In recent years, “Cancel Culture” has become a ubiquitous term in the world of social media and politics. But what exactly is Cancel Culture?
In simple terms, Cancel Culture is the practice of publicly shaming or ostracizing individuals or groups who have said or done something deemed offensive or objectionable by the snowflakes. While some may argue that cancel culture is necessary to hold people accountable for their actions, the reality is that Cancel Culture is toxic as it causes more harm than good for both individuals and society as a whole.
Let’s take a look at why exactly cancel culture is toxic, and what impact it has on a free society.
Firstly, cancel culture is toxic because it operates on the principle of guilt by association. Individuals are often judged not by their actions, but by their perceived association with a particular group or ideology. This can lead to a situation where people are judged unfairly and punished without due process. This causes a chilling effect and creates a climate of fear, where people are afraid to express their opinions or engage in debate for fear of being labeled as “problematic“, “cancel-worthy” or God-forbid… “anti-semitic.”
Secondly, cancel culture is toxic because it is often based on subjective interpretations of words or actions. What may be deemed as offensive or problematic by one person or group may not be seen that way by others. Cancel culture allows for one group or individual to dictate what is deemed acceptable or not, often without considering the perspectives of those who may disagree. This can create a narrow-minded and intolerant society, where only a certain set of ideas and beliefs are deemed acceptable.
Thirdly, cancel culture is toxic because it often seeks to erase or silence opposing viewpoints. This is particularly true on social media, where people can be “cancelled” for expressing opinions that are deemed outside of the mainstream, or those which are not “politically correct.” This creates a culture of conformity, where people are afraid to express dissenting views or engage in healthy debate. In a free society, the ability to express opposing viewpoints is essential for progress and democracy.
Finally, cancel culture is toxic because it can have serious real-world consequences. People who are “cancelled” can lose their jobs, their reputations, and even their livelihoods. This creates an environment where people are afraid to speak out or express their opinions, for fear of being punished or ostracized. It also leads to a society where people are defined by their worst moments or actions, rather than their potential for growth and change.
In conclusion, cancel culture is a toxic phenomenon that is harmful to a free society. It operates on the principle of guilt by association, is based on subjective interpretations of words and actions, seeks to silence opposing viewpoints, and can have serious real-world consequences.
Rather than cancelling or ostracizing individuals who may have made mistakes or expressed unpopular opinions, we should engage in healthy debate and dialogue, and seek to understand and learn from different perspectives. The idea of an inclusive and tolerant society which cancel culture fanboys scream for can then, and only then become reality.
The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, that is excellent, individual, qualified, and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated.
Michael Rectenwald is an American scholar, author, and former professor of Liberal Studies at New York University. Rectenwald rose to prominence in 2016 after he created a Twitter account named “Deplorable NYU Prof” and began publicly criticizing what he saw as the increasing intolerance and censorship on college campuses.
His criticisms of “woke” culture and cancel culture garnered him a significant following on social media and led to appearances on various media outlets, including Fox News and The Joe Rogan Experience podcast. Rectenwald is the author of several books, including “Springtime for Snowflakes: ‘Social Justice’ and Its Postmodern Parentage” and “Beyond Woke.”
In the video, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset and the potential conspiracy theories surrounding it. He highlights that the World Economic Forum (WEF) promotes digital biometric surveillance identity systems and has pushed young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, which has led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.
Rectenwald also discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism, and argues that it is a form of corporate socialism. He provides a “grand refusal” plan to combat the Great Reset, which includes divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the WEF, United Nations, and World Health Organization.
00:00:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald addresses whether the idea of the Great Reset is simply a conspiracy theory. He notes that while some sources, such as the New York Times and the BBC, claim that the Great Reset is a benign effort to bring about a fairer, greener future, Time Magazine has devoted an entire issue to it, hailing it as the solution to all our problems.
Michael Rectenwald also suggests that the World Economic Forum generates conspiracy theories on purpose to discredit their critics in advance. The history of the Great Reset begins with Richard Florida’s book in 2010, which inspired Klaus Schwab to push the reset button in 2014. The WF then participated in two pandemic simulations (Clade X and Event 201) prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, which led to a coordinated global response eerily similar to the simulation scenarios.
00:05:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the simulations done before the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the Clade X and Event 201, which anticipated every aspect of the crisis, including worldwide lockdowns, the collapse of businesses and industry, widespread riots, and the adoption of biometric surveillance technologies.
These simulations, along with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) involvement in promoting digital biometric surveillance identity systems and pushing young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, have led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.
The WEF’s partnership with the UN to advance Agenda 2030, sustainable development goals, and its commitment to help the UN meet the needs of the fourth industrial revolution, including government by algorithms and AI, are also highlighted.
00:10:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the history of globalist organizations such as the Trilateral Commission and their push for a global agenda. The Great Reset, which is a reset of various domains of human life including economic, environmental, geopolitical, industrial, technological, social, and individual, is an outline of the kind of things they want to reset.
The economic system they want to usher in is called stakeholder capitalism, which is a euphemism for a collusion between the government, state, and corporate world that establishes a cartel shared Monopoly scheme. The world economic Forum has signed on 1,000 of the world’s top corporations in all major sectors of the economy, and they are all firmly behind this agenda, including major players like BlackRock Inc.
The stakeholder capitalism regime has its main mechanism, the ESG score, which Schwab likens to Dr. Evil, and companies that don’t get on board with the sustainability ESG stakeholder regime will be starved with capital and die on the vine.
00:15:0
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism. He explains that socialists believe that stakeholder capitalism is a form of socialism, specifically corporate socialism, which is the monopolization of the economy by a group of monopolists who want to eliminate their competition and retain complete and total control over the rest of the economy.
Rectenwald argues that the Chinese system is the model for the Great Reset, as it still maintains for-profit production by oligarchs, total control over the population, a great surveillance structure, and generates wealth for the few. He believes that globalists want to establish this system globally.
00:20:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset in relation to China and public-private partnerships. He claims that the Great Reset is drawing corporations into the state and making them state apparatuses, with examples such as Twitter and Google.
He mentions the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which he argues represents high-tech surveillance and control of the population at large. Rectenwald highlights that the Great Reset promises inclusion in a shared destiny, but this inclusion represents the subordination of netizens, who will experience total political and economic disenfranchisement and hyper-vigilance over themselves and others, resulting in organized loneliness.
00:25:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald provides a nine-point plan, which he calls “the grand refusal,” to combat the Great Reset. The plan includes refusing the central bank digital currency, internet of bodies, and digital identity, practicing the free market, divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers, and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the World Economic Forum, United Nations, and World Health Organization.
Rectenwald acknowledges that it may not be possible to reverse the global agenda on our own, but we can become a Remnant that promotes the principles of the free market and individual freedom to future generations.
00:30:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald suggests putting pressure on legislators to move pensions and other funds away from ESG asset managers, and encouraging defections from the elites. Elon Musk is cited as a possible defector from ESG and a nominal supporter of free speech.
