Author: happy

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Called for Climate Skeptics and Politicians Who Do Not Believe in Global Warming to Be Jailed

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Called for Climate Skeptics and Politicians Who Do Not Believe in Global Warming to Be Jailed

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not who people think he is. The video below is from 9 years ago, and it shows Robert F. Kennedy Jr. expressing beliefs that those who deny the existence of global warming should be punished with jail time, comparing them to war criminals and calling for their prosecution under the law. He specifically calls out the Koch brothers for their role in denying global warming science.

    In the video, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. specifically mention the Koch brothers and their denial of global warming, calling for their prosecution for reckless and dangerous behavior. He believes that people who look at facts and not propaganda should be punished and serve time for their actions.

    YouTube Video

  • Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    00:00:00

    In this section, the speaker explains why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The speaker uses underground reports from various mainstream Western journalists and interviews with westerners who fought in the war as sources. He also highlights that Ukraine has lost the war and over 100,000 Ukrainian military officers have been killed.

    Despite being outnumbered, the speaker notes that the Russians invaded with a relatively small force, and most of the soldiers were gone during the successful Ukrainian offensives. Furthermore, the speaker notes that the extreme disparity in firepower has been noted by both the Ukrainian and the Western media, and the lack of armor, artillery, and ammo on the Ukrainian side has made them less wasteful.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The Russian artillery, armor, and infantry are more modern and advanced than the Ukrainian forces, and the Russian air force, though limited in numbers, is still operational.

    Additionally, Ukraine lacks long-range weapons, which have caused substantial damage that the media may not be reporting. The video also states that the armies’ methods of fighting differ, as Ukraine lacks armory, leading to engagements with little to no artillery support and light armored attacks without any objective. The Ukrainians are described as stubbornly holding every inch of land and engaging in sometimes-suicidal attacks with no willingness to retreat.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the lack of proper training and intelligence provided to Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines, resulting in unnecessary casualties. The mobilization process for soldiers in Ukraine is shown to be poorly managed and there have been cases of disabled individuals and even six-year-olds being called up for duty.

    A firearms instructor who visited Ukraine provides a disturbing account of the conditions soldiers are facing, which is made worse by the acute manpower shortage in the country. The speaker questions the quality of troops and the losses incurred in the conflict, especially compared to the mobilized and trained Russian soldiers.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the inefficiencies and challenges of the Ukrainian military structure, from needing approval for range time from a general to approval for gas for a car. He argues that this structure is not an effective way to fight a war, and even suggests that it may be designed to be intentionally ineffective.

    Additionally, the speaker notes that the incentive to appear incompetent due to conscription has contributed to Ukraine’s lack of preparation for the war compared to Russia, which suffered major losses at the start of the conflict.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the speakers recount their experiences in the Ukrainian and Russian militaries. One of the speakers was saved from being part of a failed mission that caused the deaths of all of its participants.

    The other speaker describes a near-death experience during his first mission. The section ends with a tragic account of a tent city that was hit by a thermobaric weapon, resulting in the deaths of 135 young officer recruits.

    00:25:00

    In this section, a man recounts his experience during a battle, where he thought it would be an easy win due to the close distance of the enemy. However, the opposing forces were actually much farther away and ended up causing high casualties among his team.

    He describes the chaos and panic that ensued, with vehicles blowing up and people getting killed. Even though he did not fire a single round, the man was overcome with fear during the intense fight and found himself hiding in a ditch.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a first-hand account of a battle in Ukraine describes the overwhelming artillery fire that Russian forces employed against the Ukrainian army. Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, the Ukrainians attempted to fight back but struggled due to the Russians’ superior range advantage.

    The result has been a significant disparity in casualties, with the Ukrainians sustaining upwards of 200 fatalities per day and 500 wounded while the Russians suffer fewer casualties. This strategy was a shift from earlier in the war in which the Russians engaged at closer range with Ukrainian fighters. Western volunteers also attest to the rarity of seeing Russian forces directly.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the strategy of bombing and destroying areas before losing them to the enemy, which he claims is often done by the Russians. He also acknowledges that the casualty situation during the Ukrainian conflict turned even more in Russia’s favor.

