attending the summit, which will focus on the pandemic after the declared first one. He urges the audience to keep an open mind and heart as the experts present their research-based material that might be different from what people have been learning so far. Ky, on the other hand, sees the summit as an opportunity to ask difficult questions about the human condition and rethink the history of biological patents leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the speaker expresses his gratitude to the members of parliament for hosting the summit and acknowledges his wife’s role in encouraging him to share his insights on the pandemic with the world. He talks about his previous fame on mainstream media and how COVID-19 took that away from him, but he is happier to be standing with the people at the summit. The speaker then sets the historical context of the pandemic, dating back to the mid-1900s when the conversation of pathogen use began. He highlights how the coronavirus model was identified in 1965 as a pathogen that could be used for a variety of purposes but specifically in human manipulation. The first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment was done in 1966, and the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus were done in 1967. The speaker questions where the human civilization was in allowing these experiments and violating biological and chemical weapons treaties.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the history of coronavirus research, specifically noting that Pfizer filed a patent for a Spike protein vaccine in 1990. Despite this early research, publications on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 to 2018 showed that vaccines were ineffective as the virus mutates too quickly for them to be effective. The speaker then delves into the 2002 patent filed by the University of North Carolina for an infectious replication-defective clone of coronavirus, which suggests a weapon aimed at specific individuals with no collateral damage. The patent preceded the SARS outbreak by a year and was funded by Anthony Fauci’s NIAID. The speaker suggests that this engineered SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon but rather a product of human research.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws in the US. The CDC had filed a patent on SARS coronavirus in violation of these treaties and laws, after downloading the sequence from China, which led to the rejection of the patent application until the CDC bribed the patent office. RTPCR, the test allegedly identified to detect Coronavirus risks, was identified by the speaker as a bioterrorism threat in Europe in 2002 and 2003. Furthermore, the pathogen was described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005 and a bio-warfare-enabling agent from that point forward. The gain-of-function moratorium to freeze any efforts to do gain-of-function research was conveniently suspended, as the University of North Carolina received an exemption from the grant. This led to the publication of the journal article stating that SARS Coronavirus is poised for human emergence.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a speaker at the International Covid Summit III discusses the potential premeditation of the Covid-19 pandemic. They quote a statement made in September 2019 that the world would experience an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen to allow for a universal vaccine template to be created. The speaker argues that this alleged release was premeditated domestic terrorism and an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race. They criticize the lack of independent review boards since 1965 and call for an end to gain of function research, weaponization of nature, and corporate patronage of science for self-interest.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker from Status Analytics argues that the initial narrative surrounding COVID-19 was based on fear rather than reality. They claim that the reality was that the virus posed a high risk to few people and negligible risks to most, that asymptomatic people were not major drivers of disease spread, and that lockdowns and mask mandates did not work and caused harm. The speaker also criticizes the World Health Organization for conflating case fatality rates with infection fatality rates, causing a misunderstanding of the true fatality rate of COVID-19. They argue that the infection fatality rate is less than 0.1 percent and that the virus presented a minimus risk to healthy people under the age of 70 who were not in the hospital for a severe comorbidity.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the International Covid Summit III, the speaker discusses several lies that have been spread about the COVID-19 pandemic. One of these lies is that the virus was novel and therefore more dangerous, when in fact it had been identified early on as a variant of SARS. Another lie is the myth of asymptomatic transmission, which was based on flawed studies and contradicted by experts. The speaker also discusses the idea that lockdowns saved lives, which is debunked by multiple studies showing no benefit to the implementation of lockdowns or other non-pharmaceutical interventions. The speaker argues that lockdowns may have actually been pro-contagion and that maximizing the differential mobility of the elderly and young is key to minimizing mortality.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker presents evidence to suggest that lockdowns were not effective at reducing COVID-19 mortality rates and instead resulted in a shift of the disease burden to vulnerable elderly populations. A scatterplot is shown indicating no relationship between lockdown stringency and COVID-19 mortality. Additionally, a comparison of pandemic curves for countries with and without lockdowns, and with and without mask mandates, reveal virtually identical results. The negative impacts of lockdowns are discussed, including increased child deaths, poverty, starvation, and joblessness. The presentation suggests that public health officials and industry leaders were waiting for a pandemic to occur in order to launch a vaccine, ultimately resulting in what the speaker considers to be a complete lie surrounding the sudden need for global vaccination.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video discusses how a nasal spray vaccine would have been more effective at preventing transmission and infection of COVID-19, and how the lack of development of this type of vaccine was a mistake that was belatedly recognized by experts. The speaker also highlights how there has been a continuous stream of lies and collusion between politicians, media, and health experts around the world regarding the true nature of COVID-19. Additionally, a pathologist presents their perspective on the disease, stating that COVID-19 is not as unknown as it was initially presented, and that better management of the disease could have been achieved through following basic medical teaching. The pathologist also provides information on the symptoms and severity of the disease.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the history of respiratory diseases and the similarities between SARS and COVID-19. The speaker highlights the importance of the autophagy lysosomal degradation pathway as a protective system against viruses, and how COVID-19 exploits and modulates this pathway to escape degradation. The speaker notes that in older individuals, this pathway is less efficient, leading to a hyper-induction of the inflammatory and immune response, resulting in a cytokine storm. The speaker points out that there are many inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that can stop the cytokine storm. Lastly, the speaker mentions that COVID-19 not only affects the lungs but also other organs, including the intestine and vasculature.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the cytokine storm and its role in causing disseminating intravascular coagulation with thromboembolisms. The presence of thromboembolisms makes it difficult for the patient’s oxygen to be exchanged and causes their condition to deteriorate rapidly. The speaker also points out the subtle mistake of not conducting autopsies to determine the cause of death. Moreover, patients who were given just paracetamol were not counteracting the inflammation caused by the virus. Inflammation anti-inflammatory drugs could have been more effective in treating the patients. Finally, the speaker also points out that the other effects of the spike protein, whether from the virus or the vaccine, are causing altered control of blood pressure.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the transcript, the speaker discusses how using omics technology could have improved the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This technology could have been used to create personalized profiles of patients in order to understand who was most susceptible to the disease and would benefit from vaccination. The speaker emphasizes the importance of trusting in science rather than relying solely on technology for solutions. They also mention the need for early treatment and studying the cellular and molecular pathways of infection. The speaker ends with a quote from Giordano Bruno about the potential consequences of relying on technology without understanding ourselves.