Rectenwald calls for a grand refusal against revolutionary subversive elites who are wrecking society, and emphasizes the need for counter-revolution against their objectives. He concludes by rejecting the utopian and striving for continuity and sanity.
The video explores the possibility of a collapse of the United States, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.
The author discusses the weaknesses in the American system of representative government, including challenges in finding and verifying quality information, political schemas becoming entangled with self-identity, and a polarized population susceptible to propaganda.
The role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping American perspectives is also examined, and a proposed solution by Walter Lippmann to form a tax-funded intelligence bureau is discussed.
Ultimately, the video emphasizes the need for a “crucial core” in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States and invites viewers to contemplate a post-collapse world if nothing changes.
00:00:00
In this section, the host poses the question of whether the United States will collapse, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.
He goes on to discuss how disillusionment and polarization have become the best predictors for authoritarian takeover, and how this could lead to anarchy or tyranny in the most armed nation on earth, potentially impacting the entire world.
The host then introduces his special guest, Walter Lippmann, a 20th-century journalist and propagandist, who wrote a book called Public Opinion, which highlighted a deeper problem with the American system of representative government.
Lippmann argued that there was a weakness in how power and information flowed through the system, with sovereignty resting in the hands of individual citizens who delegate that power through elections and public opinion. The core idea behind this system was considered radical and experimental at the time of the nation’s founding, and has been subject to challenges and concerns over the years.
00:05:00
In this section, the author discusses how the initial design of the United States relied on individual self-interest being directed towards the public good. However, this design assumed that citizens would only elevate the most competent amongst them and that politicians would heed public opinion.
These assumptions have become vulnerable points of weakness as the nation has grown in size and complexity. Furthermore, the author illustrates how complicated it is for an individual to become fully informed on every issue of the day, using the example of a major tech company’s announcement of creating the world’s first general artificial intelligence.
The video states that modern-day forces, such as destructive propaganda, incoherent policy making and an overreliance on the manufacturing of consent and distractions, are inflaming these weaknesses, making the entire nation susceptible to crisis.
00:10:00
In this section, the challenges of finding and verifying quality information are discussed. The example of Clyde, who has limited resources and time for research is given, which highlights the issue of information overload and distractions that hinder thorough research.
The general population’s ignorance about political issues, and their own ignorance, are pointed out, and Lippmann’s concept of the “stereotype” is introduced as being at the core of political beliefs.
Lippmann believed that people were not discussing political differences rationally, creating a dangerous vulnerability. The importance of intellectual humility, the vast scale of topics, and the need for a variety of quality sources in research are emphasized.
00:15:00
In this section, the video explains the concept of schemas and how they play a role in shaping beliefs and behavior. Schemas are mental frameworks that humans develop to organize and navigate the vast amount of information and memories they encounter throughout their lives.
These schemas can be influenced by past experiences, media, and other factors, and can lead to oversimplifications or inaccurate beliefs about the world. While schemas can be useful in making quick decisions, they can also lead to a confirmation bias where individuals only notice things that reinforce their existing beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence.
Schemas can change over time, but this process can be slow and difficult, especially for complex and abstract beliefs like political opinions.
00:20:00
In this section, the author explains how political schemas often become entangled with one’s self-identity, giving the impression that they are the kind of person who believes certain things and not others.
This self-reinforcing web of belief makes it difficult to engage with evidence or ideas that conflict with one’s beliefs. Political partisans are more likely to make logical mistakes, jump to conclusions, and bend evidence to fit their worldview.
To reduce the detrimental impact of ideological bias, individuals ought to be self-aware and humble enough to know that their thinking is always at risk of these distortions and form a new super schema that connects their identity to this awareness.
The author notes, however, that fostering a political culture that values intellectual humility is unlikely in the United States due to the cultural dogma of the innately rational citizenry combined with the intellectual arrogance and fanatical certainty of political partisans.
00:25:00
In this section, the video explores how a polarized population with unchanging beliefs and rooted in tribalism is susceptible to propaganda. A few tools for self-government to navigate disagreement include persuasion, compromise or bargain, ignoring, or forming a consensus.
If you believe the opposition is insane or evil, then these tools are off the table. The news media is another major player, which often fails in its responsibilities due to its fragmented and sensationalized business model.
True investigative journalism requires a huge investment, but most Americans expect news for free which, in turn, leads to an over-reliance on advertising, sensational content, and click-bait titles that may not always align with the reality of the situation.
00:30:00
In this section, the video focuses on the role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping the American perspective. The media landscape is highly polarized and it’s nearly impossible for citizens to have a comprehensive and unbiased view of any issue.
Rather than focusing on accuracy, news media companies prioritize fulfilling their audience’s demand for preconceived ideas to maintain their business models. This gives an opportunity for anyone with enough resources to exploit this weakness towards external and internal threats. The video also details how the emergence of public relations added a new player in the information ecosystem of a democracy, which reshaped public opinion by planting stories, creating artificial events, or even paying people to promote products or ideas.
The combination of radio, film, and PR created a powerful force, but the Internet has become an influencing machine of unmatched power in history, making PR’s presence in American life so common that it is rarely reported or thought about.
00:35:00
In this section, the author highlights the power of public relations and PR agents in shaping information, both online and in political discourse. With the decline of traditional news sources, journalists have become more reliant on PR agents for news, and with the rise of social media, it is easier than ever to sway public opinion on a large scale.
Meanwhile, an idealistic politician faces two scenarios: ignoring public opinion and following their own agenda, potentially leading to manipulation and propaganda, or following public opinion that is influenced by PR agents and their clients, resulting in a lack of coherent policies. Ultimately, the increasing complexity of modern problems and the struggle to solve them can lead to a sense of helplessness among citizens, allowing undemocratic influence to flourish.
00:40:00
In this section, the focus is on the proposed solution by Walter Lippmann, who suggested forming a tax-funded intelligence bureau to assemble experts on national issues to provide an analysis of problems and potential solutions in a digestible report to the public.
However, the solution is now deemed too naive, considering the possibility that the institution may become corrupt over time. While there are institutions in the US that aim to provide knowledge to the people, these have been criticized due to their failures and deceptions, with the entire collection often labeled as “the Deep State.”
To address this, the essential core needs to be developed in the public, which includes the mental tools to audit their own beliefs and schemas, the ability to debate ideas with others, demand accuracy in information sources, and track policy issues over time without falling victim to counter-messaging. While not all people have these ideals, the development of the essential core is crucial to overcome America’s core vulnerability.
00:45:00
In this section, the speaker emphasizes the need for a crucial core in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States. He acknowledges that the current situation is an active experiment in real-time, but believes that exploring steps towards strengthening this core may prevent decline and destruction.
The speaker concludes by saying that if nothing changes, he fears the collapse of the United States and invites the viewer to join him in contemplating a post-collapse world.
David Icke discusses the agenda of the interbreeding bloodlines, which is to establish a global fascist structure of world government with nation-states serving as administrative units and a world central bank with a currency that is entirely electronic. This structure would also include a world army that would be NATO, expanding and becoming a fully-fledged world police force.