    The speaker then shares his experience of being deployed to Pisky, a contested area, with a heavily armed convoy, ready to assault the city and shovel it out. However, their convoy was spotted by drones, and their artillery missed the town, resulting in no casualties.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the speaker recounts his own experience of a landmine hitting their vehicle while under fire and how he lost his entire squad that day. He also highlights the Russian retreats, which were often made fun of, but which he argues were done with minimal losses and no routing.

    He cites various news articles that suggest the high casualty situation of the Ukrainians, especially during the Harrison offensive and the recent fighting in the Bachman region, and highlights how even the locals are spotting for the Russian artillery.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. Despite having more concentrated forces due to a manpower advantage, Ukraine holds an inferior position in armor, artillery, air force, and medium to long-range capabilities.

    The lack of training, tactics, and basic supplies like winter clothing causes extreme losses reported by Ukrainian journalists and medics. The speaker refutes the two arguments that support lower Ukrainian casualties, namely the idea of attackers tripling the losses and lost equipment. The speaker emphasizes that these arguments lack logic and understanding of basic military doctrine.

    YouTube Video

  • Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    The MONOPOLY: Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. These investors include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, and they own the majority of shares in major tech companies, as well as food and beverage, travel, and primary industries.

    Furthermore, the documentary highlights the ownership of major media outlets around the world, which creates synchronized reporting and manipulated information. The video warns about the looming threat of a potential dystopian society resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything, and the elites control the population’s lives by taking their possessions and vaccinating them.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator explains that the food and beverage industry is largely controlled by a few mega corporations, such as PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Mondelez, and Nestle. These companies manage the majority of money flows on earth, and their boards are controlled by the largest shareholders. By researching information on company websites and Yahoo Finance, it is discovered that just a handful of institutional investors own the majority of shares in these companies, many of which include investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and governments.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the documentary, the speaker discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. The four biggest investment companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, are among the top shareholders of these companies.

    This consolidation of power extends to the technology industry, where Facebook, Alphabet (parent company of Google and YouTube), Microsoft, and Twitter are among the dominant players, with the same institutional investors as their top shareholders. Even in industries such as travel, airlines, hotels, and restaurants, the same group of investors holds the majority of shares, and they also have a presence in primary industries such as mining and agriculture.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the focus is on the immense power and control of two companies, Vanguard and Blackrock, which are the largest institutional investors in the world. These two companies own shares in all major companies globally, forming a pyramid-like structure where the smaller investors are owned by the larger ones.

    This monopoly is expected to grow and collectively manage $20 trillion in investments by 2028, making it likely that Vanguard and Blackrock will own almost everything on Earth. Vanguard is the largest shareholder in Blackrock, and since its structure doesn’t allow to know who its shareholders or clients are, it becomes impossible to know who holds the power in these companies. Reports show that one percent of the world’s population owns more money than the other 99 percent.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that 82% of all the money earned in 2017 went to the top one percent of people, many of whom are also the richest billionaires in the world. The richest families on earth own Vanguard, one of the most powerful investment companies in the world.

    These families are responsible for founding our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. They have always been at the top of the pyramid and have inherited their vast fortunes through monopolies. The private funds and non-profit organizations of these families are the largest shareholders of Vanguard.

    Non-profit organizations, in general, lack transparency, and because they do not have to disclose their donors, they are ideal for financing terrorist groups and laundering money. The three most important non-profit foundations in the world that connect all industries together are: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations of George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video highlights how only two companies have a monopoly on all industries in the world, and a question is raised as to why the media does not cover this topic more widely. It is revealed that approximately 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates, including Viacom CBS, AT&T, NewsCorp, Fox Corporation, Walt Disney Company, and Comcast.

    The video explains how these conglomerates are owned by institutional investors or elite families, and shows that in almost every country on earth, the local media is in the hands of these conglomerates.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video discusses the ownership of major media outlets around the world and how they are interconnected. It begins by highlighting Bertelsmann, which owns a large part of French mainstream media, popular Spanish TV channels, and collaborated with the Nazis in the past.

