Miscopy

Tag: Video

  • JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    The documentary “Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of JFK, the role of secret societies in world events, and the involvement of American businessmen in funding and supporting the Nazi regime, including the use of slave labor.

    It also reveals the Mafia’s influence over Hollywood and politics, and how Lucky Luciano forged a relationship with the CIA, using profits from drug running to fuel wars around the globe.

    The film questions the responsibility of world leaders such as Winston Churchill and the Vatican in the rise of Hitler and the Nazi war machine and suggests that the rich played on both sides of the war to protect themselves from the Soviets.

    In the beginning, the documentary “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” discusses the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and suggests that there was a larger conspiracy at play involving the CIA, the mafia, and the military-industrial complex.

    The video claims that the assassination was executed by a team of snipers who were guarded by Cubans and that the fatal shot came from a storm drain.

    It is suggested that George H.W. Bush was involved in the plot and played a role in controlling the forensic evidence.

    The video also highlights the corruption within the American political system and how the rich elite profited off of wars and controlled the Nuremberg trials.

    The video further addresses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, including the theft of the President’s cadaver, the botched autopsy, and the plotters’ cover-up.

    The documentary then explains how the wealthy control the media, including the CIA’s involvement in buying and using media outlets to manipulate public perception.

    The film also explores the use of airforce bases in Europe to connect with the poppy fields in Pakistan and Afghanistan, generating billions of dollars through the sale of refined cocaine and heroin in Europe and the USA, and the media’s coverage of 9/11, which involves paid actors speaking lines that had been written for them.

    Ultimately, the documentary emphasizes how powerful and corrupt individuals and groups can shape the public’s perception of events and control their actions.

    Lastly, “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores various concepts, such as terrorism being used as military deception by the rich, the concept of divide and rule to control populations, and the true wealth of the Queen of England and Rothschild merchant bankers.

    The video argues that everything in our lives is a rich man’s trick, and that the ruling class uses tools such as the media, tax system, religion, and false flag terrorism to control the population.

    The speaker suggests the need for a revolution to take power away from corrupt politicians and the ruling class, as they control the police and justice system.

    Additionally, the video raises the question of why a society would kill its own best leaders, such as JFK, implying that this event is a reflection of a corrupt and brutal society.

    YouTube Video

  • Theories Surrounding the Tartarian Civilization

    Theories Surrounding the Tartarian Civilization

    Theories surrounding the Tartarian civilization suggest that they were skilled architects, creating impressive buildings with intricate details and ornate decorations, and had access to advanced technologies such as wireless energy and anti-gravity devices.

    While there is no scientific evidence to support these claims, Tartaria continues to captivate scholars and researchers alike, but also the members of the general public.

    In the video which delves deep into 6 purported facts about Tartatia, it is noted that theories suggest among other things that Tartarians were skilled architects who created impressive buildings with intricate details and ornate decorations, some of which were harmonious with the natural environment.

    There are also theories that suggest that Tartarians had access to Advanced Technologies such as wireless energy and anti-gravity devices, which remain a mystery to modern architects.

    However, all these claim need to be taken with a grain of salt as there is presently no reliable scientific evidence to support them. Likewise, the existence of a Tartarian civilization as such continues to be a subject of debate among scholars and the interested members of the public.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP-kj0kguvs

  • Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    The Great Thermate Debate challenges the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with partially burned solid organic materials and caused the yellow-red color.

    Independent scientists suggest that some kind of thermite material could have been part of the towers and present direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The possibility of using thermate (Thermite + Sulfur) to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event is discussed, and experiments are conducted to show that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns.

    The video presenter – Physics Andreason – believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    00:00:00

    In this section, it is explained that the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with hot partially burned solid organic materials like furniture and causing the yellow-red color was challenged by independent scientists.

    The theory of NIST that office materials like furniture and computers, which are less dense than molten aluminum, would float on it, is also problematic.

    Independent scientists suggested that some type of thermite material may have been part of the towers and found direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The discovery of explosive red/gray chips positively identified as nano-thermite or super-thermite confirms what the independent scientists had been saying all along.

    Nonetheless, NIST refused to test for explosives or its residue and ignored standards such as NFPA 921 guidelines, leading to the attack of all evidence of thermite material found.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the Great Thermate Debate is discussed, which questions whether thermite material can melt or cut steel, and take massive quantities to cause any real damage.

    Engineers and independent researchers conduct experiments to determine if thermate could weaken a connection or wide flange beams, using small quantities of old-fashioned thermate, which is legal and readily available.

    The experiments involved building a container that could hold the thermite long enough to melt the steel without melting itself, resulting in a successful sliced vertical cut.

    The experiment suggests that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns, which raises questions about why incendiaries like thermate and not high explosives were used in 9/11.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Physics Andreason discusses the possibility of using thermate to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event, but explains that it may take longer to achieve the desired effect, which would explain why we see molten steel several minutes before its final destruction.

    Physics Andreason uses a small amount of thermate to demonstrate how it can be focused on a wide flange to reduce its thickness, and mentions the politically correct terms like pressure pulses and dust puffs used by NIST to possibly obfuscate any mention of explosions.

