Miscopy

Tag: USA

  • Michael Shellenberger Discusses the Dangers of Censorship and the Rewriting of History

    Michael Shellenberger Discusses the Dangers of Censorship and the Rewriting of History

    In this video, Michael Shellenberger discusses the dangers of censorship and the rewriting of history, highlighting his own experiences as a journalist and author. He addresses topics such as police killings, disinformation campaigns, and censorship during the pandemic. He also delves into the concept of the “woke matrix,” propaganda, and the rise of cancel culture.

    The speaker explores the implications of denying the existence of God and the moral hierarchy based on race. He raises questions about mask-wearing and the behavior of individuals in positions of power. The importance of free speech, equal justice, and meritocracy is emphasized, along with the need to address psychopathic and narcissistic tendencies in leaders.

    The speaker encourages critical analysis of information and the pursuit of truth, while advocating for access to clean energy and debunking misinformation on climate change. They stress the importance of patriotism, love for humanity, and positive change through journalism and new institutions. The talk concludes with a discussion on environmental stewardship and the role of climate change narratives in censorship and control.

    Escape the Woke Matrix

    In the beginning of the video Michael Shellenberger discusses the importance of understanding history and the dangers of censorship. He highlights how censorship rewrites history to benefit the powerful and harm the people. He also talks about his own work as a journalist and author, including uncovering the FBI and intelligence community’s efforts to discredit factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings. Shellenberger addresses the issue of domestic censorship and disinformation campaigns supported by the U.S. government. He then introduces his lecture titled “Escape the Woke Matrix” and questions the prevailing narratives surrounding climate change and social issues.

    Michael Shellenberger then discusses the decline in police killings of African-Americans over the years, citing data from Roland Friar at Harvard University. He explains that police killings of African-Americans decreased from 217 per year in the 1970s to 157 per year in the 2010s. Furthermore, he highlights that police killings of all races have dramatically declined, from 59 per year between 1970-1975 to 12 per year. Shellenberger also mentions that researchers do not have enough data to determine if trans people are being killed disproportionately or if trans homicides are rising. He criticizes news outlets for irresponsibly suggesting otherwise. Shellenberger then goes on to discuss various instances of disinformation campaigns, such as the FBI investigation based on a made-up memo about Trump and the lab leak theory of COVID-19. He emphasizes the need for accurate information and highlights the role of senior government officials in perpetuating disinformation campaigns.

    When discussing various examples of censorship and suppression of information related to the pandemic, v mentions how the Washington Post and Fauci were involved in spreading disinformation, and how a fake science article was published to support conspiracy theories. Shellenberger also talks about the Great Barrington declaration, which proposed a focused protection approach to the pandemic, and how it was met with criticism and attempts to discredit it. He criticizes individuals like Renee DiResta, who ran a censorship operation using taxpayer dollars, and mentions social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook censoring posts related to election questioning and vaccine side effects. Shellenberger highlights the government’s involvement in demanding censorship, and expresses concern over the violation of the First Amendment.

    The speaker also discusses how accurate information was being censored by platforms like Twitter and Facebook because they were concerned that people might make the wrong decisions based on that information. The FBI had reportedly approached these platforms, prompting them to be prepared to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story before it had even been published. The speaker argues that this censorship goes against the principles of journalism and the First Amendment, which protect the public interest and whistleblowers. The speaker also highlights the efforts by the Aspen Institute, funded by the US federal government, to discourage journalists from covering certain stories and focusing instead on the individuals who leaked the information. The speaker contends that these tactics are being used to suppress information and protect “fragile” individuals, under the guise of protecting them from harm.

    The speaker further discusses various aspects of the “woke matrix,” including attempts to read encrypted text messages, the creation of tip lines for reporting “wrong think,” and the involvement of figures like Jacinda Ardern in global censorship initiatives. They also explore the censorship industrial complex, which involves organized pressure campaigns and cancellation efforts in various domains. The speaker argues that propaganda plays a role in controlling the information environment and influencing public perception, citing the example of the Hunter Biden laptop story. They suggest that the rise of cancel culture and wokism as predicates for censorship, stems from a lack of traditional moral structures and the need for individuals to find meaning and significance in their lives.

    The speaker then discusses the dangers of denying the existence of God, arguing that when people stop believing in God, they end up believing in anything, including things like climate change as a new external authority. He describes how guilt has shifted from religious sins to guilt about using fossil fuels and modern technology. The speaker also addresses the rise of a new moral order based on race, where people are ranked on a moral hierarchy. He criticizes the idea that laws should be enforced differently based on victimhood and argues that it is leading to a new set of witches. The speaker further discusses the influence of social media and the rise of cluster B personality disorders, with individuals adopting victimhood as an identity. He warns about the dangers of entitlement, aggression, and impaired empathy that can arise from perpetuating victimhood as an identity. The speaker concludes by mentioning the infiltration of narcissists and psychopaths in victimhood movements.

    The speaker raises questions about the reasoning behind the demand for mask-wearing, particularly in schools, questioning why well-intentioned people would support this. They also touch on the idea that individuals in positions of political power who exhibit psychopathic behavior can create an epidemic of psychopathology, and that people who are not inherently psychopathic can, under certain circumstances, behave like psychopaths. The speaker warns against creating a culture of cluster B personality disorders and highlights the potential for aggression and violence within grievance-based movements. They emphasize the importance of free speech but also acknowledge the need for equal justice under the law, meritocracy, affordable energy, and freedom of speech as essential components of a liberal democracy. Lastly, they discuss the need to address and remove individuals with psychopathic and narcissistic tendencies from positions of power and authority.

    The speaker emphasizes the importance of not becoming like the monsters we confront and the challenge of loving our enemies. He also discusses the need to debunk false narratives and misinformation, particularly when it comes to the perception of increasing hatred. By examining the data, he suggests that there is actually less hatred among racial, religious, and sexual minorities today compared to any other time in recorded history. He encourages individuals to critically analyze information, debunk false claims, and seek truth in order to maintain a sense of bravery and overcome victimization. The speaker also criticizes the New York Times and Financial Times for their biased reporting and emphasizes the importance of seeking status and recognition for the right reasons, such as courage, acuity, and compassion.

    Michael Shellenberger then discusses the misrepresentation of data on hurricanes and the importance of providing access to clean energy for people in the third world. He points out that satellite technology has greatly improved hurricane detection and refutes the claim that there has been an increase in hurricanes over the last century. He argues that denying access to natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas for sub-Saharan Africans and South Asians is morally wrong, as it prevents them from escaping poverty and significantly impacts their quality of life. Shellenberger emphasizes that cheap energy is crucial for women’s liberation and highlights the potential for global poverty eradication and wildlife conservation. He concludes by urging everyone to fight for this future and expresses his gratitude to the audience.

    When discussing the importance of patriotism and love for humanity, Michael Shellenberger acknowledges that there are negative aspects of the country but emphasizes the uniqueness and tolerance of America. Shellenberger believes that building a positive future involves addressing issues such as climate change and solving environmental problems, advocating for the use of gas and nuclear energy to lift people out of poverty. He criticizes censorship, fake hate crises, and the need to be policed by authorities. When asked about the connection between the decline of Christianity and the rise of wokism, Shellenberger agrees that people may turn to new ideologies to find meaning in their lives. He highlights the need for consistent reinvention and the potential for journalism, public intellectual life, and new institutions like the University of Austin to bring about positive change. Shellenberger encourages people to confront darkness, let go of unhealthy relationships and toxic institutions, and find freedom in expressing their beliefs.

