Miscopy

Author: happy

  • Sarah Hardiman Discusses Dangers of Ireland’s New Hate Speech Law

    Sarah Hardiman Discusses Dangers of Ireland’s New Hate Speech Law

    The video discusses the potential dangers of Ireland’s new hate speech law, which goes beyond incitement to violence and extends to offense and perception of mistreatment, criminalizing possession or preparation of material that could incite hatred on protected characteristics with the intention of communicating it to the public.

    The speaker – Sarah Hardiman of Free Speech Ireland – fears that the law’s broad language and potential for abuse could restrict discussions on topics like sex characteristics and transgender people in bathrooms and have a chilling effect on free speech. The previous video featuring Sarah Hardiman discussing the same controversial law is HERE.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the new hate speech law in Ireland and its potential impact on free speech. They note that while there are restrictions on free speech in Ireland and in the European Charter of Human Rights, the new legislation is going beyond incitement to violence and extending to offense and perception of mistreatment, such as spreading memes or sharing content such as Pepe the Frog. While protection from incitement to violence is important, the speaker argues that this new law is going too far and could potentially restrict free speech and expression.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the transcript discusses the Irish hate speech law and the potential danger to free speech. While the Irish Times article mentions the processing of material that could be considered hateful, other articles such as the Yahoo article only mention incitement of violence and the need to update old legislation. However, section 10 part 1A of the law criminalizes the preparation or possession of material that may incite hatred against a person or group on account of protected characteristics with the intention of communicating it to the public. This could include comments made about sex characteristics and transgender people in bathrooms, which is a legitimate concern that should still be allowed to be discussed without fear of prosecution. The law’s broad language and potential for abuse by well-funded interest groups is alarming and could have a chilling effect on speech.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker voices concerns about Ireland’s new hate speech law. Specifically, they discuss the potential for predators to use the law to access spaces like women’s bathrooms that have an unwritten rule for keeping children safe. They argue that these are important conversations that society should be able to have and defend, but with the new law’s potential restrictions on free speech, they fear that such discussions may be silenced.

    YouTube Video

  • The Phenomenon 2020 – UFO Documentary

    The Phenomenon 2020 – UFO Documentary

    “The Phenomenon 2020” is a video documentary that explores the UFO phenomenon and the evidence that suggests we are not alone in the universe. As a documentary about the existence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and the attempts by the government to keep them hidden, the film explores various sightings and encounters with UFOs all over the world and the evidence of government cover-ups and advanced technology.

    The video highlights numerous reports of sightings, encounters, and incidents involving UFOs and highly qualified witnesses, including military and government officials.

    The video delves into the history of the phenomenon, beginning with Kenneth Arnold’s sighting in 1947, the subsequent military investigations and the Condon Report, the involvement of Dr. Jacque Vallee, and witnesses describing their experiences involving UFOs in various locations.

    The video also focuses on the UFO incursions at military nuclear weapon sites, including the Bentwaters base in England and Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana. The video concludes with the discussion of Lawrence Rockefeller’s interest in UFOs and his attempt to convince President Clinton’s science advisor to declassify government UFO data by selecting the 1947 Roswell incident for declassification.

    Furthermore, the Roswell incident is discussed, as well as the covert government program initiated by Senator Harry Reid to investigate UFOs. The documentary features accounts from pilots who scrambled jets to capture the object on video, Gordon Cooper who claimed to see and film a landed UFO, and the school children who experienced an alien encounter in Zimbabwe in 1994. The film emphasizes the need to further investigate these phenomena and recognize the potential technological advancement and implications for solving global issues.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the narrator discusses the idea that humans are not alone in the universe and the importance of accepting and understanding this fact. The section also highlights a naval announcement from the same year that water was discovered on a distant planet that confirmed that images captured by Navy pilots of objects with superior technology were authentic. The narrator suggests that we can finally begin to answer questions about the origin, function, and purpose of these vehicles. To do this, we must examine a body of evidence that has been suppressed for at least 70 years, including witness reports of strange objects, such as a flying saucer encountered by World War II pilot William Coleman in 1955.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the beginnings of the UFO phenomenon in 1947 in the US. It started with Kenneth Arnold’s sighting of flying objects that looked like discs without tails, that flipped and flashed like mirrors. Arnold’s account soon made headlines across the nation, and reporters began interviewing multiple witnesses who had also seen similar objects. Despite General Vandenberg’s public claim that there was nothing to worry about, a secret memorandum suggested that the highest military ranks considered the reports to be real and not fictitious. The phenomenon was reported to be real, and the objects were described as metallic discs with domes on top that traveled in groups of three to nine.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video highlights reports of UFO sightings over the years, including photographic evidence, eyewitness testimonies, and encounters from commercial pilots and astronauts. The sightings include instances of extreme rates of climb, dazzling maneuverability, and evasive action. Some of these sightings were picked up by Life Magazine and became a global phenomenon. Reports from former Navy aviators and commercial pilots with thousands of hours of flight experience describe seeing huge discs fly in formation and approach them head-on at incredible speeds estimated at 12,000 miles per hour. These sightings have left many believing that the unidentified objects were not from this point and were on their own mysterious mission.

    00:15:00

    In this section, we learn about the UFO sightings that took place near top US government locations in the 1950s. Despite the Air Force’s attempts to scramble fighter jets, the UFOs disappeared whenever they were detected. The Air Force then issued orders to shoot them down if necessary but refrained from using lethal force in subsequent sightings. The Air Force downplayed the sightings in the largest Pentagon press conference since World War II, stating the radar readings were merely tricks of the atmosphere. However, the president of the United States rocket Society urged defense officials not to fire at any UFOs as it might alienate any friendly extraterrestrial forces. Behind the scenes, a secret memo from the CIA urged attention to unexplained objects near major US defense installations.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video delves into the involvement of Dr. Jacque Vallee, a renowned French UFO researcher who, for decades, conducted sober scientific research on the UFO phenomenon. He consulted with witnesses, scientific, military, and government officials, including Project Blue Books’ top science advisor, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, whom he became close colleagues with. Their collaboration led to Vallee making a significant discovery of a letter signed by H.C. Cross, Director of Exotic Metallurgy at Patel National Laboratories, which revealed an ultra-secret, highly funded scientific investigation of the UFO phenomenon working parallel to Blue Book, unknown to all but a select few. Additionally, the video features eyewitness testimonies of a UFO sighting by several hundred students at the Westall School in Australia during the 50s and 60s.

    00:25:00

    In this section, witnesses describe their encounters with UFOs and the subsequent reactions of authorities. One witness saw a silver, hovering object that moved rapidly and was warned to keep quiet by two older men who threatened his job and prosecution under the Official Secrets Act. Another witness, a young engineer, took a Polaroid photo of a metallic object that appeared to be rotating before it bounced and rocketed away at high speed. Air Force officers showed up at his doorstep, questioning him and confiscating his photographs and a book with similar pictures. These incidents were not isolated, and despite the efforts of Project Blue Book to explain them away, cases continued to be filed as unknown.

    00:30:00

    In this section, witnesses describe their encounter with a UFO in New Mexico in 1964. Patrolman Zamora saw a craft with two human-like figures outside of it and heard a loud blast when it took off. The landing site had footprints and a burn area, which was documented by officials from the FBI, military, and Project Blue Book. Witnesses were given a book about flying saucers and instructed not to say too much about it.

    00:35:00

    In this section of “The Phenomenon 2020,” we hear from witnesses and officials involved in the Socorro close encounter and the Michigan sightings. Officer Lonnie Zamora, who witnessed the Socorro incident, sent a letter to a family who also witnessed a UFO, expressing that they were not alone. However, people started making fun of Zamora and accused him of making up stories about little men from outer space. Meanwhile, Dr. Heineck investigated the Michigan sightings but struggled to explain them to the public without igniting a public uproar. The sightings ultimately led to Congressional hearings in 1966, with Dr. Heineck and Secretary Harold Brown testifying.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the Air Force’s investigation into UFOs and the outside panel of scientists led by physicist Edward Condon that was commissioned to settle the matter. Despite finding many cases to be unexplainable, the panel ultimately stated that there was no evidence that UFOs represented any interplanetary space vehicle. However, after studying the panel’s report, it was discovered that Dr. Condon’s percentage of unexplained cases was five to six times larger than the Air Force’s, and yet his principal recommendation was that there was nothing of scientific interest that warranted further attention from the federal government. In 1969, the Air Force officially ended its public investigations into UFOs, leaving many to wonder whether they knew what the UFOs were or if they simply didn’t know.

