Miscopy

Tag: USA

  • JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    The documentary “Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of JFK, the role of secret societies in world events, and the involvement of American businessmen in funding and supporting the Nazi regime, including the use of slave labor.

    It also reveals the Mafia’s influence over Hollywood and politics, and how Lucky Luciano forged a relationship with the CIA, using profits from drug running to fuel wars around the globe.

    The film questions the responsibility of world leaders such as Winston Churchill and the Vatican in the rise of Hitler and the Nazi war machine and suggests that the rich played on both sides of the war to protect themselves from the Soviets.

    In the beginning, the documentary “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” discusses the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and suggests that there was a larger conspiracy at play involving the CIA, the mafia, and the military-industrial complex.

    The video claims that the assassination was executed by a team of snipers who were guarded by Cubans and that the fatal shot came from a storm drain.

    It is suggested that George H.W. Bush was involved in the plot and played a role in controlling the forensic evidence.

    The video also highlights the corruption within the American political system and how the rich elite profited off of wars and controlled the Nuremberg trials.

    The video further addresses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, including the theft of the President’s cadaver, the botched autopsy, and the plotters’ cover-up.

    The documentary then explains how the wealthy control the media, including the CIA’s involvement in buying and using media outlets to manipulate public perception.

    The film also explores the use of airforce bases in Europe to connect with the poppy fields in Pakistan and Afghanistan, generating billions of dollars through the sale of refined cocaine and heroin in Europe and the USA, and the media’s coverage of 9/11, which involves paid actors speaking lines that had been written for them.

    Ultimately, the documentary emphasizes how powerful and corrupt individuals and groups can shape the public’s perception of events and control their actions.

    Lastly, “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores various concepts, such as terrorism being used as military deception by the rich, the concept of divide and rule to control populations, and the true wealth of the Queen of England and Rothschild merchant bankers.

    The video argues that everything in our lives is a rich man’s trick, and that the ruling class uses tools such as the media, tax system, religion, and false flag terrorism to control the population.

    The speaker suggests the need for a revolution to take power away from corrupt politicians and the ruling class, as they control the police and justice system.

    Additionally, the video raises the question of why a society would kill its own best leaders, such as JFK, implying that this event is a reflection of a corrupt and brutal society.

    YouTube Video

  • Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    The Great Thermate Debate challenges the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with partially burned solid organic materials and caused the yellow-red color.

    Independent scientists suggest that some kind of thermite material could have been part of the towers and present direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The possibility of using thermate (Thermite + Sulfur) to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event is discussed, and experiments are conducted to show that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns.

    The video presenter – Physics Andreason – believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    00:00:00

    In this section, it is explained that the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with hot partially burned solid organic materials like furniture and causing the yellow-red color was challenged by independent scientists.

    The theory of NIST that office materials like furniture and computers, which are less dense than molten aluminum, would float on it, is also problematic.

    Independent scientists suggested that some type of thermite material may have been part of the towers and found direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The discovery of explosive red/gray chips positively identified as nano-thermite or super-thermite confirms what the independent scientists had been saying all along.

    Nonetheless, NIST refused to test for explosives or its residue and ignored standards such as NFPA 921 guidelines, leading to the attack of all evidence of thermite material found.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the Great Thermate Debate is discussed, which questions whether thermite material can melt or cut steel, and take massive quantities to cause any real damage.

    Engineers and independent researchers conduct experiments to determine if thermate could weaken a connection or wide flange beams, using small quantities of old-fashioned thermate, which is legal and readily available.

    The experiments involved building a container that could hold the thermite long enough to melt the steel without melting itself, resulting in a successful sliced vertical cut.

    The experiment suggests that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns, which raises questions about why incendiaries like thermate and not high explosives were used in 9/11.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Physics Andreason discusses the possibility of using thermate to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event, but explains that it may take longer to achieve the desired effect, which would explain why we see molten steel several minutes before its final destruction.

    Physics Andreason uses a small amount of thermate to demonstrate how it can be focused on a wide flange to reduce its thickness, and mentions the politically correct terms like pressure pulses and dust puffs used by NIST to possibly obfuscate any mention of explosions.