    01:10:00

    In this section, the discussion revolves around the morphology and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, including its genetic description and taxonomy. The virus is well-known, with its unique characteristics leading to its classification as a sabercovirus. The discussion also touches on the ac2 receptor, which the virus binds to, and the coefficient of reproduction or the measure of how effective a disease is, which has been calculated to be between two and four. The speaker explains that the horizontal coefficient differs from a spherical one in terms of how infectivity is communicated.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the phylogenesis of the coronavirus and explains that it is a very old family that has evolved progressively into producing less pathogenic diseases over time. The DNA of animals acts as a reservoir for ancient coronaviruses due to their long-lasting cohabitation. The speaker points out that interference is one of the natural virtues of the complex human immunity that helps little to no susceptibility to certain infections. Furthermore, there is still no evidence of where the virus came from, and the speaker offers a provocation highlighting that if pangolins and bats wanted to mix and share the coronavirus, they had enough time to do so, but they did not.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Professor Claudia Colucci discusses the genetic composition of the COVID-19 virus and how it is not different from any other virus, as it is the result of genetic cells and the reaction of the host. She explains that there are many ways the virus can enter a cell and replicate, and at the end of replication, it puts a black spot in the cell, which causes the cell to commit suicide. Professor Colucci stresses that immunity is not just limited to antibodies, as efficacy of a treatment is not just measured by antibodies; rather, it involves other factors as well. Furthermore, she suggests that the mechanism by which the fusion and entry into the interior of every cell takes place is not a delivery, it is then subjected to coupling to complex processes, but this is subject to errors and enlarged by the decoyrants.

