Tag: Mossad

  • Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    In this YouTube video Christopher Bollyn discusses the deception behind the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent war on terror. He argues that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror, resulting in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of dollars. Bollyn emphasizes the need to expose this dual deception and put an end to the war. He also discusses the connection between the war on terror and Zionist interests, highlighting the role of Israel in fragmenting Arab states in the Middle East. Bollyn presents evidence of Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the war in Syria. He concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu and other Jewish neocons in the construction of the 9/11 attacks, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discuss the role of influential figures like Rupert Murdoch in controlling the media narrative. Additionally, the speaker highlights the involvement of Mossad and Israeli companies in airport security, as well as the inconsistencies and anomalies surrounding the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests and calls for people to seek genuine peace and resist the fraudulent war.

    Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn begins by discussing the artificiality of American politics and the control of the media by a small number of corporations. He highlights the lack of reporting on important issues such as the war in Syria and the excessive spending on the war on terror. Bollyn argues that the United States is in a predicament and that there is a need for people to understand that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror. He emphasizes the importance of exposing this dual deception and bringing an end to the war.

    He argues that 9/11 was carried out to initiate the war on terror, which has resulted in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of borrowed dollars. The speaker emphasizes the importance of resisting this criminal war agenda, as failure to do so would be a betrayal to the nation. They also highlight that the government and media continue to lie about the events of 9/11, suggesting that they are controlled by the same people responsible for the attack.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the link between the 9/11 attacks, the war on terror, and the Zionist agenda. He argues that 9/11 was a false flag event designed to push forward the Zionist war agenda and establish Jewish supremacy. Bollyn presents evidence of the connections between individuals involved in the attacks and Israeli intelligence, highlighting the role of Richard Gutjahr and his high-level Israeli intelligence officer wife. He also mentions the meeting of Israeli Chief of Staff, Uhaul Eisen Mofaz, with prominent neoconservatives in the Pentagon. Bollyn further discusses the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, which he claims were part of the bigger plan to destabilize and control the Middle East. Citing General Wesley Clark’s statements, Bollyn suggests that the ultimate goal was to target seven countries, with five of them already being accomplished. Overall, Bollyn argues that the war on terror was a means to fulfill an unknown plan driven by Zionism and Israeli interests.

    Christopher Bollyn goes on to discuss the Israeli plan to fragment Arab states in the Middle East, which was articulated in a paper published in 1982. This plan involves breaking up the states along ethnic and confessional lines, similar to what happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Bollyn explains that Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Sudan have already been fragmented, and the ultimate goal is to establish Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East. He highlights the complicity of the American government in this plan, citing a 1948 document written by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that acknowledged Zionist objectives. Bollyn also mentions an email written by Hillary Clinton in 2012, where she states that using American force in Syria would help Israel. This, along with statements made by current Secretary of State John Kerry, suggests that the United States is actively involved in fragmenting and destroying countries like Syria for the benefit of Israel, and not out of any American interest.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the involvement of the US government in funding terrorist militias in Syria, which has fueled the ongoing war. He highlights the fact that many members of these militias wear ski masks to hide their faces, as they are paid mercenaries who have a future career to protect. Bollyn also points out a concerning incident involving Senator John McCain, who illegally entered Syria and met with leaders of a militia that the US was funding. He identifies one of the men McCain met with as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who later became the head of ISIS. Bollyn questions why McCain’s office provided an inadequate response when asked about the identity of the man in the black shirt seen in the photograph. Bollyn also sheds light on the questionable nature of the US war on terror, noting that terrorism has actually increased since 9/11 and is ten times greater in the countries where the US is fighting. He suggests that either the war on terror is counterproductive or there is another hidden agenda at play. Bollyn concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister of Israel, in the design and construction of the 9/11 attacks, along with other Jewish neocons in the Bush Administration, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the connection between Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, and how Barak made a public statement on the BBC World before the Twin Towers fell, blaming Osama bin Laden for the attack and calling for a war on terror. Bollyn points out that Barak was Netanyahu’s commander in an Israeli covert Commando force. He also highlights the false narrative presented by the New York Times after the attack, stating that hijacked jets destroyed the Twin Towers and hit the Pentagon, when in fact, there is evidence to suggest that drones were used and no large Boeing jet hit the Pentagon. Bollyn also mentions the ruthless actions of the Israeli state in the past, such as the attack on a US intelligence ship in 1967. He concludes by comparing the cover-up of 9/11 to the conspiracy surrounding the assassination of JFK and the immense cost of the fraudulent war on terror.

