Miscopy

Tag: Propaganda

  • Katherine Watt on Militarization of Public Health and Use of Military for Implementing Globalist Agenda

    Katherine Watt on Militarization of Public Health and Use of Military for Implementing Globalist Agenda

    In this video, Katherine Watt discusses the militarization of public health and the use of the military as a front for implementing a global agenda by central bankers. She explains how the US Department of Defense and the World Health Organization (WHO) are using various tactics such as propaganda, censorship, fear tactics, and toxic vaccines to establish control over the world’s population. Watt traces the origins of this agenda back to 1969 and highlights the financial coercion mechanisms and legal loopholes involved. She also discusses the consolidation of power within global health organizations and the establishment of programs that erode individual rights and transfer control to these organizations. Watt concludes by stating that as more states reclaim their authority to protect their citizens, there will be a tipping point leading to criminal prosecutions against these globalists.

    Katherine Watt starts by discussing the concept of public health being militarized and how the military is being used as a public health front. She refers to it as a “kill box,” which is a military term for establishing a geographic area for a military attack. Katherine Watt explains that the goal of the Department of Defense (DOD) and the World Health Organization (WHO) is to set up the entire world as their target population, using various weapons such as propaganda, censorship, fear tactics, and toxic vaccines. She claims that this project has been going on for centuries, with globalist central bankers seeking complete control over human beings. She also mentions the financial coercion mechanisms involved, where compliance with public health measures is tied to access to financial services. On the legal side, she traces the origins of this agenda back to 1969.

    Katherine Watt then discusses the establishment of the chemical and biological warfare program by the U.S. Congress and the loopholes built into the law to justify it. She explains that these loopholes allowed research and weapons development for “protective or prophylactic or defensive” purposes. Watt argues that this characterization is false because all biologically active products are inherently toxic and aggressive. She also mentions the creation of the Public Health Emergencies program and the National Vaccine program, both of which were instrumental in setting up liability exemption for manufacturers and funneling vaccine injury cases into a separate compensation program.

    Watt points out that the World Health Organization (WHO), which she considers a military organization, played a crucial role in transferring sovereign government power from nation-states to the WHO and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). She highlights amendments to international health regulations in 2005 that aimed at strengthening surveillance, testing, detention, quarantine, and forced treatment during international outbreaks of communicable diseases. Despite the pretext of protecting international trade, Watt argues that the real intention was to establish legal systems that transferred power to global health organizations. She also mentions the establishment of the Emergency Use Authorization program and the transfer of CBRN weapon stockpile control.

    Katherine Watt continues by discussing the establishment of program management structures in the early 2000s, following the events of 9/11 and the anthrax attacks. This was done through various statutes such as the 2000 Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act and the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which effectively put the country into a permanent state of war.

    Katherine Watt argues that these actions essentially created a de facto covert global martial law act by the US government, making everyone a presumptive combatant or enemy target. She also highlights the merging of various government agencies through acts like the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act.

    Additionally, Katherine Watt mentions the Other Transactions Authority, which was revealed through Pfizer’s motion to dismiss a whistleblower case, stating that the COVID-19 vaccines were DOD prototypes and didn’t require valid clinical trials or FDA authorization. She argues that all of this has led to a massive funding stream for military-led bioweapons research and use, eliminating informed consent and shielding the government and stakeholders from liability. She sees this as a joint project between the US Department of Defense, the Federal Reserve, the World Health Organization, the Bank for International Settlements, and the United Nations.

    At the end, Katherine Watt discusses the actions taken by globalists against states and provinces that pass laws protecting informed consent and consumer safety. She mentions a report released in October 2022 that criticizes state laws limiting public health protections, stating that the globalists are not in favor of such laws. Watt believes that as more states reclaim their authority and implement measures to protect their citizens, there will be a tipping point leading to criminal prosecutions. She emphasizes that the evidence against these globalists is strong and their attempts to defend themselves using national security only further reinforce the need for action against their crimes.

    Video

  • Barbie Movie Review by Ben Shapiro

    Barbie Movie Review by Ben Shapiro

    In this 43 minutes long video, Ben Shapiro reviews the Barbie movie and delivers a scathing assessment. He criticizes the lack of jokes, coherent plot, and logical coherence in the film. Shapiro questions the intended audience and attributes positive reviews to the film’s politics rather than its quality. He also critiques the film’s portrayal of gender dynamics, feminism, and relationships between men and women. Overall, Shapiro considers the movie to be one of the worst he has ever seen and predicts that it will lose its appeal after the initial hype.