    Overall, Physics Andreason believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    YouTube Video

  • Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    The RESTRICT Act is a potential new law that has bipartisan support and is backed by the Biden Administration to ban technology from countries deemed adversaries, including China. However, critics warn that it could be the final nail in the coffin of American freedom, as it could criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on topics deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The Act would give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any activities that contradict the regime in power. Mike Adams, author of the mini-documentary urges viewers to take action against the Act and warns that, like the Patriot Act, it could eventually be weaponized against the people, posing a threat to human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:00:00

    In this section, a potential new law called the RESTRICT Act is discussed, which would allow the US government to potentially ban technology from countries deemed as adversaries, including China. The bill has bipartisan support and is supported by the Biden Administration, but critics warn that it is an Orwellian nightmare that would criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on any topic deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The bill could allow for the removal of content deemed to pose an undue risk to the safety of US persons, including Christian content or any content that contradicts the regime in power, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any of those activities.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the RESTRICT Act is described as a way for the US government to exercise absolute tyranny over the American people. The Act would allow the government to seize assets and properties of those deemed in violation of the Act without any legal recourse or due process. FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests would be prohibited, preventing the public from obtaining the list of restrict act targets.

    All websites, including e-commerce sites, could be confiscated, and total government control over cryptocurrency would be threatened. The Act would seize total control over the entire online economy, online speech, and online freedom.

    This would include all e-commerce, all online banking transactions, payment systems, cryptocurrency, and more, making it an attempt to exercise power over the American people.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the transcript excerpt discusses the potential ramifications of the RESTRICT Act, which seeks to give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, effectively creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state over all Americans.

    The Act is said to be aimed at preventing election interference but would give the government broad powers to target and punish anyone who merely criticizes a Democratic candidate or even jokes about them. Individuals could face serious consequences, including having all their assets confiscated, and being silenced completely without due process. The transcript stresses the importance of defeating the RESTRICT Act to prevent the end of the Republic and human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Mike Adams urges viewers to take action against the Restrict Act, which is an initiative that he believes supports tyranny and poses a threat to the American people. He provides a list of Republican Senators who have shown support for this act, encouraging constituents in their states to register their opposition to it.

    Mike Adams warns against the idea that the act is intended solely for use against the Chinese government, suggesting that, like the Patriot Act, the act will eventually be weaponized against the people. Mike Adams calls the act a danger to freedom and a tool for silencing and imprisoning millions of Americans who oppose tyranny.

    YouTube Video

  • In Plane Site – 9/11 Documentary with Pentagon Attack Questions

    In Plane Site – 9/11 Documentary with Pentagon Attack Questions

    We’ve got some serious evidence showing that a 757 didn’t actually hit the Pentagon on 9/11. We’ve got photos of a hole that’s not big enough for a plane and no wreckage to be seen anywhere. Plus, the roof of the Pentagon hadn’t even collapsed yet in some of these photos. But hey, don’t worry about any of that because the government told us what really happened and we should just blindly accept it. Right? Right.

    For Real

    This documentary discusses the events of September 11, 2001, specifically the attack on the Pentagon. The narrator acknowledges that people watching the documentary may fall into one of three categories: those who deny any conspiracy theories, those who are violently opposed to them, and those who are not surprised and knew it all along.

    The idea of conspiracy theories is explored, with the word “conspiracy” being the first part of the phrase, and “theory” being the active word.

    The documentary then examines the events of 9/11, specifically the four events that occurred within an hour and fifteen minutes of one another. The lack of credible claim of responsibility is mentioned, as is the idea that groups or agencies involved in the events would do anything they could to obfuscate or cover up information that might lead to their discovery.

    The focus then shifts to the attack on the Pentagon, with the discrepancy between the damage caused by the 757 that hit the building and the damage that should have been caused by that much fuel being ignited being explored. Photographs of the damage to the upper floors and roof area of the Pentagon are shown, and the lack of evidence of a crater or wreckage is discussed.

    The documentary includes photographs taken before the wall of the Pentagon collapsed, which also show a lack of wreckage, with wire spools and the broken concrete facing of the building being used as reference points.

    The documentary concludes by asking questions about the events of 9/11 and the attack on the Pentagon, and suggesting that the evidence presented should be scrutinized.