    Bollyn explains that the War on Terror is essentially an Israeli strategy, promoted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since 1979, to involve the US military and its allies in the Middle East to fight on behalf of Israel. Bollyn points out that Netanyahu wrote books on the topic, claiming that Islamic terrorists were attacking Israel because it was part of the West and therefore the West needed to fight this war. He argues that this is a deceptive way to delegitimize the Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation. Bollyn also highlights Netanyahu’s statement after the 9/11 attacks, where he said that it would generate sympathy and be beneficial for Israel. Additionally, Bollyn discusses the close relationship between Netanyahu and Larry Silverstein, who owned the three buildings that collapsed on 9/11, and how Silverstein acquired the World Trade Center towers through a privatization scheme.

    The speaker also connects the war on terror to the Israeli stratagem and historical figures like Menachem Begin and David Ben-Gurion, who had aspirations for a larger Israel. He emphasizes the extreme nature of the current Israeli government and how acts of terrorism are used to scare people into supporting their aggressive Middle East war policy. The speaker concludes by mentioning the invasion of South Lebanon by Israel and their intention to establish a Christian state there.

    The speaker then discusses the actions of a radical Zionist group known as the Shamir group in the late 1940s, including the assassination of a United Nations mediator in Palestine. The group also played a role in the expulsion of Palestinians during the Israeli takeover after the United Nations partitioned Palestine. The speaker connects this history to the current mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, suggesting he has ties to the “Mohsad” (Mossad) and has been influential in American politics.

    The speaker then shifts to discuss the Israeli aviation of 9/11, highlighting a movie made in 1978 featuring a plane crashing into the Pan Am building and another movie made in 2000 featuring a plane crashing into the World Trade Center. These films, produced by Israeli agent Arnon Milchan, are presented as examples of predictive programming. The speaker also mentions Milchan’s involvement in a secret Israeli organization called Lakam, which was involved in smuggling nuclear components from America to Israel. Additionally, Benjamin Netanyahu’s role in the war on terror and the Netanyahu Institute on International Terrorism are discussed, along with a 1980 prediction made by the head of Mossad about terrorism coming to America, specifically New York City.

    Milchan and another agent, Avraham Shalom Bendor, tried to secure the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, but it was torn up when it was discovered that Bendor was a convicted murderer in Israel. However, they later went to work for Jules Kroll, a business partner of Maurice Greenberg, and their company, Kroll Associates, got the security contract for the World Trade Center after the 1993 bombing. It is also mentioned that the Israelis had prior knowledge of the 1983 bombing of the Beirut barracks but failed to share that information with the Americans. The section ends by discussing how the US, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan cooperated to arm and train the mujahideen in Afghanistan, even supporting anti-western groups, in order to create a future enemy for the War on Terror.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the influence of a man named V Rafia, who used Charlie Wilson’s office as his own and had significant control over lobbying efforts. Bollyn goes on to explain how Arab fighters, known as Afghan Arabs, were trained by Israeli military intelligence, including Osama bin Laden. He mentions a man named Ali Muhammad, who trained bin Laden and set up a terrorist cell in Nairobi. Bollyn then connects the creation of Al-Qaeda and Taliban to the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel in the early 1980s. He also mentions an article from Foreign Affairs magazine in 1998 that discussed the possibility of catastrophic terrorism coming to America. Bollyn points out that the authors of this report, including Philip Zelikow, went on to play prominent roles in the 9/11 Commission. He also highlights the Project for the New American Century, a group that predicted the need for US military engagement prior to 9/11.

