Sarah Hardiman of Free Speech Ireland discusses the controversial new hate speech law in Ireland, which is recommend by the EU and could set a dangerous precedent for speech restrictions online.
Hardiman notes that the law is overly broad and could potentially criminalize individuals for possessing material deemed hateful, even if they have no intention of sharing it. Despite opposition from her advocacy group and the public, the law is likely to pass due to a lack of political opposition, leading Hardiman to urge people to support their cause online and raise awareness about the potential implications of the law on free speech.
00:00:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman from Free Speech Ireland discusses the controversial new hate speech law in Ireland, proposed by Minister for Justice Helen McEntee, but actually recommended by the EU. Hardiman explains that the reason for the EU’s strong interest in Ireland’s speech laws is due to the country’s importance in the bustling tech industry. With Dublin hosting the headquarters of big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook, the Irish legal system is becoming an important regulator for these companies. Hardiman warns that this hate speech legislation could set a dangerous precedent for restricting speech online, not just in Ireland or Europe, but globally. She also notes that the Irish people have not had a say in this legislation, and it is terrifying from that perspective.
00:05:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman discusses the concept of free speech in Ireland and how it is qualified rather than absolute, with restrictions in place to protect public order and morality. She notes that the 1989 Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act is fit for purpose and prevents individuals from calling for violence against certain groups. However, the new Hate Offences Bill of 2022 is changing the definitions of hate speech and safety, creating confusion around what is considered offensive and what poses a real threat. Hardiman notes that while protection from incitement to violence is necessary, the new legislation is also restricting humor and free expression online.
00:10:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman discusses the specifics of Ireland’s new hate speech law. She explains that the Irish Times article on the law fails to mention the section that makes it possible to criminalize individuals for possessing material that is deemed hateful. Hardiman breaks down Section 10 of the law, which essentially states that anyone who prepares or possesses material likely to incite violence or hatred against a group with protected characteristics is guilty of an offense. She argues that this new law could lead to a dangerous suppression of free speech and legitimate discussions about sensitive topics. Hardiman cites an example in the UK where a woman was visited by police after having an online disagreement with a transgender male on Twitter, which highlights the conflation of physical violence with online interaction.
00:15:00
In this section of the video, the speakers discuss how the new hate speech law in Ireland, section two of the bill, necessitates good faith acting for individuals commenting on topics such as genocide, without room for concern if everyone is acting in good faith. However, there remains a worry on how the law or norms can be exploited to the gain of an individual or cause, rather than the people who operate in good faith. Furthermore, the law might not permit historical and academic discourse, restricting democratic and free speech, leading to the question of whether Ireland is still a democratic and free nation.
00:20:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman discusses how the new hate speech law in Ireland is not about artwork or academia, but rather it is a way to get people to conform to a set of thoughts. The new legislation is about making people think twice about their thoughts and by default, controlling their speech, making them afraid to voice certain opinions. Sarah mentions a case where a woman was fined for posting a lyric on her social media account. The current politicians may promise not to exploit the law, but there is no guarantee the future ones won’t. The dangerous thing about this law is that it has already started to silence people in Ireland since the government tries to dismiss any criticism of the migrant crisis as racism.
00:25:00
In this section, the speaker highlights the unpopularity of the hate speech legislation in Ireland with 73% of people opposing the bill proposed. A national referendum on blasphemy laws was also defeated in 2018 with a 65% vote. Despite the public’s opposition to speech restrictions, members of Parliament are ignoring the citizens’ views and moving forward with the legislation. The speaker argues that the government is trying to use this legislation to instill fear and compliance in the people, which she describes as tyranny. The speaker also mentions the power of NGO groups in Ireland and how they can influence legislation.
00:30:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman discusses the changing societal views in Ireland regarding online life and how it could affect public perception of the controversial new hate speech law currently being debated. She notes that older generations may see the law as an infringement on their freedoms, but younger people who have grown up online may view it as necessary protection. Hardiman also criticizes the journalist union in Ireland for their lack of vocal opposition to the new law, considering their past advocacy for free speech and the right to free expression. Despite opposition from her advocacy group, Hardiman believes the law will pass and become secure in the future.
00:35:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the failure of journalists to protect free speech and points out that journalism has shifted from challenging powerful institutions to promoting a particular narrative. The controversial new hate speech law recently passed in Ireland by a vote of 110 to 14, with only a few members on the Left voting against it. The speaker notes that it is a reflection of the broken system and the lack of viable opposition. The speaker also expresses concern that the new law may have been handed down from the EU, and there is a lack of viable alternatives in the political system.
00:40:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman discusses how Ireland’s new hate speech law can potentially convict people for possessing hateful or offensive content even if they have no intention of sharing it. Hardiman compares this to the conviction of possessing child porn. She also expresses concern over the policing of such content, questioning whether simply scrolling through Twitter and viewing potentially hateful content warrants a conviction. Hardiman believes the law will likely pass the Senate due to a lack of political opposition, but there is still a window of opportunity for opposition before the president signs it into law. She urges people, particularly those who use social media within Europe, to be aware of the potential implications of this law.
00:45:00
In this section, Sarah Hardiman of Free Speech Ireland urges people to support their cause online by following them on social media and sharing their content. She explains that major social media outlets, including Google, are based in Dublin and are governed by the Irish system, so it is crucial to raise awareness about the controversial new hate speech law in Ireland. Hardiman also notes that while they are open to various options in the future, including legal avenues, challenging the law will take a lot of effort. In the meantime, they are a group of people who are hungry to do whatever they can to challenge it as successfully as possible.
In this YouTube video on Chris Williamson’s Modern Wisdom podcast, dating coach Matthew Hussey shares his insights into the dating world, highlighting the importance of vulnerability in relationships, the impact of social media on unrealistic expectations and entitlement, and the need to prioritize emotional intimacy and communication over superficial markers of success or attractiveness when looking for a long-lasting partner.
Hussey also emphasizes that chemistry should not be overrated as a predictive indicator of relationship success, and that people should focus on what they can control in their dating habits rather than complain about outside factors. He encourages people to redefine their priorities in a partner and make counter-cultural compromises to find happiness.
In addition, Matthew Hussey provides insights on how people can lower their standards in dating by not being clear about their goals. Hussey advises men to be decisive in their relationships, and suggests non-traditional first date settings to lower the stakes.
He also emphasizes the importance of showcasing one’s personality in dating profiles and avoiding negative experiences.
The coach discusses the growing trend of women choosing not to have children and the danger of telling women what choices they should make. He also talks about maintaining attraction and desire in a long-term relationship, the importance of staying grateful, and avoiding external metrics of success.
Finally, he shares his experience of feeling disconnected and prioritizing external factors before introspection. He also shares his personal experience with depression and anxiety and how he learned to modulate his emotional relationship with problems in life, emphasizing the importance of changing the story we tell ourselves about the things that happen to us.
Hussey also provides advice for people struggling with anxiety in early dating, suggesting they settle in and breathe differently..
00:00:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discusses the idea of vulnerability in relationships, stating that a person who wants a real relationship but cannot handle a partner’s vulnerability may not be mature enough to understand men. He also addresses the biggest changes he’s seen in what women want during his 15 years of experience, including a concern about finding someone who is at the same level economically or socially, and the challenge for successful women to be attracted to men who are not in their same socio-economic sphere. Finally, he explains that people may sometimes narrowly define what they see as powerful or attractive, but freedom to choose a partner is the ultimate goal of achieving success or wealth.
00:05:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the changes in dating since he began his career 15 years ago, including the rise of dating apps and societal acceptance of online dating. He also notes the way in which social media has changed the way people present themselves, with a globalization of looks leading to a homogenization of appearance. This can create feelings of insecurity and contribute to unrealistic standards in relationships. The speaker compares this to the way social media can create unrealistic expectations of travel destinations by presenting an idealized version of reality.
00:10:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discusses the potential impact of social media on people’s expectations in relationships, suggesting that the constant exposure to what seems like perfect and luxurious lives on platforms like Instagram can create an unrealistic sense of entitlement and an expectation for an equally luxurious relationship. He also points out that men, in particular, may misunderstand what women want because they’re chasing after flashier, more superficial gimmicks that may not translate into a fulfilling relationship or bring real happiness. Hussey also shares his personal experience of vulnerability backfiring on him in a relationship and how he learned the wrong lesson from it.
00:15:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discusses the balance of vulnerability and confidence in men. He believes that vulnerability, as a form of openness, is attractive to the right person when it comes to sharing struggles and battles. However, he warns against crossing the line into neediness and dumping your problems on someone else, which he believes is unattractive. Taking ownership of your struggles and actively working on them is an incredibly powerful thing to do in any relationship, as it shows responsibility. While some women may perceive vulnerability as a sign of weakness, there is a yearning for men to talk more and be more open. Hussey acknowledges that there will be people who will not accept your vulnerability and will judge you, but it is essential to be true to yourself and keep searching for the right match.
00:20:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discusses the importance of finding a partner who can accept your vulnerabilities, past mistakes, and emotions. He explains that while some men may appear to be “bulletproof” and unemotional, there are plenty of men who are more emotional and vulnerable – it’s all about finding the right match for you. Hussey advises against investing in someone based solely on markers of “eligibility,” such as success or attractiveness, as these traits don’t necessarily equate to a strong, lasting relationship. Instead, he encourages people to prioritize emotional intimacy, communication, and vulnerability when looking for a partner.
00:25:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey emphasizes that while chemistry may be necessary and important for sexual and physical attraction to someone, it should not be overrated as a predictive indicator of the success of a long-term romantic relationship. Hussey notes that chemistry does not necessarily mean aligned intentions or investment, and that people often mistake attention for intention. He adds that the most common complaint he hears from women in his coaching sessions is that men are indecisive and do not commit. On the other hand, Hussey suggests that men often worry about not being found attractive or being seen as creepy or predatory, especially in the online dating world.
00:30:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey talks about the importance of choosing the right partner and chasing the right things in a relationship. He highlights the issue of entitlement among men and the hypocrisy among both men and women when it comes to their dating preferences. Hussey encourages people to redefine what they consider as important in a partner and to make counter-cultural compromises in order to live a happier life, rather than just seeking cultural norms of success.
00:35:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey shares that while it’s understandable to be curious and fascinated about things happening at a macro-level, complaining about the things outside of our control should not become an excuse. Hussey advises individuals to focus on what they can control, particularly in their dating life. Instead of being concerned about the number of men or women who are intimidated by them, people should analyze their dating habits and reflect on how they come across on a date. Being genuinely interested in the person opposite them and conveying gratitude towards them by the end of the meeting can work wonders in someone’s favor. Regardless of how the world is faring, it’s essential to learn how to be proactive in the dating world.