    Michael Shellenberger then highlights two important ways to be better environmental stewards. Firstly, he emphasizes the importance of not throwing plastic waste into the recycling bin, as plastic recycling is largely ineffective and often ends up polluting rivers and oceans. Secondly, he advocates for nuclear power as a solution to climate change, debunking common misconceptions and emphasizing the need for a change in attitudes towards nuclear energy. Shellenberger also discusses how certain personality types, such as narcissists and psychopaths, have taken over institutions and organizations, using their charisma and spellbinding tactics. He argues that the decline of patriotism has led to the rise of a new, base morality enforced through bullying. Lastly, he mentions that red flags arise when news promoting increasing hatred contradicts the overall trend of declining violence and societal hatred.

    Michael Shellenberger also discusses how the narrative of climate change is often used as a tool for censorship and control. He highlights the consequences of climate action, such as depriving developing regions like sub-Saharan Africa of the natural gas they produce, which is vital for fertilizer and food production. Shellenberger suggests that the motivations behind these actions may be driven by a desire for power and control rather than genuine concern for the environment. He also mentions the importance of debunking false narratives and engaging in discussions with woke individuals, emphasizing the need to understand various factors like psychopathy and narcissism on a spectrum rather than being dismissive. Additionally, he shares his satisfaction in debunking the notion of an increase in hate and racism through evidence-based arguments, stating that it has had a positive impact in challenging these claims. Finally, he briefly acknowledges the issue of corporate power and money but does not elaborate further on it in his talk.

    In the end, Michael Shellenberger discusses the connection between the news media, corporations, and financial institutions in the context of the attention economy. He explains that the news media’s main interest is to capture your attention so they can sell it to advertisers. While moving towards subscriber-based media may be a partial remedy, it is important to be aware that the business model may not change anytime soon. Shellenberger also points out that there is a demand for debunking, as people find it exciting to see conventional wisdom challenged. He believes that the attention economy doesn’t have to be a bad thing, just like capitalism doesn’t necessarily have negative implications. However, he does acknowledge the issue of pathogenicism and the takeover of institutions by individuals with extreme ideas. Overall, Shellenberger emphasizes the complexity of these interconnected systems and the need for a balanced approach that includes the positive role of government.

    Odysee Video

    YouTube Video

  • Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    In this YouTube video Christopher Bollyn discusses the deception behind the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent war on terror. He argues that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror, resulting in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of dollars. Bollyn emphasizes the need to expose this dual deception and put an end to the war. He also discusses the connection between the war on terror and Zionist interests, highlighting the role of Israel in fragmenting Arab states in the Middle East. Bollyn presents evidence of Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the war in Syria. He concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu and other Jewish neocons in the construction of the 9/11 attacks, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discuss the role of influential figures like Rupert Murdoch in controlling the media narrative. Additionally, the speaker highlights the involvement of Mossad and Israeli companies in airport security, as well as the inconsistencies and anomalies surrounding the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests and calls for people to seek genuine peace and resist the fraudulent war.

    Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn begins by discussing the artificiality of American politics and the control of the media by a small number of corporations. He highlights the lack of reporting on important issues such as the war in Syria and the excessive spending on the war on terror. Bollyn argues that the United States is in a predicament and that there is a need for people to understand that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror. He emphasizes the importance of exposing this dual deception and bringing an end to the war.

    He argues that 9/11 was carried out to initiate the war on terror, which has resulted in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of borrowed dollars. The speaker emphasizes the importance of resisting this criminal war agenda, as failure to do so would be a betrayal to the nation. They also highlight that the government and media continue to lie about the events of 9/11, suggesting that they are controlled by the same people responsible for the attack.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the link between the 9/11 attacks, the war on terror, and the Zionist agenda. He argues that 9/11 was a false flag event designed to push forward the Zionist war agenda and establish Jewish supremacy. Bollyn presents evidence of the connections between individuals involved in the attacks and Israeli intelligence, highlighting the role of Richard Gutjahr and his high-level Israeli intelligence officer wife. He also mentions the meeting of Israeli Chief of Staff, Uhaul Eisen Mofaz, with prominent neoconservatives in the Pentagon. Bollyn further discusses the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, which he claims were part of the bigger plan to destabilize and control the Middle East. Citing General Wesley Clark’s statements, Bollyn suggests that the ultimate goal was to target seven countries, with five of them already being accomplished. Overall, Bollyn argues that the war on terror was a means to fulfill an unknown plan driven by Zionism and Israeli interests.

    Christopher Bollyn goes on to discuss the Israeli plan to fragment Arab states in the Middle East, which was articulated in a paper published in 1982. This plan involves breaking up the states along ethnic and confessional lines, similar to what happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Bollyn explains that Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Sudan have already been fragmented, and the ultimate goal is to establish Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East. He highlights the complicity of the American government in this plan, citing a 1948 document written by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that acknowledged Zionist objectives. Bollyn also mentions an email written by Hillary Clinton in 2012, where she states that using American force in Syria would help Israel. This, along with statements made by current Secretary of State John Kerry, suggests that the United States is actively involved in fragmenting and destroying countries like Syria for the benefit of Israel, and not out of any American interest.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the involvement of the US government in funding terrorist militias in Syria, which has fueled the ongoing war. He highlights the fact that many members of these militias wear ski masks to hide their faces, as they are paid mercenaries who have a future career to protect. Bollyn also points out a concerning incident involving Senator John McCain, who illegally entered Syria and met with leaders of a militia that the US was funding. He identifies one of the men McCain met with as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who later became the head of ISIS. Bollyn questions why McCain’s office provided an inadequate response when asked about the identity of the man in the black shirt seen in the photograph. Bollyn also sheds light on the questionable nature of the US war on terror, noting that terrorism has actually increased since 9/11 and is ten times greater in the countries where the US is fighting. He suggests that either the war on terror is counterproductive or there is another hidden agenda at play. Bollyn concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister of Israel, in the design and construction of the 9/11 attacks, along with other Jewish neocons in the Bush Administration, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the connection between Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, and how Barak made a public statement on the BBC World before the Twin Towers fell, blaming Osama bin Laden for the attack and calling for a war on terror. Bollyn points out that Barak was Netanyahu’s commander in an Israeli covert Commando force. He also highlights the false narrative presented by the New York Times after the attack, stating that hijacked jets destroyed the Twin Towers and hit the Pentagon, when in fact, there is evidence to suggest that drones were used and no large Boeing jet hit the Pentagon. Bollyn also mentions the ruthless actions of the Israeli state in the past, such as the attack on a US intelligence ship in 1967. He concludes by comparing the cover-up of 9/11 to the conspiracy surrounding the assassination of JFK and the immense cost of the fraudulent war on terror.