    The speaker also discusses how terrorism has been used as a pretext for launching wars and justifying foreign policies. He mentions the 9/11 attacks as the catalyst for implementing long-standing plans and projects. The speaker also highlights the close relationship between Israeli intelligence and ISIS, claiming that the Israeli intelligence outfit, SITE, had access to ISIS beheading videos before they were released. Furthermore, he argues that there is a connection between the Clinton and Bush families through their involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. The speaker suggests that politicians with a secret Vice or criminal history are often willing to do what they’re told to keep their secrets hidden. He concludes by discussing the fraudulent nature of some ISIS videos and how events like the Orlando shooting are used to draw Israel and the West closer together.

    He argues that the American public was duped into supporting the global war on terror through a combination of controlling the investigation, media interpretation, and litigation. The evidence was destroyed, and there was no criminal investigation into the attacks. The speaker also questions the integrity of key figures involved in the 9/11 Commission and their true motivations. He highlights several individuals who played a role in the cover-up, ultimately raising doubts about the official narrative of the events.

    He highlights the influence of figures like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who played a significant role in shaping public opinion through media ownership. The speaker also points out the involvement of powerful figures like Jacob Rothschild and Cheney Woolsey in the control of resources in places like Kurdistan and the Golan Heights. The speaker raises concerns about media consolidation and the lack of transparency surrounding events like the collapse of Building 7. Additionally, the speaker reveals a potential conflict of interest involving Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who oversaw the 9/11 tort litigation, suggesting that the legal proceedings were strategically settled out of court. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests.

    The speaker then discusses the involvement of the Mossad company Envy in airport security in Europe and their connection to the 9/11 attacks. The company ICTS, which was responsible for security at Boston, Newark, and Dulles airports on that day, was a defendant in the 9/11 Court litigation. However, the trial ended abruptly with the judge dismissing them as just the parent company. The speaker also mentions individuals involved in the litigation, such as Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum, both high-level Zionist players. They were responsible for distributing money to the families of 9/11 victims, and those who accepted the money had to sign non-disclosure agreements. The speaker highlights the connection between these individuals and their ties to Israel. The judge overseeing the litigation, Michael McCasey, is also mentioned, as he belonged to the same congregation as John Schallerstein, oversaw the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and facilitated Larry Silverstein’s negotiations with the insurance company. The speaker suggests that the government and media are suppressing evidence that contradicts the official narrative of 9/11 in order to protect the true culprits. The speaker personally realized early on that the government’s story was a lie and began writing about it, eventually relocating to Europe. He shares conversations he had with former German intelligence chiefs who questioned the official narrative and pointed to Mossad as a possible culprit. However, their statements were not published in German magazines due to strict restrictions on discussing such matters in Germany.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the issue of deception and disinformation in the mainstream media. He explains that journalists often do not question the official version of events and those who do are labeled as crazy or fired from their jobs. Bollyn also highlights some anomalies of 9/11, such as the strange behavior of the hijackers and the peculiar characteristics of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. He suggests that there may have been a missile-like object fired before the plane hit the tower, possibly made of depleted uranium. Bollyn provides evidence of a burning object leaving a trail of dark oxides, which he believes could be a result of depleted uranium.

    When discussing the characteristics of the burning World Trade Center towers on 9/11, he suggests that an object, possibly a burning warhead, was used to create a superheated environment inside the towers, causing anything combustible to immediately burst into flames. Bollyn points out that there were peculiar explosions coming out of the entry wounds where the planes entered the buildings, which he believes could be indicative of thermite. He mentions that thermite produces white smoke and incredible heat when it burns. Bollyn also highlights the presence of molten iron and molybdenum in the dust from the World Trade Center, which cannot be explained by burning jet fuel or office fires, but can be attributed to thermite. He concludes that the government reports have ignored this evidence, suggesting a cover-up.