Underpinning it all is a population that is microchipped with their financial and medical details, allowing external manipulation of their mental and emotional processes. Icke cautions that this will happen unless the human race wakes up and spreads awareness about the situation.
James Lindsay first gained national attention with his co-authoring of the book “Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity–and Why This Harms Everybody,” which critiques the postmodernist philosophy that has influenced many social justice movements. The book has been praised for its rigorous analysis and bold stance on a controversial subject.
Lindsay’s most prominent argument is that the “critical social justice” movement has become a form of fundamentalism that is more interested in promoting ideology than in promoting real change.
While some may disagree with his ideas, there is no denying that James Lindsay has made an important contribution to contemporary discourse by challenging established beliefs and encouraging critical thinking.
In the video, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy. He warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows, and their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science.
Lindsay explains that these cults create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place.
He warns against the lure of hyperreality and the use of faith and truth to prevent people from falling for scams, including those that claim to have a deeper understanding of bigger truths, and concludes that reality is recalcitrant, and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.
Titled “The Negation of the Real“, it’s the presentation in which James Lindsay talks about how certain movements, such as Marxism and the woke culture, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own.
These beliefs lead to constructing a synthetic simulacrum, a hyper-reality where reality is negated as it contradicts their religion. This is done through the creation of social concepts, such as gender and race, leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.
Philosophers like Hegel adopt this way of thinking, where reality is abandoned to understand their own interpretation. Lindsay argues that these movements ultimately aim to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist.
This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. Finally, Lindsay urges people to resist this religion and identify those who traffic in it.
00:00:00
In this section of the lecture, James Lindsay discusses how the West has been shaped by so-called secret religions or cults, which are often overlooked or ignored. He argues that these cults have been central to the construction of the West and have played a major role in its politics, faith, science and overall development.
Lindsay explains that if one wants to install false religions, they must negate the real religions while acknowledging that his use of the term religion is broad and includes the sciences. Through his talks, he aims to compare faith, science, and these cults to better understand how they work together.
Lindsay asks his audience to engage in a mental exercise and imagine a world where a large ancient religion exists that is just as big as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Buddhism, but nobody has ever heard of it, and how this religion has been present and influenced the development of the West.
00:05:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy.
Lindsay warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows and that their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science. He sees the exposure of these religions and the development of the discernment to identify them as necessary steps to defeating them, as they cannot claim truth on their side.
While acknowledging that the terminology and concepts associated with these religions may be overwhelming, Lindsay encourages the audience to watch the videos multiple times and at double speed to develop an understanding of these religions.
00:10:00
In this section, James Lindsay asks viewers to imagine that they are “crazy” and believe they had a direct encounter with God and have been told to change the world. He explains that these occult religions, like ancient hermeticism, gnosis, and gnosticism, operate on negative theology, which tears down or takes things apart, rather than positive theology, which describes the attributes of God.
These cultures create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use the fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place. The only way to get people to accept this fake reality is to obliterate reality first.
00:15:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how negative thinking or critique has evolved into “woke denunciation,” which involves denouncing something in a way that supposedly announces the possibility of something different without ever having to articulate a positive argument or clear plan. He explains that this process is a form of sorcery that confuses people and gives power to those making negative arguments against others.
Lindsay then explains that these occult, esoteric religions of the West need to displace their competitors (such as faith and science) to occupy the space they fill, so they create a counterfeit and subvert the real thing to make their own ideas look more attractive. He concludes that these confidence religions or philosophies are parasitic and latch onto something real.
00:20:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of simulacra which is the idea that a copy of something can lose its relevance and resemblance to the original. He provides examples such as knockoff Rolex watches and pancake syrup, where each iteration becomes less and less like the original.
He then compares this to the concept of performance, which is the idea that some people perform a role or identity rather than it being inherent in them. He gives examples such as communist pastors and Judith Butler, a college professor who believed that gender was a performance, which led to the negation of biological sex. This idea of negating the real in favor of a constructed reality is a theme that he believes is present in many aspects of Western culture, including religion and politics.
00:25:00
In this section, James Lindsay describes the Gnostic creation myth and how it is a simulation and a counterfeit of Christianity. The creator God, who is seen as God in Genesis and throughout the Bible, is actually an evil demon, the demiurge, who created the world as a prison to trap humanity and keep them from realizing they are really God.
The serpent in the Garden of Eden was telling the truth, and Lucifer, the first savior, becomes equivalent to Christ as another savior. Lindsay warns against the lure of Gnostic cults that construct a false version of reality, and how this can extrapolate out into the creation of fiction that replaces reality, such as gender identity replacing biological sex.
Finally, Lindsay explains how faith and reason are broad institutions that are being counterfeited, leading to false churches and institutions that claim to be something they are not.
00:30:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of Gnosis and how it is an absolute, revealed knowledge that is not based on faith or reason, but on secret and esoteric teachings known only to a select few.
He draws attention to the different meanings of the word Gnostic, including lower case Gnosticism, referring to awareness of absolute truth, and capital Gnosticism, a religious text originating from the early Christian cults of the first and second centuries that refers to the universe as a prison constructed by an evil demon.
Lindsay argues that the point of Gnosis is not the truth of the propositions presented, but rather the meaning they affect in the hearts of the readers or listeners, leading to a revolutionary moment of reflexivity which can be a dangerous thing when people start to lose track of what they’re supposed to be fighting for.
00:35:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the difference between science and alchemy. While science seeks to understand reality and discover truths, alchemy seeks to bring about a desired state of affairs through means that may not be based in reality.
Lindsay argues that this kind of desire for control, rooted in esoteric religions from antiquity, is what we are seeing now with the rise of woke communism or neo-communism. He emphasizes the importance of faith and reason working together, keeping each other balanced and preventing gnosticism from taking hold.
Lindsay concludes that despite certain people claiming that reality has moved “beyond true theories and false theories,” the fact is that reality is recalcitrant and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.
00:40:00
In this section, James Lindsay talks about how snake oil and other scams have operated historically, and how the use of faith and truth can prevent people from falling for such scams. He warns about the lure of hyperreality and how people can be misled by those who claim to have a deeper understanding of some bigger truth.
He explains how the drive to dominate others, or libido dominandi, can be behind some of these scams, and how people can be seduced by the idea that their ignorance is keeping them from deeper truths. He warns about how people may unwittingly become complicit in oppressive systems like racism and capitalism without even realizing it, and how these dynamics can be exploited by those with a financial interest in keeping people stuck and ignorant.
00:45:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of hermeticism and how it relates to the idea of creating a new religion called sustainability and inclusion by taking all existing faiths, philosophy, and sciences and mashing them together. He highlights how the woke movement has colonized the sciences and uses dialectical inversion to justify their beliefs.
They claim that everything is political, nothing is objective, and the hard sciences are not inclusive or diverse enough. They offer a new method as a solution, which they claim is data-driven and being implemented in almost every American school district. However, they do not have the data to justify it, and they dismiss any criticism as conspiracies. Hegel’s dialectical method is invoked as a formal language to explain this phenomenon.