    00:45:00

    In this section, military personnel come forward to confirm ongoing UFO incursions at nuclear weapons sites. Former missile launch officer stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, Robert Salas, recounts a UFO sighting above the missile silos, during which ten missiles went offline one after the other. Former top-secret control officer, Jerome Nelson, reports a message coming through his communication center stating that a UFO had shut down several missile silos in Montana. Additionally, former deputy base commander at RAF Bentwaters, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, recounts the now-famous incident where strange lights were seen in the forest and an unrecognizable object was discovered on the ground. All these accounts showcase the reality of UFO incursions at the military’s most sensitive facilities.

    00:50:00

    In this section, a US Air Force officer describes his encounter with a UFO at Bentwaters base in England in 1980. While on duty, he, along with several security policemen, watched an object approaching them at high speed. As suddenly as it appeared, it disappeared but they noticed another object hovering over the Woodbridge base. Concerns grew as they noticed beams falling into or near the weapons storage area. Meanwhile, a secret Soviet document reveals that a UFO hovered over a Ukrainian nuclear base for nearly an hour, causing several missiles to suddenly switch to full combat readiness without authentication codes. Witnesses, who are some of the most highly vetted military officers in charge of the world’s most devastating armaments suggest that UFOs have made incursions into top-security nuclear facilities, decade after decade.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video explores the USSR’s openness in sharing decades worth of UFO files and interviews high-ranking military personnel who have witnessed UFO activity. Additionally, the video discusses Lawrence Rockefeller’s interest in UFOs and his attempt to convince President Clinton’s science advisor to declassify government UFO data by selecting the 1947 Roswell incident for declassification. The video also explores the Roswell incident and interviews witnesses who claim to have seen debris from the crashed object, including major Jesse Marcel, the base’s intelligence officer who investigated the site.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the Roswell incident is discussed, where debris was found in New Mexico in 1947. Marcel was ordered to transport the wreckage to Fort Worth Army Airfield, where he was met by the Commanding General who instructed him to pose with debris from a conventional weather balloon. This cover-up story never added up, and the Air Force claimed that it was just a device to spy on Soviet nuclear tests. However, many believe that the government was covering up something extraterrestrial. Even Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who grew up around Roswell, is convinced that there was something not of this Earth that went down there. Despite government attempts to keep it secret, some believe the American people deserve to know the truth.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses how there have been crashed UFOs, recovered materials, and bodies, which has been kept concealed from the normal government channels. In 2007, Senator Harry Reid persuaded Senators Ted Stevens and Daniel Inoue to secretly allocate millions of dollars in defense department funds to investigate UFOs. The covert program lasted from the Bush presidency through the Obama Administration and into Donald Trump’s first year in office. The government finally admitted to a modern-day program to investigate UFOs in December of 2017, releasing official evidence, including videos from the cockpits of military aircraft. One of the authors of the story in the New York Times was investigative journalist and best-selling author Leslie Kane.

    01:10:00

    In this section, a group of F-18 Super Hornet pilots describe their encounter with a strange object they spotted on their radar scopes and in the air. The object appeared to be a white, smooth, wingless, and windowless Tic Tac-shaped craft that had exceptional movement and control, darting around in the air just above a large, submerged object. The object accelerated at alarming rates and reappeared instantaneously in the fleet’s critical aerial Defense Zone. Additional jets were scrambled to capture the object on video, during which time it was readily apparent that the object had a dominant battle space awareness, and it outmatched U.S. Frontline Fighters. Despite holding a seat on the Special Access Program Oversight Committee, the senator admits that there is nothing like it on the drawing boards.

    01:15:00

    In this section, various individuals speak about their experiences with government cover-ups and their attempts to reveal the truth about UFOs. This includes an interview with Gordon Cooper, a Mercury astronaut who claimed that he saw and filmed a landed UFO in 1957, but the footage was taken away and never seen again. Additionally, Dr. Jacques Vallée collects purported metal debris from UFO cases dating back to 1947 that are being analyzed using state-of-the-art equipment. One sample was found to have a composition unlike any known metal, with 253 different isotopes. This suggests that the material was manufactured, possibly by an advanced civilization, and could help us understand physical principles that we don’t know today. Overall, it seems that there is evidence of government cover-ups and advanced technology that warrants further investigation and study.

    01:20:00

    In this section, the video discusses encounters with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) that suggest the existence of an advanced intelligence and technology beyond our current understanding. Some sightings have involved interactions with beings, but the origin and intent of these craft and entities remain unknown. Examples of sightings from Papua New Guinea in 1959 and Zimbabwe in 1994 are given. The potential technological advancement and the implications for solving global issues such as the energy crisis are recognized. The need to investigate these phenomena is emphasized.

    01:25:00

    In this section, a group of school children from the Ariel school in Zimbabwe share their experience of encountering an alien in 1994. Psychiatrist Dr. John Mack explored the encounter, and the children believed their experience was true. They explain that the alien had big eyes, a big head, short legs, and a long top, and communicated through telepathy, warning them about the environment and our misuse of technology. The children went into a trance-like state when making contact with the alien but snapped out of it when the alien tried to communicate more, which made them anxious.

    01:30:00

    In this section, a witness describes chaotic scenes with the media frenzy that was going on at the Ariel School after the infamous UFO sighting in Zimbabwe in September 1994. The witness saw how the teachers and children were affected by the incident and how their teachers didn’t believe them, which made it difficult to continue going to school. However, years later, they met with the headteacher at the time of the incident, who wanted to apologize for her behavior. The witness still believes that the incident was real and that if they saw the UFO again, the biggest question they would ask is, “what does it want with us?” The video also highlights how well-observed UFO cases have been reported all over the world since the 17th century.

    01:35:00

    In this section, several experts and eyewitnesses comment on the UFO phenomenon and their belief that the presence of these objects suggest the action of some form of intelligence which wants to be seen. One witness expresses regret for not attempting to communicate with the object and recognizes the advanced technology that allows the craft to enter our airspace. Another witness describes how the craft he saw disappeared in a blink of an eye and moved at incredible speeds, leaving him in awe of its capabilities.

    YouTube Video

  • The International Covid Summit III Held at the European Parliament in Brussels

    The International Covid Summit III Held at the European Parliament in Brussels

    The International Covid Summit III held at the European Parliament in Brussels saw speakers presenting their findings on various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Topics included the history of coronavirus research, the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties, and the potential premeditation of the pandemic.

    Speakers also discussed the lies spread about the pandemic, including the myth of asymptomatic transmission and the effectiveness of lockdowns, while emphasizing the negative impacts of lockdowns on issues like poverty, starvation, and joblessness.

    In addition, there were talks regarding the nasal spray vaccine, the autophagy lysosomal degradation pathway as a protective system against viruses, and how COVID-19 affects multiple organs beyond the lungs.

    In the second hour of the conferance, the speakers discuss various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the cytokine storm and thromboembolisms, the use of omics technology, the morphology of the virus, its phylogenesis, the genetic composition of the virus, and the complexity of its immunology.

    They also discuss the situation in Europe, including overcrowded hospitals and a scandal surrounding the release of images depicting the scale of the crisis. The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as masks and lockdowns, is also debated, with some questioning their efficacy and others emphasizing the importance of historical context in decision-making.

    The third hour of the conference covers a range of topics around the COVID-19 pandemic. One speaker explains the results of various studies on the efficacy of masks, highlighting that the Danish study showed no statistical significance in the difference of infection rates between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers.