    Christopher Bollyn suggests a controlled demolition was responsible for the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. He mentions the discovery of super thermite material in the dust, which is capable of releasing more energy per gram than any known explosive. The smoke from the burning pile contained nanoparticles that were extremely dangerous when inhaled, causing serious illnesses such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, molten steel was found beneath the rubble, even weeks after the attack. Bollyn also highlights the suspicious destruction of Building 6, where all the evidence for major crimes in the 1990s was stored. The night before the attack, the evidence was stolen from the vault in the basement and then the vault was bombed to cover up the theft. Bollyn raises questions about the Pentagon attack as well, pointing out the lack of visible evidence of a plane crash.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the inconsistencies and cover-ups surrounding the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the Shanksville crash. He questions how a small aluminum body plane could have penetrated the reinforced concrete wall of the Pentagon without damaging the columns in between. Bollyn also highlights the lack of evidence of a plane at the Shanksville site, with the debris field located elsewhere. He emphasizes the need to inform, organize, and take meaningful action to resist the fraudulent War on Terror, urging people to boycott Israeli products and engage in political activism. Bollyn quotes JFK to emphasize the importance of seeking genuine peace and building a better future for all.

    At the Q & A, the speaker is asked a personal question about Noam Chomsky and his stance on 9/11. The speaker believes that Chomsky has been an agent of manipulation and control, as his position on 9/11 contradicts the rest of his work. The speaker also mentions Alex Jones, another alternative voice in the media who avoids discussing Israeli involvement in 9/11. In response to the second question about video footage showing a plane wing entering a building, the speaker acknowledges that the video may be fraudulent, but maintains that planes did indeed strike the World Trade Center based on eyewitness accounts and the sound of the impact.

    Christopher Bollyn also reveals that many powerful figures in America, including the Bush family, have significant investments in war stocks. Companies like Halliburton, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman profited greatly from the war. Bollyn believes that while individuals like George Bush and Dick Cheney should be held accountable for treason and war crimes, it is important to recognize that the issue goes beyond them. He calls for a proper investigation that includes figures like Cheney, Bush, Sheratoff Ashcroft, and Ali Hupa to expose the full extent of their knowledge and involvement. Bollyn also addresses the Saudi connection, stating that while there is evidence of financial support from a Saudi royal family member, there is no proof of their involvement in the actual crime. He suggests that the Saudis have been manipulated to play the role of financiers, with the United States and Israel dictating their actions. Overall, Bollyn argues that the American government has become a “crimeocracy” run by criminals, and simply replacing one person with another will not bring about real change.

    The speaker also discusses the theory that the images and videos from 9/11 were pre-fabricated and that the witnesses were actors, suggesting that no real footage of the event exists. However, the speaker believes that these theories are “red herrings” and that the focus should be on the fact that thousands of people were killed and the world has changed as a result. The speaker argues that the US and Europe are now engaged in an open-ended war in the Middle East, with plans for more wars with Iran and Russia. They believe that this war agenda is orchestrated by Zionists. The solution proposed is to change the banking system and establish national banks that issue credit to the people on behalf of the state, in order to free nations from debt slavery. However, the speaker acknowledges that this would require a large popular movement to overthrow the current banking system.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the systemic corruption in the banking and financial system. He mentions that while there may be some smaller banks that are not in conspiracy with everyone, the overall system is rigged against the people. He also highlights the corruption within the U.S. government, where the president can declare war without Congress and the Federal Reserve controls the printing of money. Bollyn emphasizes the need to reorganize and rectify these situations in order to find solutions. He also touches upon the connection between the Arab Spring and the fraudulent war on terror, stating that the United States manipulated the Arab Spring to serve its own interests, as seen in Egypt and Syria. Bollyn expresses his frustration that these issues are not being discussed enough in America and that the media, controlled by a few corporations, keeps the public ignorant. He concludes by saying that the American people are starting to wake up but that there is still a long way to go.

    At the end, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the current state of the country and the political circus surrounding the Trump-Clinton rivalry. They argue that Americans need to wake up and take responsibility for their own future, instead of relying on one candidate to solve all their problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being informed and spreading awareness, as they believe that a revolution of awareness is necessary for real change. They mention various conspiracy theories, such as chemtrails, Fukushima, and 9/11, stating that these events were hoaxes designed to deceive and control the population. In conclusion, the speaker urges the audience to fight against the deception and lies that have enslaved them.