00:40:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey talks about how having a strong presence and putting in a small amount of effort can help people stand out in the dating market, where the bar is currently set very low due to challenges and turbulence. He suggests using concerns about the dating market as a litmus test for personal behavior and recommends that people stress test any ideas they learn from the internet with their personal experiences. He also touches on the importance of having a clear outcome in mind when it comes to dating.
00:45:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey emphasizes that finding someone who thinks you’re awesome is more important than how many people find you attractive. He talks about how your focus on the shallowness of women looking for certain attributes in a partner can dictate your entire life, making you resentful and bitter. Hussey believes that attracting people with the values that match yours and embodying those values will make meeting the right person easier. He encourages people to be a paradigm shifter, one who makes people change their mind on what really matters.
00:50:00
In this section, the speaker talks about the importance of valuing oneself beyond physical attractiveness and superficial qualities. He explains that true worth lies in internal qualities and that genuine connections take time to develop. The speaker also discusses his experience of letting go of his insecurities and realizing that his worth is not tied to his ability to be the life of the party. Additionally, the video shares new data about the percentages of young men and women who haven’t had sex in the past year. The host suggests that generalized risk aversion disorder may be a factor in people’s reluctance to engage in social situations, due to the convenience and accessibility of modern technology.
00:55:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discussed the possible reasons why women are becoming more hesitant to engage in the dating market. He mentioned the decrease in social skills due to social media and the delicate dance of flirting, which requires a lot of skill to do. However, he attributed the increased pathogen aversion to women’s decreased disgust threshold, which makes them more worried about being intimate with a guy. Additionally, he wonders if women are becoming more selective about their partners, focusing on their North Star or goals, and turning down relationships that won’t lead to their desired future.
01:00:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey speaks about how people often lower their standards in dating which results in relationships that do not align with their goals. He discusses how online dating has affected the dating scene and how women form a skewed perception of men due to the presence of many men who use dating apps just for hookups. Hussey also suggests that guys who want to be effective in dating and convince a girl that they are in it for the right reasons should showcase decisiveness when it comes to relationship progression.
01:05:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey shares his advice on how to suggest meeting up with someone for a first date, including his preference for non-traditional first date settings such as a walk or sitting at the bar of a restaurant. He also suggests lowering the stakes by suggesting a short date, such as grabbing a coffee or juice. When it comes to online dating profiles, Hussey suggests using the “show don’t tell” approach and using the space to actually showcase your personality and values rather than listing generic characteristics.
01:10:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey talks about the messages people convey in their dating profiles. He discusses how some people include negative experiences they’ve had in the past, like casual hookups, which gives off a frustrated and negative vibe. It’s better to let the positive aspects of your personality and intentions come out naturally through conversation instead of trying to communicate everything upfront. Hussey also shares some examples of how women have tried to communicate that they are single mothers, with some being more successful than others. Lastly, he briefly touches on the trend of women choosing not to have kids.
01:15:00
In this section, the dating coach acknowledges that while women may still face pressure to have kids, it is to a far lesser extent than before and the number of people who never want kids or feel that it is not their path must have risen. However, a significant chunk of women who make it to adulthood end up being childless, with eight out of ten women who break through the fertility window and don’t have kids not having intended to be childless. The coach stresses the importance of timing and how delaying having kids can sometimes lead to grieving, especially if someone hasn’t met the right person yet or has gone through many relationships that don’t pan out. The coach also expresses concern at the current trend of demonizing motherhood, saying that to see choosing to be a mother as settling or choosing to be second-class is not good.
01:20:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the growing trend of women choosing not to have children and the potential consequences for women who may later regret this decision. He acknowledges that while the decision to have children is completely up to the individual, it is also important to recognize the societal pressure against delaying childbirth. He highlights the danger in telling women that they should not have children and reinforces the importance of women having financial independence. He also draws parallels between the pressure men feel to sleep around and the pressure women feel to delay childbirth. Ultimately, he encourages individuals to make choices that will bring them real happiness, rather than just following what society dictates.
01:25:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey, a dating coach, talks about the importance of figuring out what one wants in life before getting into a relationship. Hussey stresses that it is critical to get in touch with oneself and determine what kind of life one wants before making a decision to enter a relationship. He highlights that this lesson applies to men and women alike, and it is necessary to quiet the noise and reflect on what is essential without fearing losing time.
01:30:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey discusses how perceived challenge and connection affect our value and attraction towards someone. He explains that having standards around one’s value is crucial, as bleeding out for someone exclusively without an equal exchange of value can lower our value in their eyes. Hussey also delves into the challenge of maintaining desire and connection in a long-term relationship, citing the importance of creating space between two people. He emphasizes that maintaining attraction and desire is nuanced and cannot be achieved through simple tricks or sex positions. It’s essential to remind oneself of the joys of being in a relationship and avoiding the expectation that everything must stay the same to keep the attraction.
01:35:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey discusses the danger of optimizing too much in a relationship and losing sight of the value that the relationship brings. He emphasizes the importance of staying grateful and connecting to the simplicity of life to avoid getting caught up in external metrics of success. Hussey also touches on his decision to focus on trauma in his work, not because it is trendy, but because he believes it is important to help people in their mental health.
01:40:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the negative impact of his anxiety and stress on himself and his loved ones. He explains how living in cities like LA or Austin can amplify the comparison game and external pressure to be successful. However, he notes that he has learned from his past failures, such as when he worked on a TV show that got canceled after three episodes, and acknowledges that failure was a blessing in disguise. He also expressed gratitude for his experience on a reality TV show, which gained him followers but didn’t lead to success. He recognizes that if he had gained success through reality TV, he would have been pigeonholed and expected to replicate the formula.
01:45:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey advises against seeking instant gratification and the desire to be plucked out of a lottery and magically gifted status. He mentions how reality shows often create a prefabricated ‘shape’ that one is squeezed into, making it difficult not to follow similar patterns taught through life experience. Hussey believes finding something one loves and can do for a long time without thinking much of the spikes is a great secret to playing the long game. He cites the example of Mr Morrow, who started filming his experience at the Disney parks and built a career on it, as someone who figured something out they really loved and can do it for a living, without always craving more.
01:50:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey opens up about feeling disconnected and unhappy in his 20s, despite having achieved success in his career and being able to care for the people he loved. He admits that he had avoided introspection and therapy, thinking that it was something other people needed. However, he realized that there was always another level to explore and address, and he now applauds great therapists for the work they do in helping people become more self-aware. It took a significant amount of pain for him to finally address his disconnect, but he encourages others to seek introspection and therapy before they reach that point.
01:55:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey shares how he used to prioritize external factors such as optimization instead of going inward. He admits that he hadn’t seen any immediate return in doing inward work and only began to understand its importance after experiencing chronic physical pain and realizing something wasn’t right. The pain forced him to slow down and prioritize his well-being, which was more important than anything else.
02:00:00
In this section, the speaker shares his personal experience with depression and anxiety. He reveals that he always had anxiety, but depression was something he experienced intensely and seriously. The realization that no one was coming to help him, not even his family, was terrifying. He tried everything, but nothing seemed to work. It took him years to work on his own peace, and he gradually found a new level of peace in his life. He struggled with physical pain, which had a real physiological component, but his emotional relationship with it made it much worse.
02:05:00
In this section, Matthew Hussey shares how he learned to modulate his emotional relationship with problems in life, and how teaching this idea to others brings him joy. He highlights the importance of changing the story we tell ourselves about the things that happen to us and the power of having a different mindset. Hussey also emphasizes the idea that everything changes, including our relationship with problems, and that we never really know how things will play out. By understanding this, we can learn to “strap in” and move forward, knowing that everything has the potential to change.
02:10:00
In this section, dating coach Matthew Hussey suggests settling in and breathing differently when faced with anxiety in early dating, using the metaphor of a one-hour roll instead of a three-minute roll. He also shares his three platforms for dating advice: his YouTube channel, Instagram, and Facebook for free content, Your Dating Solution for personalized advice for women, and his upcoming virtual retreat for men and women to transform their entire psychology and get the most out of their lives.
The “Age of Deceit – Fallen Angels and the New World Order” is a 2011 video documentary directed by Gonzo Shimura. The video discusses various topics relating to the New World Order, the Illuminati, and fallen angels.
The speaker argues that the ultimate goal of the New World Order is to force everyone to worship the Antichrist, and the system being built is designed to do so. This belief system stems from ancient Mystery School teachings that go against biblical Christianity, and theosophy, which believes that Lucifer is the god of the world.
The video also discusses how fallen angels cohabited with humans and taught them various skills, including weapon-making, makeup application, and jewelry-making. The speaker believes that the so-called aliens are actually demonic entities, and the media is perpetuating the idea of alien life as part of the plan to prepare the world for a New World Order.
In addition, the video explores the possibility that entities that are seen as aliens may have been considered demons or gods in the past. It discusses the abundance of UFO sightings, and scholars suggest that they represent a manifestation of reality that transcends our current understanding of physics. There are both negative and positive accounts of experiences with these entities, including claims of an alien hybridization program with the goal of creating a hybrid race to take over the world.
The video warns about the dangers of allowing deceiving spirits to enter one’s body, including the entities channeled by New Age figures like David Wilcox and books that deny the unique deity of Jesus Christ.
The speaker believes that both the New Age movement and the New World Order are about a coming evolution of mankind, where the elite believe that they are the only ones that will attain higher spiritual beings, and the rest of mankind are mere cattle in the way of this goal.
Finally, the video delves into the dark plans of the New World Order, which include the creation of Satanic super soldiers and a one-world religion to usher in a false utopia promised by man. The video highlights the involvement of fallen beings who were given authority over humanity but abused their power, transhumanism as a cover-up for sinister deeds to come, and the need for spiritual rebirth through Jesus Christ’s unique DNA.
The speaker warns of deception and the increase of wickedness and false prophets, stressing the importance of accepting Jesus Christ as a savior and finding the truth beyond the seductive ideas of the New World Order.
00:00:00
In this section, the speaker discusses how the New World Order and Illuminati possess knowledge that could be used for the betterment of humanity, but instead, they use it to enslave us. The new world order has already divided up the world into regions and wants to reduce the population to half a billion, with a few elites ruling the world. The Bible warns of perilous times to come, and Christians will be despised and hated. The speaker also touches on the possibility of a harmonious world with ascended abilities after 2012. Lastly, a quote by George H. W. Bush is heard, discussing the idea of a New World Order, where diverse nations are united for common purposes.