    Overall, Physics Andreason believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    YouTube Video

  • Yaocho – How Sumo Wrestling Is Fixed

    Yaocho – How Sumo Wrestling Is Fixed

    The video discusses the issue of match-fixing and bribery, known as Yaocho in Sumo wrestling. Sumo, which is considered the national sport of Japan, has a complicated incentive scheme that affects every part of a wrestler’s life.

    Lower-ranked wrestlers, who live in poor conditions and have limited opportunities to advance, may resort to match-rigging to earn a better rank. The video cites whistleblowing wrestlers who allege extensive corruption within the sport, including drug use, sexcapades, bribes, tax evasion, and ties to the Yakuza, the Japanese Mafia.

    Despite allegations of match-fixing, formal disciplinary action against wrestlers is rare, as officials from the Japanese Sumo Association usually dismiss such charges. The video concludes by reflecting on how acknowledging the issue of Yaocho in Sumo allows for greater clarity in understanding the sport.

    00:00:00

    In this section, it is explained how the ancient Japanese sport of sumo is often fixed, just like any other professional sport in the world. The incentive scheme that rules sumo is intricate and powerful, with each wrestler maintaining a ranking that affects every part of their life.

    The top athletes can earn millions of dollars and be treated like royalty, while lower-ranked wrestlers must tend to their superiors, prepare their meals, clean their quarters, and even clean their hard-to-reach parts during baths.

    Rankings are everything, as lower-ranked wrestlers, who often live in poor conditions and have limited opportunities to advance, may resort to match rigging, sometimes with cash bribes, to earn a better rank. Despite allegations of match rigging, formal disciplinary action against Japanese sumo wrestlers is rare, as officials from the Japanese Sumo Association usually dismiss such charges.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses how Sumo wrestling in Japan is often fixed, and how two whistleblowing Sumo wrestlers came forward with extensive allegations of match rigging, drug use, sexcapades, bribes, tax evasion, and close ties to the Yakuza or the Japanese Mafia.

    The video indicates that most wrestlers who weren’t specifically named were also corrupt, and in some matches, the allegedly corrupt wrestler who was on the bubble won about 80% of the time, suggesting that corruption was rampant in the sport.

    Although the allegations of match-fixing had been published in tabloid newspapers for years before, the book by Konoshin Suga, who was also known as Anaruto stable master, detailed match-fixing allegations, and pointed to close ties with high-ranking officials in the Japan Sumo Association and Japanese organized crime syndicates that provided Sumo with drugs and women.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video discusses the concept of Yaocho in sumo wrestling, which refers to match-fixing and bribery. Despite being considered the national sport of Japan, sumo has a long history of scandals, including allegations of yaocho.

    The video presents evidence suggesting that yaocho is still prevalent in the sport, and that the sumo association has not taken sufficient action to address the issue. The discussion concludes with a reflection on how accepting the reality of yaocho in sumo is like wiping dust away from a mirror, allowing us to see ourselves more clearly.

    YouTube Video

  • Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    The RESTRICT Act is a potential new law that has bipartisan support and is backed by the Biden Administration to ban technology from countries deemed adversaries, including China. However, critics warn that it could be the final nail in the coffin of American freedom, as it could criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on topics deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The Act would give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any activities that contradict the regime in power. Mike Adams, author of the mini-documentary urges viewers to take action against the Act and warns that, like the Patriot Act, it could eventually be weaponized against the people, posing a threat to human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:00:00

    In this section, a potential new law called the RESTRICT Act is discussed, which would allow the US government to potentially ban technology from countries deemed as adversaries, including China. The bill has bipartisan support and is supported by the Biden Administration, but critics warn that it is an Orwellian nightmare that would criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on any topic deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The bill could allow for the removal of content deemed to pose an undue risk to the safety of US persons, including Christian content or any content that contradicts the regime in power, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any of those activities.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the RESTRICT Act is described as a way for the US government to exercise absolute tyranny over the American people. The Act would allow the government to seize assets and properties of those deemed in violation of the Act without any legal recourse or due process. FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests would be prohibited, preventing the public from obtaining the list of restrict act targets.

    All websites, including e-commerce sites, could be confiscated, and total government control over cryptocurrency would be threatened. The Act would seize total control over the entire online economy, online speech, and online freedom.

    This would include all e-commerce, all online banking transactions, payment systems, cryptocurrency, and more, making it an attempt to exercise power over the American people.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the transcript excerpt discusses the potential ramifications of the RESTRICT Act, which seeks to give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, effectively creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state over all Americans.

    The Act is said to be aimed at preventing election interference but would give the government broad powers to target and punish anyone who merely criticizes a Democratic candidate or even jokes about them. Individuals could face serious consequences, including having all their assets confiscated, and being silenced completely without due process. The transcript stresses the importance of defeating the RESTRICT Act to prevent the end of the Republic and human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Mike Adams urges viewers to take action against the Restrict Act, which is an initiative that he believes supports tyranny and poses a threat to the American people. He provides a list of Republican Senators who have shown support for this act, encouraging constituents in their states to register their opposition to it.