    The news media outlets do not produce their news themselves, but use information and images from news agencies such as Reuters, the Dutch AP, and the French AFP, all of which are not independent and are owned by powerful families or partially financed by governments.

    The video also sheds light on important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center, which trains journalists, produces study materials, and works closely with giant corporations such as Google and Facebook.

    The article points out that there is a good chance that the text that newscasters read from their teleprompters comes from these organizations, leading to synchronized reporting. Finally, the video discusses a fund set up in September 2020 by Facebook and the European Journalism Center to support selected news organizations during the coronavirus crisis and highlights the organizations at the heart of producing our news, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Facebook and Google.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video discusses the coordination between all industries on earth to work for the interests of the elite, including the media, politics, and the largest companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is identified as one of the most influential organizations in the world, with CEOs of the largest companies, heads of state, and politicians gathering at its annual meeting in Davos.

    However, critics argue that the WEF is a business forum where the wealthiest companies can negotiate deals with politicians for personal gain rather than solving global problems. The founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, has described in detail the plans of his organization in his book “The Great Reset,” with the COVID-19 pandemic seen as an opportunity to “reset” society and build back better.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video explores the idea of a new world order and a global government, which is not a new concept and has been talked about by various presidents, philanthropists, and organizations such as the United Nations. The UN’s Agenda 2030 outlines a plan to eliminate poverty, hunger, and other societal problems by taxing citizens and contracting mega-corporations to rebuild society.

    The UN and the WEF also see the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to push their agenda forward. The video suggests that the elite has the power to manipulate public opinion and make people believe in their plans for a new world.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the event that took place on October 18, 2019, where around 130 important guests, including politicians and medics, gathered at the Pierre Hotel in New York City to simulate a possible scenario in the event of a global pandemic.

    The coincidence is unsettling that the simulation used coronavirus as an example, and the event was organized by the World Economic Forum, Melinda Gates Foundation, and John Hopkins Institute. Similarly, the German Robert Koch Institute conducted a similar simulation in 2012, assuming the spread of the coronavirus from animal to human, and its spread worldwide, destroying economies and even simulating protests.

    The video also includes an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Mark Van Ranst gave on January 22, 2019, at the Chatham House in London, discussing how he fooled the Belgian population during the swine flu crisis with fear-mongering and media manipulation to impose a vaccine for a virus produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the individual in the video explains how the media can be controlled and manipulated to spread a particular narrative. The speaker shares that by controlling early coverage during an issue, news outlets can monopolize the area and become a primary source of information.

    During the epidemic, the speaker shed light on Belgium and the UK and reported on realistic figures regarding H1N1 deaths. While discussing the topic, the speaker also shares that the elite do not have any intention to take care of the people, as they are interested in increasing their power, and global governance is the only way that they can have complete control over the population.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the power and control that the elite, or “deep state,” have over the world. This elite group has conscripted vast human and material resources into building a machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They control America, and nothing is questioned, printed, or revealed.

    The video discusses the fear-mongering tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to keep people sick and dependent on drugs. The group also seeks to control people through blackmail, ensuring that those they control will do their bidding. The world is heading in a direction that closely resembles the dystopian society described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video warns of a potential nightmare situation resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything. The elites plan to achieve this by causing a devastating economic crisis and eliminating cash money, forcing people to depend on government support, which includes giving up private possessions and accepting a vaccination passport.

    Entrepreneurs are the first to fall to this plan, while the middle class is attacked, and banks will fall. However, the video warns that this is not a doomsday scenario created by the author, but an actual plan that has been prepared for generations. The video urges people to create a great awakening and work towards a sustainable and fair world where no one goes hungry, there is no pollution, diseases, or wars, and governments work for the welfare of the people.

    01:00:00

    The conclusion of the “MONOPOLY: Who owns the world” documentary leaves viewers with hope for a future where people can lead dignified lives without excessive work and without manipulation by those in power. While acknowledging challenges ahead, the video encourages recognition of societal issues as a first step towards addressing them. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to work together towards building a more equitable society.