00:05:00
In this section, the speaker discusses how conspiracy theories about a One World Government and the U.N. takeover of the world have been laid to rest with the release of the U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance’s final report titled Our Global Neighborhood. However, the speaker argues that the biblical worldview best explains the origin of evil and its many symptoms to mankind, including human suffering and death. The World Elite’s mission for a two-class system where the underclass are forced to live as slaves while the elite evolved into superhumans has been the primary motivation behind several layers upon layers of systems, including political, economic, military, scientific, educational, technological, social, and spiritual facets. The World Elite are tirelessly working to allow the formation of a One World Currency, massive depopulation, a One World Religion, and a One World Government. The speaker argues that the people who promote and continue to instigate the New World Order and the promise of a new age are perhaps the most deceitful and are the ultimate victims.
00:10:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the ultimate goal behind the New World Order and the spiritual agenda driving it. According to the speaker, the ultimate goal is for everyone to worship the Antichrist, and the system being built is designed to force people into doing so. The speaker believes that those behind the New World Order are part of secret societies and engaged in occult rituals that give instructions for the nuts and bolts things needed to create the system. The speaker also suggests that a person with tremendous influence and power and access to high-tech stuff will eventually be born and become the Beast by inserting Satan’s genetic code into his DNA via recombinant DNA. The speaker further explains that the Fall of Mankind as recorded in Genesis 3 is the beginning of the plan behind the New World Order, where Satan redefined what good meant, causing mankind to be susceptible to death and is being used to create the New World Order.
00:15:00
In this section, the video discusses the concept promoted by the World Elite that through intellect, technology, and science, man will achieve immortality and become godlike. This idea plays on the hope of attaining secret knowledge and wisdom, which is a common thread among secret societies, the New Age movement, and the alien agenda. The video argues that this is the core belief of the Luciferian doctrine, where exclusive knowledge is used to achieve immortality and godhood without the help of the Creator God. The promise of attaining godhood has been sought after for centuries, with the goal of resurrecting the Lost Empire of Atlantis and forging a world empire. This ancient hope is the driving force behind the New World Order and its components such as the secret societies, the New Age movement, and the transhumanist movement.
00:20:00
In this section, the video discusses how America was not founded as a constitutional republic under biblical principles, but instead as a social experiment based on the visions described in Sir Francis Bacon’s book The New Atlantis. These principles all stem from the ancient Mystery School teachings, an esoteric spiritual philosophy passed down by the initiated elite for centuries, which is the same as the Luciferian doctrine of man becoming God through his own intellect. This philosophy is the religion of the New World Order, which operates through various secret societies, cults, and religious circles. Theosophical writers such as H.P. Blavatsky and Grace Notes have written about the history and origins of these Mystery School teachings and their connection to Atlantis.
00:25:00
In this section, the transcript discusses the ancient Mystery School teachings and their beliefs about achieving godhood and becoming Divine beings through the process of evolution. These teachings go against biblical Christianity, which offers salvation to anyone who believes in Jesus Christ. Many writers on the topic of ancient Mysteries attempt to discredit Christianity by painting an untrue picture of the faith and infiltrating its religious institutions to corrupt many sectors of Christianity. Alice Bailey, the co-founder of Lucis Trust, formerly known as Lucifer Publishing, referred to the initiation of the race into the mystery of the ages by overhauling Christianity and its sources. Helena Blavatsky and Manly P. Hall also refer to the astronomical underpinnings of Christianity, with Hall referring to the adoration of the sun as one of the earliest and most natural forms of religious expression.
00:30:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the influence of the Theosophical Society, specifically its deep-rooted Luciferian beliefs, on the modern-day worldview. The core belief of theosophy is that Lucifer is the God of the world, and Alice Bailey and Blavatsky are both known for exalting him. Even though the New World Order may not explicitly worship Lucifer, they have adopted the idea from the ancient Mystery Schools of a Promethean light-bearer who gives people knowledge. Freemasons have a secret society that has evolved through history, with those at the highest levels being aware of the true nature of Lucifer. Through knowledge and power, the members of the ancient Mystery Schools have been working in secrecy to steer society towards fulfilling their plan.
00:35:00
In this section, the video discusses secret societies such as the Shriners and Masons teaching that Lucifer is life and how Yale University still has exotic clubhouses where secret societies meet and perform rituals. The video presents the example of Skull and Bones, a secret society that has been around since 1832 and whose members have gone on to be leaders of Wall Street and the White House, showing initiation rituals involving members kissing a skull and performing a mock killing. The video also explains a Biblical explanation for ancient mystery schools, where the fall of mankind in the garden leads God to say something interesting to Satan in the first prophecy recorded in the Bible, showing that Satan’s counter move was to disrupt the human genetic pool so that the pure bloodline of man would not bring forth the Messiah to redeem mankind, which is the reason for the flood.
00:40:00
In this section, the video discusses the concept of fallen angels and their attempt to create a hybrid race by cohabiting with humans, which resulted in the Nephilim or Earthborn. The video states that the idea of aliens from outer space is part of the New World Order deception. The purpose of the flood was not just because of sin but also because Satan’s strategy was to contaminate the human race. The video also explores the Book of Enoch, which is referenced by Jesus, Peter, Paul, and Jude in the New Testament. Although modern-day Christian scholars have put the book aside, it is said to be worth investigating and enhances the understanding of the Bible. The Book of Enoch provides several insights such as the number of fallen angels, their landing, and what they taught.
00:45:00
In this section, the video discusses how the fallen angels taught mankind various skills, including weapon-making, makeup application, and jewelry-making. They also introduced mankind to psychedelic drugs, astrology, vampirism, cursing, and enchantments. The Book of Enoch and the Book of Jasher both record the nefarious acts of the fallen angels, including mixing different species, committing immorality, and teaching the art of abortion. The ancient myths and fairy tales from various cultures give overwhelming evidence that the Nephilim existed. The video concludes that the anti-diluvian world of fallen angels hybrids, warfare, Nephilim, astrology, advanced technology, and false spirituality is Atlantis. The elite and secret societies are trying to rediscover Atlantis and fulfill the ancient hope, which has been at work since the days of Adam and Eve: the earthly rule of the Antichrist.
00:50:00
In this section, the video discusses the New Age movement’s interest in the topic of UFOs and ETs. The movement has infiltrated the truth movement and uses UFOs as a main topic of interest. Many New Age proponents, such as David Wilcock, David Ike, and Jordan Maxwell, argue that the UFO phenomenon is not necessarily flesh and blood beings but are highly evolved spiritual entities who have attained godhood and power over the elements of nature and physics. This parallels the sacred promise given to the inner members of the New World Order and is consistent with transhumanists’ beliefs in attaining Singularity and human immortality through the use of technology and biology.
00:55:00
In this section, the speaker discusses how the media has perpetuated the idea of alien life and how this could be a part of the plan to prepare the world for disclosure. They argue that this serves the Antichrist system by causing the world to reject God, allowing humans to see themselves as gods and promoting the concept of evolution. The speaker believes that the demons of yesterday are today’s aliens, and while there are not aliens from distant galaxies, there are aliens that are very much from here, which are demonic in nature.
01:00:00
In this section of the video, the speaker touches on the idea that the entities that people see as aliens today were once considered demons or gods in the past. The concept of evolution serves as a foundation for the belief in these otherworldly beings, which have supposedly evolved over time. The speaker also discusses the abundance of UFO sightings today, with videos and first-hand accounts from people all over the world, including famous figures like Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter. The idea of beings from another realm manifesting in our own is explored, and the speaker questions the function of wings and horses of fire in the Angelic spiritual realm, of which there are still many unanswered questions.
01:05:00
In this section, scholars with no religious affiliation who have studied UFOs and ETS for several decades have concluded that these crafts being sighted have the ability to manipulate time and space, making them invisible or maneuver in ways that defy understanding of nature and physics. Jack Valet, a former astronomer, stated in his book Messengers of Deception, that they represent a manifestation of reality that transcends our current understanding of physics and that we are under the control of a strange force that bends us in contact with these beings. J Allen Heineck also came to similar conclusions of the UFOs and alleged extraterrestrial phenomenon in his book Edge of Reality, stating, if UFOs are somebody else’s nuts and bolts hardware, then we must still explain how such tangible hardware can change shape before our eyes or vanish. The UFO phenomenon is described as a control system using humans to play a role in a bizarre game of deception with some individuals claiming to have been abducted by aliens; some scholars believe this is a multidimensional visitation hypothesis or an interdimensional experience coming from another dimension.
01:10:00
In this section, the video discusses the work of Dr. David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber who have both researched the UFO and alien abduction phenomenon for many years. Dr. Jacobs believes that an alien hybridization program is underway, with the ultimate goal of creating a hybrid race to take over the world. Whitley Streiber describes his personal experience with these entities which left him in a state of extreme fear and dread. Many researchers and abductees agree that there is a spiritual element behind this phenomenon, with similarities to cult initiation rituals and the occult. The video also mentions a solution offered by Joe Jordan, which involves calling on the name of Jesus to stop and reverse an abduction experience.
01:15:00
In this section, a testimony of an investigator for the CE4 Research Group is shared, discussing how calling upon the name of Jesus Christ during an alien abduction can make the experience stop instantly. The mission statement of the CE4 group is to share powerful evidence that exposes the true nature of alien entities through the testimony of those who have overcome their control through the power of the name and authority of Jesus Christ. The investigator discusses his journey from being an agnostic humanist to a believer in the New Age and then a Christian. He also shares a story of interviewing a gentleman who claimed to have been abducted by aliens six months before becoming a Christian, which ultimately led to his involvement with CE4 and the mission to help others overcome the oppression and deception of alien entities.
01:20:00
In this section of the video, a former police officer and UFO investigator shares his experience regarding a case of a man named Bill D who claimed to have stopped an alien abduction experience by calling out to Jesus. This was an unusual case as top researchers had never heard of anyone stopping an abduction experience before. The officer contacted some of these researchers and they told him they had come across similar cases but were afraid to pursue it further as it may affect their credibility in the UFO community and lead to a cover-up. The officer notes that this reluctance to share evidence for personal agendas is called a cover-up and states that it has been happening in the UFO community for a long time.
01:25:00
In this section, the speaker suggests that information about extraterrestrial life and phenomenon is often kept secret or manipulated by those who have personal agendas and that the government is covering up these experiences, causing deception. However, there are both negative and positive accounts of experiences with these entities, with the latter being found largely within the New Age movement where it is often channeled information from higher spiritual beings. Several successful individuals, such as David Wilcock and David Ike, claimed to have channeled entities and claim that Jesus Christ has spoken through them.
01:30:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the practice of channeling and mediumship, explaining that the Bible explicitly prohibits these practices due to the risk of contacting entities that might not be from God but instead could be counterfeits, such as demons. The speaker quotes passages from the Bible that admonish people to test the spirits, emphasizing that prayer is the best way to have a direct relationship with God rather than channeling, which is similar to demonic possession. The speaker concludes with a warning about the dangers of channeling and the importance of heeding God’s warnings to protect oneself from deceiving spirits who ultimately draw people away from the message of salvation.