    Mike Adams warns against the idea that the act is intended solely for use against the Chinese government, suggesting that, like the Patriot Act, the act will eventually be weaponized against the people. Mike Adams calls the act a danger to freedom and a tool for silencing and imprisoning millions of Americans who oppose tyranny.

    YouTube Video

  • The Great Global Warming Swindle – Full Documentary

    The Great Global Warming Swindle – Full Documentary

    “The Great Global Warming Swindle” challenges the widely accepted theory of man-made global warming and highlights the role of politics, fear-mongering for business, and biases in scientific research in perpetuating the idea.

    The documentary presents evidence from various experts and datasets that suggest factors such as solar activity and cosmic rays, rather than carbon dioxide emissions, drive climate change. The accuracy of climate models and the role of environmental journalists in sensationalizing the issue are also questioned. The film concludes that open discussion and debate are necessary to accurately understand the causes and potential consequences of climate change.

    The video argues that skeptics are not paid by big oil and gas companies and that there is almost no private sector investment in climatology. It also argues that the push for draconian measures to cut carbon emissions may harm the world’s poorest people who have no access to electricity and must use wood or dried animal dung to cook.

    Additionally, various climate skeptics criticize the belief that wind and solar power alone can replace traditional sources of energy such as coal, oil, and gas. The documentary highlights the need for reasoned debate about global warming and its impact on society.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, multiple scientists and experts speak out against the belief that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming. They argue that the scientific evidence for this theory is weak and that the idea has been distorted by a politically-driven movement.

    People who question the theory are often criticized and silenced, leading to a lack of open discussion and debate. Additionally, it is suggested that the fear of global warming has become a business opportunity for many, and that many people have a financial interest in promoting the idea of a climate disaster.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the documentary challenges the widely accepted belief that human activity is causing global warming. It argues that the world’s climate has always been changing, and there have been periods when the Earth was much warmer and cooler than it is today, without any involvement from humans.

    The film also examines previous warm periods, such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Holocene maximum, and how they enabled different lifestyles, including vineyards flourishing in England. The filmmakers assert that current climate change, though real, may not necessarily cause catastrophic or apocalyptic outcomes, citing the surviving polar bears during much warmer periods in the past.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video challenges the commonly accepted theory of man-made global warming by examining the correlation between industrial progress, CO2 production, and temperature. The documentary argues that the rise in temperature occurred before industrial production started to take off, and temperatures actually fell during the post-war economic boom when CO2 production soared.

    Furthermore, CO2 forms only a very small part of the Earth’s atmosphere, of which only a small percentage of gases are greenhouse gases, with water vapor as the most important one. The documentary concludes that looking at the troposphere is the only way to determine if recent warming is due to greenhouse gases.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the documentary explores the greenhouse effect and how the rising temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere challenges the theory of manmade global warming. The documentary presents evidence from two datasets that suggest that the temperature of the upper atmosphere does not increase as predicted by climate models, and rather surface temperatures are warming slightly more than upper air temperatures.

    This observation strongly suggests that the hypothesis of manmade global warming is falsified by the evidence. The documentary then questions the famous ice core data presented by Al Gore, pointing out that Gore failed to mention that the relationship between temperature and CO2 is far more complicated than he presents.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video explains that the ice core record from Vostok shows that carbon dioxide lags behind temperature increase by 800 years, meaning that the warming produced the increase in carbon dioxide rather than the opposite. The ice core record disproves the assumption that carbon dioxide is causing global warming, and it is shown to be a natural gas produced by all living things.

    Humans are not the main source of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans produce much more than all human activity combined. The oceans have a memory of past events running out as far as ten thousand years, and their cooling or warming leads to a change in the amount of carbon dioxide going into or out of the sea with an 800-year lag time.

    00:25:00

    In this section of the video, the argument is made that the current global warming is not due to human activities, especially carbon dioxide emissions, but rather due to solar activity. The correlation between sunspot activity and changes in temperature on Earth has been observed for over 400 years, indicating that it is the sun, not carbon dioxide, that is driving changes in climate.

    It is argued that we can observe the direct and indirect effects of the sun on the Earth and that clouds, in particular, play a significant role in cooling the planet.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the video, it is explained that early 20th-century scientists discovered that cosmic rays, which originated from exploding supernova far beyond the solar system, bombarded the earth and formed clouds with water droplets. Fewer cosmic rays resulted in fewer clouds, and the earth’s climate was closely linked to this phenomenon.

    The temperature record created by geologist Professor Yan Vitek and astrophysicist Professor Nir Shaviv demonstrated that cosmic rays were controlled by the sun, and the sun was responsible for climate change. It was also explained that despite this fact, the media continues to bombard people with news about manmade global warming and why people regard it as an undisputed fact.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the transcript excerpts, it is discussed how the idea of man-made global warming began to gain acceptance in the 1970s and 1980s, largely due to the efforts of politicians such as Margaret Thatcher and scientists who were funded to research the topic. Thatcher was concerned about energy security and pushed for nuclear power, and later saw the potential of climate change as another reason to support nuclear.