    Another speaker discusses the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 and notes that randomized studies are not ethical in an epidemic when a treatment is known to work. A key topic is the controversy around Ivermectin, which the speakers argue is an effective treatment for COVID-19 but is being suppressed due to conflicts of interest, politicization, and suppression of science by the pharmaceutical industry. The speakers also discuss the potential role of psychology in manipulating public behavior and decision-making during the pandemic.

    In the remainder of the conference the presenters discuss problems with PCR testing, the changing definitions and goals of vaccinations, manipulation and hiding of vaccine data, the efficacy of vaccinations decreasing over time, and fatal flaws in CDC efficacy analyses.

    Speakers highlight the importance of adhering to scientific definitions to avoid confusion and promote informed consent. They express their concern about how vaccines failing to stop infection and transmission can potentially drive the emergence of new variants and the need to acknowledge the value of naturally acquired immunity.

    Additionally, they call for worldwide moratoriums on the use of mRNA vaccine technology for all species and comprehensive reviews of funding structures for public regulatory agencies to determine potential conflicts of interest.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, two members of the European Parliament, Christian Karish and Ivan Sinchich, welcome the attendees of the International Covid Summit III. They express their gratitude to those who have been fighting for their rights and liberties during these trying times. They also emphasize the importance of this event as a platform for sharing ideas and discussing the scientific, social, medical, and legal findings of the past three years of the covid crisis. Furthermore, they acknowledge the role of the MEPs in fighting for democracy and human rights in Europe while also celebrating the efforts made by U.S. Congress members and many others around the world. Lastly, they express their commitment to continue fighting for the people and their rights.

    00:05:00

    In this section, a speaker commends the attendees for following the science during the COVID-19 pandemic while also upholding human rights, rule of law, and freedom. They criticize certain bureaucrats and politicians who are not yet accepting accountability for their wrong decisions and discreditation attempts towards those who spoke the scientific truth during the pandemic. Attendees are here to exchange findings and send a strong message to European lawmakers, government agencies, and the public about early treatments, vaccine efficacy, and the legalities surrounding the pandemic.

    00:10:00

    In this section, two speakers, Stephen Malthouse and Patrick Ky, open the International Covid Summit III in the European Parliament in Brussels. Malthouse, a family doctor from Canada, thanks the hosts and speakers for attending the summit, which will focus on the pandemic after the declared first one. He urges the audience to keep an open mind and heart as the experts present their research-based material that might be different from what people have been learning so far. Ky, on the other hand, sees the summit as an opportunity to ask difficult questions about the human condition and rethink the history of biological patents leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the speaker expresses his gratitude to the members of parliament for hosting the summit and acknowledges his wife’s role in encouraging him to share his insights on the pandemic with the world. He talks about his previous fame on mainstream media and how COVID-19 took that away from him, but he is happier to be standing with the people at the summit. The speaker then sets the historical context of the pandemic, dating back to the mid-1900s when the conversation of pathogen use began. He highlights how the coronavirus model was identified in 1965 as a pathogen that could be used for a variety of purposes but specifically in human manipulation. The first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment was done in 1966, and the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus were done in 1967. The speaker questions where the human civilization was in allowing these experiments and violating biological and chemical weapons treaties.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the history of coronavirus research, specifically noting that Pfizer filed a patent for a Spike protein vaccine in 1990. Despite this early research, publications on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 to 2018 showed that vaccines were ineffective as the virus mutates too quickly for them to be effective. The speaker then delves into the 2002 patent filed by the University of North Carolina for an infectious replication-defective clone of coronavirus, which suggests a weapon aimed at specific individuals with no collateral damage. The patent preceded the SARS outbreak by a year and was funded by Anthony Fauci’s NIAID. The speaker suggests that this engineered SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon but rather a product of human research.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws in the US. The CDC had filed a patent on SARS coronavirus in violation of these treaties and laws, after downloading the sequence from China, which led to the rejection of the patent application until the CDC bribed the patent office. RTPCR, the test allegedly identified to detect Coronavirus risks, was identified by the speaker as a bioterrorism threat in Europe in 2002 and 2003. Furthermore, the pathogen was described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005 and a bio-warfare-enabling agent from that point forward. The gain-of-function moratorium to freeze any efforts to do gain-of-function research was conveniently suspended, as the University of North Carolina received an exemption from the grant. This led to the publication of the journal article stating that SARS Coronavirus is poised for human emergence.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a speaker at the International Covid Summit III discusses the potential premeditation of the Covid-19 pandemic. They quote a statement made in September 2019 that the world would experience an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen to allow for a universal vaccine template to be created. The speaker argues that this alleged release was premeditated domestic terrorism and an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race. They criticize the lack of independent review boards since 1965 and call for an end to gain of function research, weaponization of nature, and corporate patronage of science for self-interest.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker from Status Analytics argues that the initial narrative surrounding COVID-19 was based on fear rather than reality. They claim that the reality was that the virus posed a high risk to few people and negligible risks to most, that asymptomatic people were not major drivers of disease spread, and that lockdowns and mask mandates did not work and caused harm. The speaker also criticizes the World Health Organization for conflating case fatality rates with infection fatality rates, causing a misunderstanding of the true fatality rate of COVID-19. They argue that the infection fatality rate is less than 0.1 percent and that the virus presented a minimus risk to healthy people under the age of 70 who were not in the hospital for a severe comorbidity.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the International Covid Summit III, the speaker discusses several lies that have been spread about the COVID-19 pandemic. One of these lies is that the virus was novel and therefore more dangerous, when in fact it had been identified early on as a variant of SARS. Another lie is the myth of asymptomatic transmission, which was based on flawed studies and contradicted by experts. The speaker also discusses the idea that lockdowns saved lives, which is debunked by multiple studies showing no benefit to the implementation of lockdowns or other non-pharmaceutical interventions. The speaker argues that lockdowns may have actually been pro-contagion and that maximizing the differential mobility of the elderly and young is key to minimizing mortality.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker presents evidence to suggest that lockdowns were not effective at reducing COVID-19 mortality rates and instead resulted in a shift of the disease burden to vulnerable elderly populations. A scatterplot is shown indicating no relationship between lockdown stringency and COVID-19 mortality. Additionally, a comparison of pandemic curves for countries with and without lockdowns, and with and without mask mandates, reveal virtually identical results. The negative impacts of lockdowns are discussed, including increased child deaths, poverty, starvation, and joblessness. The presentation suggests that public health officials and industry leaders were waiting for a pandemic to occur in order to launch a vaccine, ultimately resulting in what the speaker considers to be a complete lie surrounding the sudden need for global vaccination.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video discusses how a nasal spray vaccine would have been more effective at preventing transmission and infection of COVID-19, and how the lack of development of this type of vaccine was a mistake that was belatedly recognized by experts. The speaker also highlights how there has been a continuous stream of lies and collusion between politicians, media, and health experts around the world regarding the true nature of COVID-19. Additionally, a pathologist presents their perspective on the disease, stating that COVID-19 is not as unknown as it was initially presented, and that better management of the disease could have been achieved through following basic medical teaching. The pathologist also provides information on the symptoms and severity of the disease.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the history of respiratory diseases and the similarities between SARS and COVID-19. The speaker highlights the importance of the autophagy lysosomal degradation pathway as a protective system against viruses, and how COVID-19 exploits and modulates this pathway to escape degradation. The speaker notes that in older individuals, this pathway is less efficient, leading to a hyper-induction of the inflammatory and immune response, resulting in a cytokine storm. The speaker points out that there are many inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that can stop the cytokine storm. Lastly, the speaker mentions that COVID-19 not only affects the lungs but also other organs, including the intestine and vasculature.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the cytokine storm and its role in causing disseminating intravascular coagulation with thromboembolisms. The presence of thromboembolisms makes it difficult for the patient’s oxygen to be exchanged and causes their condition to deteriorate rapidly. The speaker also points out the subtle mistake of not conducting autopsies to determine the cause of death. Moreover, patients who were given just paracetamol were not counteracting the inflammation caused by the virus. Inflammation anti-inflammatory drugs could have been more effective in treating the patients. Finally, the speaker also points out that the other effects of the spike protein, whether from the virus or the vaccine, are causing altered control of blood pressure.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the transcript, the speaker discusses how using omics technology could have improved the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This technology could have been used to create personalized profiles of patients in order to understand who was most susceptible to the disease and would benefit from vaccination. The speaker emphasizes the importance of trusting in science rather than relying solely on technology for solutions. They also mention the need for early treatment and studying the cellular and molecular pathways of infection. The speaker ends with a quote from Giordano Bruno about the potential consequences of relying on technology without understanding ourselves.