01:35:00
In this section, the speaker warns about the dangers of allowing deceiving spirits to enter one’s body, which can lead to demonic possession. While exorcisms are often associated with Catholic priests, the speaker believes that anyone who has been saved by Jesus Christ can perform them, as done in Deliverance Ministries. As an example, excerpts from a 2003 WN Network broadcast of an exorcism are shown. The speaker states that spiritual beings, such as those encountered in alien abductions and channeled messages, may actually be evil demons in disguise, including the entities channeled by David Wilcox, who claims his new age Ministry is much more in tune with the truth than the Bible. The Law of One, a book supposedly channeled by an entity named Ra, describes Jesus Christ as a member of a high level of sub-octave, not to return except as a member of the Confederation.
01:40:00
In this section, the video discusses various channeled writings claiming to be from spiritual entities, such as RA, the Stardubs, and A Course in Miracles, which all deny the unique deity of Jesus Christ. They describe Jesus as simply another entity of higher spiritual levels, overshadowed by others or serving on a hierarchical board. The video argues that these claims contradict the biblical accounts of Jesus’s divinity and are evidence of deceiving spirits. It also points out that Satan, not Jesus, is said to be the ruler of this world according to the Bible.
01:45:00
In this section, the video discusses books that deny Jesus’s deity, including A Course in Miracles and the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ. Both books claim that we are all becoming christs and deny the existence of the devil. A Course in Miracles also claims that there is no judgment. Warren B Smith concluded that the Jesus presented in A Course in Miracles was actually the spirit of the Antichrist, not the true Jesus Christ. Many other channeled documents and books that deny Jesus’s divinity exist, but the video asserts that these teachings contradict biblical principles and are likely the work of deceiving spirits and false prophets. The Bible’s accuracy is also challenged by some who deny Jesus’s divinity, but the video argues that there is strong evidence in support of the Bible’s authenticity.
01:50:00
In this section, the speaker discusses how Jesus claimed to be the Son of God and how that led the Pharisees to consider it a blasphemy worthy of punishment. The Pharisees recognized that only God could forgive sins, but Jesus forgave sins and allowed himself to be worshiped. Furthermore, Jesus made several statements that hinted at him being God, such as him being the Voice of the Burning Bush, the Creator of the World, and the Cloud Rider of Daniel 7. The speaker points out that the crucifixion of Jesus only makes sense if Jesus was God himself. The speaker then transitions to discussing how both the New Age movement and the New World Order are about a coming evolution of mankind, where the elite believe that they are the only ones that will attain higher spiritual beings, and the rest of mankind are mere cattle in the way of this goal.
01:55:00
In this section, the video discusses the prophetic texts which come from esoteric authors and writers who claim to channel entities that both the new age and the New World Order seem to be basing their agenda on. One particular author, Alice Bailey, has had her channeled writings taken as the blueprint for the New World Order and the new age, with her ascended Master Djwal Kul giving the prerequisites. Bailey believes that a world government needs to be in place first, which the hierarchy, Spiritual Beings working with government organizations such as the United Nations, will accomplish. Bailey thinks the chaos is also necessary for unifying the existing system and empowering the world religion, needed to get everyone in the world on board with a singular religion. And while Christianity is the big hurdle, Bailey states that the work and teaching of the Christ will be hard for the Christian world to accept, though easier of assimilation in the East.
02:00:00
In this section, the video discusses the diabolical plan of the so-called “chosen ones” to develop the army of the Antichrist through victims of Satanic ritual abuse, multiple personality disorder, and mind control. These individuals, called “satanic super soldiers” by Russ Dizdar, have been assigned to kill and create chaos when the call is made for the black awakening. The chaos and destruction will create a climate where people cry for peace, and desire for a new system, thus allowing for the New Age movement to usher in the real New World Order. The video also suggests that the one thing that will cause the world to worship one man is a one-world religion, which could come about through the UFO and alien phenomena. Other scenarios, such as a one world Muslim or Catholic religion, are deemed problematic.
02:05:00
In this section of the transcript, the speaker argues that the creation of a one-world religion is likely to be the result of the UFO phenomenon. This takeover would necessitate the rejection of God and make the new religion very man-centered, promising Utopia, evolution, and god-like status. The speaker notes that this scenario would resemble the deception and false Utopia prophesied in the Bible and that, in this context, Christians would become Public Enemy Number One for rejecting the new Utopia. Ultimately, the speaker believes that Satan and the Fallen Angels are behind the New World Order, deceiving mankind into working for Satan’s cause.
02:10:00
section explores the concept of fallen beings who were once part of the heavenly council and were given authority over certain parts of humanity but were abusing their power and suppressing the poor. These beings fell from grace, and their sin led to their death. The video discusses how the idea of transhumanism, which seeks to upgrade humanity physically and spiritually, is a cover for the far more sinister events to come. However, the video argues that the true hope lies in the gospel message of Jesus Christ, which promises the restoration of humanity’s source code and an upgrade to its original state. The fall of man corrupted the Earth, and the condition of man reflects the condition of the Earth.
02:15:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the DNA of Jesus and how it relates to humanity’s spiritual rebirth. He explains that Jesus has a unique Y chromosome from the Holy Spirit, making him the second Adam, and for humans to be a part of God’s kingdom, they must be reborn as sons of the second Adam with a new DNA package. The video highlights how the Bible has warned of impending deception that will influence the world through various letters and visions from the authors, particularly the Apostle Paul and the Apostle John, discussing the New World Order, Antichrist, and entities that will deceive the world in the end times.
02:20:00
In this section, the speaker discusses the need for people to accept Jesus Christ as their savior, as he died for the sins of all mankind and offers spiritual freedom and salvation. He warns of the increase in wickedness and false prophets, and paraphrases scripture to explain that being persecuted and hated for one’s faith is inevitable. The speaker also appeals to those who have researched the New World Order, arguing that they subconsciously know that much of what has been revealed about the Antichrist system is true, and that the real movers and shakers behind it are theistic Satanists who hold dedicated beliefs about the worship of Satan. He cautions against the dangerous position of believing that it doesn’t matter what they believe, as it means that one is denying the reality of Satan and the cosmic war of good and evil depicted in the Bible.
02:25:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses how Satanists have been shaping people’s thoughts about the Bible and Jesus Christ. They are preparing people for a new system that they want them to believe is their utopia and telling them to ignore the man that the Bible said would crush the one that these people at the top are worshiping. The speaker suggests that the ideas being presented by these Satanists are very seductive, and people are being told that they can be like God without real accountability for their actions. This makes it difficult to resist these ideas, regardless of whether they are true or not. The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking for the truth and figuring out who Jesus really is according to the Bible, rather than what the New World Order says about him.
In a video titled “Covid vaccine MHRA report: Yet again us conspiracy factualists are proved right“, Laurence Fox discusses a report published by Perseus, which was compiled by a multi-disciplinary team of experts and cites the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the UK).
The report, titled “Safe and effective?“, concludes that the MHRA failed in its duty to protect the public from harm and did not require long-term safety demonstrations from the mRNA vaccine manufacturers nor did they act promptly on reports of adverse reactions. MHRA also failed to address manufacturing quality and control problems leading to batch quality issues.
The report calls for an immediate cessation of the vaccines until a thorough, independent investigation takes place.
Laurence Fox argues that the same rushed solutions and fear-mongering tactics used during COVID-19 are being used now to push the “climate emergency” and emphasizes the need to learn from the disastrous times and swear to never let them happen again.
Michael Rectenwald is an American scholar, author, and former professor of Liberal Studies at New York University. Rectenwald rose to prominence in 2016 after he created a Twitter account named “Deplorable NYU Prof” and began publicly criticizing what he saw as the increasing intolerance and censorship on college campuses.
His criticisms of “woke” culture and cancel culture garnered him a significant following on social media and led to appearances on various media outlets, including Fox News and The Joe Rogan Experience podcast. Rectenwald is the author of several books, including “Springtime for Snowflakes: ‘Social Justice’ and Its Postmodern Parentage” and “Beyond Woke.”
In the video, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset and the potential conspiracy theories surrounding it. He highlights that the World Economic Forum (WEF) promotes digital biometric surveillance identity systems and has pushed young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, which has led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.
Rectenwald also discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism, and argues that it is a form of corporate socialism. He provides a “grand refusal” plan to combat the Great Reset, which includes divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the WEF, United Nations, and World Health Organization.
00:00:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald addresses whether the idea of the Great Reset is simply a conspiracy theory. He notes that while some sources, such as the New York Times and the BBC, claim that the Great Reset is a benign effort to bring about a fairer, greener future, Time Magazine has devoted an entire issue to it, hailing it as the solution to all our problems.
Michael Rectenwald also suggests that the World Economic Forum generates conspiracy theories on purpose to discredit their critics in advance. The history of the Great Reset begins with Richard Florida’s book in 2010, which inspired Klaus Schwab to push the reset button in 2014. The WF then participated in two pandemic simulations (Clade X and Event 201) prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, which led to a coordinated global response eerily similar to the simulation scenarios.
00:05:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the simulations done before the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the Clade X and Event 201, which anticipated every aspect of the crisis, including worldwide lockdowns, the collapse of businesses and industry, widespread riots, and the adoption of biometric surveillance technologies.
These simulations, along with the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) involvement in promoting digital biometric surveillance identity systems and pushing young global leaders into major roles in managing the COVID-19 crisis, have led to a pandemic narrative that suggests the crisis may have been staged by global elites to serve as an alibi for instituting the Great Reset.
The WEF’s partnership with the UN to advance Agenda 2030, sustainable development goals, and its commitment to help the UN meet the needs of the fourth industrial revolution, including government by algorithms and AI, are also highlighted.
00:10:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the history of globalist organizations such as the Trilateral Commission and their push for a global agenda. The Great Reset, which is a reset of various domains of human life including economic, environmental, geopolitical, industrial, technological, social, and individual, is an outline of the kind of things they want to reset.
The economic system they want to usher in is called stakeholder capitalism, which is a euphemism for a collusion between the government, state, and corporate world that establishes a cartel shared Monopoly scheme. The world economic Forum has signed on 1,000 of the world’s top corporations in all major sectors of the economy, and they are all firmly behind this agenda, including major players like BlackRock Inc.
The stakeholder capitalism regime has its main mechanism, the ESG score, which Schwab likens to Dr. Evil, and companies that don’t get on board with the sustainability ESG stakeholder regime will be starved with capital and die on the vine.
00:15:0
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the economic system that globalists want to establish, which they call stakeholder capitalism. He explains that socialists believe that stakeholder capitalism is a form of socialism, specifically corporate socialism, which is the monopolization of the economy by a group of monopolists who want to eliminate their competition and retain complete and total control over the rest of the economy.