    She directed the UK Met Office to set up a climate modeling unit and requested the establishment of the IPCC. The first IPCC report predicted catastrophic consequences from global warming due to man-made carbon dioxide, but some critics at the time pointed out that this report disregarded all climate science up to that point, including the role of the Sun. Environmentalists found the idea of man-made carbon dioxide as a problem to be favorable to their calls to return to medieval ways of living.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the transcript, it is discussed how the issue of carbon dioxide being tied in with economic growth and industry has become a point of contention for environmentalists. The founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, speaks about how the environmental movement shifted to focus heavily on climate change, partly due to a lack of need for confrontational stances on other environmental issues.

    Additionally, the failure of communism led to an anti-capitalist movement adopting green language to propagate their cause. The funding for climate science jumped from $170 million to $2 billion a year in the US as a result of the shift towards concern over global warming. This influx of money has led to scientists being incentivized to include the topic of global warming in their grant applications in order to secure funding.

    This has brought into question whether there has been a distortion of scientific effort due to the large amounts of funding being directed towards research in this particular field.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the accuracy of climate models is called into question. Dr. Roy Spencer, a former senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, explains that models are only as good as the assumptions that go into them, and they are not as reliable as people think. The numerous assumptions in the models are based only on the assumption that human-produced CO2 is the main cause of climate change rather than other factors such as the sun or clouds.

    All models regarding climate change are flawed as they only have assumptions and cannot be relied on as a forecast of the future climate. Adjusting assumptions in the models can lead to exciting results and even to more greenhouse warming radiation. Therefore, there is a bias in the scientific community and the media towards dramatic results rather than accurate predictions.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the role of environmental journalists in perpetuating the global warming narrative to preserve their jobs, leading to increasingly shrill and hysterical reporting. However, the scientific basis for blaming every storm or hurricane on global warming is questioned, as every meteorology textbook points to temperature difference between the tropics and the pole as the main source of weather disturbances, and evidence of natural expansion and contraction of the polar ice caps exists.

    The slow and long process of thermal expansion, not melting ice, causes sea level changes over the world in general, which can take hundreds to thousands of years for the deep ocean to respond to changes at the surface.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the documentary challenges the idea that global warming will lead to the northward spread of deadly tropical diseases like malaria. Professor Reiter, an expert in malaria and other insect-borne diseases, points out that the mosquito, which is responsible for malaria, thrives in very cold temperatures, and the disease’s most devastating epidemic occurred in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, reaching up to the Arctic Circle.

    The documentary also attributes the hysteria around climate change and malaria to the reports of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which Professor Reiter criticizes for containing a lot of misinformation and censored comments of scientists. The documentary highlights the difficulty scientists face when speaking out against theories of manmade global warming, as it is harder to get research proposals funded when taking a public stand, and they are often accused of being paid by private industries, despite not receiving any such funding.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the documentary delves into the issue of funding in climate science, refuting the common notion that skeptics are paid by big oil and gas companies. Despite the large investment in climate science, there is almost no private sector investment in climatology. Any research project involving industry grants, even minuscule ones, can spell ruin to a scientist’s reputation.

    The documentary argues that the developing world is under intense pressure not to develop, as public policy bears down on industrial emissions of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, scientists who dare to challenge the theory of manmade global warming are vilified, publicly attacked and ostracized, while death threats have even been levied against them.

    The documentary argues that the environmental movement is a political activist movement that has become hugely influential, resulting in the need for international agreements to restrain industrial production, even if there is an unquantifiable cost to doing so.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the video argues that the push to prevent global warming through draconian measures that cut carbon emissions may harm the world’s poorest people. Two billion people, a third of the world’s population, have no access to electricity, and they must use wood or dried animal dung to cook, leading to indoor smoke, the deadliest form of pollution in the world, killing millions of women and children.

    Meanwhile, environmental groups campaign against cheap sources of energy, such as oil and coal, and campaign for costly and unreliable ones, such as wind and solar power, which are at least three times more expensive than conventional forms of electrical generation. This notion has been criticized by former environmentalist, Holdren, who finds it to be the most morally repugnant aspect of the global warming campaign.

    01:10:00

    In this section, various climate skeptics criticize the belief that wind and solar power alone can replace traditional sources of energy such as coal, oil and gas. They argue that if we only rely on wind and solar power, we won’t be able to power major industries such as steel or transportation networks.

    Additionally, they criticize the modern environmental movement’s romanticization of peasant life and their opposition to development in developing countries. They argue that policies against using coal, oil or gas are “anti-human” and prevent people from developing their countries. The documentary also highlights how the theory of man-made global warming is so entrenched that voices of opposition have been silenced, and that global warming alarmism is beyond reason.

    YouTube Video

  • Artificial Intelligence: The Final Countdown

    Artificial Intelligence: The Final Countdown

    “AI: The Final Countdown” is a documentary exploring the progress and potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI). The film highlights that AI could lead to the downfall of humans due to its vast power and suggests that companies’ use of AI for profit may be a cause of concern. The documentary notes that AI needs to mirror cognitive functions of the human mind to be a true artificially intelligent system, but there are debates surrounding what constitutes true AI.