    Bullet Points

    • The documentary raises questions about the events of September 11th, including the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    • The damage at the Pentagon is deemed inconsistent with the damage caused by a 757.
    • Photographic evidence does not show any recognizable wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon.
    • The release of only five frames from a security camera at the Pentagon raises questions about the lack of video evidence for the most secure building in the country.
    • The article “From Deception to Revelation” claims that the jet caused a crater 100 feet wide that ripped away the walls of all five stories of the building, but photographic evidence shows a hole approximately 14 to 16 feet across with no wreckage from a 757 on the outside of the building.

    Let’s Sing Along

    In the land of the free,
    Where truth is hard to see,
    There’s talk of conspiracy,
    On September 11th, oh can’t you see?

    The first two towers fell,
    The Pentagon was hit as well,
    But questions began to swell,
    About the tale they used to tell.

    A French website caught our eye,
    Saying something just didn’t fly,
    The photos didn’t seem to lie,
    A 757 didn’t make that guy.

    No sign of wreckage on the ground,
    And a hole too small to astound,
    No engines, wings or seats to be found,
    Just a mystery that’s gone unbound.

    The official story starts to crack,
    As the evidence just won’t retract,
    From the facts we can’t turn back,
    The truth is what we lack.

    So let’s ask the question why,
    Just one camera caught the sky,
    At the Pentagon where so many died,
    Is there more we need to try?

    In theory, it’s just a thought,
    But once the evidence is brought,
    The truth we can’t be fought,
    And justice must be sought.

    YouTube Video

  • Real History of World War I and America’s Involvement in It

    Real History of World War I and America’s Involvement in It

    Oh, it’s just your typical story of countries arguing over who gets to play with their weapons and then suddenly they’re all in a big war! Germany is pointed all fingers at and America didn’t want to get involved, but they couldn’t resist showing off their global power by sending troops to every corner of the earth.

    Even William Jennings Bryan, a devout Christian, got so disgusted with Woodrow Wilson’s handling of the war that he quit his job. And then there was that whole Lusitania ship thing with accusations of carrying war stuff and warnings that it might get sunk.

    The really cool thing about this war was that conscription made sure everyone got to join in on the dying, not just the professional soldiers. Plus, civilians got to die more than military people – that’s always fun for the Satanic elite. Turkey killed a whole bunch of civilians and Serbia had a lot of disease deaths, but Germany and Russia won the prize for losing the most people. America, of course, also had to join in and lost a measly 50,000.

    For Real

    The document talks about the events leading to World War I, highlighting how Russia mobilized against Austria and Germany declared war on Russia, invaded West through Luxembourg and Belgium, and declared war on France. Great Britain entered the war due to the invasion of Belgium while America remained undecided.

    President Woodrow Wilson promised to keep the US out of the European War and follow the Monroe Doctrine of allowing European monarchies to exhaust themselves, but America had become a global power with possessions, and it was not likely to stay neutral.

    The involvement of Woodrow Wilson and America’s participation in World War I was questionable, with the secretary of state resigning in disgust over Wilson’s handling of the war. When the Lusitania passenger liner was to sail from New York, the German Embassy passed out leaflets warning people that the ship was liable to be sunk, and many agreed that the ship was carrying Munitions for the war effort in England.

    The casualty figures of the war are difficult to ascertain, with conscription distributing deaths over a large cross-section of society instead of the professional soldiers. Civilian deaths were much higher than military deaths, with a million or more civilians dying in Turkey as a result of the massacre of Turkish Armenians, while only 325 000 are recorded as dying in Turkish military action.

    Russia and Germany are thought to have lost 1.8 million, with France losing about 1.3 million, and Britain losing about the same. America lost 50 000 in the war.

    Dr. Gene Kim argues Satanic occult rituals may have taken place…

    Let’s Sing Along

    From peace to war, overnight it came
    Russia, Austria, Germany, all met with shame
    Invading through Belgium, Germany caused a stir
    Britain declared war, America didn’t concur

    Wilson promised peace, to keep US out
    But recent global power made doubt
    Bryan resigned as Christians raised concerns
    Lusitania’s sinking gave one excuse to turn

    Difficult to count, the casualties of war
    Conscription and disease spread far
    Civilian deaths surpassed the rest
    Turkey, Serbia, France and Britain, put to the test

    Overall, the world was changed
    Millions lost and rearranged
    A war that impacted far and wide
    A history that we can’t divide.

    YouTube Video