    01:10:00

    In this section, the discussion revolves around the morphology and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, including its genetic description and taxonomy. The virus is well-known, with its unique characteristics leading to its classification as a sabercovirus. The discussion also touches on the ac2 receptor, which the virus binds to, and the coefficient of reproduction or the measure of how effective a disease is, which has been calculated to be between two and four. The speaker explains that the horizontal coefficient differs from a spherical one in terms of how infectivity is communicated.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the phylogenesis of the coronavirus and explains that it is a very old family that has evolved progressively into producing less pathogenic diseases over time. The DNA of animals acts as a reservoir for ancient coronaviruses due to their long-lasting cohabitation. The speaker points out that interference is one of the natural virtues of the complex human immunity that helps little to no susceptibility to certain infections. Furthermore, there is still no evidence of where the virus came from, and the speaker offers a provocation highlighting that if pangolins and bats wanted to mix and share the coronavirus, they had enough time to do so, but they did not.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Professor Claudia Colucci discusses the genetic composition of the COVID-19 virus and how it is not different from any other virus, as it is the result of genetic cells and the reaction of the host. She explains that there are many ways the virus can enter a cell and replicate, and at the end of replication, it puts a black spot in the cell, which causes the cell to commit suicide. Professor Colucci stresses that immunity is not just limited to antibodies, as efficacy of a treatment is not just measured by antibodies; rather, it involves other factors as well. Furthermore, she suggests that the mechanism by which the fusion and entry into the interior of every cell takes place is not a delivery, it is then subjected to coupling to complex processes, but this is subject to errors and enlarged by the decoyrants.

    01:25:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker talks about the complexity of the immunology of COVID-19 and how different it is from traditional vaccines. He emphasizes the need for precise scientific terminology in discussing COVID-19 treatment, suggesting that the mRNA treatment should not be referred to as a vaccine. The speaker presents a case of a 15-year old girl who had the virus only in her bowel, highlighting the importance of correct diagnosis. He concludes by discussing the use of epidemiology as a tool to analyze and understand the causes and effects of COVID-19, saying that independent and dependent variables must be set and measured to determine the factors that contribute to the spread of the virus.

    01:35:00

    In this section, there is an excerpt from the International Covid Summit III where the speakers discuss the situation in Europe amidst the pandemic. They mention the Paris crisis and the strain it has put on respiratory care units, as well as the issue of overcrowded hospitals. The speakers also discuss journalist El Mondo’s investigation into a crematorium in Madrid, where the secretary for foreign affairs allegedly tried to prevent the release of images depicting the scale of the crisis.

    01:50:00

    In this section of the video, Dr. Louis Vachon, an intensivist in Marseille and a member of the independent scientific council, discusses the benefits and risks of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as masks and lockdowns. He stresses the importance of having a clear historical context and avoiding being disoriented in space and time when making decisions about these interventions. Dr. Vachon then gives a timeline of the mask and lockdown mandates in France from 2020 to 2021.

    01:55:00

    In this section, the speaker presents various sources of information that question the effectiveness of wearing masks for the general population. The World Health Organization previously believed that masks were of no use in the general population, and 120 different trials support this. Additionally, manufacturers and the boxes of masks themselves claim that they do not provide any protection against the coronavirus. The use of masks has also been compared to torture experienced by prisoners in Guantanamo, and it has become a new normal for children in Thailand. Further studies have shown that medical and surgical masks have no effect in preventing respiratory illness.

    02:00:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses various studies conducted on the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19. The Danish study showed no statistical significance in the difference of infection rate between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers, whereas a Bangladeshi study cited by the government and media showed a relative efficiency of 11% in reducing COVID-19 symptoms, but an absolute efficacy of only 104 persons. A study in Catalonia, Spain involving 6.6 million children showed no significant difference in infection rates between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers. The speaker also mentions the risks of wearing masks, such as increased CO2 in the blood and contaminated masks.

    02:05:00

    In this section, a speaker discusses the failure of lockdowns in slowing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of social and economic inequality that it poses. They also mention a consensus conference, which found that masks in general populations, including children, should be avoided, as there is still no evidence of benefits after three years of mask mandates. The speaker uses mathematical modeling to compare the diffusion rate of the infection between countries and concludes that lockdowns have increased the speed of virus diversion by 50%. They argue that lockdowns must be avoided, and there is significant risk for children wearing masks.

    02:10:00

    In this section, a French researcher speaks about the laboratory in Marseille that has over 4 million euros worth of equipment and is a reference center for epidemic preparedness in Southern France. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the laboratory conducted tests on over 3,000 people, cared for over 30,000 outpatients and over 5,000 patients in the hospital, and developed COVID-19 tests. They also conducted 100,000 PCR and generic studies for different variants. The researcher also discusses their early use of chloroquine, which they were familiar with due to previous experience in treating tropical diseases.

    02:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses how they conducted studies on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. They started with a small study on 24 patients and found that it had a slight effect on viral loads. They then did an observational study on 1,000 patients and found that hydroxychloroquine was more effective than no treatment. They argue that randomized studies are not ethical in an epidemic when a treatment is known to work. They conducted a study on over 30,000 patients and found that hydroxychloroquine works better than no treatment. They point out that the pressure on this treatment is due to its effectiveness in reducing mortality in elderly patients and that vaccines for acute respiratory infections are not efficient in controlling virus spread.

    02:20:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses several concerning issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. They present data showing that vaccinated individuals are still contributing to the spread of the virus and highlight conflicts of interest, politicization, corruption, and suppression of science. The speaker also shares examples of cyber harassment and censorship of scientific information on platforms like YouTube. They then shift the focus to the topic of Ivermectin, a drug that has been shown to be effective in treating COVID-19 but has faced disinformation campaigns aimed at suppressing evidence of its efficacy. The speaker argues that the war on Ivermectin is a global campaign whose only objective is to keep people away from this life-saving drug.

    02:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the long-standing war on any generic, off-patent drugs that threaten pharmaceutical profits, highlighting how any medicine that costs a dollar or two dollars will not find regulatory approval in any advanced health economy around the world. She points out that this has resulted in people dying frequently and in high numbers due to being unable to access recommended medicines. The speaker identifies Ivermectin as a drug that presents a massive threat and probably would have halted the vaccine campaign if people were following the rules. She explains how the pharmaceutical industry uses disinformation and tactics such as propaganda and censorship, which are historically unparalleled due to their global media and communication systems’ consolidation. Merck is singled out as an example for raking on Ivermectin and denying the Nobel prize-winning discoverer’s request to study it in COVID-19.

    02:30:00

    In this section, Dr. Pierre Kory discusses the 95 controlled trials and 134,000 patients that have been treated with Ivermectin. Despite its efficacy, the medication is not recommended by any advanced health economy, and almost all hospitals have removed it from their formularies. Dr. Kory highlights that there are only six heavily-funded, high-quality trials that have been published in top journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of American Medical Association, British Medical Journal, The Lancet, and the Annals of Internal Medicine, which seem to show that Ivermectin is not effective contrary to all the other trials. However, Dr. Kory argues that those six trials were the only ones where almost every single investigator of that trial was drowning in pharmaceutical company financial conflicts of interests, and this may have interfered with the results.

    02:35:00

    In this section, Dr. Peter McCullough speaks about the Ivermectin trial conducted by the University of Oxford and how they have not published the positive results, despite the trial being completed 10 months ago. He shared that they allowed up to 14 days before starting the medicine, which made it a fake trial. He also talked about the editorial mafia that controls the top medical journals, where positive randomized controlled trials of Ivermectin were rejected from publication, while those that managed to get published were suddenly retracted. Dr. McCullough questioned the selective publication of negative trials by pharmaceutical companies and conflicted researchers.