Rectenwald argues that the Chinese system is the model for the Great Reset, as it still maintains for-profit production by oligarchs, total control over the population, a great surveillance structure, and generates wealth for the few. He believes that globalists want to establish this system globally.
00:20:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald discusses the Great Reset in relation to China and public-private partnerships. He claims that the Great Reset is drawing corporations into the state and making them state apparatuses, with examples such as Twitter and Google.
He mentions the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which he argues represents high-tech surveillance and control of the population at large. Rectenwald highlights that the Great Reset promises inclusion in a shared destiny, but this inclusion represents the subordination of netizens, who will experience total political and economic disenfranchisement and hyper-vigilance over themselves and others, resulting in organized loneliness.
00:25:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald provides a nine-point plan, which he calls “the grand refusal,” to combat the Great Reset. The plan includes refusing the central bank digital currency, internet of bodies, and digital identity, practicing the free market, divesting from ESG stocks and asset managers, and pressuring the government to stop funding organizations such as the World Economic Forum, United Nations, and World Health Organization.
Rectenwald acknowledges that it may not be possible to reverse the global agenda on our own, but we can become a Remnant that promotes the principles of the free market and individual freedom to future generations.
00:30:00
In this section, Michael Rectenwald suggests putting pressure on legislators to move pensions and other funds away from ESG asset managers, and encouraging defections from the elites. Elon Musk is cited as a possible defector from ESG and a nominal supporter of free speech.
Rectenwald calls for a grand refusal against revolutionary subversive elites who are wrecking society, and emphasizes the need for counter-revolution against their objectives. He concludes by rejecting the utopian and striving for continuity and sanity.
The video explores the possibility of a collapse of the United States, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.
The author discusses the weaknesses in the American system of representative government, including challenges in finding and verifying quality information, political schemas becoming entangled with self-identity, and a polarized population susceptible to propaganda.
The role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping American perspectives is also examined, and a proposed solution by Walter Lippmann to form a tax-funded intelligence bureau is discussed.
Ultimately, the video emphasizes the need for a “crucial core” in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States and invites viewers to contemplate a post-collapse world if nothing changes.
00:00:00
In this section, the host poses the question of whether the United States will collapse, citing concerns over lack of trust in government, partisan gridlock, and the perception of widespread corruption.
He goes on to discuss how disillusionment and polarization have become the best predictors for authoritarian takeover, and how this could lead to anarchy or tyranny in the most armed nation on earth, potentially impacting the entire world.
The host then introduces his special guest, Walter Lippmann, a 20th-century journalist and propagandist, who wrote a book called Public Opinion, which highlighted a deeper problem with the American system of representative government.
Lippmann argued that there was a weakness in how power and information flowed through the system, with sovereignty resting in the hands of individual citizens who delegate that power through elections and public opinion. The core idea behind this system was considered radical and experimental at the time of the nation’s founding, and has been subject to challenges and concerns over the years.
00:05:00
In this section, the author discusses how the initial design of the United States relied on individual self-interest being directed towards the public good. However, this design assumed that citizens would only elevate the most competent amongst them and that politicians would heed public opinion.
These assumptions have become vulnerable points of weakness as the nation has grown in size and complexity. Furthermore, the author illustrates how complicated it is for an individual to become fully informed on every issue of the day, using the example of a major tech company’s announcement of creating the world’s first general artificial intelligence.
The video states that modern-day forces, such as destructive propaganda, incoherent policy making and an overreliance on the manufacturing of consent and distractions, are inflaming these weaknesses, making the entire nation susceptible to crisis.
00:10:00
In this section, the challenges of finding and verifying quality information are discussed. The example of Clyde, who has limited resources and time for research is given, which highlights the issue of information overload and distractions that hinder thorough research.
The general population’s ignorance about political issues, and their own ignorance, are pointed out, and Lippmann’s concept of the “stereotype” is introduced as being at the core of political beliefs.
Lippmann believed that people were not discussing political differences rationally, creating a dangerous vulnerability. The importance of intellectual humility, the vast scale of topics, and the need for a variety of quality sources in research are emphasized.
00:15:00
In this section, the video explains the concept of schemas and how they play a role in shaping beliefs and behavior. Schemas are mental frameworks that humans develop to organize and navigate the vast amount of information and memories they encounter throughout their lives.
These schemas can be influenced by past experiences, media, and other factors, and can lead to oversimplifications or inaccurate beliefs about the world. While schemas can be useful in making quick decisions, they can also lead to a confirmation bias where individuals only notice things that reinforce their existing beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence.
Schemas can change over time, but this process can be slow and difficult, especially for complex and abstract beliefs like political opinions.
00:20:00
In this section, the author explains how political schemas often become entangled with one’s self-identity, giving the impression that they are the kind of person who believes certain things and not others.
This self-reinforcing web of belief makes it difficult to engage with evidence or ideas that conflict with one’s beliefs. Political partisans are more likely to make logical mistakes, jump to conclusions, and bend evidence to fit their worldview.
To reduce the detrimental impact of ideological bias, individuals ought to be self-aware and humble enough to know that their thinking is always at risk of these distortions and form a new super schema that connects their identity to this awareness.
The author notes, however, that fostering a political culture that values intellectual humility is unlikely in the United States due to the cultural dogma of the innately rational citizenry combined with the intellectual arrogance and fanatical certainty of political partisans.
00:25:00
In this section, the video explores how a polarized population with unchanging beliefs and rooted in tribalism is susceptible to propaganda. A few tools for self-government to navigate disagreement include persuasion, compromise or bargain, ignoring, or forming a consensus.
If you believe the opposition is insane or evil, then these tools are off the table. The news media is another major player, which often fails in its responsibilities due to its fragmented and sensationalized business model.
True investigative journalism requires a huge investment, but most Americans expect news for free which, in turn, leads to an over-reliance on advertising, sensational content, and click-bait titles that may not always align with the reality of the situation.
00:30:00
In this section, the video focuses on the role of media, public relations, and propaganda in shaping the American perspective. The media landscape is highly polarized and it’s nearly impossible for citizens to have a comprehensive and unbiased view of any issue.
Rather than focusing on accuracy, news media companies prioritize fulfilling their audience’s demand for preconceived ideas to maintain their business models. This gives an opportunity for anyone with enough resources to exploit this weakness towards external and internal threats. The video also details how the emergence of public relations added a new player in the information ecosystem of a democracy, which reshaped public opinion by planting stories, creating artificial events, or even paying people to promote products or ideas.
The combination of radio, film, and PR created a powerful force, but the Internet has become an influencing machine of unmatched power in history, making PR’s presence in American life so common that it is rarely reported or thought about.
00:35:00
In this section, the author highlights the power of public relations and PR agents in shaping information, both online and in political discourse. With the decline of traditional news sources, journalists have become more reliant on PR agents for news, and with the rise of social media, it is easier than ever to sway public opinion on a large scale.
Meanwhile, an idealistic politician faces two scenarios: ignoring public opinion and following their own agenda, potentially leading to manipulation and propaganda, or following public opinion that is influenced by PR agents and their clients, resulting in a lack of coherent policies. Ultimately, the increasing complexity of modern problems and the struggle to solve them can lead to a sense of helplessness among citizens, allowing undemocratic influence to flourish.
00:40:00
In this section, the focus is on the proposed solution by Walter Lippmann, who suggested forming a tax-funded intelligence bureau to assemble experts on national issues to provide an analysis of problems and potential solutions in a digestible report to the public.
However, the solution is now deemed too naive, considering the possibility that the institution may become corrupt over time. While there are institutions in the US that aim to provide knowledge to the people, these have been criticized due to their failures and deceptions, with the entire collection often labeled as “the Deep State.”
To address this, the essential core needs to be developed in the public, which includes the mental tools to audit their own beliefs and schemas, the ability to debate ideas with others, demand accuracy in information sources, and track policy issues over time without falling victim to counter-messaging. While not all people have these ideals, the development of the essential core is crucial to overcome America’s core vulnerability.
00:45:00
In this section, the speaker emphasizes the need for a crucial core in self-government to prevent the collapse of the United States. He acknowledges that the current situation is an active experiment in real-time, but believes that exploring steps towards strengthening this core may prevent decline and destruction.
The speaker concludes by saying that if nothing changes, he fears the collapse of the United States and invites the viewer to join him in contemplating a post-collapse world.
David Icke discusses the agenda of the interbreeding bloodlines, which is to establish a global fascist structure of world government with nation-states serving as administrative units and a world central bank with a currency that is entirely electronic. This structure would also include a world army that would be NATO, expanding and becoming a fully-fledged world police force.
Underpinning it all is a population that is microchipped with their financial and medical details, allowing external manipulation of their mental and emotional processes. Icke cautions that this will happen unless the human race wakes up and spreads awareness about the situation.
James Lindsay first gained national attention with his co-authoring of the book “Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity–and Why This Harms Everybody,” which critiques the postmodernist philosophy that has influenced many social justice movements. The book has been praised for its rigorous analysis and bold stance on a controversial subject.
Lindsay’s most prominent argument is that the “critical social justice” movement has become a form of fundamentalism that is more interested in promoting ideology than in promoting real change.
While some may disagree with his ideas, there is no denying that James Lindsay has made an important contribution to contemporary discourse by challenging established beliefs and encouraging critical thinking.
In the video, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy. He warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows, and their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science.
Lindsay explains that these cults create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place.
He warns against the lure of hyperreality and the use of faith and truth to prevent people from falling for scams, including those that claim to have a deeper understanding of bigger truths, and concludes that reality is recalcitrant, and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.
Titled “The Negation of the Real“, it’s the presentation in which James Lindsay talks about how certain movements, such as Marxism and the woke culture, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own.
These beliefs lead to constructing a synthetic simulacrum, a hyper-reality where reality is negated as it contradicts their religion. This is done through the creation of social concepts, such as gender and race, leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.
Philosophers like Hegel adopt this way of thinking, where reality is abandoned to understand their own interpretation. Lindsay argues that these movements ultimately aim to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist.
This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. Finally, Lindsay urges people to resist this religion and identify those who traffic in it.
00:00:00
In this section of the lecture, James Lindsay discusses how the West has been shaped by so-called secret religions or cults, which are often overlooked or ignored. He argues that these cults have been central to the construction of the West and have played a major role in its politics, faith, science and overall development.
Lindsay explains that if one wants to install false religions, they must negate the real religions while acknowledging that his use of the term religion is broad and includes the sciences. Through his talks, he aims to compare faith, science, and these cults to better understand how they work together.
Lindsay asks his audience to engage in a mental exercise and imagine a world where a large ancient religion exists that is just as big as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Buddhism, but nobody has ever heard of it, and how this religion has been present and influenced the development of the West.
00:05:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy.