    YouTube Video

  • Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    The YouTube video “How Jeffrey Epstein Got Away With It” explores the story behind Jeffrey Epstein’s examination, trial, and conviction for federal sex trafficking involving minors. The video highlights the questionable plea deal struck with Epstein by Alex Acosta, the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida, and the implications it had on the justice system. The documentary also examines the case from the perspective of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, and their alleged involvement in it. The video raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 and suggests alternative explanations for it.

    Acosta was the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida from 2005 to 2009, and his job was to ensure that criminals went to jail. He was portrayed as a person of integrity and an honorable guy, who caught the attention of former president Donald Trump. However, he refused to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Labor position, and the Senate was concerned about a particular case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

    Jeffrey Epstein was a friend of presidents and high-profile lawyers who was arrested on new sex trafficking charges and waiting trial for federal sex trafficking involving minors. Acosta gave Epstein the plea deal of the century, which excused underage sex trafficking, and allowed Epstein to walk free.

    When Acosta was being interviewed for the job of Trump’s labor secretary, he was asked about the questionable plea deal, and he said that he was ordered to stand down immediately because Epstein belonged to intelligence. The current US Attorney General cannot order a US Attorney to stand down unless he is elected by someone who is not part of the judiciary.

    According to Nick Bryan, an expert reporter on the Epstein case, only the president or the Attorney General has the power to order a US attorney to stand down. There have been four presidential administrations that have covered up the Jeffrey Epstein case, and now, the Biden Administration is covering it up. The American government is aiding the embedding of child trafficking by not investigating Jeffrey Epstein.

    The evidence potentially connects Jeffrey Epstein to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. The film highlights how it was possible for one man to be protected and supported by the entire US government and how Epstein’s lawyers at Morgan and Morgan fight to give victims the best shot at compensation.

    The film also discusses how lawsuits can be expensive but that victims of abuse can receive compensation with the help of law firms. The film explains how Epstein’s case was yanked away from the Palm Beach Police Department and given to a grand jury, where a special prosecutor was responsible for showing the grand jurors the evidence necessary. However, the film argues that the grand jury was corrupt and that the special prosecutor, Barry Cromwell, called only one victim and skewed her credibility.

    The speaker then discusses the background of Jeffrey Epstein and how his victims were repeatedly molested and became addicted to drugs. The system in place allowed the perps to go unpunished once they became “unmarketable” and their damaged credibility would compromise them.

    When the grand jury didn’t indict Epstein on a single count of child abuse, the Palm Beach Police Department and its chief Michael Ryder went to the feds and claimed it was a cover-up. They didn’t prosecute him, despite having a list of 32 victims, due to pressures from high up, possibly the President or the Attorney General. The outrage over Epstein’s lenient plea deal and lack of punishment raises questions about the justice system’s dealings with high-powered individuals, prompting some to question the existence of a “VIP justice system” in the United States.

    The speaker claims that Epstein was a professional con man with access to people, money, and young girls, and that the government targeted him due to his exploitative and blackmailing behavior. The speaker also suggests that Epstein was meeting with Joe Biden’s CIA director and that he was recruited for his intelligence work due to his predilection for underage girls and his charm, deceitfulness, and sociopathic tendencies.

    The speaker further claims that Epstein’s case makes more sense when viewed from the perspective of an intelligence operation, and that the sweetheart deal he received in 2006, the prison cell cover-up, and the disappearance of his tapes are all explained by his status as an asset. Finally, the speaker points to the recent raid on Epstein’s Caribbean island and the discovery of tapes there as evidence of his intelligence work. The speaker is Stuart Kaplan, a retired FBI special agent.

    Jeffrey Epstein was later convicted as a registered offender, but despite this, he was able to maintain relationships with politicians, CEOs, and public figures, who should have had no interest in him. The speaker suggests that these actions may be due to threats or blackmail from intelligence agencies, as Robert Maxwell, Epstein’s closest confidant, was believed to have been working for Israel’s version of the CIA, Massad. The speaker also mentions the possibility that Epstein was able to blackmail powerful figures due to the intelligence apparatus behind him, making it clear that his actions were not possible without this support.