    02:40:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the potential power of the media in making decisions during the COVID-19 response. He poses several crucial questions regarding the impact of group pressure on individuals and whether the public was exposed to psychology during this time. The speaker argues that a PR campaign against Ivermectin was launched, and professional societies sent out memos calling for an immediate cessation of prescribing Ivermectin after an increase in prescriptions. He declares that it is one of the most effective drugs in history and claims that the campaign was launched since they saw they were losing the war against Ivermectin. The speaker considers this a crime against humanity, and no one will go to jail for it.

    02:45:00

    In this section, the speaker describes the psychology of conformity and how it has been used to manipulate the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research showed that people tend to conform to the crowd, even if they know it’s wrong. Those most likely to conform were low status individuals with a high need for approval. Fear is a major factor in increasing conformist behavior, as it shuts down critical thinking. The speaker also mentions how organizations such as the UK Sage and the Behavioral Insights Team used psychological manipulation to achieve their desired outcomes during the pandemic. Isolation and fear were upregulated to increase conformist behaviors in people.

    02:50:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses how contradictory messages from the media created confusion, which is a key element of mind control. He questions if the public exposure of vaccine status through work mandates was used as a deliberate attempt to trigger group pressure and increase compliance. He talks about the concept of trauma bonding with authority and whether the heavy-handedness of the authorities was meant to facilitate Stockholm syndrome. Finally, he suggests that criminal charges need to be laid for the alleged weaponization of psychology against the public.

    02:55:00

    In this section, the speaker, a chief operating officer of a company that develops immunosuticals and an associate professor of viral immunology at the University of Guelph, shares his concerns about the science underpinning Covid-19 vaccines. He points out that the primary rationale for vaccine mandates and masking mandates, which is asymptomatic transmission, is not a substantial driver of transmission of the SARS coronavirus 2 pandemic, and he backs it up with literature that establishes that studies arguing in favor of asymptomatic transmission are fatally flawed. He emphasizes that he bases all of his messaging on peer-reviewed published science and believes that everyone deserves respect and love.

    03:00:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses PCR testing and the importance of calibrating the test to differentiate between infectious and non-infectious virus particles. He highlights a study conducted by the Public Health Agency of Canada, which concluded that there was no evidence of infectious virions if the cycle threshold was less than 24. However, many papers have suggested that asymptomatic people could be a problem in spreading COVID-19, but the speaker argues that if sick people stay home, the virus will not spread. The speaker also warns that using unclear language, like turning vaccination terms into buzzwords, and not adhering to scientific definitions causes confusion and hinders the public’s ability to give informed consent.

    03:05:00

    In this section, an immunologist explains that the definition of a vaccine has been changed in the United States to accommodate the new COVID-19 shots, and under the new definition, even yogurt would be considered a vaccine. The traditional textbook definition of a vaccine is that once vaccinated, one cannot get the disease or transmit it to others, which is what the public was thinking about when the term vaccine was applied to COVID-19 shots. The shots were originally intended to prevent infection, not dampen the severity of the disease, but the goalposts were moved. Through a freedom of information request, a document was obtained that shows that the Pfizer vaccine was intended to prevent infection, not dampen the disease. The vaccines cannot prevent infection or transmission, but Pfizer failed to meet its contractual duty, according to the speaker.

    03:10:00

    In this section, a speaker discusses the manipulation and hiding of vaccine data, giving examples such as the unusual clustering of cases and hospitalizations after the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine and the refusal to overlay data based on vaccination status. The speaker also cites Pfizer’s own six-month clinical trial data update which shows no statistically significant benefit of the COVID-19 vaccine in reducing death, with numerically more deaths in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated. The speaker goes on to emphasize the superiority of natural immunity and the lunacy of vaccine passports without checking the immune response of individuals. Lastly, the speaker highlights the superiority of natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity in terms of cases, severity of disease, hospitalizations, and deaths.

    03:15:00

    In this section, a speaker highlights concerns that the vaccines may be making people more susceptible to Covid-19, particularly those who have been boosted with bivalent vaccines. The widespread use of vaccines that fail to stop infection and transmission can drive the emergence of new variants, similar to chemotherapy resistance and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, vaccines need to acknowledge the value of naturally acquired immunity. Additionally, there needs to be a worldwide moratorium on the use of mRNA vaccine technology for all species and comprehensive reviews of the funding structures for public regulatory agencies to determine potential conflicts of interest. Finally, there should be objective third-party scientific reviews of the raw data from submission packages that go to regulatory agencies and novel public health data to ensure integrity.

    03:20:00

    In this section of the transcript, the speaker discusses how the efficacy of vaccines decreases over time, which means that vaccinated people are more likely to get infected with Covid than unvaccinated people who have never been vaccinated. The speaker presents data that led the CDC to state that the vaccines do not work for the purposes of public health infection control. The vaccines only provide minimal protection against infection and transmission after receiving the most recent dose, although protection can wane over time. The speaker argues that the state’s only interest in mandating vaccines is to prevent transmission, and given that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, the state should not mandate them for the prevention of infection. The speaker also briefly touches on epidemiology and the different types of studies that can be done to evaluate vaccine efficacy.

    03:25:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses a fatal flaw in every vaccine efficacy analysis that the CDC has published in its in-house journal, morbidity mortality weekly report – the use of odds ratio as a parameter instead of relative risk. The speaker argues that the use of odds ratio skews the data and provides incorrect vaccine efficacy rates, which the CDC has repeatedly failed to correct, leading him to distrust the agency. The speaker questions how the CDC can have dozens of professionals involved in the publications and still make such a mistake.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ

  • Why Is Regret Stronger Than Gratitude

    Why Is Regret Stronger Than Gratitude

    There’s a saying that “The reason why the dead receive more flowers than the living is because regret is stronger than gratitude.” And no… it wasn’t Ann Frank who said that, though many things have been wrongly attributed to her. Let’s take a look at why exactly is regret a stronger emotion than gratitude.

    Regret has long been deemed a powerful emotion. It’s a feeling that demands our attention and forces us to confront our mistakes. It is often stronger than gratitude, because it has the potential to linger and haunt us for years. Regret can be a rather powerful emotion. The feel of guilt and shame about one’s past actions or decisions frequently accompanies the expression of guilt. This can in turn make one feel stuck, like they cannot move forward in life until they make amends with themselves or others.

    The power of regret comes from its utility to make us reflect on our mistakes. If used correctly, those can then be learned from and even provide motivation for change in the future. When we take responsibility for our own feelings of regret, instead of trying to sweep them under a rug or running away from them, the burden it casts off our shoulder is sure to open us up to new beginnings.

    It can even help us identify patterns in ourselves which need addressing in order to move forward with new goals or ambitions. By accepting responsibility for what happened in the past as well as learning lessons along the way helps ensure that similar mistakes will not be made again – resulting ultimately into personal growth and development over time..

    Ultimately regret serves as a reminder of how far one has come since then; allowing individuals who experienced pain due their own fault realize how much further ahead they could’ve been if only those same choices were different ones back then — thus why regret is stronger than attitude because it serves both purposeful yet painful lesson all at once: learning through reflection whilst being motivated by newfound awareness towards betterment within oneself .

    In conclusion, regret is a powerful emotion that we cannot ignore. It’s a feeling that demands our attention and forces us to confront our mistakes. While gratitude is important, it’s regret that has the power to transform our lives and make us better people. Let us then embrace our regrets. Let us learn from them, and use them to become the best version of ourselves.

  • Power of Suggestion, Repetition, and Conviction in Achieving Phenomenal Results

    Power of Suggestion, Repetition, and Conviction in Achieving Phenomenal Results

    The video explores the power of suggestion, repetition, and conviction in achieving phenomenal results through the subconscious mind. With the right use of imagination, beliefs, and affirmations, individuals can become unstoppable in achieving their desires.

    However, distractions and negative influences can scatter energies and affect one’s ability to remain positive. Claude M. Bristol emphasizes the importance of controlling thoughts and surrounding oneself with positivity to attain wealth and happiness independently of material possessions or surroundings.