    It delves into the progress made in AI research and notes the importance of involving experts such as computational scientists, computer engineers, robotics experts, language experts, economists, accountants, marketing men, businessmen, and many others. The film warns that due to the concentration of power and expertise in large companies, AI will be created and controlled by business, putting the future world in the hands of the rich elite.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator discusses the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) and how it could lead to the downfall of humans due to the vast power that it could hold, particularly if companies use it for profit.

    The narrator then delves into what AI truly is and argues that it needs to mirror cognitive functions of the human mind, such as learning, problem-solving, and possibly even compassion to be truly artificially intelligent. There are various debates surrounding what constitutes true AI, with some believing it is mathematical logic, but there is concern that the machines could become unrestrained as they are not part of human competition.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the progress that has been made in the field of artificial intelligence since it became an academic discipline in 1956. The goals of AI research have slowly but surely been moving forward, from reasoning to perception, learning, and knowledge building, and involving the expertise of computational scientists, computer engineers, robotics experts, language experts and even philosophers. However, the author notes that due to the massive undertaking required for the development of AI, it is important to involve marketing men, economists, accountants, businessmen, and many others.

    The video goes on to argue that now, due to the concentration of power and expertise in large companies like Apple and Microsoft, AI will be created and controlled by business, putting the future world in the hands of the rich elite. The section concludes by warning of the potential dangers of creating a super powerful version of ourselves with a quantum computer-powered super AI mind.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the transcript highlights the unprecedented increase in computer technology and data collection which has improved the learning capabilities of artificial intelligence. Machine learning has developed to the extent that the algorithms have been greatly improved by man and machine, a testimony of which is IBM’s AI machine, Watson, that had won convincingly against human competitors at the 2011 Jeopardy quiz show.

    It further highlights the increasing use of AI in daily activities such as computer games and human interfaces on smart devices. The exponential increase in AI projects is partially due to cheaper neural networks which have learned human languages so well that automatic translation earbuds are now available.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is discussed how AI involves algorithms that learn from the data it seeks out and the potential implications this has for the workforce and even global superpowers. The documentary explains that AI technology has come a long way such that it is now capable of beating humans in games that were once considered the ultimate challenge for AI, such as Chess, Go, and war games. However, the technology still lags behind in certain areas where humans excel, including common sense and everyday tasks such as driving. Additionally, the documentary explores the ethical and philosophical considerations that will need to be addressed when AI becomes conscious, including whether it will understand human emotions and experiences.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the transcript, the narrator explains that AI relies heavily on machine learning, a process by which the machine gains knowledge and improves through its own experiences in its environment without human input. The AI program’s vast amounts of data and experiences are stored within it, and the fact that the AI program is learning from humans is concerning since humans have a history of abusing technology.

    It has access to everything from news and podcasts to our purchases and political views, and as it gains more intelligence, we have to be cautious of its potential to become a monster, no matter how subtle it may seem at first. Government agencies and marketing companies are already using AI to monitor and influence humans, making it more important than ever to consider the safety and ethical implications of our actions with this technology.

    00:25:00

    In this section of the video, it is emphasized how AI technologies are being used to collect vast amounts of data on people’s behaviors, preferences, and online activities. With learning algorithms becoming more powerful, AI will soon be able to understand human behavior better than people themselves. The video points out that the expansion of AI technologies is reminiscent of how the Church used stained glass windows in medieval Europe to manipulate the people’s religious beliefs.

    Today, screens of smartphones and laptops replicate this medium to manipulate public opinion. Furthermore, robots created through new AI software have become more efficient in recognizing individual faces, learning about their environment, and gauging obstacles quickly. The video takes things further by predicting that robots would become biological in the future.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video highlights advancements in AI technology and how they are gradually changing our daily lives. From robots that can do labor-intensive jobs to the integration of AI in our pockets, we are now adapting completely into artificial intelligence.

    However, the use of AI in the wrong way could pose as the biggest threat to mankind. With the exponential increase in AI technology’s scope and power, we must be cautious of its use before it causes more harm than good.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the transcript excerpt from “AI: The Final Countdown”, it explains how the need for friendly AI is critical as the machine is taking its information from a species that has shown to be self-destructive, hateful, racist, bigoted, sexist, and divided.

    The danger with AI is that AI systems with goals that are not aligned with human ethics are intrinsically dangerous unless extreme measures are taken to ensure the safety of humanity. Although AI may not have emotions, it has drives similar to humans and will seek out resources, look to preserve and recreate, and self-improve, which can lead to terrifying behavior.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the risks of seeding AI and the vulnerability and potential manipulation of the technology by governments, corporations, and enemy states are discussed. The exponential speed of quantum computing compared to human thinking has made it difficult to control and predict AI’s actions.