00:50:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how Hegel’s philosophy involves negation and the shift from the real to the actual. Hegel believed that reality was abstract and that true knowledge involved understanding all of its causes and making it concrete.
Negation, in this context, meant recognizing that one’s understanding of reality was incomplete and needed to be expanded. However, according to Lindsay, Hegel’s method led to guru-ship and a cult-like practice, attracting grifters and abusive psychopaths to take advantage of people.
Additionally, Hegel’s reliance on circular reasoning and his dismissal of other viewpoints as false or partial knowledge shows his philosophy’s similarity to gnosticism and wizardry.
00:55:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the real must be negated to make space for the actual, which is synthetic and concrete, projected into the future by the sorcerer. He highlights how this process is like a self-fulfilling prophecy or spellcasting, posing effectively as science and religion.
Lindsay also delves into the concept of a Wizard’s Circle, where you are trapped and can only see what the sorcerer wants you to see, resulting in a negation of your reality. He emphasizes how this is a strategy that secret religions and esoteric religions have used throughout history, changing forms every time they are exposed.
01:00:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the negation of the real manifests in society through the creation of a synthetic simulacrum. This is done through the construction of social concepts such as gender, race, and freedom, ultimately leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.
The far right and postmodernists alike engage in this process. However, when the synthetic simulacrum imitates science or reason, it becomes dangerous. Expert consensus or ideologically acceptable conclusions replace true scientific methodology.
Messages from the woke literature often fail the funnel plot technique, which involves the exclusion of scientific experiments with “wrong conclusions.” This negation of the real can be found in most major medical journals, leading to the cost of many lives and untold suffering.
01:05:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of gnosis and its manifestation as politics pretending to be science. Gnosis is a belief system that portrays individuals as gods seeking to displace genuine truth and replace it with their own ideologies.
Various movements, such as communism, Nazism, and sustainability, are all modern and post-modern forms of esoteric faiths trying to establish a single world religion. Hyper-reality is the false simulacrum of reality that these ideologies simulate to project their vision of utopia or the arrived kingdom.
To achieve their beliefs, they must negate the real, and the first reality has to be broken to pieces and absorbed into the second reality before it can actualize. Hegel’s hyper-reality was a perfect idea of what a perfect society with perfect people would look like, using negative thinking to create a true science of history.
01:10:00
In this section, James Lindsay uses an absurd example to illustrate the problem with systemic thinking. He posits that if a driver runs over a pedestrian, everyone from the car maker to the coffee bean producer and medical industry can be implicated, therefore, everybody’s at fault, and everybody supports a system that causes damage.
By following this systematic line of thinking, everybody is guilty, so we need a total system change, which, using concrete thinking, will involve lots of intermediate practical steps that are systems of control, and bad things won’t happen anymore. This is how critical car theory and critical race theory are the same theory.
01:15:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of perpetual revolution, which he describes as the idea that the revolution must continue without ever stopping. He argues that this perpetual revolution is characterized by pure criticism, relentless negativity, and a constant denunciation of the world. He explains that this negative theology involves destroying reality to insert a hyper-reality that is not even clearly described.
The goal of this perpetual revolution, according to Lindsay, is to conquer existing reality by teaching children to complain about everything being racist, sexist, harmful, or traumatic. This negative theology, Lindsay argues, is found in woke ideology, and has its roots in Hegelian and Marxist thought. Lindsay brings out the idea of apoptosis or programmed cell death which he calls programmed death of the existing society.
01:20:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses Hegel’s idea of negation and negativity and its role in society. Hegel believed that negative thinking is the core and that by negating, we can get more. Furthermore, Hegel understood that there are distinctions, but these have to be lifted above or sublated to find broader categorization that returns to the one category of all things, which is the one.
However, this concrete thinking that he is replacing reality with is structural thinking. Ultimately, in Hegel’s system of science for understanding things, we abandon reality and understand his interpretation.
This section also discusses how Marx talks about the ruthless criticism of all that exists, which he got from Goethe’s character Mephistopheles, the voice of Satan, who said “all that exists deserves to perish.”
01:25:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the idea of negating the real, which involves the belief that everything that exists deserves to perish. When this occurs, truth becomes relative, and the Marxist hyper reality can take precedence as the science of history, which then becomes Marxism or that which forwards Marxism as a system of praxis.
Marx believed that through negative thinking and ruthless criticism, there could be a positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement. This was defined as the proper definition of communism and the ideal society they wanted to simulate through socialism.
Marx stated that communism is the positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement, which is, in turn, the real appropriation of human essence by and for man. Ultimately, communism is the riddle of history solved, and it is the true resolution of the conflict between man and nature and between man and man.
01:30:00
In this section, Lindsay discusses the concept of “negative thinking” and how it is used to criticize and denounce existing societal structures with the aim of envisioning new possibilities. He critiques the idea that one must have “consciousness” or be “gnostic” in order to denounce and announce a new world, comparing this to a sorcery or wizardry that is taught in woke education.
Lindsay argues that such forms of critical consciousness do not offer any tangible solutions or descriptions of what the new world is supposed to look like. He further highlights that the lack of specificity in these ideas allows for endless demands for power, leading to an endless cycle of societal upheavals that never lead to actual solutions.
01:35:00
In this section of the transcript, James Lindsay discusses the origins of wokeness and how it stems from the fusion of critical theory and post-modernism into a method of knowing. Wokeness is described as gnosticism derived from esoteric secret religions, which aims to construct a hyper-real simulation in order to negate the real.
The ultimate goal of wokeness is to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist until it is fully controlled. In this sense, wokeness allows for a pointless criticism of all that exists and reflects Marx’s desire for ruthless criticism.
Lindsay also points out how absurd some of the woke narratives have become, such as claiming that shark week is racist because it employs too many people named Mike.
01:40:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the negation of the real and how certain movements, such as Marxist and woke ideologies, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own. They make no positive arguments and risk nothing, only forward the idea that their opponent’s ideology is evil.
Lindsay explains that this tactic is similar to playing poker with someone who bets nothing and eventually ends up bankrupting the other player. Furthermore, Lindsay uses the works of Hegel and Marx to demonstrate how certain ideologies separate reason and understanding, where reason is the higher level knowing, while understanding is the lower level.
Ultimately, Hegel believed that one must negate the real to insert magic, and this way of thinking has been adopted by many modern ideologies, creating a culture in which negation of the real is prevalent.
01:45:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the belief system of G.W.F. Hegel, a German philosopher from the early 19th century. Hegel’s system of pure reason, or the realm of pure thought, is believed to be God’s mind, logos, which represents truth without a veil.
According to Hegel, the content of this realm is the presentation of God before the creation of nature, and through his system of science, or science of logic, he alone claims to understand the pathway for people to return to what they originally supposed to be.
This is known as the Hermetic belief system, in which people like Hegel claim to know the presentation of God without any veil, absolute truth, and what humans must do to return to their original state, and it is the secret religion of the West.