    The video urges the audience to create a mental picture of their desired selves and hold onto it until it becomes a reality.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the video, which is based on the teachings by Claude M. Bristol, discusses the power of suggestion and repetition in achieving phenomenal results through the subconscious mind. The repetition of affirmations and incantations leads to belief, which then becomes a deep conviction that results in things happening.

    Claude M. Bristol presents how this power of suggestion was evident during the Depression years, where the repetition of negative statements about hard times and business failures led to a nationwide belief that prosperous days would never return. The use of charms and talismans also proves how people can breathe life into them and make them effective through their beliefs.

    Claude M. Bristol emphasizes the importance of proper use of imagination, where one sees oneself doing something and then does it. However, this is difficult for the average person to do, given the constant distractions that affect our creative force and scatter our energies. Therefore, the video advises not to discuss one’s desires with others, which can scatter forces and lose the close connection with the subconscious mind.

    00:05:00

    In this section, Claude M. Bristol explains how people who consciously or unconsciously use their imagination and hold strong beliefs and convictions are great doers in action. Faith without action is dead, and the intensity of your thought will eventually be revealed. Much like planting seeds, the results of suggestions given to your subconscious mind are dependent on the original seed and the attention given to it.

    A positive attitude and the proper aura will work wonders, but negative personalities can raise havoc and negatively affect others. The vibrations set up by others affect us more than we realize, and we take on the characteristics of those we associate with. To remain positive, we should avoid negative or pessimistic people and surround ourselves with riches to attain wealth. The power of the mind can give us dominion over the Earth and everything on it, but we need to constantly stoke the fire with ideas and action.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, Claude M. Bristol emphasizes on how our thoughts have immense power and how we need to control them to achieve happiness. He suggests that happiness is completely within ourselves and independent of material possessions or our surroundings. Claude M. Bristol cites examples of successful and powerful individuals who were able to change the course of their lives with a single thought.

    He emphasizes that we all have the power of thought and need to use it to become the person we envisage in our imagination. The video ends with Claude M. Bristol urging the audience to create a mental picture of their newly conceived self and to continue to hold it until it becomes their reality.

    YouTube Video

  • The Kingdom of God is Within You

    The Kingdom of God is Within You

    This video, narrated by Dr. Santos Bonacci, discusses the Third Eye, its location in the brain, and how it can be activated. It also explains the difference between religious and esoteric knowledge, and how the former is typically taught in churches. Finally, the video explains that the kingdom of God is within us, and that by looking inside we can avoid being deceived by false prophets.

    00:00:00

    In the beginning of the video, actor Jim Carey explains that in the brain there is the cerebrum, which is in the middle of the head, and the claustrum, which is a portion of the brain that is located just above the sacral plexus. Dr. Santos Bonacci then explains that the oil that comes from the cerebrum and flows down the spinal cord to the sacrum is called the “cloud stream.” The cloud stream is also known as the “holy clusterum” because of the beautiful oil that is produced and secreted. The video explains that the secretion of the oil is a secret and the sacrum is the sacred part of the secret.

    00:05:00

    Dr. Santos Bonacci discusses the different parts of the body and how the oil is brought down to the spinal cord. The oil is brought down through the “pingala” and “Eda” nerves and arrives at the “sacral plexus.” Once a month, the oil is transmitted to the “germinating seed” in the “medulla oblongata” and “ponds and midbrain.”

    If one practices meditation, good eating, and peaceful behavior, they are able to raise the “Christ oil” and send it up to the “optic thalamus” and “pineal gland.” This process is known as “eating from the Tree of Life” and it opens up millions of brain cells, which allows one to become enlightened.

    00:10:00

    Dr. Santos Bonacci discusses the difference between religious and esoteric knowledge, and how the former is typically taught in churches. It goes on to explain that the third eye is actually located in the cerebrum, and that by understanding this secret one can regenerate their physiology and live longer.

    Dr. Santos Bonacci also mentions the importance of respecting and keeping the sacred secret of the Christ within the Christ, which is why the Egyptians built Ascension Chambers. Finally, the video explains that the kingdom of God is within us, and that by looking inside we can avoid being deceived by false prophets.

    00:15:00

    Dr. Santos Bonacci explains how physical regeneration occurs, and how the oil must be raised to the optic thalamus in order to achieve it. He also discusses mediumship and the hippocampus.

    00:20:00

    Dr. Santos Bonacci explains how the Third Eye is located in the middle of the head and how it is activated by Jesus’ name. He also mentions the Claustrum, Cerebrum, and Pineal Gland.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONcvij_pA-A

  • American Commentator Gonzalo Lira Arrested by Ukrainian Nazis for Exposing Truth

    American Commentator Gonzalo Lira Arrested by Ukrainian Nazis for Exposing Truth

    The video focuses on the case of Gonzalo Lira, a US commentator who was jailed in Ukraine for speaking about uncomfortable facts, such as the presence of neo-fascists and neo-Nazis in the Kiev regime, and the shelling of Russian-speaking Ukrainians.

    The evidence used against him is based on factual statements that have been admitted by UN agencies, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International.

    The video discusses the double standard of Western media and human rights organizations in remaining silent about Lira’s arrest and calls for pressure on them to speak out.

    The speaker highlights the importance of speaking up against injustice, regardless of political differences, as this could happen to anyone.

    00:00:00

    In this section, we learn about the case of Gonzalo Lira, a US citizen living in Ukraine who was arrested by the Ukrainian security service on allegations of producing pro-Russian propaganda. However, as it turns out, the evidence used against him is a video in which Lira expresses factual statements, such as the Kiev regime consisting of neo-fascists and neo-Nazis, and the shelling of Russian-speaking Ukrainians. These are facts that have been admitted by both the Western media and Western governments sponsoring Ukraine. Therefore, the accusations against Lira appear to be baseless, and it is suggested that his arrest is part of Ukraine’s crackdown on free speech and the suppression of any narrative that does not fit its agenda.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the transcript discusses the evidence of Ukraine’s shelling of its own population, resulting in thousands of deaths, which Gonzalo Lira was arrested for speaking about. The evidence comes from sources such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the UN itself. Despite this evidence being admitted by US government officials and Western media outlets, they have remained largely silent about Lira’s arrest. The transcript argues that if this were happening in Russia, the condemnation would be immediate. It calls for pressure on these “hypocrites” and exposes the double standard of Western media and human rights organizations.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker highlights that Gonzalo Lira, a US commentator, was jailed in Ukraine for speaking about the presence of Nazis and the shelling of civilians. The speaker argues that despite political differences, people should speak up against this injustice as it could happen to anyone. The video description gives a list of Twitter accounts that people can tag and put pressure on, such as Human Rights Watch, the US Embassy in Kiev, and the US State Department. The Western media is also criticized for its silence on this issue.

    YouTube Video

  • Declassified FBI Files – LAPD Was Involved in Murders of Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls

    Declassified FBI Files – LAPD Was Involved in Murders of Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls

    Declassified FBI files on the unsolved murders of Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls reveal connections between the LAPD and the crimes. The investigation supported the findings of LAPD detective Russell Poole, who uncovered corrupt officers connected to the murders and accused the LAPD of a cover-up.

    The files suggest that US intelligence orchestrated the assassination of Tupac and that several people related to the LAPD were involved in covering up the plot. Furthermore, the files reveal connections between Tupac’s murder and the gang war in Compton. The same tactics were used in the Biggie murder, and FBI Agent Phil Carson wanted to make an arrest, but his superiors did not allow him to follow up with charging the officer. The LAPD’s involvement in the two cases was significant, with some believing that allegedly crooked cops could have been involved.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the declassified FBI files on the unsolved murders of Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls were revealed, exposing connections between the LAPD and the crimes. The FBI investigation supported the findings of LAPD detective Russell Poole who uncovered corrupt officers connected to the murders and was removed from the case after accusing the LAPD of a cover-up. The FBI was investigating Tupac and Death Row Records in the 1990s and used an undercover agent, Kevin Hackey, who was formerly a Compton school district police officer to infiltrate the label, revealing that the FBI had Suge Knight and death row under surveillance and had tapped into their communications. Hackey also alleged that he introduced arms trafficking to the label as part of an ATF gun-walking operation.