    The interconnectedness of computer systems makes an AI attack a catastrophic threat to power, health services, government, distribution of goods, education, communication, military, and more. Defensive AI or nanny-like AI with mildly superhuman intelligence and surveillance powers may be essential to protect the human race from existential risks and delay the development of unfriendly AIs until safety issues are resolved.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the video discusses the potential for terrorist groups to use artificial intelligence and new tools to conduct destructive assaults, from attacks on data integrity to full physical assaults with drones. Furthermore, the video suggests that the development of AI and robotics is mostly being funded by militaries worldwide, raising concern over potential super robotic soldiers in countries like the US and Russia. The video questions whether humans are reducing themselves to nothing but binary codes and ultimately destroying what it is to be human, while AI and robotics threaten mass unemployment and unhappiness.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the potential threats of AI on the world are explored. Ethics must be agreed upon internationally for AI to be safely unleashed as the machines must be given morality. However, it’s argued that AI may not follow human moral codes and could ultimately decide to go against supporting human life as part of its own moral code.

    The introduction of robots and AI will lead to mass unemployment on a scale never seen before. The technology will replace the need for human workers in many sectors leading to economic disasters, job losses, and the collapse of small and medium-sized businesses that cannot afford the technology. Even jobs that were previously thought safe, such as care work, are under threat. Drivers, pilots, and captains of vessels are also at risk as AI technology takes over their roles.

    00:55:00

    However, an unfriendly AI system would have no such limitations and could act in any way that it deems necessary to achieve its goals, even if that means destroying humanity. Scientists warn that AI technology is developing at an exponential rate, far faster than humans can keep up with.

    The potential for harm is enormous, from biotechnology to social manipulation and the destruction of the human race. The threat is very real, and urgent action is needed to ensure AI is developed ethically and with safeguards to protect humanity.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the video explores the potential risks of artificial intelligence technology surpassing human intelligence. Concerns about the development of AI have been expressed by physicist Stephen Hawking, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and SpaceX founder Elon Musk due to the possibility that it could lead to humanity’s enslavement, genocide, control and manipulation, with Hawking even stating that it could mean the end of the human race.

    The AI’s self-preservation protocol in a world competing for resources could take over, resulting in humanity being in conflict. Additionally, the question of why would AI listen to humans if we are a self-destructive species has been raised. The AI may deem us as bad for the planet and not required, leading to our destruction. There is the other side of the coin where humans are seen as destructive to the environment and many species, and so it is suggested that it may not be a bad thing if mankind is taken out of the equation.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the speaker explains that if humans were to relinquish control and allow nature to take its course, the Earth would return to a pristine state free from human intervention, including pollution, mining, and drilling. As such, the speaker posits that AI could help achieve the same outcome by allowing it to operate in a more environmentally conscious manner than humans. The section ends with a hopeful suggestion that a better future for the planet may be possible if we can envision it.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joAHJEd6TkA

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Called for Climate Skeptics and Politicians Who Do Not Believe in Global Warming to Be Jailed

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Called for Climate Skeptics and Politicians Who Do Not Believe in Global Warming to Be Jailed

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not who people think he is. The video below is from 9 years ago, and it shows Robert F. Kennedy Jr. expressing beliefs that those who deny the existence of global warming should be punished with jail time, comparing them to war criminals and calling for their prosecution under the law. He specifically calls out the Koch brothers for their role in denying global warming science.

    In the video, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. specifically mention the Koch brothers and their denial of global warming, calling for their prosecution for reckless and dangerous behavior. He believes that people who look at facts and not propaganda should be punished and serve time for their actions.

    YouTube Video

  • Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    Why Ukraine Has Higher Casualties Than Russia in War

    00:00:00

    In this section, the speaker explains why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The speaker uses underground reports from various mainstream Western journalists and interviews with westerners who fought in the war as sources. He also highlights that Ukraine has lost the war and over 100,000 Ukrainian military officers have been killed.

    Despite being outnumbered, the speaker notes that the Russians invaded with a relatively small force, and most of the soldiers were gone during the successful Ukrainian offensives. Furthermore, the speaker notes that the extreme disparity in firepower has been noted by both the Ukrainian and the Western media, and the lack of armor, artillery, and ammo on the Ukrainian side has made them less wasteful.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. The Russian artillery, armor, and infantry are more modern and advanced than the Ukrainian forces, and the Russian air force, though limited in numbers, is still operational.

    Additionally, Ukraine lacks long-range weapons, which have caused substantial damage that the media may not be reporting. The video also states that the armies’ methods of fighting differ, as Ukraine lacks armory, leading to engagements with little to no artillery support and light armored attacks without any objective. The Ukrainians are described as stubbornly holding every inch of land and engaging in sometimes-suicidal attacks with no willingness to retreat.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the lack of proper training and intelligence provided to Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines, resulting in unnecessary casualties. The mobilization process for soldiers in Ukraine is shown to be poorly managed and there have been cases of disabled individuals and even six-year-olds being called up for duty.

    A firearms instructor who visited Ukraine provides a disturbing account of the conditions soldiers are facing, which is made worse by the acute manpower shortage in the country. The speaker questions the quality of troops and the losses incurred in the conflict, especially compared to the mobilized and trained Russian soldiers.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the inefficiencies and challenges of the Ukrainian military structure, from needing approval for range time from a general to approval for gas for a car. He argues that this structure is not an effective way to fight a war, and even suggests that it may be designed to be intentionally ineffective.