Philosophers, according to Hegel, are Misti or initiates into a mystery, someone who has secret knowledge or gnosis, while their duty is to write down the cabinet orders of God. This is how Hegel thinks of himself and his philosophy, and he believes it is through secret rites that man gets elevated to the Divine and assured of redemption, becoming a God and conferring immortality upon him.
01:50:00
In this section of the video, James Lindsay discusses the difference between cult religion and healthy religion. He explains that the religion he is referring to is a secret, esoteric religion posing as politics, science, and faith.
The Wizards who control this religion aim to die and be reborn through hermetic magic, become Gods, and get secret gnosis and immortality. To accomplish this, they construct a hyper-reality where reality must be negated because it refutes their religion completely.
They replace major pieces of reality with simulacra, including faith with occult belief, logic with porology, and reason with pretend reason. This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. The talk ends on the understanding that we are dealing with secret religions that have operated since antiquity throughout the West.
01:55:00
In this section, James Lindsay explains how a Greek concept, which was translated into Latin and spread throughout Europe, became a defining force in the destruction of society. He argues that this concept, which is now hidden in fields such as economics, politics, and science, is actually a secret esoteric religion.
Marx turned it into a political and economic project of destruction, which has led to our current path to doom. Lindsay urges people to understand and resist this religion, identifying those who traffick in it and either bringing them back or casting them out. He also critiques cancel culture as a projection of responsibility onto others.
Created by by John Hankey, this John F. Kennedy Jr. assassination documentary explores various theories surrounding his untimely death, including the possibility that it was orchestrated by those responsible for the assassination of his father and uncle.
The video discusses the discrepancies in the timeline of JFK Jr.’s plane disappearance and the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission. Additionally, a possible connection to the Bush family is explored, and doubts are raised about claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane.
The video challenges the official narrative surrounding the crash and presents evidence to suggest that there may be more to the story than what was reported.
00:00:00
In this section, the video discusses the Kennedy family’s history of opposing the military-industrial complex that was seeking to take over the government and end democracy, and how many of them were killed as a result. Joe, the eldest son, died fighting Nazis in Germany, while Jack died fighting the Nazis in the US. John F. Kennedy Sr. opposed the Vietnam War, an excuse for the military-industrial complex to loot the US treasury, and was subsequently assassinated.
Bobby Kennedy continued the fight against the military-industrial complex and was murdered after winning the California primary for the presidency. The murder was blamed on a lone nut, Sirhan Sirhan, but the coroner concluded that the fatal shot was fired from within one inch of Kennedy’s head, indicating the possibility of mind control and a decoy to divert attention from the real killer.
00:05:00
In this section, the video highlights John F. Kennedy Jr.’s life and work, explaining that he was not just a “harmless boob” but instead someone who fought for the truth and the interests of the people. His magazine, George, was a platform for smart and real infotainment, which sometimes included dangerous articles that exposed the corruption of the powerful, such as Oliver Stone’s piece on political assassinations.
Due to his potential to win political office, some believed that John’s death was orchestrated by his father’s killers, who feared that he would go after them. In addition, the video suggests that the presence of Mossad agents in the United States before his death was not a coincidence but was related to the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ahud Barak.
00:10:00
In this section of the JFK Jr assassination documentary, John Hankey presents the idea that George W. Bush and his father George H. W. Bush are prime suspects in the death of John Kennedy Jr. due to their involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.
John Hankey claims that after John’s death, George W. Bush lost in the New Hampshire primaries, but instead of the usual reactions, he received a significant increase in financial support, allowing him to smear McCain’s image and spread false rumors.
John Hankey asks why the establishment would overwhelmingly support Bush instead of siding with McCain, and postulates that they needed someone they could trust to assist them in executing the murder of three thousand Americans so that they could steal billions from the national treasury.
John Hankey also notes that George W. Bush was nowhere to be found when reporters asked for his response to the death of John Jr. and emphasizes that John was a responsible, intelligent, and good-hearted person, a stark contrast to the portrayal of him as an irresponsible drug user in some media reports.
00:15:00
In this section of the documentary, John Hankey questions how John F. Kennedy Jr., who was known for being a cautious and responsible pilot, could have ended up crashing into the ocean and killing himself, his wife, his sister-in-law, and possibly his unborn child.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigated the crash and found no evidence of mechanical problems or bad weather conditions. The radar report showed that the plane suddenly dropped as if someone had grabbed the controls and pushed them forward, leading some to believe it was a suicide.
However, there were indications that JFK Jr. was looking forward to fatherhood and had expressed optimism about his magazine’s future. The documentary also notes that the last few moments of the flight followed standard procedures until the sudden and unexplained dive into the water.
00:20:00
In this section, officials describe JFK Jr.’s final communication with the FAA as being at 9:39 pm on its final approach to Martha’s Vineyard, which requires the plane to pause at 2,500 feet, contact the tower, and receive permission to continue.
This is consistent with radar information reconstructed by the NTSB that was used to explain the plane’s last moments before crashing. FAA regulations require the agency to begin searching for a plane anytime it descends below 100 feet, and a search should have been started at 9:40 pm, five minutes after JFK Jr.’s final contact with the tower. However, reports show that the FAA and the Coast Guard went silent and the Pentagon took over news reporting, indicating a possible cover-up.
00:25:00
In this section, the video talks about discrepancies in the timeline of the events that occurred before and after the disappearance of JFK Jr.’s plane. The official coast guard spokesman reported that JFK Jr.’s plane was late in arriving at Martha’s Vineyard, but this report was later washed away.
Friends of Lauren Bessette, JFK Jr.’s sister-in-law, were expecting her at the airport at 9:30 pm, yet no one reported the plane missing until 2 am. FAA officials did nothing when contacted and even caused a U.S senator’s attempts to help correct the situation to be pointless. The reporters who tried to question these discrepancies were shut off from asking any further questions by the Pentagon who took over press coverage.
00:30:00
In this section, it is revealed that the Kennedy family first called the Coast Guard instead of the FAA to search for JFK Jr.’s plane. The Coast Guard contacted the FAA, which then contacted the Air Force. The Air Force then informed the Coast Guard that they were now in charge, sent them on a wild goose chase, and did nothing for five hours.
Eventually, Clinton was woken up and threatened to fire everyone in the Air Force if a search wasn’t underway within 15 minutes. Eventually, two planes and two helicopters were sent to search a 20,000 square miles area of the ocean. The FAA, however, did conduct some analytical work, including the NTAP radar analysis, which showed that the plane had gone down on the western approach to Martha’s Vineyard.
00:35:00
In this section, the video discusses the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission for John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane after it went down. Colonel Steve Rourke, a helicopter pilot and former director of the Air Force rescue coordination center, was present at the rescue coordination center and lied about the search progress, even though he was intimately familiar with the radar tapes and end taps.
The video suggests that the military purposely kept the rescue craft out of the crash area, and they lost many crucial pieces of information. The emergency beacon or ELT that all civil aircraft is required to carry was activated and received via a network of satellites, but this information was not passed on to the rescue teams in the Coast Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. The video raises questions as to why the military and others involved in the rescue mission did not want the searches to know where to search.