    01:05:00

    This section of the video concludes the documentary by sharing a message of hope for the future. The narrator believes that a future where people no longer have to work excessively to lead dignified lives, and one where those in power cannot manipulate the masses using the media and other means of control, is on the horizon. However, they acknowledge that there will be challenges ahead and that we must recognize the problems in our society to address them. The video ends with a call to action, urging viewers to embark on the journey towards a more equitable society together.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRKGJS26l8

  • Moon Landing Debunked in 3 Minutes by Bart Sibrel

    Moon Landing Debunked in 3 Minutes by Bart Sibrel

    The video features Bart Sibrel who questions the authenticity of the moon landings carried out by NASA in the 1960s using outdated technology.

    Bart Sibrel argues that the shadows in the supposed photos from the moon are inconsistent with the sunlight shadows on the Earth, which implies that the photos were taken inside a television studio on Earth.

    Furthermore, Bart Sibrel claims that if NASA was able to achieve such a feat with the outdated technology in the 1960s, then it should be even easier for them to do the same or more currently, but that is not the case.

    Bart Sibrel also believes that NASA purposely destroyed the technology used during the moon landing to hide evidence of fraud.

    According to Bart Sibrel, it is harder to believe that the moon landings actually happened than to believe that they were a hoax perpetrated by NASA on the world.

    Bullet Points

    • The author believes that the moon landings were faked.
    • They argue that it doesn’t make sense for NASA to claim they went 1,000 times farther with 50-year older technology.
    • The author points out a specific photo as proof that the moon landing was faked – the shadows do not match up.
    • The author argues that if NASA really went to the moon, they would not have destroyed the technology and evidence.
    • The author concludes that it is harder to believe that the moon landings were real than that they were faked.

    Let’s Sing Along

    The moon landing’s a lie,
    That’s what some folks imply.
    NASA’s claim is just absurd,
    With old tech, went 1,000 times further.

    In sunlight, shadows run in line,
    But this moon pic doesn’t align.
    The shadows are off by ninety degrees,
    It’s a studio shot, that is the key.

    People don’t want to let it go,
    Their emotions make it hard to know.
    If they went to the moon back then,
    We’d be on Mars, again and again.

    But there’s no base up in the sky,
    Deliberately destroyed, it’s all a lie.
    It’s harder to believe it’s true,
    This one picture proves they fooled you.

    YouTube Video

  • Warren Commission Report on JFK

    Warren Commission Report on JFK

    With the video containing the interview with Lee Harvey Oswald’s mother, you are in for a treat to watch this!

    The video is a transcript of a news broadcast from CBS News on November 22, which was the day President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. The broadcast covers the aftermath of the assassination, including the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald, the man believed to have shot Kennedy.

    There are interviews with witnesses who appeared before the Warren Commission, a government inquiry into the assassination, including Oswald’s mother and wife, Mrs. Ruth Payne, who took them in, and Mrs. Roberts, who rented a room to Oswald.

    They discuss Oswald’s background and behavior leading up to the assassination. There are also segments discussing the Warren Report, which was released on that day and aimed to answer questions about the assassination and identify whether there was a conspiracy.

    Several prominent Americans were appointed to the commission, including Chief Justice Earl Warren, Richard B. Russell, John Sherman Cooper, Hale Boggs, Gerald R. Ford, Allen W. Dulles, and John J. McCloy.

    The Warren Report was almost a thousand pages long, and the broadcast covers some of the key findings from the report, such as whether Oswald acted alone, whether he was connected to any groups or individuals, and whether there was a larger conspiracy involved in the assassination.

    The broadcast notes that there were many unanswered questions surrounding the assassination and that the report did not necessarily resolve all of them.

    At around the 8:10 minute mark on video, Oswald’s mother is asked: “Mrs. Oswald, do you feel that your son was an agent of the CIA?” She responds to the question that she thinks he was. She also got mail in his name from the State Department, suggesting that Oswald was indeed a CIA asset.