    01:25:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker talks about the complexity of the immunology of COVID-19 and how different it is from traditional vaccines. He emphasizes the need for precise scientific terminology in discussing COVID-19 treatment, suggesting that the mRNA treatment should not be referred to as a vaccine. The speaker presents a case of a 15-year old girl who had the virus only in her bowel, highlighting the importance of correct diagnosis. He concludes by discussing the use of epidemiology as a tool to analyze and understand the causes and effects of COVID-19, saying that independent and dependent variables must be set and measured to determine the factors that contribute to the spread of the virus.

    01:35:00

    In this section, there is an excerpt from the International Covid Summit III where the speakers discuss the situation in Europe amidst the pandemic. They mention the Paris crisis and the strain it has put on respiratory care units, as well as the issue of overcrowded hospitals. The speakers also discuss journalist El Mondo’s investigation into a crematorium in Madrid, where the secretary for foreign affairs allegedly tried to prevent the release of images depicting the scale of the crisis.

    01:50:00

    In this section of the video, Dr. Louis Vachon, an intensivist in Marseille and a member of the independent scientific council, discusses the benefits and risks of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as masks and lockdowns. He stresses the importance of having a clear historical context and avoiding being disoriented in space and time when making decisions about these interventions. Dr. Vachon then gives a timeline of the mask and lockdown mandates in France from 2020 to 2021.

    01:55:00

    In this section, the speaker presents various sources of information that question the effectiveness of wearing masks for the general population. The World Health Organization previously believed that masks were of no use in the general population, and 120 different trials support this. Additionally, manufacturers and the boxes of masks themselves claim that they do not provide any protection against the coronavirus. The use of masks has also been compared to torture experienced by prisoners in Guantanamo, and it has become a new normal for children in Thailand. Further studies have shown that medical and surgical masks have no effect in preventing respiratory illness.

    02:00:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses various studies conducted on the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19. The Danish study showed no statistical significance in the difference of infection rate between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers, whereas a Bangladeshi study cited by the government and media showed a relative efficiency of 11% in reducing COVID-19 symptoms, but an absolute efficacy of only 104 persons. A study in Catalonia, Spain involving 6.6 million children showed no significant difference in infection rates between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers. The speaker also mentions the risks of wearing masks, such as increased CO2 in the blood and contaminated masks.

    02:05:00

    In this section, a speaker discusses the failure of lockdowns in slowing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of social and economic inequality that it poses. They also mention a consensus conference, which found that masks in general populations, including children, should be avoided, as there is still no evidence of benefits after three years of mask mandates. The speaker uses mathematical modeling to compare the diffusion rate of the infection between countries and concludes that lockdowns have increased the speed of virus diversion by 50%. They argue that lockdowns must be avoided, and there is significant risk for children wearing masks.

    02:10:00

    In this section, a French researcher speaks about the laboratory in Marseille that has over 4 million euros worth of equipment and is a reference center for epidemic preparedness in Southern France. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the laboratory conducted tests on over 3,000 people, cared for over 30,000 outpatients and over 5,000 patients in the hospital, and developed COVID-19 tests. They also conducted 100,000 PCR and generic studies for different variants. The researcher also discusses their early use of chloroquine, which they were familiar with due to previous experience in treating tropical diseases.

    02:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses how they conducted studies on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. They started with a small study on 24 patients and found that it had a slight effect on viral loads. They then did an observational study on 1,000 patients and found that hydroxychloroquine was more effective than no treatment. They argue that randomized studies are not ethical in an epidemic when a treatment is known to work. They conducted a study on over 30,000 patients and found that hydroxychloroquine works better than no treatment. They point out that the pressure on this treatment is due to its effectiveness in reducing mortality in elderly patients and that vaccines for acute respiratory infections are not efficient in controlling virus spread.

    02:20:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses several concerning issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. They present data showing that vaccinated individuals are still contributing to the spread of the virus and highlight conflicts of interest, politicization, corruption, and suppression of science. The speaker also shares examples of cyber harassment and censorship of scientific information on platforms like YouTube. They then shift the focus to the topic of Ivermectin, a drug that has been shown to be effective in treating COVID-19 but has faced disinformation campaigns aimed at suppressing evidence of its efficacy. The speaker argues that the war on Ivermectin is a global campaign whose only objective is to keep people away from this life-saving drug.