00:40:00
In this section, the video highlights evidence of a concerted effort by the upper levels of the Air Force and FAA to prevent the search and rescue teams from locating the crash site of John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane as long as possible. The bad guys created a false picture of JFK Jr. being an incompetent and careless pilot by manipulating events and hiding crucial information.
The missing pieces include the missing flight plan, all of Kennedy’s communication with the radar facilities along the route of his flight, and the battery of the plane’s cockpit recorder that preserved the final moments of the flight. Additionally, witnesses saw JFK Jr. talking on the phone before he took off, which raises questions about who he was talking to and what they were talking about. All these missing pieces could be part of the conspiracy to hide certain facts about the case.
00:45:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the missing phone records and the intact aquamarine duffel bag discovered among the debris from the crash. The bag was assumed to contain John Kennedy Jr.’s flight log, which records who was on the plane.
The flight log and who was on the plane are crucial because insurance companies use them to determine whose policy they have to pay out on. The speaker emphasizes the importance of believing the earliest reports from accurate and credible witnesses rather than unsubstantiated ones that come later. The speaker also challenges the claim that John did not have the proper license to fly the plane, and explains that he was a qualified pilot.
00:50:00
In this section of the video, John Hankey raises doubts about the claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane. While “the family” suggests that JFK Jr did not have the proper license to fly without a flight instructor, John Hankey argues that JFK Jr was legal to fly under visual flight rules.
John Hankey also notes that JFK Jr had always flown with a flight instructor in the past, and had recently acquired a powerful new plane that required additional training. Witnesses report that JFK Jr, his wife Carolyn, and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette waited for 45 minutes at the airport before taking off, leading John Hankey to suggest that they may have been waiting for the flight instructor to arrive.
00:55:00
In this section, the video analyzes allegations surrounding JFK Jr.’s decision to have a flight instructor on his plane. Kennedy had passed his performance evaluation and written exam, but he needed to log hours, and because of his broken foot, which had the cast taken off the previous day, many people were worried about him flying alone.
Reports claim that he told Canadian business associates that he preferred to fly with a co-pilot, and his friend and co-editor at George magazine confirmed that he was flying with an instructor. Although this hasn’t been officially confirmed, the evidence supporting this theory is abundant. The video questions why this theory was thrown away in favor of ones that couldn’t be verified.
01:00:00
In this section, the documentary delves into the inconsistencies in the official reports of JFK Jr.’s tragic plane crash. It appears that there were attempts to cover up some aspects of the case. For example, a group calling themselves “the Family” infiltrated the Dallas police and spread baseless stories about JFK Jr.’s lack of a necessary flying license and the absence of a flight instructor.
The documentary questions why the media readily accepted these baseless stories. Additionally, the final report of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) featured a dramatic story that one of JFK Jr.’s flight instructors had offered to fly with him, but Kennedy declined, wanting to fly alone. The documentary examines the origin of this story and the problematic interview process between the NTSB and JFK Jr.’s flight instructor, in which an essential part of their conversation seemed to have gone missing.
01:05:00
In this section of the video, the speaker questions the inconsistencies in the NTSB investigation report of John F. Kennedy Jr’s plane crash, particularly regarding the supposed last conversation between JFK Jr and his friend, Michael Morena. Morena’s claim, although proven false by his own lawyer, was still included in the final report and covered by the media.
The speaker believes that this was a deliberate move by the “bad guys” to manipulate the news and hide the presence of a flight instructor on the plane, who they may have intentionally delayed rescue efforts for so they could recover the body and alter the wounds of JFK Jr’s father. The presence of an unseen hand is evident to the speaker, proving that there was a cover-up.
01:10:00
In this section of the video, the focus is on the fuel selector valve found in the off position when John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane went into a headfirst disastrous plunge towards the sea leading to his death. The video explains that an airplane fuel selector valve is used for distributing the weight of the gasoline evenly on the plane during the flight, which is important to keep the weight evenly distributed.
The video discusses how the fuel selector valve found in the off position is strange and mind-boggling, and how it is impossible for John or someone on the plane to have randomly fiddled with the valve. The video also explains how an engine failure alone would not cause a plane to make that kind of spectacular dive, and how the idea that John turned off the fuel selector valve is not plausible.
01:15:00
In this section, the importance of the fuel selector valve and its safety features on airplanes is explained. The valve has an off position that can only be turned off in an emergency situation by holding down a special button while simultaneously turning the valve. Although it is a safety feature, it is impossible to accidentally turn off.
The fact that the valve in John Kennedy Jr.’s plane was in the off position is seen as suspicious and raises questions about how it could have happened. The article also discusses the radar analysis of the crash and suggests that someone on the plane may have intentionally crashed it by grabbing the controls and pushing them forward. The question of why the NTSB did not pursue this possibility further is also raised.
01:20:00
In this section of the video, the speaker ponders the idea that someone on JFK Jr.’s plane may have committed murder-suicide and purposely turned off the fuel valve.
The speaker talks to a flight instructor who tells him that strange things can happen, and mentions another tragic event where a maniac pilot turned off the fuel valve causing a plane to plunge into the ocean, killing 217 people. However, there are alternative theories regarding what happened to this particular flight, including the possibility of the pilot being a Manchurian candidate and being programmed to commit the murder-suicide.
01:25:00
In this section of the video, John Hankey discusses the idea of mind control and how it has been utilized by the CIA for the past 50 years under the name MK Ultra. This program aimed to create “Manchurian candidates” or individuals who would be programmed to carry out political assassinations without remembering anything about their programming.
John Hankey suggests that many high-profile assassinations, such as those of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and John Lennon, may have been carried out by Manchurian candidates. John Hankey then questions the likelihood of two separate pilots from two different countries both deciding to commit suicide by crashing their planes and then turning off the fuel valves. This coincidence is deemed highly unlikely, leading John Hankey to suggest that the pilots may have been programmed by the same people who carried out the Manchurian candidate experiments.
01:30:00
In this section, the speaker reflects on the reason for their search and their hope for evidence to develop a theory that would explain the facts of the JFK Jr. assassination in a manner that wasn’t ridiculous. He compares the incomplete evidence of the assassination with the incomplete evidence of Galileo’s theory of the solar system, which over time became widely accepted even though it was not fully provable.
The speaker then puts forward the theory that the flight instructor on JFK Jr.’s plane was programmed to crash it into the sea, which is supported by all the evidence available. This theory, he argues, is more reasonable and makes more sense than the NTSB’s theory that an experienced pilot crashed the plane for no reason.
The speaker also suggests the plan was to commit the perfect crime and whisk JFK Jr.’s body away, but the bad guys messed it up by delaying the search and rescue mission. The evidence for this delay lies in the fact that the end tap location was withheld from the coast guard and the civil air patrol for 15 hours.
01:35:00
In this section of the video, the evidence is reviewed and presented as a two-step process for bringing charges against George W. Bush for the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. The evidence includes JFK Jr’s potential to seek high government office and his real threat to those who had killed his father, the oral mafia support earned by Bush Sr. for participating in JFK Sr.’s murder, and Bush Jr.’s own place at the table with the mafia.