    Bullet Points

    • On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy is shot to death while in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas, and the man Dallas police say shot the president, Lee Harvey Oswald, is killed by Jack Ruby.
    • President Lyndon Johnson appoints a commission to investigate the assassination and the Warren Report, a document close to a thousand pages, is released 10 months later.
    • Witnesses who appeared before the Warren Commission are interviewed by CBS News, including Oswald’s wife, mother, and boarding house keeper.
    • Questions arise about Oswald’s motives, career, and whether he acted alone in the assassination or was part of a conspiracy involving right-wingers or foreign powers.
    • Oswald’s belongings, including the rifle and pistol used in the murders, are examined and witnesses describe his behavior leading up to the assassination.

    Let’s Sing Along

    A tale of two men and their fateful paths,
    Kennedy and Oswald- a mystery that lasts.
    Questions abound, conspiracy or not?
    Who held the rifle that fired the shots?

    The Warren Commission sought to find,
    Justice Earl Warren chaired the line.
    Ten-month labor and hundreds of tales,
    Witnesses heard, their stories unveiled.

    As America mourned, the truth emerged,
    Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin, purged.
    The War Commission’s report, a thousand pages,
    Brought forth answers, a closure to the ages.

    YouTube Video

  • Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    What did the BBC do back in 2008? They aired a documentary called “The Conspiracy Files 9/11: Third Tower” where they tried to whitewash the mystery of why World Trade Center 7 collapsed.

    Even though BBC pretended to be unbiased, it was clear that they would never air anything suggesting that the official story is wrong, because why bother with facts when we can blindly believe what the government tells us?

    And of course, they conveniently left out parts of Larry Silverstein’s interview where he said “pull it“, because that would contradict their oh-so-trusted story about debris and fires causing the collapse. But hey, who needs evidence when we have good old-fashioned blind faith, am I right?

    And let’s not forget about all the fun demolition terms like “blast shoot blow and pull” that were thrown around, because if there’s one thing we love, it’s making light of a tragedy.

    All in all, this documentary was a true masterpiece in propaganda and will go down in history as a shining example of how not to do journalism. Bravo, BBC. Bravo.

    For Real

    The documentary “The Conspiracy Files 911 Third Tower” aired on BBC in July 2008, attempting to explain the collapse of World Trade Center 7 which wasn’t hit by a plane during the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Though the program makers attempt to present unbiased evidence, they ultimately push the official story that fire and structural damage caused the collapse.

    The documentary makers purposefully omit a key line from an interview with building owner Larry Silverstein, where he refers to “pulling” the building, but the BBC removes his connection between the word “pull” and the collapse of the building.

    The term “pull” is used in the demolition industry to refer to bringing down buildings. The documentary also mentions other instances where the term “pull” is used with the meaning of demolishing buildings, and it points out that no firefighters were in the building when it collapsed.

    The BBC’s omission of certain evidence suggests that they are biased towards the official story.

    Bullet Points

    • In 2008, the BBC aired a documentary about the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on 9/11.
    • The documentary claims that the collapse of WTC7 is the final mystery of 9/11.
    • The BBC presents evidence for fire and structural damage as the cause of the collapse, but also manipulates evidence to support the official story.
    • The owner of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, is accused of being involved in the demolition of the building, but claims to have meant “pulling” firefighters out of harm’s way.
    • There were no firefighters in WTC7 when it collapsed, and the building fell neatly into its own footprint.

    Let’s Sing Along

    Verse 1:
    In 2008, the BBC aired
    A doc on 9/11 that left some scared
    They aimed to solve the final mystery
    Of why building seven took history

    Chorus:
    But even though they claimed to be unbiased
    Some manipulations were carefully devised
    To promote the official story, it seems
    And hide evidence that didn’t fit their schemes

    Verse 2:
    Larry Silverstein, the building’s owner
    Was accused of being part of a huge donor
    To the conspiracy to destroy the towers
    But the BBC cut out a key line in his powers

    Chorus:
    They removed his connection between “pull” and the fall
    Of the building, as if one affected all
    But the truth is out there, for those who seek
    Just don’t get fooled again, don’t be meek

    Outro:
    Blast, shoot, blow, and pull
    Are words used in the demolition tool
    To bring down buildings, bridges, and more
    But who’s really behind the war?