    02:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the long-standing war on any generic, off-patent drugs that threaten pharmaceutical profits, highlighting how any medicine that costs a dollar or two dollars will not find regulatory approval in any advanced health economy around the world. She points out that this has resulted in people dying frequently and in high numbers due to being unable to access recommended medicines. The speaker identifies Ivermectin as a drug that presents a massive threat and probably would have halted the vaccine campaign if people were following the rules. She explains how the pharmaceutical industry uses disinformation and tactics such as propaganda and censorship, which are historically unparalleled due to their global media and communication systems’ consolidation. Merck is singled out as an example for raking on Ivermectin and denying the Nobel prize-winning discoverer’s request to study it in COVID-19.

    02:30:00

    In this section, Dr. Pierre Kory discusses the 95 controlled trials and 134,000 patients that have been treated with Ivermectin. Despite its efficacy, the medication is not recommended by any advanced health economy, and almost all hospitals have removed it from their formularies. Dr. Kory highlights that there are only six heavily-funded, high-quality trials that have been published in top journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of American Medical Association, British Medical Journal, The Lancet, and the Annals of Internal Medicine, which seem to show that Ivermectin is not effective contrary to all the other trials. However, Dr. Kory argues that those six trials were the only ones where almost every single investigator of that trial was drowning in pharmaceutical company financial conflicts of interests, and this may have interfered with the results.

    02:35:00

    In this section, Dr. Peter McCullough speaks about the Ivermectin trial conducted by the University of Oxford and how they have not published the positive results, despite the trial being completed 10 months ago. He shared that they allowed up to 14 days before starting the medicine, which made it a fake trial. He also talked about the editorial mafia that controls the top medical journals, where positive randomized controlled trials of Ivermectin were rejected from publication, while those that managed to get published were suddenly retracted. Dr. McCullough questioned the selective publication of negative trials by pharmaceutical companies and conflicted researchers.

    02:40:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the potential power of the media in making decisions during the COVID-19 response. He poses several crucial questions regarding the impact of group pressure on individuals and whether the public was exposed to psychology during this time. The speaker argues that a PR campaign against Ivermectin was launched, and professional societies sent out memos calling for an immediate cessation of prescribing Ivermectin after an increase in prescriptions. He declares that it is one of the most effective drugs in history and claims that the campaign was launched since they saw they were losing the war against Ivermectin. The speaker considers this a crime against humanity, and no one will go to jail for it.

    02:45:00

    In this section, the speaker describes the psychology of conformity and how it has been used to manipulate the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research showed that people tend to conform to the crowd, even if they know it’s wrong. Those most likely to conform were low status individuals with a high need for approval. Fear is a major factor in increasing conformist behavior, as it shuts down critical thinking. The speaker also mentions how organizations such as the UK Sage and the Behavioral Insights Team used psychological manipulation to achieve their desired outcomes during the pandemic. Isolation and fear were upregulated to increase conformist behaviors in people.

    02:50:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses how contradictory messages from the media created confusion, which is a key element of mind control. He questions if the public exposure of vaccine status through work mandates was used as a deliberate attempt to trigger group pressure and increase compliance. He talks about the concept of trauma bonding with authority and whether the heavy-handedness of the authorities was meant to facilitate Stockholm syndrome. Finally, he suggests that criminal charges need to be laid for the alleged weaponization of psychology against the public.

    02:55:00

    In this section, the speaker, a chief operating officer of a company that develops immunosuticals and an associate professor of viral immunology at the University of Guelph, shares his concerns about the science underpinning Covid-19 vaccines. He points out that the primary rationale for vaccine mandates and masking mandates, which is asymptomatic transmission, is not a substantial driver of transmission of the SARS coronavirus 2 pandemic, and he backs it up with literature that establishes that studies arguing in favor of asymptomatic transmission are fatally flawed. He emphasizes that he bases all of his messaging on peer-reviewed published science and believes that everyone deserves respect and love.

    03:00:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses PCR testing and the importance of calibrating the test to differentiate between infectious and non-infectious virus particles. He highlights a study conducted by the Public Health Agency of Canada, which concluded that there was no evidence of infectious virions if the cycle threshold was less than 24. However, many papers have suggested that asymptomatic people could be a problem in spreading COVID-19, but the speaker argues that if sick people stay home, the virus will not spread. The speaker also warns that using unclear language, like turning vaccination terms into buzzwords, and not adhering to scientific definitions causes confusion and hinders the public’s ability to give informed consent.