    Bollyn explains that the War on Terror is essentially an Israeli strategy, promoted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since 1979, to involve the US military and its allies in the Middle East to fight on behalf of Israel. Bollyn points out that Netanyahu wrote books on the topic, claiming that Islamic terrorists were attacking Israel because it was part of the West and therefore the West needed to fight this war. He argues that this is a deceptive way to delegitimize the Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation. Bollyn also highlights Netanyahu’s statement after the 9/11 attacks, where he said that it would generate sympathy and be beneficial for Israel. Additionally, Bollyn discusses the close relationship between Netanyahu and Larry Silverstein, who owned the three buildings that collapsed on 9/11, and how Silverstein acquired the World Trade Center towers through a privatization scheme.

    The speaker also connects the war on terror to the Israeli stratagem and historical figures like Menachem Begin and David Ben-Gurion, who had aspirations for a larger Israel. He emphasizes the extreme nature of the current Israeli government and how acts of terrorism are used to scare people into supporting their aggressive Middle East war policy. The speaker concludes by mentioning the invasion of South Lebanon by Israel and their intention to establish a Christian state there.

    The speaker then discusses the actions of a radical Zionist group known as the Shamir group in the late 1940s, including the assassination of a United Nations mediator in Palestine. The group also played a role in the expulsion of Palestinians during the Israeli takeover after the United Nations partitioned Palestine. The speaker connects this history to the current mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, suggesting he has ties to the “Mohsad” (Mossad) and has been influential in American politics.

    The speaker then shifts to discuss the Israeli aviation of 9/11, highlighting a movie made in 1978 featuring a plane crashing into the Pan Am building and another movie made in 2000 featuring a plane crashing into the World Trade Center. These films, produced by Israeli agent Arnon Milchan, are presented as examples of predictive programming. The speaker also mentions Milchan’s involvement in a secret Israeli organization called Lakam, which was involved in smuggling nuclear components from America to Israel. Additionally, Benjamin Netanyahu’s role in the war on terror and the Netanyahu Institute on International Terrorism are discussed, along with a 1980 prediction made by the head of Mossad about terrorism coming to America, specifically New York City.

    Milchan and another agent, Avraham Shalom Bendor, tried to secure the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, but it was torn up when it was discovered that Bendor was a convicted murderer in Israel. However, they later went to work for Jules Kroll, a business partner of Maurice Greenberg, and their company, Kroll Associates, got the security contract for the World Trade Center after the 1993 bombing. It is also mentioned that the Israelis had prior knowledge of the 1983 bombing of the Beirut barracks but failed to share that information with the Americans. The section ends by discussing how the US, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan cooperated to arm and train the mujahideen in Afghanistan, even supporting anti-western groups, in order to create a future enemy for the War on Terror.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the influence of a man named V Rafia, who used Charlie Wilson’s office as his own and had significant control over lobbying efforts. Bollyn goes on to explain how Arab fighters, known as Afghan Arabs, were trained by Israeli military intelligence, including Osama bin Laden. He mentions a man named Ali Muhammad, who trained bin Laden and set up a terrorist cell in Nairobi. Bollyn then connects the creation of Al-Qaeda and Taliban to the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel in the early 1980s. He also mentions an article from Foreign Affairs magazine in 1998 that discussed the possibility of catastrophic terrorism coming to America. Bollyn points out that the authors of this report, including Philip Zelikow, went on to play prominent roles in the 9/11 Commission. He also highlights the Project for the New American Century, a group that predicted the need for US military engagement prior to 9/11.

    The speaker also discusses how terrorism has been used as a pretext for launching wars and justifying foreign policies. He mentions the 9/11 attacks as the catalyst for implementing long-standing plans and projects. The speaker also highlights the close relationship between Israeli intelligence and ISIS, claiming that the Israeli intelligence outfit, SITE, had access to ISIS beheading videos before they were released. Furthermore, he argues that there is a connection between the Clinton and Bush families through their involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. The speaker suggests that politicians with a secret Vice or criminal history are often willing to do what they’re told to keep their secrets hidden. He concludes by discussing the fraudulent nature of some ISIS videos and how events like the Orlando shooting are used to draw Israel and the West closer together.

    He argues that the American public was duped into supporting the global war on terror through a combination of controlling the investigation, media interpretation, and litigation. The evidence was destroyed, and there was no criminal investigation into the attacks. The speaker also questions the integrity of key figures involved in the 9/11 Commission and their true motivations. He highlights several individuals who played a role in the cover-up, ultimately raising doubts about the official narrative of the events.

    He highlights the influence of figures like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who played a significant role in shaping public opinion through media ownership. The speaker also points out the involvement of powerful figures like Jacob Rothschild and Cheney Woolsey in the control of resources in places like Kurdistan and the Golan Heights. The speaker raises concerns about media consolidation and the lack of transparency surrounding events like the collapse of Building 7. Additionally, the speaker reveals a potential conflict of interest involving Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who oversaw the 9/11 tort litigation, suggesting that the legal proceedings were strategically settled out of court. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests.

    The speaker then discusses the involvement of the Mossad company Envy in airport security in Europe and their connection to the 9/11 attacks. The company ICTS, which was responsible for security at Boston, Newark, and Dulles airports on that day, was a defendant in the 9/11 Court litigation. However, the trial ended abruptly with the judge dismissing them as just the parent company. The speaker also mentions individuals involved in the litigation, such as Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum, both high-level Zionist players. They were responsible for distributing money to the families of 9/11 victims, and those who accepted the money had to sign non-disclosure agreements. The speaker highlights the connection between these individuals and their ties to Israel. The judge overseeing the litigation, Michael McCasey, is also mentioned, as he belonged to the same congregation as John Schallerstein, oversaw the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and facilitated Larry Silverstein’s negotiations with the insurance company. The speaker suggests that the government and media are suppressing evidence that contradicts the official narrative of 9/11 in order to protect the true culprits. The speaker personally realized early on that the government’s story was a lie and began writing about it, eventually relocating to Europe. He shares conversations he had with former German intelligence chiefs who questioned the official narrative and pointed to Mossad as a possible culprit. However, their statements were not published in German magazines due to strict restrictions on discussing such matters in Germany.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the issue of deception and disinformation in the mainstream media. He explains that journalists often do not question the official version of events and those who do are labeled as crazy or fired from their jobs. Bollyn also highlights some anomalies of 9/11, such as the strange behavior of the hijackers and the peculiar characteristics of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. He suggests that there may have been a missile-like object fired before the plane hit the tower, possibly made of depleted uranium. Bollyn provides evidence of a burning object leaving a trail of dark oxides, which he believes could be a result of depleted uranium.

    When discussing the characteristics of the burning World Trade Center towers on 9/11, he suggests that an object, possibly a burning warhead, was used to create a superheated environment inside the towers, causing anything combustible to immediately burst into flames. Bollyn points out that there were peculiar explosions coming out of the entry wounds where the planes entered the buildings, which he believes could be indicative of thermite. He mentions that thermite produces white smoke and incredible heat when it burns. Bollyn also highlights the presence of molten iron and molybdenum in the dust from the World Trade Center, which cannot be explained by burning jet fuel or office fires, but can be attributed to thermite. He concludes that the government reports have ignored this evidence, suggesting a cover-up.