The evidence also suggests that the dark lord supported Bush Jr. over John McCain, the FAA ignoring Senator Kennedy, and the lies of Colonel Rourke. Bush Jr. would need to provide a reasonable alternative explanation for these events and his whereabouts on July 16th, 1999, but he doesn’t have one.
01:40:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the need for George Bush to provide a credible alibi for the weekend that John Kennedy Jr.’s plane crashed. The speaker suggests that if Bush’s alibi is proved to be a lie, he will be convicted just like any other person accused of murder based on circumstantial evidence.
The speaker goes on to discuss the sick, criminal mafia that has been infesting the United States and the world, responsible for everything from state-sponsored race-based slavery to the Vietnam War. The speaker urges viewers to fight this dehumanization and take action, stating that they are soldiers on the front line in a war for the very future of humanity.
The Bernays Dynasty is a fascinating family whose influence can be felt across various fields, from literature to public relations, politics, and feminism. The dynasty’s origins can be traced back to Rabbi Bir Neustedtel, or Baer Lazar, who lived in the German state of Hesse. His sons, Isaac and Jacob Bernays, founded influential dynasties in Europe, America, and Australia.
Isaac Bernays was the chief rabbi of Hamburg and is credited with combining orthodox Judaism and European culture in education. His younger brother, Adolphus Bernays, was the first professor of German at King’s College, London. Adolphus Bernays wrote multiple books to help English speakers learn German. Hakham Isaac Bernays founded a branch of the Bernays dynasty that remains influential to this day.
One of Isaac’s sons, Jacob Bernays, became a respected philologist and translator who wrote a biography of Joseph Scaliger, the founder of modern chronology. Isaac’s son Michael Bernays renounced Judaism in favor of Christianity and became a German historian of literature and an important researcher of Goethe and Shakespeare.
Isaac’s eldest son, Bermann Bernays, had a daughter, Martha Bernays, who became Sigmund Freud’s only wife. According to many of Freud’s biographers, her younger sister Minna Bernays was Freud’s mistress, and it is likely that Isaac Bernays’s granddaughters inspired the Austrian psychoanalyst to study sexuality in depth.
Bermann’s grandson, Edward Bernays, is often referred to as the “father of public relations“, a newspeak for “father of propaganda“. He was responsible for many famous campaigns, including the promotion of female smoking as a feminist act and work for United Fruit Company related to the CIA-organized overthrow of the democratically elected government of Guatemala.
Other notable members of the Bernays family include:
Thekla Bernays – a suffragette who wrote a decalogue for women that laid the foundations for modern feminism;
Karl Ludwig Bernays – a German journalist and associate of Karl Marx who later held several important positions in the Republican Party after emigrating to the US;
Doris Fleischmann Bernays – feminist activist and Edward Bernays’s wife, who urged women to keep their names after marriage and was the first married woman to obtain a US passport with her maiden name;
Paul Bernays – a Swiss mathematician known for his work in the axiomatic set theory and the philosophy of mathematics who co-founded the philosophical journal Dialectic;
Robert Hamilton Bernays – a liberal member of Parliament and close friend of Sir Harold Nicolson, one of the organizers of the League of Nations, and other high aristocrats in the UK.
Despite the extensive information available on deceased members of the Bernays family, information on the living members of the family is limited. However, the descendants of the Bernays dynasty continue to have a direct influence on the public consciousness of many nations. Mark Bernays Randolph, the great-grandson of Martha Bernays, is an entrepreneur and environmentalist from the United States and is the co-founder and first CEO of Netflix.
Step into a time machine and travel back to 1982 with G. Edward Griffin’s rare interview of Norman Dodd, an 83-year-old investigator for the Reece Committee.
This revealing interview exposes the infiltration of the New World Order by large corporations that are merging the USA into a world government. Dodd delves into the infiltration of banking and the public education system, providing an eye-opening perspective on how these systems operate.
As a member of the Reece Committee, Dodd has a wealth of knowledge on the subject of tax-exempt foundations and how they contribute to the New World Order.
Gain a unique insight into the political and financial landscape of the early 1980s and discover the truths about the New World Order’s influence on society.
Join G. Edward Griffin as he delves into this intriguing interview with a man who has spent his career uncovering the hidden agendas of the powerful elite.
Interview Summary
Norman Dodd, the former staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954, reveals in this video the collusion of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.
He discovered in his investigation that the endowments aimed to alter American history by controlling education after World War I and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.
The focus shifted after World War II to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before, and the key to their operations was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter.
The investigation was later accused of being anti-Semitic by the Republican National Committee, which was a false accusation, and the hearings were eventually terminated due to public outrage.
00:00:00
In this section of the interview, Mr. Norman Dodd introduces himself and explains that he was the staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954. He explains that his life’s interests have always revolved around the US and its original founding.
Having worked in manufacturing, international communication, and finally banking, Mr. Dodd was part of a major New York bank during the 1929 collapse, and during this time, his superiors asked him what the next steps were.
00:05:00
In this section, the speaker, Norman Dodd, talks about how he was assigned by his superiors to investigate banking policies and practices in the US, as they suspected something was not quite right. Dodd found proof that conflicting interests had been institutionalized in the banking industry since the end of World War I, which shocked him. His superior then offered him the opportunity to reorganize the bank in keeping with his own ideas, but Dodd resigned instead due to his conscience.
00:10:00
In this section of the transcript, Norman Dodd discusses his career in the financial world, including his resignation from a bank and subsequent difficulty finding work. He also talks about his specific interest in economics and desire to educate people about the dangers of speculative activities in the country.
Dodd then goes on to explain his role as Director of Research for the Reese Committee, which was tasked with investigating the activities of foundations to determine if they were un-American.
00:15:00
In this section of the video, Norman Dodd discusses his testimony to Congress regarding the activities of large endowed foundations in the past 40 years. He defined “unamerican” as any effort to effect unconstitutional changes in the country and explained how these foundations had influenced education in a way that moved away from the principles of the Constitution.
Dodd also speaks about his conversation with Rowan Gaither, the president of the Ford Foundation, who revealed that they had experience operating under directives that emanated from the White House and that they were currently operating under similar directives.
00:20:00
In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his experience with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. After asking certain questions and requesting information from them via a letter, he was invited to come up to New York to discuss the matter further.
There, the president of the endowment, Dr. Joseph Johnson, offered to allow a member of Dodd’s staff to examine the foundation’s minute books since its inception, saying that they could answer all the questions and their counter-suggestion would be obvious from those minutes.
Dodd accepted and later picked a member of his staff who was initially unsympathetic toward the investigation to search the archives.
00:25:00
In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his conversation with Katherine Casey, who was tasked with reviewing 50 years of handwritten minutes from the Carnegie Foundation.
Casey discovers that in 1908, the Carnegie trustees discussed the most effective means of altering the life of an entire people to be war. In 1910, they aimed to control the United States government by taking over and controlling the diplomatic machinery of the country.