    As one of the worst movies he has ever seen, Ben Shapiro finds the only redeeming aspect in the production design and costumes. He states that the movie seems to despise Barbie as a fascist emblem. Shapiro questions the intended audience for the film and attributes its positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes to its politics rather than its quality.

    Ben Shapiro diligently discusses the movie’s portrayal of Barbie as a tool of the patriarchal capitalist system and the failure of her message of female empowerment. He highlights the film’s lack of logical coherence, including the criticism of mommy dolls while also criticizing discontinuing a pregnant doll named Midge. Shapiro questions the intended audience of the movie, as it references complex topics like Citizens United and includes explicit sexual innuendos. He also comments on the film’s portrayal of Ken as secondary and unnecessary, emphasizing the repeated gay masturbation jokes in a movie targeting children.

    Shapiro questions why the film delves into existential themes and politics instead of catering to its supposed target audience of seven-year-old girls. He also disapproves of the film’s portrayal of sexism in the real world, claiming that it perpetuates a victim narrative for women. He highlights his dissatisfaction with the movie’s handling of the relationship between Ken and Barbie, arguing that it missed an opportunity for addressing equality, and instead, the plot simply restores Barbie’s dominance. Furthermore, Shapiro comments on the film’s attempt to portray the board of Mattel as solely composed of men, which he refutes by mentioning the female representation on the actual board.

    Shapiro also highlights how the character inconsistencies undermine the believability of the story. He discusses the themes of feminism and patriarchy in the film, expressing disagreement with the portrayal of women as competent and brilliant, while men are portrayed negatively. He argues that the film fails to present a balanced perspective on these issues and instead relies on lazy writing and obscure jokes. Moreover, he points out the lack of explanation for certain character decisions and plot developments, further undermining the coherence of the film.

    He argues that the film propagates the idea that women who enjoy the company of men have been brainwashed by the patriarchy. Shapiro also points out various inconsistencies in the film’s plot, such as the unnecessary vote held by the Kens and the introduction of random characters like Michael Sarah. He highlights the film’s portrayal of men as all being garbage and the lack of fulfilling relationships between men and women. Shapiro concludes that the filmmakers are insecure about their own script, evidenced by the narrator stepping in to address the shortcomings of the lead actress, Margot Robbie.

    Ben Shapiro emphatically criticizes the movie for its feminist message, claiming that it perpetuates the idea that it is impossible to be a woman in the modern age due to the patriarchy. He argues that the film wrongly portrays women seizing power away from men, when in reality women obtained power through lobbying men. Shapiro also mocks the film’s portrayal of women masking their power under a giggle and pretending to be confused about money. He concludes by ridiculing the idea that women not being able to wear pants is a symbol of men’s control, calling it “claptrap.”

    In the second half of the review, Ben Shapiro discusses the absurdity and lack of coherence in the plot of the Barbie movie. He points out that the movie tries to create conflict between the men by having the women switch partners, but argues that in reality, men would likely just throw a party if beautiful women switched to other men. Shapiro also criticizes the inclusion of a 15-minute long musical number that adds no value to the plot. He sarcastically comments on the portrayal of men and women needing to be separate and the supposed subjugation of women in the real world. Shapiro concludes by highlighting the multiple endings in the movie, each with its own inconsistencies and lack of substance.

    When discussing the ending of the Barbie movie, Ben Shapiro criticizes its attempt to please the core audience of moms and daughters by inserting footage of moms and daughters playing. He argues that the entire movie focuses on portraying men and Mattel as evil and terrible, and that the last-minute nostalgia play falls short. Shapiro highlights the revelation that a woman actually created the Barbie doll as a failed attempt to defy the patriarchy narrative. He also criticizes the movie’s emphasis on Barbie going to the gynecologist as the epitome of being a human woman, noting that it contradicts the film’s own trans-inclusive messaging. Ultimately, Shapiro concludes that the film’s politics overshadow its poor plot, characters, and humor, and attributes its positive reviews to the infusion of feminist ideologies.

    In the end, Ben Shapiro expresses his concerns about the negative messages the Barbie movie promotes. He believes that Hollywood has taken a beloved brand and turned it into a politically divisive film that seeks to separate men from women and undermine basic human values. Shapiro finds it alarming that a movie marketed towards children ends up being filled with angry feminist themes. He predicts that the movie will not do well in China, and ultimately gives it a negative rating, stating that it is one of the worst films he has ever seen.