Lindsay warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows and that their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science. He sees the exposure of these religions and the development of the discernment to identify them as necessary steps to defeating them, as they cannot claim truth on their side.
While acknowledging that the terminology and concepts associated with these religions may be overwhelming, Lindsay encourages the audience to watch the videos multiple times and at double speed to develop an understanding of these religions.
00:10:00
In this section, James Lindsay asks viewers to imagine that they are “crazy” and believe they had a direct encounter with God and have been told to change the world. He explains that these occult religions, like ancient hermeticism, gnosis, and gnosticism, operate on negative theology, which tears down or takes things apart, rather than positive theology, which describes the attributes of God.
These cultures create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use the fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place. The only way to get people to accept this fake reality is to obliterate reality first.
00:15:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how negative thinking or critique has evolved into “woke denunciation,” which involves denouncing something in a way that supposedly announces the possibility of something different without ever having to articulate a positive argument or clear plan. He explains that this process is a form of sorcery that confuses people and gives power to those making negative arguments against others.
Lindsay then explains that these occult, esoteric religions of the West need to displace their competitors (such as faith and science) to occupy the space they fill, so they create a counterfeit and subvert the real thing to make their own ideas look more attractive. He concludes that these confidence religions or philosophies are parasitic and latch onto something real.
00:20:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of simulacra which is the idea that a copy of something can lose its relevance and resemblance to the original. He provides examples such as knockoff Rolex watches and pancake syrup, where each iteration becomes less and less like the original.
He then compares this to the concept of performance, which is the idea that some people perform a role or identity rather than it being inherent in them. He gives examples such as communist pastors and Judith Butler, a college professor who believed that gender was a performance, which led to the negation of biological sex. This idea of negating the real in favor of a constructed reality is a theme that he believes is present in many aspects of Western culture, including religion and politics.
00:25:00
In this section, James Lindsay describes the Gnostic creation myth and how it is a simulation and a counterfeit of Christianity. The creator God, who is seen as God in Genesis and throughout the Bible, is actually an evil demon, the demiurge, who created the world as a prison to trap humanity and keep them from realizing they are really God.
The serpent in the Garden of Eden was telling the truth, and Lucifer, the first savior, becomes equivalent to Christ as another savior. Lindsay warns against the lure of Gnostic cults that construct a false version of reality, and how this can extrapolate out into the creation of fiction that replaces reality, such as gender identity replacing biological sex.
Finally, Lindsay explains how faith and reason are broad institutions that are being counterfeited, leading to false churches and institutions that claim to be something they are not.
00:30:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of Gnosis and how it is an absolute, revealed knowledge that is not based on faith or reason, but on secret and esoteric teachings known only to a select few.
He draws attention to the different meanings of the word Gnostic, including lower case Gnosticism, referring to awareness of absolute truth, and capital Gnosticism, a religious text originating from the early Christian cults of the first and second centuries that refers to the universe as a prison constructed by an evil demon.
Lindsay argues that the point of Gnosis is not the truth of the propositions presented, but rather the meaning they affect in the hearts of the readers or listeners, leading to a revolutionary moment of reflexivity which can be a dangerous thing when people start to lose track of what they’re supposed to be fighting for.
00:35:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the difference between science and alchemy. While science seeks to understand reality and discover truths, alchemy seeks to bring about a desired state of affairs through means that may not be based in reality.
Lindsay argues that this kind of desire for control, rooted in esoteric religions from antiquity, is what we are seeing now with the rise of woke communism or neo-communism. He emphasizes the importance of faith and reason working together, keeping each other balanced and preventing gnosticism from taking hold.
Lindsay concludes that despite certain people claiming that reality has moved “beyond true theories and false theories,” the fact is that reality is recalcitrant and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.
00:40:00
In this section, James Lindsay talks about how snake oil and other scams have operated historically, and how the use of faith and truth can prevent people from falling for such scams. He warns about the lure of hyperreality and how people can be misled by those who claim to have a deeper understanding of some bigger truth.
He explains how the drive to dominate others, or libido dominandi, can be behind some of these scams, and how people can be seduced by the idea that their ignorance is keeping them from deeper truths. He warns about how people may unwittingly become complicit in oppressive systems like racism and capitalism without even realizing it, and how these dynamics can be exploited by those with a financial interest in keeping people stuck and ignorant.
00:45:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of hermeticism and how it relates to the idea of creating a new religion called sustainability and inclusion by taking all existing faiths, philosophy, and sciences and mashing them together. He highlights how the woke movement has colonized the sciences and uses dialectical inversion to justify their beliefs.
They claim that everything is political, nothing is objective, and the hard sciences are not inclusive or diverse enough. They offer a new method as a solution, which they claim is data-driven and being implemented in almost every American school district. However, they do not have the data to justify it, and they dismiss any criticism as conspiracies. Hegel’s dialectical method is invoked as a formal language to explain this phenomenon.
00:50:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how Hegel’s philosophy involves negation and the shift from the real to the actual. Hegel believed that reality was abstract and that true knowledge involved understanding all of its causes and making it concrete.
Negation, in this context, meant recognizing that one’s understanding of reality was incomplete and needed to be expanded. However, according to Lindsay, Hegel’s method led to guru-ship and a cult-like practice, attracting grifters and abusive psychopaths to take advantage of people.
Additionally, Hegel’s reliance on circular reasoning and his dismissal of other viewpoints as false or partial knowledge shows his philosophy’s similarity to gnosticism and wizardry.
00:55:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the real must be negated to make space for the actual, which is synthetic and concrete, projected into the future by the sorcerer. He highlights how this process is like a self-fulfilling prophecy or spellcasting, posing effectively as science and religion.
Lindsay also delves into the concept of a Wizard’s Circle, where you are trapped and can only see what the sorcerer wants you to see, resulting in a negation of your reality. He emphasizes how this is a strategy that secret religions and esoteric religions have used throughout history, changing forms every time they are exposed.
01:00:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the negation of the real manifests in society through the creation of a synthetic simulacrum. This is done through the construction of social concepts such as gender, race, and freedom, ultimately leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.
The far right and postmodernists alike engage in this process. However, when the synthetic simulacrum imitates science or reason, it becomes dangerous. Expert consensus or ideologically acceptable conclusions replace true scientific methodology.
Messages from the woke literature often fail the funnel plot technique, which involves the exclusion of scientific experiments with “wrong conclusions.” This negation of the real can be found in most major medical journals, leading to the cost of many lives and untold suffering.
01:05:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of gnosis and its manifestation as politics pretending to be science. Gnosis is a belief system that portrays individuals as gods seeking to displace genuine truth and replace it with their own ideologies.
Various movements, such as communism, Nazism, and sustainability, are all modern and post-modern forms of esoteric faiths trying to establish a single world religion. Hyper-reality is the false simulacrum of reality that these ideologies simulate to project their vision of utopia or the arrived kingdom.
To achieve their beliefs, they must negate the real, and the first reality has to be broken to pieces and absorbed into the second reality before it can actualize. Hegel’s hyper-reality was a perfect idea of what a perfect society with perfect people would look like, using negative thinking to create a true science of history.
01:10:00
In this section, James Lindsay uses an absurd example to illustrate the problem with systemic thinking. He posits that if a driver runs over a pedestrian, everyone from the car maker to the coffee bean producer and medical industry can be implicated, therefore, everybody’s at fault, and everybody supports a system that causes damage.
By following this systematic line of thinking, everybody is guilty, so we need a total system change, which, using concrete thinking, will involve lots of intermediate practical steps that are systems of control, and bad things won’t happen anymore. This is how critical car theory and critical race theory are the same theory.
01:15:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of perpetual revolution, which he describes as the idea that the revolution must continue without ever stopping. He argues that this perpetual revolution is characterized by pure criticism, relentless negativity, and a constant denunciation of the world. He explains that this negative theology involves destroying reality to insert a hyper-reality that is not even clearly described.
The goal of this perpetual revolution, according to Lindsay, is to conquer existing reality by teaching children to complain about everything being racist, sexist, harmful, or traumatic. This negative theology, Lindsay argues, is found in woke ideology, and has its roots in Hegelian and Marxist thought. Lindsay brings out the idea of apoptosis or programmed cell death which he calls programmed death of the existing society.
01:20:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses Hegel’s idea of negation and negativity and its role in society. Hegel believed that negative thinking is the core and that by negating, we can get more. Furthermore, Hegel understood that there are distinctions, but these have to be lifted above or sublated to find broader categorization that returns to the one category of all things, which is the one.
However, this concrete thinking that he is replacing reality with is structural thinking. Ultimately, in Hegel’s system of science for understanding things, we abandon reality and understand his interpretation.
This section also discusses how Marx talks about the ruthless criticism of all that exists, which he got from Goethe’s character Mephistopheles, the voice of Satan, who said “all that exists deserves to perish.”
01:25:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the idea of negating the real, which involves the belief that everything that exists deserves to perish. When this occurs, truth becomes relative, and the Marxist hyper reality can take precedence as the science of history, which then becomes Marxism or that which forwards Marxism as a system of praxis.
Marx believed that through negative thinking and ruthless criticism, there could be a positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement. This was defined as the proper definition of communism and the ideal society they wanted to simulate through socialism.
Marx stated that communism is the positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement, which is, in turn, the real appropriation of human essence by and for man. Ultimately, communism is the riddle of history solved, and it is the true resolution of the conflict between man and nature and between man and man.
01:30:00
In this section, Lindsay discusses the concept of “negative thinking” and how it is used to criticize and denounce existing societal structures with the aim of envisioning new possibilities. He critiques the idea that one must have “consciousness” or be “gnostic” in order to denounce and announce a new world, comparing this to a sorcery or wizardry that is taught in woke education.
Lindsay argues that such forms of critical consciousness do not offer any tangible solutions or descriptions of what the new world is supposed to look like. He further highlights that the lack of specificity in these ideas allows for endless demands for power, leading to an endless cycle of societal upheavals that never lead to actual solutions.
01:35:00
In this section of the transcript, James Lindsay discusses the origins of wokeness and how it stems from the fusion of critical theory and post-modernism into a method of knowing. Wokeness is described as gnosticism derived from esoteric secret religions, which aims to construct a hyper-real simulation in order to negate the real.
The ultimate goal of wokeness is to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist until it is fully controlled. In this sense, wokeness allows for a pointless criticism of all that exists and reflects Marx’s desire for ruthless criticism.
Lindsay also points out how absurd some of the woke narratives have become, such as claiming that shark week is racist because it employs too many people named Mike.
01:40:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the negation of the real and how certain movements, such as Marxist and woke ideologies, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own. They make no positive arguments and risk nothing, only forward the idea that their opponent’s ideology is evil.