    03:05:00

    In this section, an immunologist explains that the definition of a vaccine has been changed in the United States to accommodate the new COVID-19 shots, and under the new definition, even yogurt would be considered a vaccine. The traditional textbook definition of a vaccine is that once vaccinated, one cannot get the disease or transmit it to others, which is what the public was thinking about when the term vaccine was applied to COVID-19 shots. The shots were originally intended to prevent infection, not dampen the severity of the disease, but the goalposts were moved. Through a freedom of information request, a document was obtained that shows that the Pfizer vaccine was intended to prevent infection, not dampen the disease. The vaccines cannot prevent infection or transmission, but Pfizer failed to meet its contractual duty, according to the speaker.

    03:10:00

    In this section, a speaker discusses the manipulation and hiding of vaccine data, giving examples such as the unusual clustering of cases and hospitalizations after the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine and the refusal to overlay data based on vaccination status. The speaker also cites Pfizer’s own six-month clinical trial data update which shows no statistically significant benefit of the COVID-19 vaccine in reducing death, with numerically more deaths in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated. The speaker goes on to emphasize the superiority of natural immunity and the lunacy of vaccine passports without checking the immune response of individuals. Lastly, the speaker highlights the superiority of natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity in terms of cases, severity of disease, hospitalizations, and deaths.

    03:15:00

    In this section, a speaker highlights concerns that the vaccines may be making people more susceptible to Covid-19, particularly those who have been boosted with bivalent vaccines. The widespread use of vaccines that fail to stop infection and transmission can drive the emergence of new variants, similar to chemotherapy resistance and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, vaccines need to acknowledge the value of naturally acquired immunity. Additionally, there needs to be a worldwide moratorium on the use of mRNA vaccine technology for all species and comprehensive reviews of the funding structures for public regulatory agencies to determine potential conflicts of interest. Finally, there should be objective third-party scientific reviews of the raw data from submission packages that go to regulatory agencies and novel public health data to ensure integrity.

    03:20:00

    In this section of the transcript, the speaker discusses how the efficacy of vaccines decreases over time, which means that vaccinated people are more likely to get infected with Covid than unvaccinated people who have never been vaccinated. The speaker presents data that led the CDC to state that the vaccines do not work for the purposes of public health infection control. The vaccines only provide minimal protection against infection and transmission after receiving the most recent dose, although protection can wane over time. The speaker argues that the state’s only interest in mandating vaccines is to prevent transmission, and given that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, the state should not mandate them for the prevention of infection. The speaker also briefly touches on epidemiology and the different types of studies that can be done to evaluate vaccine efficacy.

    03:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses a fatal flaw in every vaccine efficacy analysis that the CDC has published in its in-house journal, morbidity mortality weekly report – the use of odds ratio as a parameter instead of relative risk. The speaker argues that the use of odds ratio skews the data and provides incorrect vaccine efficacy rates, which the CDC has repeatedly failed to correct, leading him to distrust the agency. The speaker questions how the CDC can have dozens of professionals involved in the publications and still make such a mistake.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ

  • Perseus Report Criticizing How MHRA Approved Covid Vaccines in the UK

    Perseus Report Criticizing How MHRA Approved Covid Vaccines in the UK

    In a video titled “Covid vaccine MHRA report: Yet again us conspiracy factualists are proved right“, Laurence Fox discusses a report published by Perseus, which was compiled by a multi-disciplinary team of experts and cites the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the UK).

    The report, titled “Safe and effective?“, concludes that the MHRA failed in its duty to protect the public from harm and did not require long-term safety demonstrations from the mRNA vaccine manufacturers nor did they act promptly on reports of adverse reactions. MHRA also failed to address manufacturing quality and control problems leading to batch quality issues.

    The report calls for an immediate cessation of the vaccines until a thorough, independent investigation takes place.