    YouTube Video

  • COINTELPRO – Secret FBI Program to Disrupt and Discredit Black Nationalist Organizations

    COINTELPRO – Secret FBI Program to Disrupt and Discredit Black Nationalist Organizations

    This video reflects on Counterintelligence Program’s (COINTELPRO), a secret FBI program that sought to disrupt and discredit freedom movements. The specific focus this video outlines the goals and tactics of COINTELPRO for disrupting and discrediting black nationalist organizations and their leaders in the United States, though blacks were far from the only ones targeted by he FBI’s program.

    As the video points out, the primary goals were to prevent the emergence of a “messiah” who could unify and electrify the militant black nationalist movement, preventing violence on the part of black nationalist groups, discrediting black nationalists to the responsible negro community, whites, and agro-radicals, and preventing long-range growth of militant black organizations especially among youth. The program’s tactics included discrediting groups and individuals through publicity, pinpointing potential troublemakers, and developing specific strategies to prevent militant black organizations from converting young people.

    The first goal is to prevent the rise of a powerful black leader who could unify and electrify the movement, such as Martin Luther King Jr. or Stokely Carmichael.

    The second goal is to prevent violence on the part of black nationalist groups by identifying potential troublemakers and neutralizing them before they act.

    The third goal is to discredit black nationalists to three separate segments of the community: responsible black leaders, sympathetic white liberals, and radical followers of the movement.

    The fourth goal is to prevent the long-term growth of militant black organizations, particularly among youth. The document encourages agents to take an enthusiastic and imaginative approach to this endeavor and encourages them to recommend techniques for achieving these goals.

    Let’s Sing Along

    Spying on black nationalists,
    Trying to disrupt their plans.
    Targeting leaders with charisma,
    And discrediting their whole clan.

    Prevent violence and gain control,
    Neutralize troublemakers in full.
    Discredit to the black community,
    And to white sympathizers too.

    The goal’s to stop a black revolution,
    And prevent youth from joining the solution.
    Get imaginative with your approach,
    And the Bureau will always encroach.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQtrEzzZPzg

  • Video Exploring Possibility of Collapse of the United States

    Video Exploring Possibility of Collapse of the United States

    The video explores the possibility of a collapse of the United States, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.

    The author discusses the weaknesses in the American system of representative government, including challenges in finding and verifying quality information, political schemas becoming entangled with self-identity, and a polarized population susceptible to propaganda.

    The role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping American perspectives is also examined, and a proposed solution by Walter Lippmann to form a tax-funded intelligence bureau is discussed.

    Ultimately, the video emphasizes the need for a “crucial core” in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States and invites viewers to contemplate a post-collapse world if nothing changes.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the host poses the question of whether the United States will collapse, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.

    He goes on to discuss how disillusionment and polarization have become the best predictors for authoritarian takeover, and how this could lead to anarchy or tyranny in the most armed nation on earth, potentially impacting the entire world.

    The host then introduces his special guest, Walter Lippmann, a 20th-century journalist and propagandist, who wrote a book called Public Opinion, which highlighted a deeper problem with the American system of representative government.

    Lippmann argued that there was a weakness in how power and information flowed through the system, with sovereignty resting in the hands of individual citizens who delegate that power through elections and public opinion. The core idea behind this system was considered radical and experimental at the time of the nation’s founding, and has been subject to challenges and concerns over the years.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the author discusses how the initial design of the United States relied on individual self-interest being directed towards the public good. However, this design assumed that citizens would only elevate the most competent amongst them and that politicians would heed public opinion.

    These assumptions have become vulnerable points of weakness as the nation has grown in size and complexity. Furthermore, the author illustrates how complicated it is for an individual to become fully informed on every issue of the day, using the example of a major tech company’s announcement of creating the world’s first general artificial intelligence.

    The video states that modern-day forces, such as destructive propaganda, incoherent policy making and an overreliance on the manufacturing of consent and distractions, are inflaming these weaknesses, making the entire nation susceptible to crisis.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the challenges of finding and verifying quality information are discussed. The example of Clyde, who has limited resources and time for research is given, which highlights the issue of information overload and distractions that hinder thorough research.