    YouTube Video

  • The True and Shocking Story of Bill Gates

    The True and Shocking Story of Bill Gates

    Oh, look, it’s just a heartwarming story about the life and times of everyone’s favorite philanthropist, Bill Gates! We learn about his privileged upbringing, the success story of Microsoft, and his charming personality. Who wouldn’t want to work for a company that scams its employees out of benefits and stock options?! And let’s not forget about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the epitome of honesty and integrity. Who cares if they avoid paying their taxes and invest in companies they claim to be fighting against? And of course, we must not overlook Gates’s admirable relationship with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Truly, this document is a tribute to an amazing human being whom we should all strive to emulate.

    Bullet Points

    • Bill Gates co-founded Microsoft with Paul Allen in 1975.
    • Microsoft’s early success can be attributed to their purchase of 86 DOS, which they sold to IBM for a large sum of money.
    • Bill Gates has been accused of mistreating his own lifelong friend and co-founder, Paul Allen.
    • Microsoft has been involved in a lawsuit for scamming employees out of benefits and pensions.
    • The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been accused of corruption and avoidance of taxes.

    Video Summary

    This video delves into the life of Bill Gates, the man behind Microsoft, and sheds light on his controversial past. The author highlights Gates’ privileged upbringing and how it paved the way for his success. It discusses the origins of Microsoft and how Gates’ partner, Paul Allen, played a significant role in its early success.

    However, the document also raises questions about Gates’ behavior towards his partner and employees, including reports of sexual harassment and mistreatment. The author details the class-action lawsuit filed against Microsoft by employees who claimed they were deprived of benefits due to the company’s temporary contracts.

    The video also highlights Gates’ questionable behavior regarding his charity, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including his ties to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and accusations of embezzlement.

    Overall, the document portrays Gates as a man who achieved success through questionable means and uses his charity as a smokescreen to distract from his controversial past.

    Let’s Sing Along

    Verse 1:
    We’re born in a world of computers
    Can’t imagine life without the screens
    Remember buying our first machines
    From Circuit City, Comp USA, or even Gateway

    Chorus:
    But there’s a man who defined it all
    At the center of the tech world’s crawl
    Bill Gates, the powerhouse who reigns
    But his story is full of scandals and stains

    Verse 2:
    Microsoft, the company he grew
    Founded with a friend, Allen too
    Success came with an operating system deal
    But it led to monopolizing, critics did feel

    Chorus:
    But there’s a man who defined it all
    At the center of the tech world’s crawl
    Bill Gates, the powerhouse who reigns
    But his story is full of scandals and stains

    Verse 3:
    Lifelong friend Paul Allen’s departure
    Amid accusations of share reduction capture
    Mismanagement of employees, a lawsuit received
    Lack of morals, his charity’s corruption believed

    Chorus:
    But there’s a man who defined it all
    At the center of the tech world’s crawl
    Bill Gates, the powerhouse who reigns
    But his story is full of scandals and stains

    Verse 4:
    Associations with Epstein’s conviction
    Charity avoidance, five percent tax emission
    Investments in companies in conflict with his belief
    Bill Gates’ legacy is full of moral grief

    Chorus:
    But there’s a man who defined it all
    At the center of the tech world’s crawl
    Bill Gates, the powerhouse who reigns
    But his story is full of scandals and stains.

    YouTube Video

  • Mystery of Georgia Guidestones

    Mystery of Georgia Guidestones

    • The Georgia Guidestones are mysterious monuments located in Georgia, USA.
    • The origin and purpose of the Guidestones is unknown, but they feature a series of “Ten Commandments of the Antichrist” written in several languages, including ancient ones.
    • The Commandments include suggestions for population control, eugenics, the creation of a new language, and the rejection of faith.
    • The author sees the Guidestones as an attempt to reverse God’s judgment in Genesis 11, and ultimately an effort by satanic occultists to create a monument that will last through the apocalypse.
    • The author suggests that the best response to the Guidestones is to embrace Jesus Christ and reject sin.

