A YouTube creator shares an urgent warning about banks, specifically Santander, questioning and threatening to close accounts of crypto investors.
The speaker, a Santander customer from the UK, received an unexpected phone call from the bank inquiring about the source and destination of funds related to crypto transactions. Although the speaker had answered all questions honestly and provided detailed information about his legal business, the bank continued to press for more details. The speaker emphasizes that this is a risk for anyone investing in cryptocurrencies, especially in the UK.
He urges viewers, regardless of their location, to be aware of this issue and encourages them to watch the video if they’ve encountered similar experiences with their banks. He also underlines that he is an upstanding citizen, having paid all taxes, and operates a legitimate business. Despite this, the bank still expressed concerns about the origins and destinations of his crypto-related transactions
Although they had assumed the call was the end of the matter after answering various queries, they were contacted again and asked to provide detailed paperwork regarding their crypto transactions on Coinbase. The bank identified PayPal transactions as crypto-related and requested access to the transaction history for both platforms. The speaker expressed concerns about privacy and a trust issue, as they felt threatened with the impending closure of their account if they failed to comply.
The bank stated that the cryptocurrency-related purchases affected only their current account and would not impact their mortgage or other accounts. The speaker plans to seek legal advice and request subject access to the case handler’s notes. Ultimately, the bank sought extensive information on the size, composition, and storage of the speaker’s cryptocurrency portfolio.
They fear the potential risks of sharing such information with the bank, as they cannot fully trust who they’re dealing with or the safety of their data. The individual also warns, especially for those heavily invested in cryptocurrencies, that this constitutes a significant risk and may lead to financial instability if they lose access to their banking facilities or have their accounts frozen. The speaker advocates for caution and preparing alternate financial arrangements to protect one’s assets
Shockingly, this incident occurred shortly after he had set up a new account with a different bank. The speaker expresses his anger and disbelief over the situation, calling it “vile” and “disgusting,” and urging his community to be aware and protect themselves. He invites viewers to join his Discord and encourages open discussions about the issue. The speaker intends to bring up this matter in future interviews and plans to share updates as more information becomes available.
In his speech in the British Parliament, Andrew Bridgen MP discussed the rising trend of excess deaths in immediate follow-up of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the United Kingdom, specifically referring to the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities recording of 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above and over 18,000 excess deaths recorded among people aged 15-19 in the 12 months starting in July 2022.
Andrew Bridgen MP also discussed Serious Adverse Events that have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The video explores the experimental COVID-19 vaccines’ possible impact on cardiac emergencies and Australian mortality, as well as the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, the lack of data on Spike protein production, and the contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccines. Andrew Bridgen MP advocated for evidence-based medicine and a return to basic science and ethics.
The Speech
At the beginning of his speech, Andrew Bridgen MP points out that excess deaths have been on the rise, affecting a significant number of people, generally those in their prime. The deaths have not been proportionate to the elderly population. The speaker also comments on history’s potential judgment of the house’s handling of the issue.
The Office of Health Improvement and Disparities has recorded 8,000 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above in the 12 months starting in July 2020, which includes the Autumn 2020 wave of COVID-19 and a portion of the first COVID-19 winter.
However, over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group have been recorded in the 12 months starting in July 2022, which is 9% above expected levels, more than twice as many as in the previous year. There was a clear stepwise increase in mortality after the vaccine rollout, which has continued steadily ever since, despite data suggesting that fewer hospitalizations and deaths were associated with the vaccine than previous COVID-19 illnesses. Officials seem unwilling to acknowledge this disturbing data and have chosen to turn a blind eye to it.
Andrew Bridgen MP then discusses the issue of harm caused by the COVID-19 vaccines to vaccinated individuals, specifically the Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), which have been shown to be twice as high as a chance of preventing a COVID-19 hospitalization. The vaccines, Andrew Bridgen MP claims, have caused harm to 1 in 800 people to supposedly save one in 20,000, which is, according to him, “madness“.
Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the flawed assumptions and biases that have been used to arrive at these conclusions, and the importance of considering socioeconomic and ethnic differences in the vaccination process. He also explores the phenomenon of the excess mortality seen in more heavily vaccinated regions, and the correlation between vaccination and several health issues such as cardiac arrest and cardiovascular disease. After saying this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for transparency and accountability in the vaccination process and the need for further research to identify the causal link between vaccination and harm.
The impact of vaccination on cardiac emergencies in South Australia for 15-44 year olds is then brought up. After the vaccine rollout in this age group, there was a 67% increase in cardiac emergencies compared to usual, with 2,172 cases in November 2021, up from 1,300 emergency cardiac presentations a month before.
Andrew Bridgen MP also discusses the increase in Australian mortality overall, which is due to cardiac deaths, and how these excess deaths cannot be explained by an aging population, disease of old age, low Statin prescriptions, or undertreated hypertension. He suggests that the experimental COVID-19 vaccines may be the cause of these excess deaths and raises concerns about the data presentation by the ON. He also discusses the lack of transparency from the UK Health Security Agency regarding anonymized data and how this data could potentially reveal damaging information about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines.