    The general population’s ignorance about political issues, and their own ignorance, are pointed out, and Lippmann’s concept of the “stereotype” is introduced as being at the core of political beliefs.

    Lippmann believed that people were not discussing political differences rationally, creating a dangerous vulnerability. The importance of intellectual humility, the vast scale of topics, and the need for a variety of quality sources in research are emphasized.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the video explains the concept of schemas and how they play a role in shaping beliefs and behavior. Schemas are mental frameworks that humans develop to organize and navigate the vast amount of information and memories they encounter throughout their lives.

    These schemas can be influenced by past experiences, media, and other factors, and can lead to oversimplifications or inaccurate beliefs about the world. While schemas can be useful in making quick decisions, they can also lead to a confirmation bias where individuals only notice things that reinforce their existing beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence.

    Schemas can change over time, but this process can be slow and difficult, especially for complex and abstract beliefs like political opinions.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the author explains how political schemas often become entangled with one’s self-identity, giving the impression that they are the kind of person who believes certain things and not others.

    This self-reinforcing web of belief makes it difficult to engage with evidence or ideas that conflict with one’s beliefs. Political partisans are more likely to make logical mistakes, jump to conclusions, and bend evidence to fit their worldview.

    To reduce the detrimental impact of ideological bias, individuals ought to be self-aware and humble enough to know that their thinking is always at risk of these distortions and form a new super schema that connects their identity to this awareness.

    The author notes, however, that fostering a political culture that values intellectual humility is unlikely in the United States due to the cultural dogma of the innately rational citizenry combined with the intellectual arrogance and fanatical certainty of political partisans.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video explores how a polarized population with unchanging beliefs and rooted in tribalism is susceptible to propaganda. A few tools for self-government to navigate disagreement include persuasion, compromise or bargain, ignoring, or forming a consensus.

    If you believe the opposition is insane or evil, then these tools are off the table. The news media is another major player, which often fails in its responsibilities due to its fragmented and sensationalized business model.

    True investigative journalism requires a huge investment, but most Americans expect news for free which, in turn, leads to an over-reliance on advertising, sensational content, and click-bait titles that may not always align with the reality of the situation.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video focuses on the role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping the American perspective. The media landscape is highly polarized and it’s nearly impossible for citizens to have a comprehensive and unbiased view of any issue.

    Rather than focusing on accuracy, news media companies prioritize fulfilling their audience’s demand for preconceived ideas to maintain their business models. This gives an opportunity for anyone with enough resources to exploit this weakness towards external and internal threats. The video also details how the emergence of public relations added a new player in the information ecosystem of a democracy, which reshaped public opinion by planting stories, creating artificial events, or even paying people to promote products or ideas.

    The combination of radio, film, and PR created a powerful force, but the Internet has become an influencing machine of unmatched power in history, making PR’s presence in American life so common that it is rarely reported or thought about.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the author highlights the power of public relations and PR agents in shaping information, both online and in political discourse. With the decline of traditional news sources, journalists have become more reliant on PR agents for news, and with the rise of social media, it is easier than ever to sway public opinion on a large scale.

    Meanwhile, an idealistic politician faces two scenarios: ignoring public opinion and following their own agenda, potentially leading to manipulation and propaganda, or following public opinion that is influenced by PR agents and their clients, resulting in a lack of coherent policies. Ultimately, the increasing complexity of modern problems and the struggle to solve them can lead to a sense of helplessness among citizens, allowing undemocratic influence to flourish.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the focus is on the proposed solution by Walter Lippmann, who suggested forming a tax-funded intelligence bureau to assemble experts on national issues to provide an analysis of problems and potential solutions in a digestible report to the public.

    However, the solution is now deemed too naive, considering the possibility that the institution may become corrupt over time. While there are institutions in the US that aim to provide knowledge to the people, these have been criticized due to their failures and deceptions, with the entire collection often labeled as “the Deep State.”

    To address this, the essential core needs to be developed in the public, which includes the mental tools to audit their own beliefs and schemas, the ability to debate ideas with others, demand accuracy in information sources, and track policy issues over time without falling victim to counter-messaging. While not all people have these ideals, the development of the essential core is crucial to overcome America’s core vulnerability.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker emphasizes the need for a crucial core in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States. He acknowledges that the current situation is an active experiment in real-time, but believes that exploring steps towards strengthening this core may prevent decline and destruction.