    00:05:00

    In this section, it is revealed that Tupac’s rap group, Outlaws, had connections to gun walking operations carried out by the ATF, and one member’s weapon was tracked by the FBI and ATF and later used in Tupac’s murder. The FBI had surveillance footage of the drive-by shooting in which Tupac was killed, and Kevin Gaines, an LAPD Rampart cop who was found to be dating Suge Knight’s ex-wife Sharifa Knight, was at the scene. Three LAPD officers, including David Mack and Rafael Perez, were also connected to Death Row events and parties, with Russell Poole, an LAPD detective, asking why so many officers were working within Death Row records and being told to consider them covert agents. However, Kevin Hackie, an undercover ATF agent, was assigned elsewhere by the FBI on the night of the shooting, which interfered with the security’s radio system.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the declassified FBI files on Tupac Shakur’s case reveal that the assassination of the rapper was orchestrated by US intelligence. Several people related to the LAPD, including officer Richard McCauley and James Green, were involved in covering up the plot by transferring Tupac’s ashes from Las Vegas to Los Angeles and presenting a staged fight at the MGM Hotel to frame a rival gang member for the murder. The files also reveal connections between Tupac’s murder and the gang war in Compton, where a fellow Crip named Orlando Anderson was labeled as the shooter. Moreover, the files suggest that LAPD officers were involved in the murder of rapper Notorious B.I.G. six months later, as there were several officers allegedly present at the Vibe magazine party at the Peterson Automotive Museum where Biggie was murdered. The Civil Trial filed against the LAPD by Biggie’s family in 2005 alleged that corrupt Rampart cops may have played a role in the murder using police radios and other tactics to carry out the hit.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that FBI Agent Phil Carson wanted to make an arrest for the murder of Biggie Smalls based on evidence found, including a rare type of ammunition and a car that matched the description of the shooter’s vehicle. However, his superiors did not allow him to follow up with charging the officer. The FBI documents revealed that the same tactics were used by the cops in a previous crime, which some believe may have been the Tupac murder or a bank robbery. It is claimed that Biggie was killed for no other reason than to advance the theory that the conspirators who tried to take out Suge Knight were putting forward. The LAPD’s involvement in the two cases was significant, with Russell Poole, a former LAPD detective, believing that allegedly crooked cops could have been involved.

    YouTube Video

  • Targeted Individual Talks About Use of Modern Direct Energy Weapons

    Targeted Individual Talks About Use of Modern Direct Energy Weapons

    This video is from 2019 National Targeted Individuals Day on the technical and methodological details behind modern directed energy weapons.

    In her speech, the targeted individual shares her experiences with stalking, harassment, and physical harm caused by a neighbor who is using direct energy weapons. The targeted individual encounters a Navy man who is laughing while holding what she suspects is a black box Ravenclaw device manufactured by Raytheon.

    The targeted individual believes that Ravenclaw is being used as a torture tool against thousands of innocent citizens across California, with perpetrators shooting radar waves at their skulls, ears, eyes, and hearts for target practice. The targeted individual also discusses the legal implications of this crime, including punishments for those convicted of using the weapon.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the targeted individual details the ongoing stalking and harassment they have faced from their neighbor who is using direct energy weapons on them, causing a variety of physical injuries including hearing loss. The targeted individual describes their experiences being surveilled at every moment and points to evidence of a black box that was planted in their hotel room. Despite the physical and emotional toll that this has taken on them, the targeted individual remains resolute in seeking justice and holding those responsible accountable.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the targeted individual describes an encounter with a Navy man who was assaulting them using a black box device called the Ravenclaw manufactured by Raytheon. The targeted individual noticed an older white male with a navy emblem on his car, smoking a cigarette while holding his phone in his hand. When she got out of her car and walked up to him, she saw a pixelated image on the man’s phone which was a recreated image of her legs. The man laughed and the targeted individual noticed that he had a black box in his vehicle which he quickly put into a black cloth briefcase. The targeted individual believes that the black box is the Ravenclaw and it has been used for a noise campaign involving ravens mimicking her every move, set up to emulate a battlefield of helicopters, drones, and other irritating sounds.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the targeted individual describes how targeted individuals are being stalked and shot using a torture tool called Ravenclaw. The weapon is being used as a crime against thousands of innocent citizens across California, with perpetrators shooting radar waves at their skulls, ears, eyes, and hearts for target practice. Ravenclaw has several user-friendly features, such as line-of-sight propagation, through-wall sensors, geofencing and bio-fencing alarms, electronic jammers, and countermeasures. However, the targeted individual highlights various disadvantages of the perpetrators, including moral turpitude, shock to the public conscience, vileness, and contrariness to the rules of morality and society, resulting in severe punishment.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the targeted individual describes the legal implications of this crime, including the revocation of personal licenses and the loss of green cards or visas for convicted individuals. The weapon itself operates on line-of-sight propagation, which makes it easier to catch perpetrators, and the operators become addicted to the hunt and the stimulation of participating in the crime. The targeted individual also references an engineer who distributed a list of dielectric constants that could be used by the Raytheon weapon, making it easier for the operators to store and shoot victims accurately. The targeted individual encourages people to be aware of their surroundings and to look out for people who seem overly interested in them, as they may be the ones using the weapon.

    YouTube Video

  • Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot and aviation whistleblower, spoke on The Michael Decon Program about the corruption and safety concerns present in the airline industry, particularly in regards to the events of 9/11.

    Hanley founded the website 911 Pilot Whistleblowers to expose the fact that the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled, and that neither the hijackers nor experienced pilots could have flown the flight profiles at the given speed and altitude.

    Hanley also discussed his personal experience, including being illegally terminated by United Airlines for speaking out about safety issues and the grounding of pilots who are whistleblowers.

    Additionally, Hanley shared skepticism about historical events and a belief that the government and media have misled and manipulated the public.

    When speaking about the damage done to the Pentagon, Hanley provided evidence that a 757 plane struck the building and described the off-body parts and identifiable passengers found as proof of a plane crash.

    Hanley also expressed his belief that a group of powerful people, including Mossad, CIA, MI6 and the Rothschild cabal, were behind the attacks.

    He discussed his experiences as a federal whistleblower and the lack of response he received from relevant government agencies when he attempted to bring forth evidence.

    Hanley encouraged individuals to speak out until justice is served and provided tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion.

    00:05:00

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot, received a plethora of certifications and flew different aircraft in his 35-year career. He shared his experience flying for the Navy during the Cold War and his tenure at United Airlines. However, his career ended due to his vocal opinions on the safety and security implications of the 9/11 events, and he was illegally terminated. In this section, Captain Hanley emphasizes that he, as an experienced aircraft pilot, could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles at the given speed and altitude, especially the Pentagon profile, and neither could the alleged hijackers.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley, who worked as an airline pilot, talks about his six-year fight with the US government AFAA and airline to expose the corruption in the industry. Despite evidence and witnesses, his case was dismissed. He founded a website called 911 Pilot Whistleblowers and serves as its Director and international public spokesperson. The website focuses on efforts to put a stop to the corruption that was prevalent in the airline industry, especially during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley explains his personal experience during the tragedy and mentions that the website aims to shed light on the events of 9/11.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley explains that the main purpose of the 911 Pilots organization is to demonstrate that the planes used in the attack were remotely controlled through a system called the uninterrupted autopilot. According to Hanley, this system allows a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer, and fly it to its target. Hanley has been trying to recruit active and retired pilots to attest to the fact that neither the hijackers nor they themselves could have flown the 9/11 flight profile. Hanley cites the example of the Pentagon profile flown by a 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker named Hani Hanjour, who was a poor student and could barely speak English, and the maneuver he made in his first attempt was nearly impossible even for experienced pilots. Hanley suspects that there might be more to the story behind the alleged hijackers.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the suspicious activities of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, prior to the attacks. Hanjour attempted to rent a single-engine airplane but was found to be an incompetent pilot by instructors who evaluated him. Despite this, Hanjour was later able to skillfully maneuver a commercial airliner during the attacks. Hanley believes that this evidence has been covered up by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and shares his attempts to track down witnesses and present this information to the government.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the lack of a criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the failures of the 9/11 commission to address the questions and concerns of the victims’ families. He explains that the commission was underfunded, time-constrained, and set up to fail, with the executive director having the final report outlined before the commission began their work. Additionally, no pilots were allowed to testify before the commission regarding the absurd assertion that the terrorists were able to fly the planes into the World Trade Center towers. Hanley also shares his experience of being grounded permanently by the FAA under the guise of being mentally unstable after speaking out about safety and security concerns in the airline industry.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his efforts to raise safety concerns with his employer, United Airlines, and the union that represented him. Despite following Federal Aviation Administration regulations and submitting multiple reports to his employer and union, he was stonewalled and eventually grounded for “psychological” reasons. When he sought legal advice from mental health professionals, he was advised to undergo psychological evaluations to protect himself and ensure that he was fit to fly, but United Airlines used the results of these evaluations to further justify their decision to ground him.