    Laurence Fox argues that the same rushed solutions and fear-mongering tactics used during COVID-19 are being used now to push the “climate emergency” and emphasizes the need to learn from the disastrous times and swear to never let them happen again.

    YouTube Video

  • Michael Rectenwald Calling Out Great Reset Agenda and Stakeholder Capitalism

    Michael Rectenwald Calling Out Great Reset Agenda and Stakeholder Capitalism

    Michael Rectenwald is an American scholar, author, and former professor of Liberal Studies at New York University. Rectenwald rose to prominence in 2016 after he created a Twitter account named “Deplorable NYU Prof” and began publicly criticizing what he saw as the increasing intolerance and censorship on college campuses.

    His criticisms of “woke” culture and cancel culture garnered him a significant following on social media and led to appearances on various media outlets, including Fox News and The Joe Rogan Experience podcast. Rectenwald is the author of several books, including “Springtime for Snowflakes: ‘Social Justice’ and Its Postmodern Parentage” and “Beyond Woke.”

    In the video, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset and the potential conspiracy theories surrounding it. He highlights that the World Economic Forum (WEF) promotes digital biometric surveillance identity systems and has pushed young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, which has led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.

    Rectenwald also discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism, and argues that it is a form of corporate socialism. He provides a “grand refusal” plan to combat the Great Reset, which includes divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the WEF, United Nations, and World Health Organization.

    00:00:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald addresses whether the idea of the Great Reset is simply a conspiracy theory. He notes that while some sources, such as the New York Times and the BBC, claim that the Great Reset is a benign effort to bring about a fairer, greener future, Time Magazine has devoted an entire issue to it, hailing it as the solution to all our problems.

    Michael Rectenwald also suggests that the World Economic Forum generates conspiracy theories on purpose to discredit their critics in advance. The history of the Great Reset begins with Richard Florida’s book in 2010, which inspired Klaus Schwab to push the reset button in 2014. The WF then participated in two pandemic simulations (Clade X and Event 201) prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, which led to a coordinated global response eerily similar to the simulation scenarios.

    00:05:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the simulations done before the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the Clade X and Event 201, which anticipated every aspect of the crisis, including worldwide lockdowns, the collapse of businesses and industry, widespread riots, and the adoption of biometric surveillance technologies.

    These simulations, along with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) involvement in promoting digital biometric surveillance identity systems and pushing young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, have led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.

    The WEF’s partnership with the UN to advance Agenda 2030, sustainable development goals, and its commitment to help the UN meet the needs of the fourth industrial revolution, including government by algorithms and AI, are also highlighted.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the history of globalist organizations such as the Trilateral Commission and their push for a global agenda. The Great Reset, which is a reset of various domains of human life including economic, environmental, geopolitical, industrial, technological, social, and individual, is an outline of the kind of things they want to reset.

    The economic system they want to usher in is called stakeholder capitalism, which is a euphemism for a collusion between the government, state, and corporate world that establishes a cartel shared Monopoly scheme. The world economic Forum has signed on 1,000 of the world’s top corporations in all major sectors of the economy, and they are all firmly behind this agenda, including major players like BlackRock Inc.

    The stakeholder capitalism regime has its main mechanism, the ESG score, which Schwab likens to Dr. Evil, and companies that don’t get on board with the sustainability ESG stakeholder regime will be starved with capital and die on the vine.

    00:15:0

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism. He explains that socialists believe that stakeholder capitalism is a form of socialism, specifically corporate socialism, which is the monopolization of the economy by a group of monopolists who want to eliminate their competition and retain complete and total control over the rest of the economy.

    Rectenwald argues that the Chinese system is the model for the Great Reset, as it still maintains for-profit production by oligarchs, total control over the population, a great surveillance structure, and generates wealth for the few. He believes that globalists want to establish this system globally.

    00:20:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset in relation to China and public-private partnerships. He claims that the Great Reset is drawing corporations into the state and making them state apparatuses, with examples such as Twitter and Google.