    The speaker concludes by saying that if nothing changes, he fears the collapse of the United States and invites the viewer to join him in contemplating a post-collapse world.

    YouTube Video

  • The Bernays Dynasty: From Freud’s Mistress to the Father of Public Relations

    The Bernays Dynasty: From Freud’s Mistress to the Father of Public Relations

    The Bernays Dynasty is a fascinating family whose influence can be felt across various fields, from literature to public relations, politics, and feminism. The dynasty’s origins can be traced back to Rabbi Bir Neustedtel, or Baer Lazar, who lived in the German state of Hesse. His sons, Isaac and Jacob Bernays, founded influential dynasties in Europe, America, and Australia.

    Isaac Bernays was the chief rabbi of Hamburg and is credited with combining orthodox Judaism and European culture in education. His younger brother, Adolphus Bernays, was the first professor of German at King’s College, London. Adolphus Bernays wrote multiple books to help English speakers learn German. Hakham Isaac Bernays founded a branch of the Bernays dynasty that remains influential to this day.

    One of Isaac’s sons, Jacob Bernays, became a respected philologist and translator who wrote a biography of Joseph Scaliger, the founder of modern chronology. Isaac’s son Michael Bernays renounced Judaism in favor of Christianity and became a German historian of literature and an important researcher of Goethe and Shakespeare.

    Isaac’s eldest son, Bermann Bernays, had a daughter, Martha Bernays, who became Sigmund Freud’s only wife. According to many of Freud’s biographers, her younger sister Minna Bernays was Freud’s mistress, and it is likely that Isaac Bernays’s granddaughters inspired the Austrian psychoanalyst to study sexuality in depth.

    Bermann’s grandson, Edward Bernays, is often referred to as the “father of public relations“, a newspeak for “father of propaganda“. He was responsible for many famous campaigns, including the promotion of female smoking as a feminist act and work for United Fruit Company related to the CIA-organized overthrow of the democratically elected government of Guatemala.

    Other notable members of the Bernays family include:

    • Thekla Bernays – a suffragette who wrote a decalogue for women that laid the foundations for modern feminism;
    • Karl Ludwig Bernays – a German journalist and associate of Karl Marx who later held several important positions in the Republican Party after emigrating to the US;
    • Doris Fleischmann Bernays – feminist activist and Edward Bernays’s wife, who urged women to keep their names after marriage and was the first married woman to obtain a US passport with her maiden name;
    • Paul Bernays – a Swiss mathematician known for his work in the axiomatic set theory and the philosophy of mathematics who co-founded the philosophical journal Dialectic;
    • Robert Hamilton Bernays – a liberal member of Parliament and close friend of Sir Harold Nicolson, one of the organizers of the League of Nations, and other high aristocrats in the UK.

    Despite the extensive information available on deceased members of the Bernays family, information on the living members of the family is limited. However, the descendants of the Bernays dynasty continue to have a direct influence on the public consciousness of many nations. Mark Bernays Randolph, the great-grandson of Martha Bernays, is an entrepreneur and environmentalist from the United States and is the co-founder and first CEO of Netflix.

  • Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    00:00:00

    In this section, the speaker explains why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The speaker uses underground reports from various mainstream Western journalists and interviews with westerners who fought in the war as sources. He also highlights that Ukraine has lost the war and over 100,000 Ukrainian military officers have been killed.

    Despite being outnumbered, the speaker notes that the Russians invaded with a relatively small force, and most of the soldiers were gone during the successful Ukrainian offensives. Furthermore, the speaker notes that the extreme disparity in firepower has been noted by both the Ukrainian and the Western media, and the lack of armor, artillery, and ammo on the Ukrainian side has made them less wasteful.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The Russian artillery, armor, and infantry are more modern and advanced than the Ukrainian forces, and the Russian air force, though limited in numbers, is still operational.

    Additionally, Ukraine lacks long-range weapons, which have caused substantial damage that the media may not be reporting. The video also states that the armies’ methods of fighting differ, as Ukraine lacks armory, leading to engagements with little to no artillery support and light armored attacks without any objective. The Ukrainians are described as stubbornly holding every inch of land and engaging in sometimes-suicidal attacks with no willingness to retreat.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the lack of proper training and intelligence provided to Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines, resulting in unnecessary casualties. The mobilization process for soldiers in Ukraine is shown to be poorly managed and there have been cases of disabled individuals and even six-year-olds being called up for duty.