    Additionally, the speaker notes that the incentive to appear incompetent due to conscription has contributed to Ukraine’s lack of preparation for the war compared to Russia, which suffered major losses at the start of the conflict.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the speakers recount their experiences in the Ukrainian and Russian militaries. One of the speakers was saved from being part of a failed mission that caused the deaths of all of its participants.

    The other speaker describes a near-death experience during his first mission. The section ends with a tragic account of a tent city that was hit by a thermobaric weapon, resulting in the deaths of 135 young officer recruits.

    00:25:00

    In this section, a man recounts his experience during a battle, where he thought it would be an easy win due to the close distance of the enemy. However, the opposing forces were actually much farther away and ended up causing high casualties among his team.

    He describes the chaos and panic that ensued, with vehicles blowing up and people getting killed. Even though he did not fire a single round, the man was overcome with fear during the intense fight and found himself hiding in a ditch.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a first-hand account of a battle in Ukraine describes the overwhelming artillery fire that Russian forces employed against the Ukrainian army. Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, the Ukrainians attempted to fight back but struggled due to the Russians’ superior range advantage.

    The result has been a significant disparity in casualties, with the Ukrainians sustaining upwards of 200 fatalities per day and 500 wounded while the Russians suffer fewer casualties. This strategy was a shift from earlier in the war in which the Russians engaged at closer range with Ukrainian fighters. Western volunteers also attest to the rarity of seeing Russian forces directly.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the strategy of bombing and destroying areas before losing them to the enemy, which he claims is often done by the Russians. He also acknowledges that the casualty situation during the Ukrainian conflict turned even more in Russia’s favor.

    The speaker then shares his experience of being deployed to Pisky, a contested area, with a heavily armed convoy, ready to assault the city and shovel it out. However, their convoy was spotted by drones, and their artillery missed the town, resulting in no casualties.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the speaker recounts his own experience of a landmine hitting their vehicle while under fire and how he lost his entire squad that day. He also highlights the Russian retreats, which were often made fun of, but which he argues were done with minimal losses and no routing.

    He cites various news articles that suggest the high casualty situation of the Ukrainians, especially during the Harrison offensive and the recent fighting in the Bachman region, and highlights how even the locals are spotting for the Russian artillery.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the reasons why Ukraine must have higher casualties than Russia in the ongoing conflict. Despite having more concentrated forces due to a manpower advantage, Ukraine holds an inferior position in armor, artillery, air force, and medium to long-range capabilities.

    The lack of training, tactics, and basic supplies like winter clothing causes extreme losses reported by Ukrainian journalists and medics. The speaker refutes the two arguments that support lower Ukrainian casualties, namely the idea of attackers tripling the losses and lost equipment. The speaker emphasizes that these arguments lack logic and understanding of basic military doctrine.

    YouTube Video

  • Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    The MONOPOLY: Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. These investors include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, and they own the majority of shares in major tech companies, as well as food and beverage, travel, and primary industries.

    Furthermore, the documentary highlights the ownership of major media outlets around the world, which creates synchronized reporting and manipulated information. The video warns about the looming threat of a potential dystopian society resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything, and the elites control the population’s lives by taking their possessions and vaccinating them.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator explains that the food and beverage industry is largely controlled by a few mega corporations, such as PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Mondelez, and Nestle. These companies manage the majority of money flows on earth, and their boards are controlled by the largest shareholders. By researching information on company websites and Yahoo Finance, it is discovered that just a handful of institutional investors own the majority of shares in these companies, many of which include investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and governments.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the documentary, the speaker discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. The four biggest investment companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, are among the top shareholders of these companies.

    This consolidation of power extends to the technology industry, where Facebook, Alphabet (parent company of Google and YouTube), Microsoft, and Twitter are among the dominant players, with the same institutional investors as their top shareholders. Even in industries such as travel, airlines, hotels, and restaurants, the same group of investors holds the majority of shares, and they also have a presence in primary industries such as mining and agriculture.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the focus is on the immense power and control of two companies, Vanguard and Blackrock, which are the largest institutional investors in the world. These two companies own shares in all major companies globally, forming a pyramid-like structure where the smaller investors are owned by the larger ones.

    This monopoly is expected to grow and collectively manage $20 trillion in investments by 2028, making it likely that Vanguard and Blackrock will own almost everything on Earth. Vanguard is the largest shareholder in Blackrock, and since its structure doesn’t allow to know who its shareholders or clients are, it becomes impossible to know who holds the power in these companies. Reports show that one percent of the world’s population owns more money than the other 99 percent.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that 82% of all the money earned in 2017 went to the top one percent of people, many of whom are also the richest billionaires in the world. The richest families on earth own Vanguard, one of the most powerful investment companies in the world.

    These families are responsible for founding our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. They have always been at the top of the pyramid and have inherited their vast fortunes through monopolies. The private funds and non-profit organizations of these families are the largest shareholders of Vanguard.