    00:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how he was told to submit to the Employee Assistance Program after an incident with a flight attendant, which was endorsed by the company, union, and FAA. After flying to Chicago and meeting with a flight surgeon, he was taken to a mental health facility without realizing it and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder by a psychologist who had no knowledge of aviation. Despite having evidence and recorded conversations, he was ignored by the government after trying to report the situation and ultimately went through a tough experience that impacted his wife and children.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how whistleblowers in the airline industry are treated by the government and how it affects their families. He shares his story of losing his 27-year marriage and two children who blame him for the divorce. Hanley is no longer a U.S citizen because of what he experienced as a whistleblower. He is now part of the Whistleblowing Airline Pilots Association, a grassroots organization that aims to expose the wrongful process of eliminating whistleblowing pilots in the industry. Hanley had lost his 35-year career and reputation as a pilot, while his children were the ultimate cost.

    00:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the patriotism that was pumped up after 9/11, even though it was a façade and the government deluded people with false patriotism. Furthermore, the media worked with the government to instigate patriotism, and we have witnessed this again, even with the recent COVID pandemic. Hanley asserts that the CIA exists not to solve problems but to create them, and this is evident in their involvement in JFK’s assassination, their lies about weapons of mass destruction, and their use of hijackers as their assets. Hanley believes that various groups, such as the Bilderberg, the Rothschild Cabal, and the 13 Bloodlines, collaborated for years to plan 9/11. Additionally, he questions American gullibility from historical events such as Pearl Harbor.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his skepticism of various historical events, including the Kennedy assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Operation Paperclip, and the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley shares his belief that 9/11 and other events were a test of global gullibility and that the media is complicit in propagating false narratives. He also mentions a book by a physics professor from the University of Punjab who claims that bin Laden died in 2005 and was fired and thrown in jail when he spoke publicly about it. A caller also shares their experience of being told not to take a mental test by their union and a mechanic’s belief that they installed a box in the plane that crashed.

    00:55:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is interviewed on The Michael Decon Program about the existence of an autopilot system that could have taken control of the airplane during the 9/11 attacks. An avionics technician named Wayne Anderson saw this system in operation back in 1996 on a Boeing 757 and had given an interview after which he was chastised by McDonald Douglas. The system has existed in some form since 1944 and is derived from cruise missile technology. Captain Hanley and the caller on the show agree that it would have been impossible for the hijackers to navigate and control the planes manually. The accuracy of navigation systems on modern commercial jet aircraft is such that when the weather is below a certain visibility, pilots are required to Auto Land the airplane, where it tracks the center line of the runway until the Pilot disconnects the autopilot.

    01:00:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the controversy surrounding what hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The argument has been whether it was a missile or American 77, or if an airplane was even involved at all. Hanley shares that there were 99 pilot whistleblowers who couldn’t have flown the plane, but he also acknowledges that many different theories exist. The FBI won’t release the camera footage around the site, which adds to the issue. They also address the fact that there are many people online who try to discredit those who question the official narrative, and that some of these individuals have been paid to do so.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the interview, the hosts and callers discuss the negative actions of the CIA and FBI, with one caller highlighting the Waco incident and Oklahoma City bombing as examples. Another caller references a Wikipedia page detailing the technology available in 1984 that allowed for remote control aircraft navigation and compares it to the advanced technology today. The hosts express the importance of educating oneself on these topics and encourage callers to share their opinions and be a part of the program.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the interview, a caller discusses his experience of witnessing the events of 9/11 in a sports bar in New Zealand and the disbelief and anger that followed. He talks about the hostile times where people were not allowed to speak against the narrative that was being pushed and how this lack of discourse allowed the official narrative to persist. They also discuss the self-censorship that is present in American culture and how it has been a factor in the ability to speak out against the narrative. Finally, they touch upon the idea that this incident was part of a larger plan that had been in the works for many years and the difficulty in discussing this narrative because of the perceived association with anti-Semitism.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the caller expresses their belief that Israelis have no business making laws in the United States and criticizes his family members who refuse to question the official narrative of 9/11. He recounts how he has been visited by the FBI several times but takes pleasure in cracking jokes with them. Later, another caller joins the show, identifying himself as being with Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and claims that there is evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley was interviewed live on The Michael Decon Program. They discussed the evidence of what happened at the Pentagon during 9/11. There was a lot of misinformation about the Pentagon, with many people believing there was some sort of missile or farce happening, but the evidence shows a 757 plane caused the damage. Photos show all the damage on the first floor and the extent of the impact damage on the outside. There were videos taken that recorded the plane crossing the lawn and evidence of the right and left wingtips and engines. The recovery of the off-body parts and identification of all the actual passengers provide compelling evidence of what happened.

    01:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is being interviewed about his belief that a plane struck the Pentagon on 9/11, not a missile. He mentions the hate mail he receives and that his stance has been thoroughly researched. Hanley goes on to discuss his belief that it was a group of powerful people, including Mossad CIA MI6, who were behind the events of 9/11, and that the Rothschild cabal and the creation of the nation state of Israel were part of the motivation for the attacks. He also mentions that his experiences with 9/11 caused him to become interested in conspiracy theories and seeking the truth, which has become a lifelong pursuit.

    01:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his belief that the military-industrial complex benefitted from the 6.2 trillion dollar expenditure since 9/11. He also mentions insider trading that occurred before the events of 9/11 and how it is a clear sign of a false flag. Hanley encourages people to visit 911pilot.org to read interviews with pilots around the world who all believe that the official narrative could not have been true. He also shares his experience with trying to report information concerning the crime to various government agencies, but ultimately being stonewalled for 30 months.

    01:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his experiences with federal whistleblower cases and the lack of response he received when attempting to bring forth evidence to relevant government agencies. He shares the story of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, who presented 57 evidence packages to a U.S attorney in New York, which led to the announcement of a grand jury investigation into their allegations. However, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology blocked their evidence, and the grand jury was prevented from moving forward. Hanley talks about how they have exhausted all political and legal avenues in the United States and are now trying to reach out to the International Community to investigate the 9/11 crime.

    01:40:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley emphasizes the importance of continuing to speak out about 9/11 until justice is served. He expresses optimism that the truth will eventually come to light with the power of information exchange in the information age. He also provides his social media information for those who want to follow his vocal opinions on the topic. The segment ends with a clip from a 2001 interview with Donald Trump about 9/11, where he suggests that the towers may have been brought down by bombs in addition to the planes. The host encourages listeners to keep speaking out and never stay silent about these important issues.

    01:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley provides tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion, advising individuals to get inside a building and move away from windows. He goes on to suggest staying inside, shutting all doors and windows, and having a basement or getting as far into the middle of the building as possible. If one was outside after the blast, he recommends getting clean immediately, removing and bagging all outer clothing to avoid radioactive dust or ash away from the body. Finally, he advises staying tuned, following media for more information, and not stepping outside until officials say it’s safe.

    YouTube Video