    Christopher Bollyn suggests a controlled demolition was responsible for the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. He mentions the discovery of super thermite material in the dust, which is capable of releasing more energy per gram than any known explosive. The smoke from the burning pile contained nanoparticles that were extremely dangerous when inhaled, causing serious illnesses such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, molten steel was found beneath the rubble, even weeks after the attack. Bollyn also highlights the suspicious destruction of Building 6, where all the evidence for major crimes in the 1990s was stored. The night before the attack, the evidence was stolen from the vault in the basement and then the vault was bombed to cover up the theft. Bollyn raises questions about the Pentagon attack as well, pointing out the lack of visible evidence of a plane crash.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the inconsistencies and cover-ups surrounding the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the Shanksville crash. He questions how a small aluminum body plane could have penetrated the reinforced concrete wall of the Pentagon without damaging the columns in between. Bollyn also highlights the lack of evidence of a plane at the Shanksville site, with the debris field located elsewhere. He emphasizes the need to inform, organize, and take meaningful action to resist the fraudulent War on Terror, urging people to boycott Israeli products and engage in political activism. Bollyn quotes JFK to emphasize the importance of seeking genuine peace and building a better future for all.

    At the Q & A, the speaker is asked a personal question about Noam Chomsky and his stance on 9/11. The speaker believes that Chomsky has been an agent of manipulation and control, as his position on 9/11 contradicts the rest of his work. The speaker also mentions Alex Jones, another alternative voice in the media who avoids discussing Israeli involvement in 9/11. In response to the second question about video footage showing a plane wing entering a building, the speaker acknowledges that the video may be fraudulent, but maintains that planes did indeed strike the World Trade Center based on eyewitness accounts and the sound of the impact.

    Christopher Bollyn also reveals that many powerful figures in America, including the Bush family, have significant investments in war stocks. Companies like Halliburton, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman profited greatly from the war. Bollyn believes that while individuals like George Bush and Dick Cheney should be held accountable for treason and war crimes, it is important to recognize that the issue goes beyond them. He calls for a proper investigation that includes figures like Cheney, Bush, Sheratoff Ashcroft, and Ali Hupa to expose the full extent of their knowledge and involvement. Bollyn also addresses the Saudi connection, stating that while there is evidence of financial support from a Saudi royal family member, there is no proof of their involvement in the actual crime. He suggests that the Saudis have been manipulated to play the role of financiers, with the United States and Israel dictating their actions. Overall, Bollyn argues that the American government has become a “crimeocracy” run by criminals, and simply replacing one person with another will not bring about real change.

    The speaker also discusses the theory that the images and videos from 9/11 were pre-fabricated and that the witnesses were actors, suggesting that no real footage of the event exists. However, the speaker believes that these theories are “red herrings” and that the focus should be on the fact that thousands of people were killed and the world has changed as a result. The speaker argues that the US and Europe are now engaged in an open-ended war in the Middle East, with plans for more wars with Iran and Russia. They believe that this war agenda is orchestrated by Zionists. The solution proposed is to change the banking system and establish national banks that issue credit to the people on behalf of the state, in order to free nations from debt slavery. However, the speaker acknowledges that this would require a large popular movement to overthrow the current banking system.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the systemic corruption in the banking and financial system. He mentions that while there may be some smaller banks that are not in conspiracy with everyone, the overall system is rigged against the people. He also highlights the corruption within the U.S. government, where the president can declare war without Congress and the Federal Reserve controls the printing of money. Bollyn emphasizes the need to reorganize and rectify these situations in order to find solutions. He also touches upon the connection between the Arab Spring and the fraudulent war on terror, stating that the United States manipulated the Arab Spring to serve its own interests, as seen in Egypt and Syria. Bollyn expresses his frustration that these issues are not being discussed enough in America and that the media, controlled by a few corporations, keeps the public ignorant. He concludes by saying that the American people are starting to wake up but that there is still a long way to go.

    At the end, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the current state of the country and the political circus surrounding the Trump-Clinton rivalry. They argue that Americans need to wake up and take responsibility for their own future, instead of relying on one candidate to solve all their problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being informed and spreading awareness, as they believe that a revolution of awareness is necessary for real change. They mention various conspiracy theories, such as chemtrails, Fukushima, and 9/11, stating that these events were hoaxes designed to deceive and control the population. In conclusion, the speaker urges the audience to fight against the deception and lies that have enslaved them.

    YouTube Video

  • Alarming Trends That May Have a Significant Impact on the Future of the USA

    Alarming Trends That May Have a Significant Impact on the Future of the USA

    The video discusses various alarming trends and potential consequences that may have a significant impact on the future of the USA. It touches upon economic warning signs, such as financial struggles and national debt, as well as the shifting priorities and habits of individuals and big businesses’ response to these changes.

    The video also emphasizes the role of natural resources, particularly oil and natural gas, in global conflicts and the potential game-changer of significant resources in Gaza. It further delves into the issues of job cuts, labor strikes, the rise of automation, and the challenges in navigating a changing job market.

    The video raises concerns about diminishing savings, rising cost of living, and the lack of financial safety nets, as well as the potential consequences of labor strikes and the increasing trend towards automation.

    Lastly, it discusses suspicions of internal orchestration behind corporate cyber attacks, questioning corporate ethics and transparency. Overall, the video serves as a warning to be aware of these developments and emphasizes the need for accountability and preparedness.

    Alarming Trends

    The video emphasizes the urgency and importance of a message they have, claiming that it involves the future of the country, our freedoms, and our way of life. They mention having come across information that took them months to understand and verify, which reveals developments unfolding under our noses that will change the nation.

    The speaker urges viewers to be ready to listen with an open mind and prepare to take action. They then discuss economic warning signs, highlighting concerning Google Trends related to financial struggles and national debt. This trend suggests that people are feeling the financial pinch, with wages not keeping up with inflation.

    The speaker questions what will hold up the economy if people can’t spend, emphasizing the need to pay attention to these signs. They also discuss Home Depot, explaining how the company has successfully adapted to consumers’ changing needs during tough economic times by focusing on smaller home projects. This demonstrates Home Depot’s ability to thrive by aligning its business strategy with current trends.

    The narrator then discusses the shifting priorities and habits of individuals, focusing on the practical rather than the luxurious, particularly in the context of Home Depot’s success. The narrator reflects on how big businesses respond to these shifts and what it says about society as a whole. The conversation then shifts to the topic of natural resources and their role in global conflicts, specifically focusing on the Middle East and the significance of oil and natural gas.

    The discovery of significant resources in Gaza is highlighted as a potential game-changer, with implications for global politics, economies, and security. It emphasizes how events halfway across the world can have a direct impact on the US and the stability of entire regions. Finally, the discussion explores the domino effect of job cuts, labor strikes, and the relentless march towards automation, addressing the economic strain from recent global events and the increased investment in robotics and AI.

    The video then discusses two major issues: the diminishing traditional labor and the rising cost of living. Labor strikes are on the rise as workers demand fair wages to keep up with the skyrocketing cost of living. However, as companies face pressure to increase wages, they are more inclined to accelerate automation, leading to potential job losses. Government policies, such as tax incentives for automation, further incentivize companies to invest in technology rather than people. This creates a complex situation where finding a balance between innovation and employment becomes crucial.