    A firearms instructor who visited Ukraine provides a disturbing account of the conditions soldiers are facing, which is made worse by the acute manpower shortage in the country. The speaker questions the quality of troops and the losses incurred in the conflict, especially compared to the mobilized and trained Russian soldiers.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the inefficiencies and challenges of the Ukrainian military structure, from needing approval for range time from a general to approval for gas for a car. He argues that this structure is not an effective way to fight a war, and even suggests that it may be designed to be intentionally ineffective.

    Additionally, the speaker notes that the incentive to appear incompetent due to conscription has contributed to Ukraine’s lack of preparation for the war compared to Russia, which suffered major losses at the start of the conflict.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the speakers recount their experiences in the Ukrainian and Russian militaries. One of the speakers was saved from being part of a failed mission that caused the deaths of all of its participants.

    The other speaker describes a near-death experience during his first mission. The section ends with a tragic account of a tent city that was hit by a thermobaric weapon, resulting in the deaths of 135 young officer recruits.

    00:25:00

    In this section, a man recounts his experience during a battle, where he thought it would be an easy win due to the close distance of the enemy. However, the opposing forces were actually much farther away and ended up causing high casualties among his team.

    He describes the chaos and panic that ensued, with vehicles blowing up and people getting killed. Even though he did not fire a single round, the man was overcome with fear during the intense fight and found himself hiding in a ditch.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a first-hand account of a battle in Ukraine describes the overwhelming artillery fire that Russian forces employed against the Ukrainian army. Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, the Ukrainians attempted to fight back but struggled due to the Russians’ superior range advantage.

    The result has been a significant disparity in casualties, with the Ukrainians sustaining upwards of 200 fatalities per day and 500 wounded while the Russians suffer fewer casualties. This strategy was a shift from earlier in the war in which the Russians engaged at closer range with Ukrainian fighters. Western volunteers also attest to the rarity of seeing Russian forces directly.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the strategy of bombing and destroying areas before losing them to the enemy, which he claims is often done by the Russians. He also acknowledges that the casualty situation during the Ukrainian conflict turned even more in Russia’s favor.

    The speaker then shares his experience of being deployed to Pisky, a contested area, with a heavily armed convoy, ready to assault the city and shovel it out. However, their convoy was spotted by drones, and their artillery missed the town, resulting in no casualties.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the speaker recounts his own experience of a landmine hitting their vehicle while under fire and how he lost his entire squad that day. He also highlights the Russian retreats, which were often made fun of, but which he argues were done with minimal losses and no routing.

    He cites various news articles that suggest the high casualty situation of the Ukrainians, especially during the Harrison offensive and the recent fighting in the Bachman region, and highlights how even the locals are spotting for the Russian artillery.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. Despite having more concentrated forces due to a manpower advantage, Ukraine holds an inferior position in armor, artillery, air force, and medium to long-range capabilities.

    The lack of training, tactics, and basic supplies like winter clothing causes extreme losses reported by Ukrainian journalists and medics. The speaker refutes the two arguments that support lower Ukrainian casualties, namely the idea of attackers tripling the losses and lost equipment. The speaker emphasizes that these arguments lack logic and understanding of basic military doctrine.

    YouTube Video

  • Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    The MONOPOLY: Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. These investors include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, and they own the majority of shares in major tech companies, as well as food and beverage, travel, and primary industries.

    Furthermore, the documentary highlights the ownership of major media outlets around the world, which creates synchronized reporting and manipulated information. The video warns about the looming threat of a potential dystopian society resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything, and the elites control the population’s lives by taking their possessions and vaccinating them.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator explains that the food and beverage industry is largely controlled by a few mega corporations, such as PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Mondelez, and Nestle. These companies manage the majority of money flows on earth, and their boards are controlled by the largest shareholders. By researching information on company websites and Yahoo Finance, it is discovered that just a handful of institutional investors own the majority of shares in these companies, many of which include investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and governments.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the documentary, the speaker discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. The four biggest investment companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, are among the top shareholders of these companies.

    This consolidation of power extends to the technology industry, where Facebook, Alphabet (parent company of Google and YouTube), Microsoft, and Twitter are among the dominant players, with the same institutional investors as their top shareholders. Even in industries such as travel, airlines, hotels, and restaurants, the same group of investors holds the majority of shares, and they also have a presence in primary industries such as mining and agriculture.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the focus is on the immense power and control of two companies, Vanguard and Blackrock, which are the largest institutional investors in the world. These two companies own shares in all major companies globally, forming a pyramid-like structure where the smaller investors are owned by the larger ones.