    He mentions the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which he argues represents high-tech surveillance and control of the population at large. Rectenwald highlights that the Great Reset promises inclusion in a shared destiny, but this inclusion represents the subordination of netizens, who will experience total political and economic disenfranchisement and hyper-vigilance over themselves and others, resulting in organized loneliness.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald provides a nine-point plan, which he calls “the grand refusal,” to combat the Great Reset. The plan includes refusing the central bank digital currency, internet of bodies, and digital identity, practicing the free market, divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers, and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the World Economic Forum, United Nations, and World Health Organization.

    Rectenwald acknowledges that it may not be possible to reverse the global agenda on our own, but we can become a Remnant that promotes the principles of the free market and individual freedom to future generations.

    00:30:00

    In this section, Michael Rectenwald suggests putting pressure on legislators to move pensions and other funds away from ESG asset managers, and encouraging defections from the elites. Elon Musk is cited as a possible defector from ESG and a nominal supporter of free speech.

    Rectenwald calls for a grand refusal against revolutionary subversive elites who are wrecking society, and emphasizes the need for counter-revolution against their objectives. He concludes by rejecting the utopian and striving for continuity and sanity.

    YouTube Video

  • Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    The MONOPOLY: Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. These investors include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, and they own the majority of shares in major tech companies, as well as food and beverage, travel, and primary industries.

    Furthermore, the documentary highlights the ownership of major media outlets around the world, which creates synchronized reporting and manipulated information. The video warns about the looming threat of a potential dystopian society resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything, and the elites control the population’s lives by taking their possessions and vaccinating them.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator explains that the food and beverage industry is largely controlled by a few mega corporations, such as PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Mondelez, and Nestle. These companies manage the majority of money flows on earth, and their boards are controlled by the largest shareholders. By researching information on company websites and Yahoo Finance, it is discovered that just a handful of institutional investors own the majority of shares in these companies, many of which include investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and governments.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the documentary, the speaker discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. The four biggest investment companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, are among the top shareholders of these companies.

    This consolidation of power extends to the technology industry, where Facebook, Alphabet (parent company of Google and YouTube), Microsoft, and Twitter are among the dominant players, with the same institutional investors as their top shareholders. Even in industries such as travel, airlines, hotels, and restaurants, the same group of investors holds the majority of shares, and they also have a presence in primary industries such as mining and agriculture.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the focus is on the immense power and control of two companies, Vanguard and Blackrock, which are the largest institutional investors in the world. These two companies own shares in all major companies globally, forming a pyramid-like structure where the smaller investors are owned by the larger ones.

    This monopoly is expected to grow and collectively manage $20 trillion in investments by 2028, making it likely that Vanguard and Blackrock will own almost everything on Earth. Vanguard is the largest shareholder in Blackrock, and since its structure doesn’t allow to know who its shareholders or clients are, it becomes impossible to know who holds the power in these companies. Reports show that one percent of the world’s population owns more money than the other 99 percent.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that 82% of all the money earned in 2017 went to the top one percent of people, many of whom are also the richest billionaires in the world. The richest families on earth own Vanguard, one of the most powerful investment companies in the world.

    These families are responsible for founding our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. They have always been at the top of the pyramid and have inherited their vast fortunes through monopolies. The private funds and non-profit organizations of these families are the largest shareholders of Vanguard.

    Non-profit organizations, in general, lack transparency, and because they do not have to disclose their donors, they are ideal for financing terrorist groups and laundering money. The three most important non-profit foundations in the world that connect all industries together are: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations of George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video highlights how only two companies have a monopoly on all industries in the world, and a question is raised as to why the media does not cover this topic more widely. It is revealed that approximately 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates, including Viacom CBS, AT&T, NewsCorp, Fox Corporation, Walt Disney Company, and Comcast.

    The video explains how these conglomerates are owned by institutional investors or elite families, and shows that in almost every country on earth, the local media is in the hands of these conglomerates.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video discusses the ownership of major media outlets around the world and how they are interconnected. It begins by highlighting Bertelsmann, which owns a large part of French mainstream media, popular Spanish TV channels, and collaborated with the Nazis in the past.

    The news media outlets do not produce their news themselves, but use information and images from news agencies such as Reuters, the Dutch AP, and the French AFP, all of which are not independent and are owned by powerful families or partially financed by governments.

    The video also sheds light on important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center, which trains journalists, produces study materials, and works closely with giant corporations such as Google and Facebook.