Lindsay explains that this tactic is similar to playing poker with someone who bets nothing and eventually ends up bankrupting the other player. Furthermore, Lindsay uses the works of Hegel and Marx to demonstrate how certain ideologies separate reason and understanding, where reason is the higher level knowing, while understanding is the lower level.
Ultimately, Hegel believed that one must negate the real to insert magic, and this way of thinking has been adopted by many modern ideologies, creating a culture in which negation of the real is prevalent.
01:45:00
In this section, James Lindsay discusses the belief system of G.W.F. Hegel, a German philosopher from the early 19th century. Hegel’s system of pure reason, or the realm of pure thought, is believed to be God’s mind, logos, which represents truth without a veil.
According to Hegel, the content of this realm is the presentation of God before the creation of nature, and through his system of science, or science of logic, he alone claims to understand the pathway for people to return to what they originally supposed to be.
This is known as the Hermetic belief system, in which people like Hegel claim to know the presentation of God without any veil, absolute truth, and what humans must do to return to their original state, and it is the secret religion of the West.
Philosophers, according to Hegel, are Misti or initiates into a mystery, someone who has secret knowledge or gnosis, while their duty is to write down the cabinet orders of God. This is how Hegel thinks of himself and his philosophy, and he believes it is through secret rites that man gets elevated to the Divine and assured of redemption, becoming a God and conferring immortality upon him.
01:50:00
In this section of the video, James Lindsay discusses the difference between cult religion and healthy religion. He explains that the religion he is referring to is a secret, esoteric religion posing as politics, science, and faith.
The Wizards who control this religion aim to die and be reborn through hermetic magic, become Gods, and get secret gnosis and immortality. To accomplish this, they construct a hyper-reality where reality must be negated because it refutes their religion completely.
They replace major pieces of reality with simulacra, including faith with occult belief, logic with porology, and reason with pretend reason. This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. The talk ends on the understanding that we are dealing with secret religions that have operated since antiquity throughout the West.
01:55:00
In this section, James Lindsay explains how a Greek concept, which was translated into Latin and spread throughout Europe, became a defining force in the destruction of society. He argues that this concept, which is now hidden in fields such as economics, politics, and science, is actually a secret esoteric religion.
Marx turned it into a political and economic project of destruction, which has led to our current path to doom. Lindsay urges people to understand and resist this religion, identifying those who traffick in it and either bringing them back or casting them out. He also critiques cancel culture as a projection of responsibility onto others.
Created by by John Hankey, this John F. Kennedy Jr. assassination documentary explores various theories surrounding his untimely death, including the possibility that it was orchestrated by those responsible for the assassination of his father and uncle.
The video discusses the discrepancies in the timeline of JFK Jr.’s plane disappearance and the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission. Additionally, a possible connection to the Bush family is explored, and doubts are raised about claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane.
The video challenges the official narrative surrounding the crash and presents evidence to suggest that there may be more to the story than what was reported.
00:00:00
In this section, the video discusses the Kennedy family’s history of opposing the military-industrial complex that was seeking to take over the government and end democracy, and how many of them were killed as a result. Joe, the eldest son, died fighting Nazis in Germany, while Jack died fighting the Nazis in the US. John F. Kennedy Sr. opposed the Vietnam War, an excuse for the military-industrial complex to loot the US treasury, and was subsequently assassinated.
Bobby Kennedy continued the fight against the military-industrial complex and was murdered after winning the California primary for the presidency. The murder was blamed on a lone nut, Sirhan Sirhan, but the coroner concluded that the fatal shot was fired from within one inch of Kennedy’s head, indicating the possibility of mind control and a decoy to divert attention from the real killer.
00:05:00
In this section, the video highlights John F. Kennedy Jr.’s life and work, explaining that he was not just a “harmless boob” but instead someone who fought for the truth and the interests of the people. His magazine, George, was a platform for smart and real infotainment, which sometimes included dangerous articles that exposed the corruption of the powerful, such as Oliver Stone’s piece on political assassinations.
Due to his potential to win political office, some believed that John’s death was orchestrated by his father’s killers, who feared that he would go after them. In addition, the video suggests that the presence of Mossad agents in the United States before his death was not a coincidence but was related to the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ahud Barak.
00:10:00
In this section of the JFK Jr assassination documentary, John Hankey presents the idea that George W. Bush and his father George H. W. Bush are prime suspects in the death of John Kennedy Jr. due to their involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.
John Hankey claims that after John’s death, George W. Bush lost in the New Hampshire primaries, but instead of the usual reactions, he received a significant increase in financial support, allowing him to smear McCain’s image and spread false rumors.
John Hankey asks why the establishment would overwhelmingly support Bush instead of siding with McCain, and postulates that they needed someone they could trust to assist them in executing the murder of three thousand Americans so that they could steal billions from the national treasury.
John Hankey also notes that George W. Bush was nowhere to be found when reporters asked for his response to the death of John Jr. and emphasizes that John was a responsible, intelligent, and good-hearted person, a stark contrast to the portrayal of him as an irresponsible drug user in some media reports.
00:15:00
In this section of the documentary, John Hankey questions how John F. Kennedy Jr., who was known for being a cautious and responsible pilot, could have ended up crashing into the ocean and killing himself, his wife, his sister-in-law, and possibly his unborn child.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigated the crash and found no evidence of mechanical problems or bad weather conditions. The radar report showed that the plane suddenly dropped as if someone had grabbed the controls and pushed them forward, leading some to believe it was a suicide.
However, there were indications that JFK Jr. was looking forward to fatherhood and had expressed optimism about his magazine’s future. The documentary also notes that the last few moments of the flight followed standard procedures until the sudden and unexplained dive into the water.
00:20:00
In this section, officials describe JFK Jr.’s final communication with the FAA as being at 9:39 pm on its final approach to Martha’s Vineyard, which requires the plane to pause at 2,500 feet, contact the tower, and receive permission to continue.
This is consistent with radar information reconstructed by the NTSB that was used to explain the plane’s last moments before crashing. FAA regulations require the agency to begin searching for a plane anytime it descends below 100 feet, and a search should have been started at 9:40 pm, five minutes after JFK Jr.’s final contact with the tower. However, reports show that the FAA and the Coast Guard went silent and the Pentagon took over news reporting, indicating a possible cover-up.
00:25:00
In this section, the video talks about discrepancies in the timeline of the events that occurred before and after the disappearance of JFK Jr.’s plane. The official coast guard spokesman reported that JFK Jr.’s plane was late in arriving at Martha’s Vineyard, but this report was later washed away.
Friends of Lauren Bessette, JFK Jr.’s sister-in-law, were expecting her at the airport at 9:30 pm, yet no one reported the plane missing until 2 am. FAA officials did nothing when contacted and even caused a U.S senator’s attempts to help correct the situation to be pointless. The reporters who tried to question these discrepancies were shut off from asking any further questions by the Pentagon who took over press coverage.
00:30:00
In this section, it is revealed that the Kennedy family first called the Coast Guard instead of the FAA to search for JFK Jr.’s plane. The Coast Guard contacted the FAA, which then contacted the Air Force. The Air Force then informed the Coast Guard that they were now in charge, sent them on a wild goose chase, and did nothing for five hours.
Eventually, Clinton was woken up and threatened to fire everyone in the Air Force if a search wasn’t underway within 15 minutes. Eventually, two planes and two helicopters were sent to search a 20,000 square miles area of the ocean. The FAA, however, did conduct some analytical work, including the NTAP radar analysis, which showed that the plane had gone down on the western approach to Martha’s Vineyard.
00:35:00
In this section, the video discusses the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission for John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane after it went down. Colonel Steve Rourke, a helicopter pilot and former director of the Air Force rescue coordination center, was present at the rescue coordination center and lied about the search progress, even though he was intimately familiar with the radar tapes and end taps.
The video suggests that the military purposely kept the rescue craft out of the crash area, and they lost many crucial pieces of information. The emergency beacon or ELT that all civil aircraft is required to carry was activated and received via a network of satellites, but this information was not passed on to the rescue teams in the Coast Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. The video raises questions as to why the military and others involved in the rescue mission did not want the searches to know where to search.
00:40:00
In this section, the video highlights evidence of a concerted effort by the upper levels of the Air Force and FAA to prevent the search and rescue teams from locating the crash site of John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane as long as possible. The bad guys created a false picture of JFK Jr. being an incompetent and careless pilot by manipulating events and hiding crucial information.
The missing pieces include the missing flight plan, all of Kennedy’s communication with the radar facilities along the route of his flight, and the battery of the plane’s cockpit recorder that preserved the final moments of the flight. Additionally, witnesses saw JFK Jr. talking on the phone before he took off, which raises questions about who he was talking to and what they were talking about. All these missing pieces could be part of the conspiracy to hide certain facts about the case.
00:45:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the missing phone records and the intact aquamarine duffel bag discovered among the debris from the crash. The bag was assumed to contain John Kennedy Jr.’s flight log, which records who was on the plane.
The flight log and who was on the plane are crucial because insurance companies use them to determine whose policy they have to pay out on. The speaker emphasizes the importance of believing the earliest reports from accurate and credible witnesses rather than unsubstantiated ones that come later. The speaker also challenges the claim that John did not have the proper license to fly the plane, and explains that he was a qualified pilot.
00:50:00
In this section of the video, John Hankey raises doubts about the claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane. While “the family” suggests that JFK Jr did not have the proper license to fly without a flight instructor, John Hankey argues that JFK Jr was legal to fly under visual flight rules.
John Hankey also notes that JFK Jr had always flown with a flight instructor in the past, and had recently acquired a powerful new plane that required additional training. Witnesses report that JFK Jr, his wife Carolyn, and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette waited for 45 minutes at the airport before taking off, leading John Hankey to suggest that they may have been waiting for the flight instructor to arrive.
00:55:00
In this section, the video analyzes allegations surrounding JFK Jr.’s decision to have a flight instructor on his plane. Kennedy had passed his performance evaluation and written exam, but he needed to log hours, and because of his broken foot, which had the cast taken off the previous day, many people were worried about him flying alone.
Reports claim that he told Canadian business associates that he preferred to fly with a co-pilot, and his friend and co-editor at George magazine confirmed that he was flying with an instructor. Although this hasn’t been officially confirmed, the evidence supporting this theory is abundant. The video questions why this theory was thrown away in favor of ones that couldn’t be verified.
01:00:00
In this section, the documentary delves into the inconsistencies in the official reports of JFK Jr.’s tragic plane crash. It appears that there were attempts to cover up some aspects of the case. For example, a group calling themselves “the Family” infiltrated the Dallas police and spread baseless stories about JFK Jr.’s lack of a necessary flying license and the absence of a flight instructor.