    The video also raises concerns about cyber security attacks on major corporations, suggesting that there may be hidden motives behind these attacks that benefit select individuals within the corporations. Additionally, the video highlights the significant increase in the cost of living, such as insurance premiums and grocery prices, which is putting a strain on people’s budgets. Overall, these issues present a challenge in navigating a changing job market and sustaining a comfortable lifestyle.

    The video goes on to discuss the alarming trend of dwindling savings among Americans. Rising inflation and stagnant incomes have led to higher costs of living, forcing people to dip into their savings just to meet everyday expenses. The data shows a consistent monthly drop in savings, raising concerns about the lack of financial safety nets for families. This situation not only affects the ability to save for the future but also creates stress and financial insecurity.

    Additionally, the video highlights the increasing number of labor strikes as a response to these economic pressures. Workers from various sectors are demanding fair wages and better working conditions, as they struggle to keep up with the rising cost of living. The strikes are a fight for dignity and survival, showcasing the disparity between average workers and corporate giants. The video also mentions how a portion of the stimulus money intended to help individuals during the pandemic ended up benefiting corporations and banks, further contributing to inflated costs of living. Overall, both the decline in savings and the rise in labor strikes reflect the challenges Americans are facing in adapting to the new economic reality of increasing costs.

    As companies invest more in robotics and AI, the demand for human labor is expected to decrease, potentially rendering many traditional jobs obsolete. This shift is not just about cutting costs but also a strategic response to the changing economic landscape. The video raises concerns about the displaced workers and questions whether retraining and shifting to new sectors will be enough to cope with the scale of change. The push for a guaranteed income is also discussed, highlighting the potential impact on society and the psychological effects of not having work. It emphasizes the need to consider the long-term implications of the automation revolution and how our roles in the workforce will change.

    The speaker also raises concerns about the possibility of corporate cyber attacks being orchestrated internally as part of a new strategy. They highlight the suspicious timing of CEOs cashing out before an attack, as well as companies with shaky finances suddenly being targeted. The speaker also suggests that these attacks can impact stock prices, potentially allowing insiders to profit from well-timed sales or purchases. The implications of such actions extend beyond cybersecurity, touching on corporate ethics, transparency, and the trust placed in these companies by consumers, investors, and citizens. The speaker emphasizes the need for awareness, tough questions, and accountability in order to address these possibilities and address the deeper issues within the corporate world.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qq9phLCzxc

  • Aleksandr Dugin Discusses Geopolitics, Religion and Conflicts in the Middle East

    Aleksandr Dugin Discusses Geopolitics, Religion and Conflicts in the Middle East

    In this video, Aleksandr Dugin, mentor of Vladimir Putin, discusses the Palestine-Israel conflict within the framework of the shift from a unipolar to a multipolar global order. He argues that Israel serves as a proxy for Western hegemony and that understanding geopolitical power dynamics is crucial for understanding their actions and motivations. Dugin emphasizes the need for unity among Islamic countries to resist Western control and establish their sovereignty. He also criticizes the West’s imposition of its values and rules on other civilizations and highlights the biases and double standards in Western media’s coverage of conflicts.

    Dugin emphasizes the need for a belief system that promotes harmony and respect, criticizing the reputation of Israel and the United States’ support for it. Dugin predicts opposition against the West from the Muslim world and highlights the significance of the conflict surrounding the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem. He also discusses the potential for a nuclear conflict in the Middle East and the need for an ontological explanation to comprehend the ongoing crisis. Dugin concludes by urging for unity against a common enemy and expressing his hope for a free Palestine.

    Detailed Description

    Professor Alexander Dugin begins by discussing the Palestine-Israel conflict within the context of the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world system. He highlights that Israel is a proxy for the hegemonic power of the West, which plays a significant role in the conflict. Dugin suggests that understanding the geopolitical balance of power is essential in comprehending the actions and motives of the Israelis.

    Prof. Dugin then discusses the current global order and the potential shift towards multipolarity. He explains how the hegemonic power is resistant to allowing this new order to emerge, leading to conflicts, wars, and diplomatic confrontations. Dugin argues that understanding Israeli politics requires considering the psychology of the Israeli state, which is based on a radical vision of the chosen race and religion. He suggests that Israel sees itself as the main people on Earth and views any resistance as a radical humiliation. Dugin predicts that Israel’s response to Hamas attacks will be harsh, with the goal of full extermination and ethnic cleansing of Gaza. He emphasizes that Israel is being supported by the global hegemon in this endeavor.

    Mr. Dugin goes on to discuss the situation in Gaza and the lack of a solid and clear Russian stance on it. He argues that while Russia has expressed its support for the Palestinian people and their struggle against Israel, it ultimately sees the issue as primarily a problem between Arabs or Muslims and Israel, with the support of the United States. Dugin suggests that if the Islamic world does not react forcefully against Israel and instead tries to find a solution through diplomatic channels, Russia cannot intervene directly. He also notes that during Russia’s conflict in Ukraine, few Islamic states came to their aid, highlighting the need for Islamic countries to overcome their internal conflicts and consolidate their power as a pole within the global system.

    Aleksandr Dugin argues that the conflict between Hamas and Israel is not just a local problem, but a direct attack on the sovereignty of Islamic civilization. He believes that if Islamic civilization does not react and stand up for itself, it shows that it is not ready to exist as a sovereign and independent power. While Russia is politically on the side of the Palestinian people, Dugin emphasizes that it is not realistic to expect Russia to open a new front and fight for the Palestinians against American power. He questions the absence of support from Islamic states, armies, and people in the face of what he perceives as the extermination of the Palestinian people. Dugin believes that the treatment of the Islamic world by the West, particularly in regards to the Palestinian issue, is a humiliation and existential threat that must be responded to in order to uphold Islamic identity and rights.

    Aleksandr Dugin then discusses the concept of sovereignty and how it can be tested through the response to existential threats. He argues that many countries may claim to be sovereign but are not if they do not respond to geopolitical challenges. Russia, he says, is fighting to restore its sovereignty in the Eurasian context. He also suggests that if the Islamic world accepts and responds to the challenges it faces, it could become a new sovereign pole alongside Russia and China. However, Dugin acknowledges that there are divisions among Arab nations and within Islamic countries themselves, with the elites being influenced by globalist networks while the people have different perspectives. He believes that if Islamic leaders listen to and align with their own people, unity can be achieved.

    Aleksandr Dugin explains that the resistance against Israel by Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian groups is becoming a global Islamic phenomenon that will eventually become an independent geopolitical power. Dugin believes that Muslims are gaining a geopolitical consciousness and understanding the need for unity in order to resist colonization and regain their status as subjects in geopolitics. He mentions the importance of a common platform and denominator for their self-organization and emphasizes that Gaza and Palestine are crucial test lines for their sovereignty.

    When Prof. Dugin touches on the concept of sovereignty and how it has evolved in the post-Cold War era, he explains that in the bipolar system of the Cold War, only the capitalist West and the socialist East were considered sovereign, while the rest of the world had to choose a side or submit to the rule of one of these powers. However, after the fall of the Soviet Union, there was only one pole of sovereignty, the liberal West, and all other states were expected to abandon their claims to sovereignty. Dugin argues that with the growing independence of Russia and the rise of China, there are now other contenders for sovereign power, but neither country alone can compete with the West. Therefore, he suggests a redistribution of sovereignty on a multipolar basis, where Russia and China can combine their capacities to challenge the dominance of the collective West.