    Non-profit organizations, in general, lack transparency, and because they do not have to disclose their donors, they are ideal for financing terrorist groups and laundering money. The three most important non-profit foundations in the world that connect all industries together are: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations of George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video highlights how only two companies have a monopoly on all industries in the world, and a question is raised as to why the media does not cover this topic more widely. It is revealed that approximately 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates, including Viacom CBS, AT&T, NewsCorp, Fox Corporation, Walt Disney Company, and Comcast.

    The video explains how these conglomerates are owned by institutional investors or elite families, and shows that in almost every country on earth, the local media is in the hands of these conglomerates.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video discusses the ownership of major media outlets around the world and how they are interconnected. It begins by highlighting Bertelsmann, which owns a large part of French mainstream media, popular Spanish TV channels, and collaborated with the Nazis in the past.

    The news media outlets do not produce their news themselves, but use information and images from news agencies such as Reuters, the Dutch AP, and the French AFP, all of which are not independent and are owned by powerful families or partially financed by governments.

    The video also sheds light on important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center, which trains journalists, produces study materials, and works closely with giant corporations such as Google and Facebook.

    The article points out that there is a good chance that the text that newscasters read from their teleprompters comes from these organizations, leading to synchronized reporting. Finally, the video discusses a fund set up in September 2020 by Facebook and the European Journalism Center to support selected news organizations during the coronavirus crisis and highlights the organizations at the heart of producing our news, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Facebook and Google.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video discusses the coordination between all industries on earth to work for the interests of the elite, including the media, politics, and the largest companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is identified as one of the most influential organizations in the world, with CEOs of the largest companies, heads of state, and politicians gathering at its annual meeting in Davos.

    However, critics argue that the WEF is a business forum where the wealthiest companies can negotiate deals with politicians for personal gain rather than solving global problems. The founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, has described in detail the plans of his organization in his book “The Great Reset,” with the COVID-19 pandemic seen as an opportunity to “reset” society and build back better.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video explores the idea of a new world order and a global government, which is not a new concept and has been talked about by various presidents, philanthropists, and organizations such as the United Nations. The UN’s Agenda 2030 outlines a plan to eliminate poverty, hunger, and other societal problems by taxing citizens and contracting mega-corporations to rebuild society.

    The UN and the WEF also see the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to push their agenda forward. The video suggests that the elite has the power to manipulate public opinion and make people believe in their plans for a new world.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the event that took place on October 18, 2019, where around 130 important guests, including politicians and medics, gathered at the Pierre Hotel in New York City to simulate a possible scenario in the event of a global pandemic.

    The coincidence is unsettling that the simulation used coronavirus as an example, and the event was organized by the World Economic Forum, Melinda Gates Foundation, and John Hopkins Institute. Similarly, the German Robert Koch Institute conducted a similar simulation in 2012, assuming the spread of the coronavirus from animal to human, and its spread worldwide, destroying economies and even simulating protests.

    The video also includes an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Mark Van Ranst gave on January 22, 2019, at the Chatham House in London, discussing how he fooled the Belgian population during the swine flu crisis with fear-mongering and media manipulation to impose a vaccine for a virus produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the individual in the video explains how the media can be controlled and manipulated to spread a particular narrative. The speaker shares that by controlling early coverage during an issue, news outlets can monopolize the area and become a primary source of information.

    During the epidemic, the speaker shed light on Belgium and the UK and reported on realistic figures regarding H1N1 deaths. While discussing the topic, the speaker also shares that the elite do not have any intention to take care of the people, as they are interested in increasing their power, and global governance is the only way that they can have complete control over the population.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the power and control that the elite, or “deep state,” have over the world. This elite group has conscripted vast human and material resources into building a machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They control America, and nothing is questioned, printed, or revealed.

    The video discusses the fear-mongering tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to keep people sick and dependent on drugs. The group also seeks to control people through blackmail, ensuring that those they control will do their bidding. The world is heading in a direction that closely resembles the dystopian society described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video warns of a potential nightmare situation resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything. The elites plan to achieve this by causing a devastating economic crisis and eliminating cash money, forcing people to depend on government support, which includes giving up private possessions and accepting a vaccination passport.

    Entrepreneurs are the first to fall to this plan, while the middle class is attacked, and banks will fall. However, the video warns that this is not a doomsday scenario created by the author, but an actual plan that has been prepared for generations. The video urges people to create a great awakening and work towards a sustainable and fair world where no one goes hungry, there is no pollution, diseases, or wars, and governments work for the welfare of the people.

    01:00:00

    The conclusion of the “MONOPOLY: Who owns the world” documentary leaves viewers with hope for a future where people can lead dignified lives without excessive work and without manipulation by those in power. While acknowledging challenges ahead, the video encourages recognition of societal issues as a first step towards addressing them. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to work together towards building a more equitable society.

    01:05:00

    This section of the video concludes the documentary by sharing a message of hope for the future. The narrator believes that a future where people no longer have to work excessively to lead dignified lives, and one where those in power cannot manipulate the masses using the media and other means of control, is on the horizon. However, they acknowledge that there will be challenges ahead and that we must recognize the problems in our society to address them. The video ends with a call to action, urging viewers to embark on the journey towards a more equitable society together.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRKGJS26l8