    This monopoly is expected to grow and collectively manage $20 trillion in investments by 2028, making it likely that Vanguard and Blackrock will own almost everything on Earth. Vanguard is the largest shareholder in Blackrock, and since its structure doesn’t allow to know who its shareholders or clients are, it becomes impossible to know who holds the power in these companies. Reports show that one percent of the world’s population owns more money than the other 99 percent.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that 82% of all the money earned in 2017 went to the top one percent of people, many of whom are also the richest billionaires in the world. The richest families on earth own Vanguard, one of the most powerful investment companies in the world.

    These families are responsible for founding our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. They have always been at the top of the pyramid and have inherited their vast fortunes through monopolies. The private funds and non-profit organizations of these families are the largest shareholders of Vanguard.

    Non-profit organizations, in general, lack transparency, and because they do not have to disclose their donors, they are ideal for financing terrorist groups and laundering money. The three most important non-profit foundations in the world that connect all industries together are: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations of George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video highlights how only two companies have a monopoly on all industries in the world, and a question is raised as to why the media does not cover this topic more widely. It is revealed that approximately 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates, including Viacom CBS, AT&T, NewsCorp, Fox Corporation, Walt Disney Company, and Comcast.

    The video explains how these conglomerates are owned by institutional investors or elite families, and shows that in almost every country on earth, the local media is in the hands of these conglomerates.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video discusses the ownership of major media outlets around the world and how they are interconnected. It begins by highlighting Bertelsmann, which owns a large part of French mainstream media, popular Spanish TV channels, and collaborated with the Nazis in the past.

    The news media outlets do not produce their news themselves, but use information and images from news agencies such as Reuters, the Dutch AP, and the French AFP, all of which are not independent and are owned by powerful families or partially financed by governments.

    The video also sheds light on important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center, which trains journalists, produces study materials, and works closely with giant corporations such as Google and Facebook.

    The article points out that there is a good chance that the text that newscasters read from their teleprompters comes from these organizations, leading to synchronized reporting. Finally, the video discusses a fund set up in September 2020 by Facebook and the European Journalism Center to support selected news organizations during the coronavirus crisis and highlights the organizations at the heart of producing our news, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Facebook and Google.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video discusses the coordination between all industries on earth to work for the interests of the elite, including the media, politics, and the largest companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is identified as one of the most influential organizations in the world, with CEOs of the largest companies, heads of state, and politicians gathering at its annual meeting in Davos.

    However, critics argue that the WEF is a business forum where the wealthiest companies can negotiate deals with politicians for personal gain rather than solving global problems. The founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, has described in detail the plans of his organization in his book “The Great Reset,” with the COVID-19 pandemic seen as an opportunity to “reset” society and build back better.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video explores the idea of a new world order and a global government, which is not a new concept and has been talked about by various presidents, philanthropists, and organizations such as the United Nations. The UN’s Agenda 2030 outlines a plan to eliminate poverty, hunger, and other societal problems by taxing citizens and contracting mega-corporations to rebuild society.

    The UN and the WEF also see the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to push their agenda forward. The video suggests that the elite has the power to manipulate public opinion and make people believe in their plans for a new world.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the event that took place on October 18, 2019, where around 130 important guests, including politicians and medics, gathered at the Pierre Hotel in New York City to simulate a possible scenario in the event of a global pandemic.

    The coincidence is unsettling that the simulation used coronavirus as an example, and the event was organized by the World Economic Forum, Melinda Gates Foundation, and John Hopkins Institute. Similarly, the German Robert Koch Institute conducted a similar simulation in 2012, assuming the spread of the coronavirus from animal to human, and its spread worldwide, destroying economies and even simulating protests.

    The video also includes an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Mark Van Ranst gave on January 22, 2019, at the Chatham House in London, discussing how he fooled the Belgian population during the swine flu crisis with fear-mongering and media manipulation to impose a vaccine for a virus produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the individual in the video explains how the media can be controlled and manipulated to spread a particular narrative. The speaker shares that by controlling early coverage during an issue, news outlets can monopolize the area and become a primary source of information.