    The documentary makes claims that Robert Maxwell, an Israeli-born British media tycoon, had spilled confidential nuclear information about Israel, which led to his kidnapping and imprisonment for 18 years. After his death in 1991, Maxwell’s close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and alleged involvement in intelligence work are speculated upon.

    Maxwell’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also discussed, highlighting his role in securing Epstein’s plea deal in 2008 and his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video posits that Epstein’s downfall, which took place in 2019, was a result of his growing arrogance and his use of blackmail to maintain power, ultimately outliving his usefulness.

    The opinion is then discussed regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 while he was awaiting trial. While it is widely believed that he committed suicide, the speaker argues that there is a larger conspiracy at play and that other co-conspirators, particularly federal agencies such as the CIA, are responsible for his death. The speaker also raises questions about Epstein’s lifestyle and funding, pointing out that he was known to have only two known clients and had a close relationship with Leslie Wexner, a wealthy CEO with ties to organized crime. The documentary however fails to consider the most likely possibility that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive and his death was faked.

    At the end, the speaker argues that Epstein was compromised himself and that his allies, including Wexner, implemented a system of secrecy and control to keep people from investing with him. The speaker also references the Epstein House of Horrors and the victims’ compensation fund as efforts to cover up his crimes. The speaker then introduces EpsteinJustice.com, an organization aimed at taking accountability for Epstein’s crimes and protecting children from similar harm.

  • Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot and aviation whistleblower, spoke on The Michael Decon Program about the corruption and safety concerns present in the airline industry, particularly in regards to the events of 9/11.

    Hanley founded the website 911 Pilot Whistleblowers to expose the fact that the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled, and that neither the hijackers nor experienced pilots could have flown the flight profiles at the given speed and altitude.

    Hanley also discussed his personal experience, including being illegally terminated by United Airlines for speaking out about safety issues and the grounding of pilots who are whistleblowers.

    Additionally, Hanley shared skepticism about historical events and a belief that the government and media have misled and manipulated the public.

    When speaking about the damage done to the Pentagon, Hanley provided evidence that a 757 plane struck the building and described the off-body parts and identifiable passengers found as proof of a plane crash.

    Hanley also expressed his belief that a group of powerful people, including Mossad, CIA, MI6 and the Rothschild cabal, were behind the attacks.

    He discussed his experiences as a federal whistleblower and the lack of response he received from relevant government agencies when he attempted to bring forth evidence.

    Hanley encouraged individuals to speak out until justice is served and provided tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion.

    00:05:00

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot, received a plethora of certifications and flew different aircraft in his 35-year career. He shared his experience flying for the Navy during the Cold War and his tenure at United Airlines. However, his career ended due to his vocal opinions on the safety and security implications of the 9/11 events, and he was illegally terminated. In this section, Captain Hanley emphasizes that he, as an experienced aircraft pilot, could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles at the given speed and altitude, especially the Pentagon profile, and neither could the alleged hijackers.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley, who worked as an airline pilot, talks about his six-year fight with the US government AFAA and airline to expose the corruption in the industry. Despite evidence and witnesses, his case was dismissed. He founded a website called 911 Pilot Whistleblowers and serves as its Director and international public spokesperson. The website focuses on efforts to put a stop to the corruption that was prevalent in the airline industry, especially during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley explains his personal experience during the tragedy and mentions that the website aims to shed light on the events of 9/11.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley explains that the main purpose of the 911 Pilots organization is to demonstrate that the planes used in the attack were remotely controlled through a system called the uninterrupted autopilot. According to Hanley, this system allows a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer, and fly it to its target. Hanley has been trying to recruit active and retired pilots to attest to the fact that neither the hijackers nor they themselves could have flown the 9/11 flight profile. Hanley cites the example of the Pentagon profile flown by a 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker named Hani Hanjour, who was a poor student and could barely speak English, and the maneuver he made in his first attempt was nearly impossible even for experienced pilots. Hanley suspects that there might be more to the story behind the alleged hijackers.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the suspicious activities of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, prior to the attacks. Hanjour attempted to rent a single-engine airplane but was found to be an incompetent pilot by instructors who evaluated him. Despite this, Hanjour was later able to skillfully maneuver a commercial airliner during the attacks. Hanley believes that this evidence has been covered up by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and shares his attempts to track down witnesses and present this information to the government.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the lack of a criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the failures of the 9/11 commission to address the questions and concerns of the victims’ families. He explains that the commission was underfunded, time-constrained, and set up to fail, with the executive director having the final report outlined before the commission began their work. Additionally, no pilots were allowed to testify before the commission regarding the absurd assertion that the terrorists were able to fly the planes into the World Trade Center towers. Hanley also shares his experience of being grounded permanently by the FAA under the guise of being mentally unstable after speaking out about safety and security concerns in the airline industry.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his efforts to raise safety concerns with his employer, United Airlines, and the union that represented him. Despite following Federal Aviation Administration regulations and submitting multiple reports to his employer and union, he was stonewalled and eventually grounded for “psychological” reasons. When he sought legal advice from mental health professionals, he was advised to undergo psychological evaluations to protect himself and ensure that he was fit to fly, but United Airlines used the results of these evaluations to further justify their decision to ground him.