    Speaking to the issue of sovereignty in the Islamic world, Aleksandr Dugin states that it is crucial for Islamic countries to unite and establish their sovereignty in order to resist Western control. He emphasizes that countries like Israel are not truly sovereign as they rely heavily on the West for support, while countries like Russia and China strive to affirm their sovereignty. Dugin argues that the world can either be unipolar or multipolar, and it is important to choose the latter, which is based on the collaboration and commonalities of different civilizations. He believes that a multipolar world order can only be established through the unity and cooperation of civilizations like Russia, China, the Islamic world, India, Africa, Latin America, and others.

    When discussing the concept of universal values and how the West has failed to uphold them, Aleksandr Dugin argues that the West, with its emphasis on individualism, liberal democracy, and market economy, has imposed its principles on the rest of humanity. However, new civilizations are emerging based on different principles. For example, in Russia, traditional values, family, patriotism, and empire form the basis of their civilization. Dugin explains that in Russian society, being human is not about individualism but about being part of the whole, with ties to religion, ethnicity, and tradition. Similar principles form the basis of civilizations like China and Islamic tradition. Dugin asserts that without a belief in God, there are no rules, and this nationalistic attitude common in the West is rejected by other civilizations.

    Aleksandr Dugin mentions that while India relies on the West to solve its regional problems, it maintains good relations with Russia. Dugin criticizes the West’s attitude towards the “other,” stating that they either view them as the same or as a dangerous threat. He argues that this racist mindset is ingrained in the West’s ideology and geopolitics. Dugin points out that resistance against global liberal values and unipolarity is growing not only in other countries but also within the West itself, with many people protesting against the treatment of others, such as the Palestinian genocide. He concludes that modern-day racism is still prevalent, despite the abandonment of the term, and cites Israel and the West as examples of this.

    Aleksandr Dugin criticizes the Israeli government for targeting Palestinian civilians and ignoring their sovereignty, despite international decisions and the obsolete structure of the United Nations. Dugin argues that international law is not real and is simply a tool of Western hegemony. He mentions the double standards in indictments, pointing out that while Vladimir Putin has faced allegations of war crimes in Ukraine without evidence, Benjamin Netanyahu has not faced any consequences for his actions. Dugin highlights the hypocrisy and indifference of the West towards civilian casualties in Palestine, as compared to the attention given to the conflict in Ukraine.

    Aleksandr Dugin argues that those who deeply believe in the Western system and its values tend to accept everything the media says, even if it includes lies. Conversely, societies that reject the Western agenda are more inclined to believe alternative narratives that expose the hypocrisy of Western media. Dugin suggests that we are in the midst of a deep psychological, cultural, and mental war, where the transmission of facts is heavily censored and controlled. He also highlights the disproportionate coverage of civilian casualties in conflicts like Ukraine and Gaza, implying that the globalist agenda is indifferent to the suffering and continues to perpetuate genocide.

    Aleksandr Dugin further discusses the need for a deeper belief system that promotes harmony, respect, and love for tradition and diversity of cultures. He argues that those who perpetrate crimes and fuel conflicts will eventually be defeated. Dugin also suggests that the reputation of Israel is irreparable, and the United States’ support for Israel creates problems with the Arab and Islamic world, damaging their relations. He believes that the US’s current actions lack real geopolitical reasons and are a hegemonic gesture. Dugin predicts that the West will be opposed by the Muslim world, and the US will lose without any balance or positive relations.

    Aleksandr Dugin believes that while the West will continue to supply Ukraine with weapons, the situation is worse for the global West overall. Dugin emphasizes that multipolarity does not promote anti-Semitism or racism, but rather accepts and celebrates differences. He also suggests that the current events in the Middle East, particularly with the conflict between Arabs and Jews, is causing deep trauma for the Islamic soul and will lead to a long-lasting and significant impact. Dugin speculates that Germany may be a victim of its own strategy, as the situation has undermined their position and created new security threats for the entire West. He also brings up the religious dimension of the conflict, highlighting the eschatological elements and the significance of defending Temple Mountain as potential triggers for a large-scale Palestinian revolt in the West Bank and Eastern Jerusalem.

    Prof. Dugin explains the significance of the conflict surrounding the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem, emphasizing that it is not solely an economic or political matter. He discusses how different religious groups, including Jews, Christians, and Muslims, hold religious beliefs regarding this temple and its connection to the end times. Dugin argues that these eschatological beliefs can intensify the conflict and make it more radical. He also dismisses the notion that the situation is about gas discovery in Gaza, stating that the economy is a flexible element that can adapt to various circumstances. Instead, he asserts that geopolitics and ideological factors play a much more crucial role. Lastly, Dugin briefly touches on the risk of nuclear weapons and suggests that a potential World War III has already begun in some form between the unipolar camp and its opponents.

    When discussing the potential for a nuclear conflict in the Middle East, Aleksandr Dugin mentions that Israel, Iran, and Pakistan are known or suspected to possess nuclear weapons. Dugin suggests that if the conflict escalates further, there is a possibility that tactical nuclear weapons could be used, potentially leading to a nuclear exchange between these countries. He also highlights the involvement of the United States and Russia in potentially supporting their respective allies. Dugin emphasizes the devastating consequences of using strategic nuclear weapons, which would result in the end of humanity, but states that the use of tactical nuclear weapons could still allow for the continuation of humanity, albeit with significant destruction and loss of life.

    Aleksandr Dugin then discusses the significance of the Middle East in relation to the concept of Armageddon. He believes that the current conflict in Gaza holds religious importance, as it aligns with the prophecies of monotheistic religions. Dugin argues that geopolitics is an important tool to understand these events, but it should be complemented with a religious analysis. He suggests that there may have been a crucial error in human history that has led to the current situation, which goes beyond ideology or religious differences. Dugin emphasizes the need for an ontological explanation to comprehend the ongoing crisis, as it ultimately impacts the destiny of humanity. In closing, he warns against being influenced by leaders who do not represent the will, thoughts, and values of the people, as this can lead to real authoritarianism and totalitarianism.

    Ultimately, Aleksandr Dugin emphasizes the importance of standing together against a common enemy, as they do in Russia. He urges Islamic brothers to understand the struggle and fight for their own values, as they are in a similar position as Russia was in the Ukrainian conflict. Dugin believes that only by being united can they preserve their dignity and achieve victory. He also expresses his hope for a free Palestine.

    YouTube Video

  • Larken Rose on How Reality Has a Built-in Reward and Deterrent System

    Larken Rose on How Reality Has a Built-in Reward and Deterrent System

    In the video titled “Your Own Damn Fault“, Larken Rose argues that reality has a built-in reward and deterrent system that is effective if the consequences are immediate and obvious. However, many people are not aware of this because the consequences of their actions are not immediate enough for them to recognize that it is their own fault.

    He uses examples such as how Trump supporters cannot deny that Biden’s inflation was caused by Trump’s socialist policies, and how the high crime rates in disarmed areas are due to the victims’ lack of weapons. Rose concludes that people’s political and personal choices can have long-term consequences that they will have to face, and it is their own fault for reaching those consequences.