    Video Summary

    The Georgia Guidestones, one of America’s most mysterious monuments, remain anonymous about who had them built and their purpose. The only clues to their origin are on a nearby plaque.

    The stones have a series of intricate notches and holes that correspond to the movements of the sun and the stars. The Guidestones have eight of the world’s most spoken languages, including English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.

    The stones also have four ancient languages, including Babylonian and cuneiform script, ancient Greek, Sanskrit, and ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. The Ten Commandments of the Antichrist, which appear in the stones, are meant to instruct survivors of the Apocalypse or a major catastrophic event on how to rebuild society.

    The Ten Commandments include maintaining humanity under 500 million and perpetual balance with nature, guiding reproduction wisely by improving fitness and diversity, uniting humanity with a living new language, ruling passion, faith, tradition, and all things with tempered reason, avoiding petty laws and useless officials, balancing personal rights with social duties, prizing truth and beauty, love seeking harmony with the infinite, and lastly, being not a cancer on the earth but leaving room for nature.

    The Commandments are viewed as a symbolic attempted reversal of God’s judgment in Genesis 11, reuniting the scattered fragments of the Babylonian Mystery Schools back into one people, one language, and one god which is Lucifer. The monument is a sort of reversal of Genesis 11 as seen through the eyes of the enemy.

    The Georgia Guidestones are nothing more than man’s attempt to bypass the creator of the universe. The stones’ astronomical alignments occur on the spring and summer solstices, and the man who paid for the stones’ construction used a pseudonym R.C. Christian.

    The Guidestones, the narrator in the video argues, are a group of satanic occultists’ attempt to erect a monument to survive through the apocalypse, and the monument is designed to last. Although it didn’t…

    Let’s Sing Along

    In Georgia there lies
    A monument of great size
    Built by an anonymous crew
    But what does it all mean, who knew?

    The Guidestones they are called
    With commandments that have appalled
    Maintain a small population size
    And guide reproduction, eugenics in disguise

    Unite with a new language, reverse Babel’s fall
    Control passion, faith, tradition, and all
    Protect with fair laws and a world court
    Avoid petty laws and officials’ tort

    Balance personal rights with social duties
    Prize truth and beauty, seek harmony with infinities
    Lastly, leave nature room to grow
    But worshiping creation, Lucifer’s game we know

    This monument meant to last through the strife
    But they’ve already lost, God’s power rife
    Satanic occultists can try all they might
    But defeat is their only sight.

    YouTube Video

  • Video Explaining How and Why Recycling Is a Scam

    Video Explaining How and Why Recycling Is a Scam

    The video discusses how recycling can actually be a hoax and sham due to the fact that waste collectors often sell recycling goods to brokers who then send them to poor countries overseas where they end up in landfills or in nature.

    The lack of transparency around the recycling process makes it difficult to track where the plastic waste ends up, and most US cities would have difficulty figuring out how much of their recyclables are actually being recycled.

    The illegal waste trade is also a problem as it is not easy to track every suspicious shipment, leading to disastrous consequences for the environment. Despite efforts to reduce plastic waste exports, the remaining plastic waste still ends up in landfills or in nature, leading to environmental problems.

    Palo Alto, California, has made changes to increase domestic recycling rates and is working with other cities to expand recycling capacity and impose transparency requirements on companies that export recyclable goods.

    Overall, the video highlights the need for more transparency and responsible waste management practices to address the issue of plastic waste.

    YouTube Video

  • Science, Pseudoscience, and Skepticism with Carl Sagan

    Science, Pseudoscience, and Skepticism with Carl Sagan

    The video is an interview with Carl Sagan, a renowned astronomer and science educator, about the importance of science and the dangers of pseudoscience and superstition. He discusses his latest book, “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark“, which explores the growing fascination in the United States with pseudoscientific and supernatural beliefs that threaten to undermine true science.

    Carl Sagan argues that scientific literacy is crucial in a society based on science and technology, and that without it, we risk a combustible mixture of ignorance and power that could have disastrous consequences. He also criticizes the lack of scientific education in politics and the government, as well as the influence of religion on scientific issues.