    00:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how he was told to submit to the Employee Assistance Program after an incident with a flight attendant, which was endorsed by the company, union, and FAA. After flying to Chicago and meeting with a flight surgeon, he was taken to a mental health facility without realizing it and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder by a psychologist who had no knowledge of aviation. Despite having evidence and recorded conversations, he was ignored by the government after trying to report the situation and ultimately went through a tough experience that impacted his wife and children.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how whistleblowers in the airline industry are treated by the government and how it affects their families. He shares his story of losing his 27-year marriage and two children who blame him for the divorce. Hanley is no longer a U.S citizen because of what he experienced as a whistleblower. He is now part of the Whistleblowing Airline Pilots Association, a grassroots organization that aims to expose the wrongful process of eliminating whistleblowing pilots in the industry. Hanley had lost his 35-year career and reputation as a pilot, while his children were the ultimate cost.

    00:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the patriotism that was pumped up after 9/11, even though it was a façade and the government deluded people with false patriotism. Furthermore, the media worked with the government to instigate patriotism, and we have witnessed this again, even with the recent COVID pandemic. Hanley asserts that the CIA exists not to solve problems but to create them, and this is evident in their involvement in JFK’s assassination, their lies about weapons of mass destruction, and their use of hijackers as their assets. Hanley believes that various groups, such as the Bilderberg, the Rothschild Cabal, and the 13 Bloodlines, collaborated for years to plan 9/11. Additionally, he questions American gullibility from historical events such as Pearl Harbor.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his skepticism of various historical events, including the Kennedy assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Operation Paperclip, and the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley shares his belief that 9/11 and other events were a test of global gullibility and that the media is complicit in propagating false narratives. He also mentions a book by a physics professor from the University of Punjab who claims that bin Laden died in 2005 and was fired and thrown in jail when he spoke publicly about it. A caller also shares their experience of being told not to take a mental test by their union and a mechanic’s belief that they installed a box in the plane that crashed.

    00:55:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is interviewed on The Michael Decon Program about the existence of an autopilot system that could have taken control of the airplane during the 9/11 attacks. An avionics technician named Wayne Anderson saw this system in operation back in 1996 on a Boeing 757 and had given an interview after which he was chastised by McDonald Douglas. The system has existed in some form since 1944 and is derived from cruise missile technology. Captain Hanley and the caller on the show agree that it would have been impossible for the hijackers to navigate and control the planes manually. The accuracy of navigation systems on modern commercial jet aircraft is such that when the weather is below a certain visibility, pilots are required to Auto Land the airplane, where it tracks the center line of the runway until the Pilot disconnects the autopilot.