    Larken Rose then addresses the ongoing murder of civilians in other countries committed by the US military. He argues that these actions have led to a boiling point where some people feel justified in responding violently, even if it means harming innocents. He also criticizes the idea of supporting the troops and the military, arguing that their actions ultimately harm civilians and serve corporate interests.

    Larken Rose further touches upon the issue of police brutality in the US, arguing that the police are not always protecting innocent people, but rather are involved in road piracy and are more interested in justifying their actions than in stopping true criminals. He ultimately questions the idea of supporting the sheriffs and the police, arguing that their actions often harm innocent people and do not truly protect the innocent.

    According to Larken Rose, law enforcement is not synonymous with freedom or justice, but rather is used to control the population through violence and intimidation. He argues that drugs and other “vice” laws have only made society more dangerous and violent, as they create a black market where organized crime can thrive.

    He uses the example of alcohol prohibition to illustrate this point, noting that the Mafia took control of the alcohol trade and created widespread corruption and violence. Larken Rose suggests that ending the War on Drugs and legalizing drugs like marijuana would help to reduce violence and abolish organized crime.

    Larken Rose goes on to argue that government intrusion into various aspects of people’s lives, including poverty levels, homelessness, food waste, and housing regulations, are ultimately the result of the problem being created by the left. He suggests that the left relies on keeping people dependent on the government and believes that government hostility is necessary for the common good.

    He draws on personal anecdotes to illustrate how such policies have caused hardships for people, including homelessness and job losses. He believes that government violence is a major contributing factor to society’s problems, and that it is essential to recognize one’s limitations and avoid imposing them on others.

    Larken Rose then challenges the validity of conservative claims to a right to freedom. He further suggests that the remoteness of the consequence from the cause often leads to cheering for a solution without understanding its true nature and its impact on society.

    Larken Rose is critical of not just conservatives but also the political left, arguing that many of their economic regulations and support for government welfare harm people. He concludes that people need to understand the causes and effects of their actions, recognize the failings of their political beliefs, and take responsibility for their mistakes if they truly care about justice and society’s welfare. He challenges people to check whether their advocacy is causing more problems than solutions and to dare to take responsibility for their actions.

    At the end of his speech, Larken Rose emphasizes that individuals need to take responsibility for their own problems and stop blaming society or external factors for their issues. Whether someone is a conservative, liberal, or voter, they are personally responsible for their actions. The speaker raises the question of asking if individuals dare to take a step back and self-reflect, acknowledging their role in the problem and taking action to resolve it, or do they cling to their comfort zones and ignore the suffering of others. He uses examples of child hunger and homelessness as examples of human suffering that can be a result of inaction, emphasizing the urgency of addressing these issues.

  • Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    The YouTube video “How Jeffrey Epstein Got Away With It” explores the story behind Jeffrey Epstein’s examination, trial, and conviction for federal sex trafficking involving minors. The video highlights the questionable plea deal struck with Epstein by Alex Acosta, the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida, and the implications it had on the justice system. The documentary also examines the case from the perspective of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, and their alleged involvement in it. The video raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 and suggests alternative explanations for it.

    Acosta was the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida from 2005 to 2009, and his job was to ensure that criminals went to jail. He was portrayed as a person of integrity and an honorable guy, who caught the attention of former president Donald Trump. However, he refused to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Labor position, and the Senate was concerned about a particular case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

    Jeffrey Epstein was a friend of presidents and high-profile lawyers who was arrested on new sex trafficking charges and waiting trial for federal sex trafficking involving minors. Acosta gave Epstein the plea deal of the century, which excused underage sex trafficking, and allowed Epstein to walk free.

    When Acosta was being interviewed for the job of Trump’s labor secretary, he was asked about the questionable plea deal, and he said that he was ordered to stand down immediately because Epstein belonged to intelligence. The current US Attorney General cannot order a US Attorney to stand down unless he is elected by someone who is not part of the judiciary.

    According to Nick Bryan, an expert reporter on the Epstein case, only the president or the Attorney General has the power to order a US attorney to stand down. There have been four presidential administrations that have covered up the Jeffrey Epstein case, and now, the Biden Administration is covering it up. The American government is aiding the embedding of child trafficking by not investigating Jeffrey Epstein.

    The evidence potentially connects Jeffrey Epstein to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. The film highlights how it was possible for one man to be protected and supported by the entire US government and how Epstein’s lawyers at Morgan and Morgan fight to give victims the best shot at compensation.

    The film also discusses how lawsuits can be expensive but that victims of abuse can receive compensation with the help of law firms. The film explains how Epstein’s case was yanked away from the Palm Beach Police Department and given to a grand jury, where a special prosecutor was responsible for showing the grand jurors the evidence necessary. However, the film argues that the grand jury was corrupt and that the special prosecutor, Barry Cromwell, called only one victim and skewed her credibility.

    The speaker then discusses the background of Jeffrey Epstein and how his victims were repeatedly molested and became addicted to drugs. The system in place allowed the perps to go unpunished once they became “unmarketable” and their damaged credibility would compromise them.

    When the grand jury didn’t indict Epstein on a single count of child abuse, the Palm Beach Police Department and its chief Michael Ryder went to the feds and claimed it was a cover-up. They didn’t prosecute him, despite having a list of 32 victims, due to pressures from high up, possibly the President or the Attorney General. The outrage over Epstein’s lenient plea deal and lack of punishment raises questions about the justice system’s dealings with high-powered individuals, prompting some to question the existence of a “VIP justice system” in the United States.

    The speaker claims that Epstein was a professional con man with access to people, money, and young girls, and that the government targeted him due to his exploitative and blackmailing behavior. The speaker also suggests that Epstein was meeting with Joe Biden’s CIA director and that he was recruited for his intelligence work due to his predilection for underage girls and his charm, deceitfulness, and sociopathic tendencies.

    The speaker further claims that Epstein’s case makes more sense when viewed from the perspective of an intelligence operation, and that the sweetheart deal he received in 2006, the prison cell cover-up, and the disappearance of his tapes are all explained by his status as an asset. Finally, the speaker points to the recent raid on Epstein’s Caribbean island and the discovery of tapes there as evidence of his intelligence work. The speaker is Stuart Kaplan, a retired FBI special agent.

    Jeffrey Epstein was later convicted as a registered offender, but despite this, he was able to maintain relationships with politicians, CEOs, and public figures, who should have had no interest in him. The speaker suggests that these actions may be due to threats or blackmail from intelligence agencies, as Robert Maxwell, Epstein’s closest confidant, was believed to have been working for Israel’s version of the CIA, Massad. The speaker also mentions the possibility that Epstein was able to blackmail powerful figures due to the intelligence apparatus behind him, making it clear that his actions were not possible without this support.

    The documentary makes claims that Robert Maxwell, an Israeli-born British media tycoon, had spilled confidential nuclear information about Israel, which led to his kidnapping and imprisonment for 18 years. After his death in 1991, Maxwell’s close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and alleged involvement in intelligence work are speculated upon.