The documentary questions why the media readily accepted these baseless stories. Additionally, the final report of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) featured a dramatic story that one of JFK Jr.’s flight instructors had offered to fly with him, but Kennedy declined, wanting to fly alone. The documentary examines the origin of this story and the problematic interview process between the NTSB and JFK Jr.’s flight instructor, in which an essential part of their conversation seemed to have gone missing.
01:05:00
In this section of the video, the speaker questions the inconsistencies in the NTSB investigation report of John F. Kennedy Jr’s plane crash, particularly regarding the supposed last conversation between JFK Jr and his friend, Michael Morena. Morena’s claim, although proven false by his own lawyer, was still included in the final report and covered by the media.
The speaker believes that this was a deliberate move by the “bad guys” to manipulate the news and hide the presence of a flight instructor on the plane, who they may have intentionally delayed rescue efforts for so they could recover the body and alter the wounds of JFK Jr’s father. The presence of an unseen hand is evident to the speaker, proving that there was a cover-up.
01:10:00
In this section of the video, the focus is on the fuel selector valve found in the off position when John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane went into a headfirst disastrous plunge towards the sea leading to his death. The video explains that an airplane fuel selector valve is used for distributing the weight of the gasoline evenly on the plane during the flight, which is important to keep the weight evenly distributed.
The video discusses how the fuel selector valve found in the off position is strange and mind-boggling, and how it is impossible for John or someone on the plane to have randomly fiddled with the valve. The video also explains how an engine failure alone would not cause a plane to make that kind of spectacular dive, and how the idea that John turned off the fuel selector valve is not plausible.
01:15:00
In this section, the importance of the fuel selector valve and its safety features on airplanes is explained. The valve has an off position that can only be turned off in an emergency situation by holding down a special button while simultaneously turning the valve. Although it is a safety feature, it is impossible to accidentally turn off.
The fact that the valve in John Kennedy Jr.’s plane was in the off position is seen as suspicious and raises questions about how it could have happened. The article also discusses the radar analysis of the crash and suggests that someone on the plane may have intentionally crashed it by grabbing the controls and pushing them forward. The question of why the NTSB did not pursue this possibility further is also raised.
01:20:00
In this section of the video, the speaker ponders the idea that someone on JFK Jr.’s plane may have committed murder-suicide and purposely turned off the fuel valve.
The speaker talks to a flight instructor who tells him that strange things can happen, and mentions another tragic event where a maniac pilot turned off the fuel valve causing a plane to plunge into the ocean, killing 217 people. However, there are alternative theories regarding what happened to this particular flight, including the possibility of the pilot being a Manchurian candidate and being programmed to commit the murder-suicide.
01:25:00
In this section of the video, John Hankey discusses the idea of mind control and how it has been utilized by the CIA for the past 50 years under the name MK Ultra. This program aimed to create “Manchurian candidates” or individuals who would be programmed to carry out political assassinations without remembering anything about their programming.
John Hankey suggests that many high-profile assassinations, such as those of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and John Lennon, may have been carried out by Manchurian candidates. John Hankey then questions the likelihood of two separate pilots from two different countries both deciding to commit suicide by crashing their planes and then turning off the fuel valves. This coincidence is deemed highly unlikely, leading John Hankey to suggest that the pilots may have been programmed by the same people who carried out the Manchurian candidate experiments.
01:30:00
In this section, the speaker reflects on the reason for their search and their hope for evidence to develop a theory that would explain the facts of the JFK Jr. assassination in a manner that wasn’t ridiculous. He compares the incomplete evidence of the assassination with the incomplete evidence of Galileo’s theory of the solar system, which over time became widely accepted even though it was not fully provable.
The speaker then puts forward the theory that the flight instructor on JFK Jr.’s plane was programmed to crash it into the sea, which is supported by all the evidence available. This theory, he argues, is more reasonable and makes more sense than the NTSB’s theory that an experienced pilot crashed the plane for no reason.
The speaker also suggests the plan was to commit the perfect crime and whisk JFK Jr.’s body away, but the bad guys messed it up by delaying the search and rescue mission. The evidence for this delay lies in the fact that the end tap location was withheld from the coast guard and the civil air patrol for 15 hours.
01:35:00
In this section of the video, the evidence is reviewed and presented as a two-step process for bringing charges against George W. Bush for the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. The evidence includes JFK Jr’s potential to seek high government office and his real threat to those who had killed his father, the oral mafia support earned by Bush Sr. for participating in JFK Sr.’s murder, and Bush Jr.’s own place at the table with the mafia.
The evidence also suggests that the dark lord supported Bush Jr. over John McCain, the FAA ignoring Senator Kennedy, and the lies of Colonel Rourke. Bush Jr. would need to provide a reasonable alternative explanation for these events and his whereabouts on July 16th, 1999, but he doesn’t have one.
01:40:00
In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the need for George Bush to provide a credible alibi for the weekend that John Kennedy Jr.’s plane crashed. The speaker suggests that if Bush’s alibi is proved to be a lie, he will be convicted just like any other person accused of murder based on circumstantial evidence.
The speaker goes on to discuss the sick, criminal mafia that has been infesting the United States and the world, responsible for everything from state-sponsored race-based slavery to the Vietnam War. The speaker urges viewers to fight this dehumanization and take action, stating that they are soldiers on the front line in a war for the very future of humanity.
Step into a time machine and travel back to 1982 with G. Edward Griffin’s rare interview of Norman Dodd, an 83-year-old investigator for the Reece Committee.
This revealing interview exposes the infiltration of the New World Order by large corporations that are merging the USA into a world government. Dodd delves into the infiltration of banking and the public education system, providing an eye-opening perspective on how these systems operate.
As a member of the Reece Committee, Dodd has a wealth of knowledge on the subject of tax-exempt foundations and how they contribute to the New World Order.
Gain a unique insight into the political and financial landscape of the early 1980s and discover the truths about the New World Order’s influence on society.
Join G. Edward Griffin as he delves into this intriguing interview with a man who has spent his career uncovering the hidden agendas of the powerful elite.
Interview Summary
Norman Dodd, the former staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954, reveals in this video the collusion of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.
He discovered in his investigation that the endowments aimed to alter American history by controlling education after World War I and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.
The focus shifted after World War II to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before, and the key to their operations was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter.
The investigation was later accused of being anti-Semitic by the Republican National Committee, which was a false accusation, and the hearings were eventually terminated due to public outrage.
00:00:00
In this section of the interview, Mr. Norman Dodd introduces himself and explains that he was the staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954. He explains that his life’s interests have always revolved around the US and its original founding.
Having worked in manufacturing, international communication, and finally banking, Mr. Dodd was part of a major New York bank during the 1929 collapse, and during this time, his superiors asked him what the next steps were.
00:05:00
In this section, the speaker, Norman Dodd, talks about how he was assigned by his superiors to investigate banking policies and practices in the US, as they suspected something was not quite right. Dodd found proof that conflicting interests had been institutionalized in the banking industry since the end of World War I, which shocked him. His superior then offered him the opportunity to reorganize the bank in keeping with his own ideas, but Dodd resigned instead due to his conscience.
00:10:00
In this section of the transcript, Norman Dodd discusses his career in the financial world, including his resignation from a bank and subsequent difficulty finding work. He also talks about his specific interest in economics and desire to educate people about the dangers of speculative activities in the country.
Dodd then goes on to explain his role as Director of Research for the Reese Committee, which was tasked with investigating the activities of foundations to determine if they were un-American.
00:15:00
In this section of the video, Norman Dodd discusses his testimony to Congress regarding the activities of large endowed foundations in the past 40 years. He defined “unamerican” as any effort to effect unconstitutional changes in the country and explained how these foundations had influenced education in a way that moved away from the principles of the Constitution.
Dodd also speaks about his conversation with Rowan Gaither, the president of the Ford Foundation, who revealed that they had experience operating under directives that emanated from the White House and that they were currently operating under similar directives.
00:20:00
In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his experience with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. After asking certain questions and requesting information from them via a letter, he was invited to come up to New York to discuss the matter further.
There, the president of the endowment, Dr. Joseph Johnson, offered to allow a member of Dodd’s staff to examine the foundation’s minute books since its inception, saying that they could answer all the questions and their counter-suggestion would be obvious from those minutes.
Dodd accepted and later picked a member of his staff who was initially unsympathetic toward the investigation to search the archives.
00:25:00
In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his conversation with Katherine Casey, who was tasked with reviewing 50 years of handwritten minutes from the Carnegie Foundation.
Casey discovers that in 1908, the Carnegie trustees discussed the most effective means of altering the life of an entire people to be war. In 1910, they aimed to control the United States government by taking over and controlling the diplomatic machinery of the country.
After the First World War, the focus shifted to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before. The trustees realized that controlling education in the United States was critical in this regard and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education, while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.
The key to the success of these operations, they believed, was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter but were turned down by the prominent teachers in the country.
00:30:00
In this section, Norman Dodd explains how the Carnegie Foundation, in collaboration with the Guggenheim Foundation and the American Historical Association, sought to influence American history education by forming a group of 20 historians to study and shape the direction of the country.
The study ultimately resulted in a seven-volume report, which concluded that the future of the country belonged to collectivism administered with American efficiency.
Dodd suggests that this story emerged from the minutes of the Carnegie fund, but it was never fully presented to Congress due to opposition efforts that began from the start of the committee’s work.
00:35:00
In this section of the video, Norman Dodd recounts how he and his counsel were ordered to visit Wayne Hayes, the ranking minority member of the Committee on Foundations and Tax-Exempt Organizations, who initially opposed the investigation as an effort to gain notoriety.
Despite counsel’s skepticism, Dodd convinced Hayes to support the investigation by relating to him the spread of communism and the Soviet world. However, adding a top-flight intelligence officer to Dodd’s staff resulted in the Republican National Committee and the White House attempting to stop Dodd from continuing the investigation in the direction Carol Reese had requested.
00:40:00
In this section, Norman Dodd explains how he was given permission to set up an independent aspect of the investigation outside of his own office, which was later opposed by the Republican National Committee and even appealed to the White House.
The committee accused him of being anti-Semitic, which was a false accusation since there was no evidence proving it. Their true intention was to halt the completion of the investigation, which would have exposed the collaboration of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.
The hearings were eventually terminated due to the public outrage, and the charge of anti-Semitism remained a mystery as there was no basis for the accusation.
00:45:00
In this section, it is revealed that Colonel Lee Lorraine wrote a book called “Waters Flowing Eastward” that was a castigation of Jewish power in the world. However, he was dismissed from the staff due to the book’s anti-Semitic nature.
It is further revealed that the motivation behind the creation of big foundations such as Mr. Carnegie’s was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain, and not to establish collectivism.
But over time, the purpose and direction of the major foundations changed, and today, they firmly believe in collectivism, with the future belonging to this concept. The foundations support communist causes as they believe it represents a means of developing a monopoly that will be beneficial to them in the future.