    01:00:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the controversy surrounding what hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The argument has been whether it was a missile or American 77, or if an airplane was even involved at all. Hanley shares that there were 99 pilot whistleblowers who couldn’t have flown the plane, but he also acknowledges that many different theories exist. The FBI won’t release the camera footage around the site, which adds to the issue. They also address the fact that there are many people online who try to discredit those who question the official narrative, and that some of these individuals have been paid to do so.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the interview, the hosts and callers discuss the negative actions of the CIA and FBI, with one caller highlighting the Waco incident and Oklahoma City bombing as examples. Another caller references a Wikipedia page detailing the technology available in 1984 that allowed for remote control aircraft navigation and compares it to the advanced technology today. The hosts express the importance of educating oneself on these topics and encourage callers to share their opinions and be a part of the program.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the interview, a caller discusses his experience of witnessing the events of 9/11 in a sports bar in New Zealand and the disbelief and anger that followed. He talks about the hostile times where people were not allowed to speak against the narrative that was being pushed and how this lack of discourse allowed the official narrative to persist. They also discuss the self-censorship that is present in American culture and how it has been a factor in the ability to speak out against the narrative. Finally, they touch upon the idea that this incident was part of a larger plan that had been in the works for many years and the difficulty in discussing this narrative because of the perceived association with anti-Semitism.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the caller expresses their belief that Israelis have no business making laws in the United States and criticizes his family members who refuse to question the official narrative of 9/11. He recounts how he has been visited by the FBI several times but takes pleasure in cracking jokes with them. Later, another caller joins the show, identifying himself as being with Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and claims that there is evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley was interviewed live on The Michael Decon Program. They discussed the evidence of what happened at the Pentagon during 9/11. There was a lot of misinformation about the Pentagon, with many people believing there was some sort of missile or farce happening, but the evidence shows a 757 plane caused the damage. Photos show all the damage on the first floor and the extent of the impact damage on the outside. There were videos taken that recorded the plane crossing the lawn and evidence of the right and left wingtips and engines. The recovery of the off-body parts and identification of all the actual passengers provide compelling evidence of what happened.

    01:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is being interviewed about his belief that a plane struck the Pentagon on 9/11, not a missile. He mentions the hate mail he receives and that his stance has been thoroughly researched. Hanley goes on to discuss his belief that it was a group of powerful people, including Mossad CIA MI6, who were behind the events of 9/11, and that the Rothschild cabal and the creation of the nation state of Israel were part of the motivation for the attacks. He also mentions that his experiences with 9/11 caused him to become interested in conspiracy theories and seeking the truth, which has become a lifelong pursuit.

    01:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his belief that the military-industrial complex benefitted from the 6.2 trillion dollar expenditure since 9/11. He also mentions insider trading that occurred before the events of 9/11 and how it is a clear sign of a false flag. Hanley encourages people to visit 911pilot.org to read interviews with pilots around the world who all believe that the official narrative could not have been true. He also shares his experience with trying to report information concerning the crime to various government agencies, but ultimately being stonewalled for 30 months.

    01:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his experiences with federal whistleblower cases and the lack of response he received when attempting to bring forth evidence to relevant government agencies. He shares the story of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, who presented 57 evidence packages to a U.S attorney in New York, which led to the announcement of a grand jury investigation into their allegations. However, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology blocked their evidence, and the grand jury was prevented from moving forward. Hanley talks about how they have exhausted all political and legal avenues in the United States and are now trying to reach out to the International Community to investigate the 9/11 crime.

    01:40:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley emphasizes the importance of continuing to speak out about 9/11 until justice is served. He expresses optimism that the truth will eventually come to light with the power of information exchange in the information age. He also provides his social media information for those who want to follow his vocal opinions on the topic. The segment ends with a clip from a 2001 interview with Donald Trump about 9/11, where he suggests that the towers may have been brought down by bombs in addition to the planes. The host encourages listeners to keep speaking out and never stay silent about these important issues.

    01:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley provides tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion, advising individuals to get inside a building and move away from windows. He goes on to suggest staying inside, shutting all doors and windows, and having a basement or getting as far into the middle of the building as possible. If one was outside after the blast, he recommends getting clean immediately, removing and bagging all outer clothing to avoid radioactive dust or ash away from the body. Finally, he advises staying tuned, following media for more information, and not stepping outside until officials say it’s safe.

    YouTube Video