After the First World War, the focus shifted to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before. The trustees realized that controlling education in the United States was critical in this regard and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education, while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.
The key to the success of these operations, they believed, was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter but were turned down by the prominent teachers in the country.
00:30:00
In this section, Norman Dodd explains how the Carnegie Foundation, in collaboration with the Guggenheim Foundation and the American Historical Association, sought to influence American history education by forming a group of 20 historians to study and shape the direction of the country.
The study ultimately resulted in a seven-volume report, which concluded that the future of the country belonged to collectivism administered with American efficiency.
Dodd suggests that this story emerged from the minutes of the Carnegie fund, but it was never fully presented to Congress due to opposition efforts that began from the start of the committee’s work.
00:35:00
In this section of the video, Norman Dodd recounts how he and his counsel were ordered to visit Wayne Hayes, the ranking minority member of the Committee on Foundations and Tax-Exempt Organizations, who initially opposed the investigation as an effort to gain notoriety.
Despite counsel’s skepticism, Dodd convinced Hayes to support the investigation by relating to him the spread of communism and the Soviet world. However, adding a top-flight intelligence officer to Dodd’s staff resulted in the Republican National Committee and the White House attempting to stop Dodd from continuing the investigation in the direction Carol Reese had requested.
00:40:00
In this section, Norman Dodd explains how he was given permission to set up an independent aspect of the investigation outside of his own office, which was later opposed by the Republican National Committee and even appealed to the White House.
The committee accused him of being anti-Semitic, which was a false accusation since there was no evidence proving it. Their true intention was to halt the completion of the investigation, which would have exposed the collaboration of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.
The hearings were eventually terminated due to the public outrage, and the charge of anti-Semitism remained a mystery as there was no basis for the accusation.
00:45:00
In this section, it is revealed that Colonel Lee Lorraine wrote a book called “Waters Flowing Eastward” that was a castigation of Jewish power in the world. However, he was dismissed from the staff due to the book’s anti-Semitic nature.
It is further revealed that the motivation behind the creation of big foundations such as Mr. Carnegie’s was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain, and not to establish collectivism.
But over time, the purpose and direction of the major foundations changed, and today, they firmly believe in collectivism, with the future belonging to this concept. The foundations support communist causes as they believe it represents a means of developing a monopoly that will be beneficial to them in the future.
Bitcoin, the world’s first cryptocurrency, was introduced to the public in 2008 by an anonymous person or group known as Satoshi Nakamoto.
The true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains unknown to this day, despite numerous attempts to uncover it.
In this article, we will explore some of the possible identities of Satoshi Nakamoto, the person who changed the way we think about money and finance.
Craig Wright: Australian Computer Scientist and Businessman
Craig Wright is an Australian entrepreneur and computer scientist who claimed to be the inventor of Bitcoin in 2016.
Despite providing cryptographic proof, Wright’s claims were met with skepticism from the cryptocurrency community, and he was unable to provide conclusive evidence to back up his claim.
Although Wright’s claims have been largely discredited, he remains a popular figure in the cryptocurrency community and continues to be a source of speculation.
Nick Szabo: Cryptography Pioneer and Smart Contract Inventor
Nick Szabo is a computer scientist and cryptographer who is widely believed to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Szabo is known for his work on digital contracts and was the inventor of the concept of smart contracts, which paved the way for the creation of decentralized applications.
Although Szabo has never confirmed his role as the creator of Bitcoin, many in the cryptocurrency community believe that he is the person behind the pseudonym.
Dorian Nakamoto: Former Systems Engineer and Japanese-American Citizen
Dorian Nakamoto is a former systems engineer who was identified as the creator of Bitcoin by Newsweek magazine in 2014.
However, Nakamoto denied any involvement with the creation of Bitcoin and claimed that he had never even heard of the cryptocurrency until his son mentioned it to him.
Despite this, some in the cryptocurrency community continue to believe that Dorian Nakamoto may be the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Hal Finney: Cryptographer and Early Bitcoin Developer
Hal Finney was a computer scientist and cryptography expert who was one of the earliest developers of Bitcoin.
Finney was the recipient of the first ever Bitcoin transaction, which was sent by Satoshi Nakamoto himself.
Although Finney passed away in 2014, some believe that he may have been the real Satoshi Nakamoto or may have had some involvement in the creation of Bitcoin.
Conclusion
The true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains a mystery, and it may be that we will never know for sure who the real creator of Bitcoin is.
However, the people mentioned in this article are just a few of the possible identities that have been proposed over the years.
Regardless of who Satoshi Nakamoto really is, there is no doubt that their invention has changed the way we think about money and has opened up a whole new world of possibilities for the future of finance.
It can be expected that the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto will continue to be a topic of debate and speculation for years to come.
What is certain, however, is that Bitcoin and the wider cryptocurrency industry that it inspired are here to stay.
As we continue to explore the possibilities of blockchain technology and decentralized finance, we may come closer to uncovering the true identity of the elusive Satoshi Nakamoto.
The documentary “Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of JFK, the role of secret societies in world events, and the involvement of American businessmen in funding and supporting the Nazi regime, including the use of slave labor.
It also reveals the Mafia’s influence over Hollywood and politics, and how Lucky Luciano forged a relationship with the CIA, using profits from drug running to fuel wars around the globe.
The film questions the responsibility of world leaders such as Winston Churchill and the Vatican in the rise of Hitler and the Nazi war machine and suggests that the rich played on both sides of the war to protect themselves from the Soviets.
In the beginning, the documentary “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” discusses the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and suggests that there was a larger conspiracy at play involving the CIA, the mafia, and the military-industrial complex.
The video claims that the assassination was executed by a team of snipers who were guarded by Cubans and that the fatal shot came from a storm drain.
It is suggested that George H.W. Bush was involved in the plot and played a role in controlling the forensic evidence.
The video also highlights the corruption within the American political system and how the rich elite profited off of wars and controlled the Nuremberg trials.
The video further addresses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, including the theft of the President’s cadaver, the botched autopsy, and the plotters’ cover-up.
The documentary then explains how the wealthy control the media, including the CIA’s involvement in buying and using media outlets to manipulate public perception.
The film also explores the use of airforce bases in Europe to connect with the poppy fields in Pakistan and Afghanistan, generating billions of dollars through the sale of refined cocaine and heroin in Europe and the USA, and the media’s coverage of 9/11, which involves paid actors speaking lines that had been written for them.
Ultimately, the documentary emphasizes how powerful and corrupt individuals and groups can shape the public’s perception of events and control their actions.
Lastly, “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores various concepts, such as terrorism being used as military deception by the rich, the concept of divide and rule to control populations, and the true wealth of the Queen of England and Rothschild merchant bankers.
The video argues that everything in our lives is a rich man’s trick, and that the ruling class uses tools such as the media, tax system, religion, and false flag terrorism to control the population.
The speaker suggests the need for a revolution to take power away from corrupt politicians and the ruling class, as they control the police and justice system.
Additionally, the video raises the question of why a society would kill its own best leaders, such as JFK, implying that this event is a reflection of a corrupt and brutal society.