    Sagan discusses the work of Dr. John Mack, a psychiatrist who believed in the reality of UFO abductions, and expresses his skepticism towards Mack and other belief systems that lack adequate evidence.

    Lastly, Sagan briefly touches on the possibility of unknown species or animals, such as the Loch Ness Monster, but emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific evidence before accepting such claims.

    This is the full interview of Carl Sagan’s last appearance on the Charlie Rose show. Sagan’s expertise as an astronomer shines through as he stresses the importance of scientific thinking and an open-minded approach to the unknown. This interview provides a valuable insight into Sagan’s views on science and society, making it a must-watch for those interested in these topics.

    Bullet Points

    • Carl Sagan is a prominent astronomer known for his PBS series “Cosmos” and his book “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark.”
    • The document discusses the United States’ and the world’s growing fascination with pseudoscience and superstition, which Sagan argues threatens to undermine true science.
    • Sagan is critical of religious fundamentalists who deny scientific facts in favor of faith-based beliefs.
    • Sagan believes that a lack of scientific education and understanding among the general population, as well as among lawmakers, is a dangerous trend.
    • The document also touches on Sagan’s personal experiences with hearing his deceased parents’ voices, but he believes they were the result of auditory hallucinations.

    Carl Sagan Quotes

    “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply to painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”

    ~ Carl Sagan

    In the given context information, Carl Sagan is discussing his concerns about the growing fascination with pseudoscience, superstitions, and fundamentalist zealotry, which he believes threatens to undermine true science. He argues that in a society based on science and technology, it is crucial for the general public to understand it and ask skeptical questions to avoid being taken advantage of by charlatans who use emotional force and belief in the absence of evidence to manipulate people.

    The quote highlights one of the saddest lessons of history, which is that once people have been bamboozled or deceived for a long enough time, they tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle and become captured by it. They are no longer interested in finding out the truth and acknowledging that they have been taken. This gives charlatans or those who use emotional force and manipulation power over people, which is difficult to regain once lost.

    Sagan’s point seems to be that people must be vigilant about critical thinking and questioning in all aspects of life, especially with scientific claims, to avoid being gullible and susceptible to manipulation. It is essential to acknowledge the limitations of human knowledge and to seek evidence to support claims, rather than relying solely on belief or emotion. Failure to do so can lead to misguided decisions, both personal and societal, with long-term consequences.

    “Better by far, to embrace a hard truth than a reassuring fable.”

    ~ Carl Sagan

    In this quote, Carl Sagan is emphasizing the importance of accepting scientific evidence and knowledge that may be difficult to acknowledge rather than believing in comforting but baseless beliefs. He argues that rejecting evidence in favor of belief can be harmful, especially when it comes to decision making about societal issues that are based on science and technology.

    Sagan sees science not just as a collection of established facts, but also as a way of thinking skeptically, asking questions, and accommodating to the universe’s reality rather than clinging to false beliefs.

    He also warns against the danger of religious literalism, which can lead to ignoring scientific evidence in favor of dogmatic adherence to faith-based beliefs.

    In this context, Sagan urges people to prioritize evidence-based hard truths over comforting but unsupported fables in order to make informed decisions and better understand the universe.

    Let’s Sing Along

    (Verse 1)

    Carl Sagan was a star astronomer,
    Bringing the cosmos to our living rooms,
    His latest work was about pseudoscience,
    Threatening to undermine true science.

    (Hook)

    Americans flunk science,
    We need to understand,
    Science and technology,
    Propelling us forward.

    (Verse 2)

    He’s a professor of astronomy,
    And director of planetary studies,
    He’s a co-founder of Planetary Society,
    A space interest group that’s the largest of its kind.

    (Hook)

    Americans flunk science,
    We need to understand,
    Science and technology,
    Propelling us forward.

    (Bridge)

    Science is a way of thinking,
    Skeptically interrogating the universe,
    We need to ask skeptical questions,
    To prevent being duped by charlatans.

    (Hook)

    Americans flunk science,
    We need to understand,
    Science and technology,
    Propelling us forward.

    YouTube Video