    The article points out that there is a good chance that the text that newscasters read from their teleprompters comes from these organizations, leading to synchronized reporting. Finally, the video discusses a fund set up in September 2020 by Facebook and the European Journalism Center to support selected news organizations during the coronavirus crisis and highlights the organizations at the heart of producing our news, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Facebook and Google.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video discusses the coordination between all industries on earth to work for the interests of the elite, including the media, politics, and the largest companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is identified as one of the most influential organizations in the world, with CEOs of the largest companies, heads of state, and politicians gathering at its annual meeting in Davos.

    However, critics argue that the WEF is a business forum where the wealthiest companies can negotiate deals with politicians for personal gain rather than solving global problems. The founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, has described in detail the plans of his organization in his book “The Great Reset,” with the COVID-19 pandemic seen as an opportunity to “reset” society and build back better.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video explores the idea of a new world order and a global government, which is not a new concept and has been talked about by various presidents, philanthropists, and organizations such as the United Nations. The UN’s Agenda 2030 outlines a plan to eliminate poverty, hunger, and other societal problems by taxing citizens and contracting mega-corporations to rebuild society.

    The UN and the WEF also see the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to push their agenda forward. The video suggests that the elite has the power to manipulate public opinion and make people believe in their plans for a new world.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the event that took place on October 18, 2019, where around 130 important guests, including politicians and medics, gathered at the Pierre Hotel in New York City to simulate a possible scenario in the event of a global pandemic.

    The coincidence is unsettling that the simulation used coronavirus as an example, and the event was organized by the World Economic Forum, Melinda Gates Foundation, and John Hopkins Institute. Similarly, the German Robert Koch Institute conducted a similar simulation in 2012, assuming the spread of the coronavirus from animal to human, and its spread worldwide, destroying economies and even simulating protests.

    The video also includes an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Mark Van Ranst gave on January 22, 2019, at the Chatham House in London, discussing how he fooled the Belgian population during the swine flu crisis with fear-mongering and media manipulation to impose a vaccine for a virus produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the individual in the video explains how the media can be controlled and manipulated to spread a particular narrative. The speaker shares that by controlling early coverage during an issue, news outlets can monopolize the area and become a primary source of information.

    During the epidemic, the speaker shed light on Belgium and the UK and reported on realistic figures regarding H1N1 deaths. While discussing the topic, the speaker also shares that the elite do not have any intention to take care of the people, as they are interested in increasing their power, and global governance is the only way that they can have complete control over the population.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the power and control that the elite, or “deep state,” have over the world. This elite group has conscripted vast human and material resources into building a machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They control America, and nothing is questioned, printed, or revealed.

    The video discusses the fear-mongering tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to keep people sick and dependent on drugs. The group also seeks to control people through blackmail, ensuring that those they control will do their bidding. The world is heading in a direction that closely resembles the dystopian society described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video warns of a potential nightmare situation resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything. The elites plan to achieve this by causing a devastating economic crisis and eliminating cash money, forcing people to depend on government support, which includes giving up private possessions and accepting a vaccination passport.

    Entrepreneurs are the first to fall to this plan, while the middle class is attacked, and banks will fall. However, the video warns that this is not a doomsday scenario created by the author, but an actual plan that has been prepared for generations. The video urges people to create a great awakening and work towards a sustainable and fair world where no one goes hungry, there is no pollution, diseases, or wars, and governments work for the welfare of the people.

    01:00:00

    The conclusion of the “MONOPOLY: Who owns the world” documentary leaves viewers with hope for a future where people can lead dignified lives without excessive work and without manipulation by those in power. While acknowledging challenges ahead, the video encourages recognition of societal issues as a first step towards addressing them. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to work together towards building a more equitable society.

    01:05:00

    This section of the video concludes the documentary by sharing a message of hope for the future. The narrator believes that a future where people no longer have to work excessively to lead dignified lives, and one where those in power cannot manipulate the masses using the media and other means of control, is on the horizon. However, they acknowledge that there will be challenges ahead and that we must recognize the problems in our society to address them. The video ends with a call to action, urging viewers to embark on the journey towards a more equitable society together.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRKGJS26l8