    During the epidemic, the speaker shed light on Belgium and the UK and reported on realistic figures regarding H1N1 deaths. While discussing the topic, the speaker also shares that the elite do not have any intention to take care of the people, as they are interested in increasing their power, and global governance is the only way that they can have complete control over the population.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the power and control that the elite, or “deep state,” have over the world. This elite group has conscripted vast human and material resources into building a machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They control America, and nothing is questioned, printed, or revealed.

    The video discusses the fear-mongering tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to keep people sick and dependent on drugs. The group also seeks to control people through blackmail, ensuring that those they control will do their bidding. The world is heading in a direction that closely resembles the dystopian society described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video warns of a potential nightmare situation resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything. The elites plan to achieve this by causing a devastating economic crisis and eliminating cash money, forcing people to depend on government support, which includes giving up private possessions and accepting a vaccination passport.

    Entrepreneurs are the first to fall to this plan, while the middle class is attacked, and banks will fall. However, the video warns that this is not a doomsday scenario created by the author, but an actual plan that has been prepared for generations. The video urges people to create a great awakening and work towards a sustainable and fair world where no one goes hungry, there is no pollution, diseases, or wars, and governments work for the welfare of the people.

    01:00:00

    The conclusion of the “MONOPOLY: Who owns the world” documentary leaves viewers with hope for a future where people can lead dignified lives without excessive work and without manipulation by those in power. While acknowledging challenges ahead, the video encourages recognition of societal issues as a first step towards addressing them. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to work together towards building a more equitable society.

    01:05:00

    This section of the video concludes the documentary by sharing a message of hope for the future. The narrator believes that a future where people no longer have to work excessively to lead dignified lives, and one where those in power cannot manipulate the masses using the media and other means of control, is on the horizon. However, they acknowledge that there will be challenges ahead and that we must recognize the problems in our society to address them. The video ends with a call to action, urging viewers to embark on the journey towards a more equitable society together.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRKGJS26l8

  • Social Media Bot Network Analysis

    Social Media Bot Network Analysis

    Oh boy, do we have a treat for you! In this video brought to you by Cook Unity (because who doesn’t want some fresh meals when discussing potential political bot networks?), we dive into the world of social media bots. You know, those pesky automated accounts that make it difficult to trust anything you see online?

    But fear not, the intrepid AI-based social experiment (because what could go wrong with that?) has uncovered a vast network of directed bot traffic, infiltrating everything from American politics to Asian adult content (which the author totally stayed away from, for obvious reasons).

    And get this, there’s a Blue Wave propaganda network being spun up again for the 2024 election! Who would have thought? But don’t worry, the author tested a bunch of profiles with his own set of criteria, and concluded that they were definitely bots. Or maybe not.

    Bot prediction tools are useful, but maybe should not be relied on exclusively, especially with the current push by Elon Musk to lock down and pay for much of the platform. So, there you have it folks, just another day in the exciting world of social media botnets!

    For Real

    The video describes a social experiment that used AI-generated content to create a false identity in order to highlight the dangers of human beings losing control of reality due to not being able to trust anything seen online.

    The experiment involved using bonded social media accounts to create the appearance of authority, and the creator discovered a directed bot network that was inflating follower counts. They then used Twitter’s API and a program called geffy to analyze results and visually graph the composition of the botnet interactions.

    The creator found a nearly 10-year widespread democratically aligned Blue Wave propaganda network that was used in 2016, 2020 and is being spun back up right now for 2024. The network contained integrated bot traffic that focused on political, adult, or crypto themes, and had ties to Indian politics, American politics, adult content, and crypto.

    The creator discovered that there is a tremendous bot network that has now been spun up twice and is gearing up again for the 2024 election.

    The video also includes a sponsorship message for Cook Unity… So there’s that!

    Let’s Sing Along

    On the brink of losing control,
    Online content takes its toll.
    AI-generated identities,
    Spreading false info with ease.

    A social experiment tried and true,
    Exposed the dangers we’re going through.
    Bots, bots, everywhere we see,
    Fake followers, fake activity.

    From politics to adult content,
    These networks are fully bent.
    Democratic propaganda,
    Is the aim for the bot agenda.

    Thanks to Geffy and Twitter’s API,
    We got to the root of the lie.
    Cook Unity’s sponsoring this fight,
    Fresh meals to keep us energized.

    Don’t trust what you see online,
    Bot networks are the new landmine.
    Stay vigilant, stay aware,
    Or reality will soon disappear.

    YouTube Video