Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

The Great Thermate Debate challenges the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with partially burned solid organic materials and caused the yellow-red color.

Independent scientists suggest that some kind of thermite material could have been part of the towers and present direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

The possibility of using thermate (Thermite + Sulfur) to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event is discussed, and experiments are conducted to show that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns.

The video presenter – Physics Andreason – believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

00:00:00

In this section, it is explained that the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with hot partially burned solid organic materials like furniture and causing the yellow-red color was challenged by independent scientists.

The theory of NIST that office materials like furniture and computers, which are less dense than molten aluminum, would float on it, is also problematic.

Independent scientists suggested that some type of thermite material may have been part of the towers and found direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

The discovery of explosive red/gray chips positively identified as nano-thermite or super-thermite confirms what the independent scientists had been saying all along.

Nonetheless, NIST refused to test for explosives or its residue and ignored standards such as NFPA 921 guidelines, leading to the attack of all evidence of thermite material found.

00:05:00

In this section of the video, the Great Thermate Debate is discussed, which questions whether thermite material can melt or cut steel, and take massive quantities to cause any real damage.

Engineers and independent researchers conduct experiments to determine if thermate could weaken a connection or wide flange beams, using small quantities of old-fashioned thermate, which is legal and readily available.

The experiments involved building a container that could hold the thermite long enough to melt the steel without melting itself, resulting in a successful sliced vertical cut.

The experiment suggests that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns, which raises questions about why incendiaries like thermate and not high explosives were used in 9/11.

00:10:00

In this section, Physics Andreason discusses the possibility of using thermate to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event, but explains that it may take longer to achieve the desired effect, which would explain why we see molten steel several minutes before its final destruction.

Physics Andreason uses a small amount of thermate to demonstrate how it can be focused on a wide flange to reduce its thickness, and mentions the politically correct terms like pressure pulses and dust puffs used by NIST to possibly obfuscate any mention of explosions.

Overall, Physics Andreason believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

YouTube Video