When discussing the problems with the safety testing and recording of deaths due to vaccination, Andrew Bridgen MP highlights the lack of data on the amount of Spike protein produced on vaccination and the broken system for properly recording deaths.
Andrew Bridgen MP also mentions the issue of doctors waiting for permission from the regulator before certifying deaths and the circularity of the situation. He discusses the problem of contamination of DNA from bacteria in the manufacturing process of the vaccine and the potential harm caused by this. With this, Andrew Bridgen MP calls for a review of the excess deaths and argues that the experimental vaccines are not safe and not effective.
In response to his speech, a female attendee attempts to counter his arguments regarding the increase in excess deaths as being due to a combination of factors, including the ongoing challenges of COVID-19 and the high flu prevalence of the previous year. The leading causes of excess deaths in England were respiratory illnesses, dementia, and heart disease, according to her. Vaccination was mentioned as an important aspect, but conflicting data was presented on its causality. She encouraged the use of the yellow card system for patients who experienced side effects from vaccines. The factor of vaccine safety was also discussed, including the MH’s action in response to rare cases of concurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia following vaccinations, leading to the vaccine not being offered to certain age groups and the commission on human medicines conducting an independent review to address concerns.
The Online Safety Bill is a new law in the UK that holds social media companies responsible for harmful content on their platforms. While some believe it will create a safer online environment, critics fear it gives too much power to regulators and tech companies to control online speech.
The bill includes measures to protect children from accessing pornography and requires prompt removal of illegal content. However, the presenter – Count Dankula 2 : Electric Boogaloo – believes the true intention behind the bill is to manipulate public opinion rather than genuinely protect users or children. He expresses concerns about restrictions on internet freedom and the flow of information, as well as the lack of public input in the legislative process. The speaker also criticizes the potential threat to freedom of expression posed by tech companies deciding what content is legal.
The Online Safety Bill
While some argue that The Online Safety Bill will create a safer online environment, critics worry that it gives too much power to regulators and tech companies to control what can be said online. The bill also includes measures to prevent children from accessing pornography and requires platforms to remove illegal content promptly. However, the presenter believes that the true intention behind the bill is to control the flow of information and manipulate public opinion, rather than genuinely protect users or children.
Count Dankula expresses concerns about the law being used to target political dissidents and the inclusion of new offenses such as cyber flashing and the sharing of deep fake pornography. However, he supports measures that make it easier for bereaved parents to obtain information about their children from tech companies. The government claims that tech firms have already started changing their behavior in anticipation of the law, but Count Dankula suggests that this is mainly due to the threat of losing their license to operate in the UK. The bill’s journey to becoming law has been contentious, and there are concerns about big tech companies challenging certain parts of it. Count Dankula also questions the responsibility of parents in monitoring their children’s internet usage and emphasizes their own strict restrictions for their children.
Count Dankula argues that the government’s intention behind controlling information is to influence how people vote and support their own interests. The speaker also criticizes the lack of public input in the legislative process and highlights the threat to freedom of expression posed by tech companies determining what content is legal. He further discusses how encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Signal may resist complying with the bill’s powers to examine messages for child abuse material, as it could undermine private communications. Overall, the speaker views the legislation as deeply flawed and suggests that the government deliberately designed it to exert more control over citizens’ speech and activities.
Later in the video, Count Dankula discusses the role of the communications regulator, Ofcom, in enforcing the new rules. The bill aims to tackle illegal online harms, such as child exploitation, fraud, and terrorism. Failure to comply with the new regulations can result in hefty fines or even imprisonment for executives. The success of the bill is crucial not only for the safety of children and adults online but also for the UK’s reputation as a tech hub.
However, Count Dankula expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of the legislation, noting that encryption and VPNs can easily bypass the restrictions. The speaker suggests that the real motive behind the law is to control the flow of information online for political reasons, which he views as a form of dishonesty.
In a video titled “Covid vaccine MHRA report: Yet again us conspiracy factualists are proved right“, Laurence Fox discusses a report published by Perseus, which was compiled by a multi-disciplinary team of experts and cites the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the UK).
The report, titled “Safe and effective?“, concludes that the MHRA failed in its duty to protect the public from harm and did not require long-term safety demonstrations from the mRNA vaccine manufacturers nor did they act promptly on reports of adverse reactions. MHRA also failed to address manufacturing quality and control problems leading to batch quality issues.
The report calls for an immediate cessation of the vaccines until a thorough, independent investigation takes place.
Laurence Fox argues that the same rushed solutions and fear-mongering tactics used during COVID-19 are being used now to push the “climate emergency” and emphasizes the need to learn from the disastrous times and swear to never let them happen again.