    Maxwell’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also discussed, highlighting his role in securing Epstein’s plea deal in 2008 and his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video posits that Epstein’s downfall, which took place in 2019, was a result of his growing arrogance and his use of blackmail to maintain power, ultimately outliving his usefulness.

    The opinion is then discussed regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 while he was awaiting trial. While it is widely believed that he committed suicide, the speaker argues that there is a larger conspiracy at play and that other co-conspirators, particularly federal agencies such as the CIA, are responsible for his death. The speaker also raises questions about Epstein’s lifestyle and funding, pointing out that he was known to have only two known clients and had a close relationship with Leslie Wexner, a wealthy CEO with ties to organized crime. The documentary however fails to consider the most likely possibility that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive and his death was faked.

    At the end, the speaker argues that Epstein was compromised himself and that his allies, including Wexner, implemented a system of secrecy and control to keep people from investing with him. The speaker also references the Epstein House of Horrors and the victims’ compensation fund as efforts to cover up his crimes. The speaker then introduces EpsteinJustice.com, an organization aimed at taking accountability for Epstein’s crimes and protecting children from similar harm.

  • Chris Hedges Discusses Fragility of Modern Societies and Need for Personal Growth Through Service and Sacrifice

    Chris Hedges Discusses Fragility of Modern Societies and Need for Personal Growth Through Service and Sacrifice

    In the short film by Amanda Zackem, Chris Hedges discusses the fragility of modern societies and how people tend to be emotionally incapable of understanding or confronting collapse, even when it’s staring them in the face. He draws on his experiences living in totalitarian societies like East Germany and Serbia to illustrate how these systems work and the dark emotions they evoke.

    Chris Hedges argues that the illusion of hope and optimism, fueled by the cult of the self and the worship of power and money, has actually become a form of fantasy and is leading us towards disaster. Hedges contends that critical thinking and the study of the humanities are essential for teaching people to think critically and challenge assumptions, and that historical amnesia perpetuated by popular culture is another tool used by totalitarian systems to keep people in the dark about their problems.

    Chris Hedges then discusses the dangers of unchecked capitalism and its impact on society. He argues that capitalism exploits everything, turning human beings, the natural world, and even the environment into commodities to be exploited until exhaustion. Hedges contends that the forces of capitalism, including corporate socialism, are responsible for the decay of states and the enslavement of vulnerable populations. He advocates for a greater emphasis on values that are rooted in community, empathy, and a sense of purpose, rather than consumerism and hedonism.

    At the end, Chris Hedges discusses the importance of self-sacrifice and service in achieving a life of fulfillment. He argues that community is essential for personal growth and development, but it also comes with a sense of anxiety and responsibility. Hedges believes that consumer society magnifies this anxiety, pushing individuals into destructive behaviors.

    He also talks about the dangers of totalitarianism and the corporate state’s total control over society. Hedges believes that popular culture has replaced real culture and that the corporate state seeks to eradicate the forces that remind us of our humanity. Hedges urges individuals to make a decision about whether they want a life that means something or continue to seek hedonistic pleasures.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp3gCeAI0ds

  • Powerful Speech by Homeless Preacher in Miami, Florida

    Powerful Speech by Homeless Preacher in Miami, Florida

    This video was recorded at night in Miami, Florida from a car and features homeless preacher who delivers quite a powerful speech. The preacher reflects on the challenges of trying to listen to God while being pulled in different directions by personal desires, family, friends, and distractions. He emphasizes the importance of going through the journey rather than rushing to the destination, as it is in the journey that we encounter people and experiences that shape us.

    The preacher highlights the significance of acknowledging and connecting with those who might be homeless or marginalized, as they too have valuable lessons to teach. He also emphasizes the need to be humble and open to wisdom and understanding, rather than thinking one already has it all figured out. Ultimately, he suggests that the purpose of going through difficulties is to inspire and uplift others, rather than solely focusing on personal gain.

    The preacher then reflects on the challenges of working in an environment where there is constant complaining, backstabbing, and lack of appreciation. He encourages gratitude for the little things and emphasizes the importance of finding a job where one can truly enjoy going to work and be appreciated.

    He also discusses the concept of haters and explains that sometimes people hate without even knowing why. He emphasizes the need to teach others and show them love and forgiveness, rather than hold grudges. The homeless preacher also talks about the decline of God’s popularity in society and encourages individuals to let their actions and spirit speak for themselves. He believes that going through difficult times is necessary for growth and authenticity, comparing it to the process of testing gold in a pawn shop. Ultimately, he emphasizes the importance of staying true to one’s faith and not letting others deter them on their journey.

    Later, the homeless preacher emphasizes the importance of humility and being open to correction, sharing that even though it may be painful, it is necessary to experience foolishness and limitations in order to gain wisdom and understanding. He encourages listeners to be sincere in their search for purpose and to trust that God will reveal it to them in due time.

  • Roy Beck Uses Gumballs to Explain Why Immigration Won’t Solve World Poverty

    Roy Beck Uses Gumballs to Explain Why Immigration Won’t Solve World Poverty

    In this video, author and journalist Roy Beck of Numbers USA discusses the idea that mass immigration into the United States won’t help reduce world poverty. He argues that while the United States takes in 1 million legal immigrants every year on average, there are still billions of people in the world who live below the poverty line.

    Roy Beck uses a gumball analogy to illustrate that even if the United States were to double its immigration to 2 million a year, it would still not make a noticeable difference in reducing world poverty. He suggests that instead, efforts should be made to help people living in poverty where they are, rather than relying on immigration as a solution.

  • Deadly Scam Involving For-Profit Dialysis Centers

    Deadly Scam Involving For-Profit Dialysis Centers

    The YouTube video titled “How A Healthcare CEO Got Away With A $12,000,000,000 Scam” highlights a deadly scam involving for-profit dialysis centers.

    The scam happened during Kent Thiry’s tenure as CEO of DaVita, during which he radicalized the company’s operations and catapulted it from bankruptcy. DaVita dialysis centers pop up all over the USA, especially in the black community.

    The problem with these centers is that patients with kidney failure who go for their blood cleaning and filtering using machines that act as an artificial kidney have a higher chance (up to 24%) of dying compared to those who get their treatment at a non-profit center. Despite the monopoly that DaVita and Fresenius, another for-profit dialysis company, own over 80% of the dialysis centers in the US, the government seems unbothered by the scam.

    The video then moves on to discuss the lobbying efforts of Medicare by the Society of Vascular Surgeons (SVS) and how financial incentives exist to put patients on hemodialysis, which can lead to monopolies in the dialysis market, as seen with companies like Kent Thiry and DaVita.

    According to Yousef Nofal, MD, the AV Fistula procedure, which is considered a reliable access for patients undergoing dialysis, has a reimbursement rate of up to $110,000 for vascular surgeons. This can generate up to $5 billion in revenue if all patients were on paranal dialysis. On the other hand, the paranal dialysis cath that gets placed collects only about $227.

    The speaker advocates for realigning economic incentives in healthcare to reward preventative treatments rather than just treating kidney failure. He encourages healthcare providers and insurers to encourage patients to seek at-home dialysis options and criticizes the current system for not meeting goals set in an executive order from 2019.

    He also emphasizes the importance of staying informed and sharing the truth to bring about change, and highlights the impact that even small actions can have.